Book contents
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributor Bios
- Acknowledgments
- Author's Preface
- Series Editors’ Preface
- 1 Contexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing
- Section 1: Situating Feedback: Sociocultural Dimensions
- 2 Sociocultural Theory
- 3 Culture and Peer Feedback
- 4 Appropriation, Ownership, and Agency
- Section 2: Shaping Feedback: Delivery and Focus Dimensions
- Section 3: Negotiating Feedback: Interpersonal and Interactional Dimensions
- Section 4: Engaging with Feedback: Student Participation Dimensions
- Index
- References
2 - Sociocultural Theory
A Framework for Understanding the Socio-Cognitive Dimensions of Peer Feedback
from Section 1: - Situating Feedback: Sociocultural Dimensions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2019
Book contents
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributor Bios
- Acknowledgments
- Author's Preface
- Series Editors’ Preface
- 1 Contexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing
- Section 1: Situating Feedback: Sociocultural Dimensions
- 2 Sociocultural Theory
- 3 Culture and Peer Feedback
- 4 Appropriation, Ownership, and Agency
- Section 2: Shaping Feedback: Delivery and Focus Dimensions
- Section 3: Negotiating Feedback: Interpersonal and Interactional Dimensions
- Section 4: Engaging with Feedback: Student Participation Dimensions
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feedback in Second Language WritingContexts and Issues, pp. 25 - 44Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Antón, M. & DiCamilla, F. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interactions in the L2 classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314–42.Google Scholar
Carson, J. G. (1992). Becoming biliterate: First language influences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 37–60.Google Scholar
Carson, J. G. & Nelson, G. L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 17–30.Google Scholar
Carson, J. G. & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1–19.Google Scholar
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, G. (Eds.), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (2001). Notes toward a theory of second language writing. In Silva, T. & Matsuda, P. K. (Eds.), On Second Language Writing (pp. 39–57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Guerrero, M. C. M. de & Villamil, O. S. (1994). Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 484–96.Google Scholar
Guerrero, M. C. M. de & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 51–68.Google Scholar
Guerrero, M. C. M. de & Villamil, O. S. (2002). Metaphorical conceptualizations of ESL teaching and learning. Language Teaching Research, 6, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John-Steiner, V., Panofsky, C. P., & Smith, L. W. (1994). Introduction. In John-Steiner, V., Panofsky, C. P., & Smith, L. W. (Eds.), Sociocultural Approaches to Language and Literacy: An Interactionist Perspective (pp. 1–33). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79–96.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Pavlenko, A. (2001). Second language activity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In Breen, M. P. (Ed.), Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research (pp. 141–58). New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Leontiev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s Guide to Dynamic Assessment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. L. & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113–31.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. L. & Murphy, J. M. (1992). An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 171–93.Google Scholar
Nine-Curt, C. J. (1993). Intercultural interaction in the Hispanic-Anglo classroom from a nonverbal perspective. In Fayer, J. (Ed.), Puerto Rican Communication Studies (pp. 99–109). San Juan, Puerto Rico: Fundación Arqueológica, Antropológica e Histórica.Google Scholar
Ohta, A. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 93–121.Google Scholar
Stone, C. A. (1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding. In Forman, E. A., Minick, N., & Stone, C. A. (Eds.), Contexts for Learning: Sociocultural Dynamics in Children’s Development (pp. 169–83). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1985). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. In Wertsch, J. (Ed.), Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskyan Perspectives (pp. 183–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Villamil, O. S. & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51–75.Google Scholar
Villamil, O. S. & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19, 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language (Kozulin, A., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934).Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1979a). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 22, 1–22.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1979b). The regulation of human action and the given-new organization of private speech. In Zivin, G. (Ed.), The Development of Self-Regulation through Private Speech (pp. 79–98). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by