Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T16:39:18.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Michael M. v. Superior Court, 450 U.S. 464 (1981)

from Part II - The feminist judgments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Margo Kaplan
Affiliation:
Associate Professor at Rutgers Law School, where she teaches courses on criminal law.
Cynthia Godsoe
Affiliation:
Professor of Law at the Brooklyn Law School.
Kathryn M. Stanchi
Affiliation:
Temple University, School of Law
Linda L. Berger
Affiliation:
University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Law
Bridget J. Crawford
Affiliation:
Pace University, School of Law
Get access

Summary

BACKGROUND

At around midnight on June 3, 1978, a seventeen-and-a-half-year-old boy named Michael and his two friends approached a sixteen-and-a-half-year-old girl named Sharon and her sister at a California bus stop. According to Sharon's testimony, Michael and Sharon walked to some railroad tracks, and then over to a bush. Michael began to kiss Sharon, who at first responded by kissing him back. Sharon then asked Michael to stop and slow down. Although he agreed to stop, he did not do so until Sharon's sister and Michael's friends rejoined them.

After the others left, Sharon and Michael walked to a park, sat down on a bench, and began kissing again. As they were lying on the bench, Michael told Sharon to take her pants off. When Sharon verbally refused and tried to stand up, Michael struck her in the face with his fist two or three times. Sharon testified, “I just said to myself ‘Forget it,’ and I let him do what he wanted to do ….” Michael took Sharon's pants off and had sexual intercourse with her.

Rather than charge Michael with rape, the State of California prosecuted him under its statutory rape statute. At the time, this offense punished only unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman under 18. Men or boys who had sex with female minors were therefore subject to criminal charges that women and girls who had sex with male minors escaped. Michael challenged the statute as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment based on its disparate treatment of men and women. The trial court, the California Court of Appeal, and the California Supreme Court all upheld the statute. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari and affirmed as well.

ORIGINAL OPINION

The Petitioner's argument reflected a growing backlash against the paternalism of statutory rape laws intended to protect the chastity of young women. Under this view, gender-specific statutory rape laws reinforce outmoded norms about both male and female sexuality, framing women as passive recipients or resisters of male sexual urges. According to the Petitioner, upholding such stereotypes would conflict with Court precedent that the legislature may not justify sex-based distinctions with “overbroad generalizations based on sex which are entirely unrelated to any differences between men and women or which demean the ability or social status of the affected class.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Feminist Judgments
Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court
, pp. 257 - 271
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×