Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2017
  • Online publication date: July 2017

10 - Prospects for Experimental Approaches to Research on Bureaucratic Red Tape***

from Part III - Substantive Contributions
Baldwin, J. N. 1990. ‘Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape: their impact on motivation’, The American Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 728.
Borry, E. 2016. ‘A new measure of red tape: introducing the three-item red tape (TIRT) scale’, International Public Management Journal. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1143421.
Bozeman, B. 1993. ‘A theory of government “red tape”’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273304.
Bozeman, B. 2000. Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bozeman, B. 2012. ‘Multidimensional red tape: a theory coda’, International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 245–65.
Bozeman, B. and Feeney, M. K. 2011. Rules and Red Tape: A Prism for Public Administration Theory and Research. ME Sharpe.
Bozeman, B. and Scott, P. 1996. ‘Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: untangling conceptual knots’, The American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 117.
Bretschneider, S. 1990. ‘Management information systems in public and private organizations: an empirical test’, Public Administration Review, 50(5), 536–45.
Brewer, G. A. and Walker, R. M. 2010. ‘Red tape: the bane of public organizations?’ In Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A., and Brewer, G. A. (eds.), Public Management and Performance: Research Directions. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–26.
Buchanan, B. 1975. ‘Red-tape and the service ethic: some unexpected differences between public and private managers’, Administration & Society, 6(4), 423–44.
Coursey, D. H. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘Content domain, measurement, and validity of the red tape concept: a second-order confirmatory factor analysis’, The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 342–61.
de Jong, G. and Van Witteloostuijn, A. 2015. ‘Regulatory red tape and private firm performance’, Public Administration, 93(1), 3451.
DeHart-Davis, L. 2017. Creating effective Rules in Public Sector Organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
DeHart-Davis, L., Chen, J., and Little, T. D. 2013. ‘Written versus unwritten rules: the role of rule formalization in green tape’, International Public Management Journal, 16(3), 331–56.
DeHart-Davis, L. and Pandey, S. K. 2005. ‘Red tape and public employees: does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 133–48.
Dickson, E. S. 2011. ‘Economics vs. psychology experiments: stylization, incentives, and deception’. In Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5869.
Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. 2011. ‘Experimentation in political science’. In Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39.
Feeney, M. K. 2012. ‘Organizational red tape: a measurement experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 427–44.
Feeney, M. K. and Rainey, H. G., 2010. ‘Personnel flexibility and red tape in public and nonprofit organizations: distinctions due to institutional and political accountability’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 801–26.
Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., and Anderfuhren-Biget, S. 2012. ‘Resigned but satisfied: the negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction’, Public Administration, 90(1), 175–93.
Goodsell, C. T. 1983. The Case for Bureaucracy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Pandey, S. K., and Deat, F. 2015. ‘Defending inflexible rules: an experiment on the effect of counter attitudinal behavior on work-related perceptions of public managers’, Paper presented at the 2015 Public Management Research Association Conference, Minneapolis, MN, June 11–13, 2015.
Hall, R. H. 1996. Organizations: structures, processes, and outcomes, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Heintze, T. and Bretschneider, S. 2000. ‘Information technology and restructuring in public organizations: does adoption of information technology affect organizational structures, communications, and decision making?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 801–30.
Hood, C. 1991. ‘A public management for all seasons’, Public Administration, 69(1), 319.
Kaufman, H. 1977. Red Tape: Its Origins, Uses, and Abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Kaufmann, W. and Feeney, M. K. 2012. ‘Objective formalization, perceived formalization and perceived red tape: sorting out concepts’, Public Management Review, 14(8), 11951214.
Kaufmann, W. and Feeney, M. K. 2014. ‘Beyond the rules: the effect of outcome favourability on red tape perceptions’, Public Administration, 92(1), 178–91.
Kaufmann, W. and Tummers, L. 2014. ‘More than words: experimental evidence on the negative effects of red tape on quality and procedural justice’, Paper presented at the IRSPM Conference, Ottawa, Canada.
Kelman, Steven. 2008. ‘The “Kennedy school” of research on innovation in government’, In Borins, S. (ed.), Innovations in Government: Research, Recognition, and Replication. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 2852.
Lambert, E. G., Paoline, E. A. III, and Hogan, N. L. 2006. ‘The impact of centralization and formalization on correctional staff job satisfaction and organizational commitment: an exploratory study’, Criminal Justice Studies, 19(1), 2344.
List, J. A., Sadoff, S., and Wagner, M. 2011. ‘So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design’, Experimental Economics, 14(4), 439–57.
Luton, L. S. 2007. ‘Deconstructing public administration empiricism’, Administration and Society, 39(4), 527.
Merton, R. K. 1995. ‘The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect’, Social Forces, 74(2): 379422.
Moynihan, D. and Herd, P. 2010. ‘Red tape and democracy: how rules affect citizenship rights’, The American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 654–70.
Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. 2006. ‘Creating desirable organizational characteristics: how organizations create a focus on results and managerial authority’, Public Management Review, 8(1), 119–40.
Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation’, Public Administration Review, 67(1), 4053.
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming Government. Reading, MA: Adison Wesley.
Pandey, S. K. 1995. ‘Managerial perceptions of red tape’, Unpublished PhD dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
Pandey, S. 2012. ‘E-government and small business activity’. In Shareef, M. A. et al. (eds.), Transformational Government through Egov Practice: Socio-economic, Cultural, and Technological Issues. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 369–86.
Pande, S. and Bretschneider, S. 1997. ‘The impact of red tape’s administrative delay on public organizations’ interest in new information technology’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 113–30.
Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H., and Moynihan, D. P. 2007. ‘Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: a multimethod study’, Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 398425.
Pandey, S. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., and Kumar, V. 2014. ‘Introduction: markets and public administration’. In Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., Pandey, S. K., and Kumar, V. (eds.), Public Administration Reformation: Market Demand from Public Organizations. Routledge/Taylor and Francis, pp. 16.
Pandey, S. K. and Kingsley, G. A. 2000. ‘Examining red tape in public and private organizations: alternative explanations from a social psychological model’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 779800.
Pandey, S. K. and Marlowe, J. 2015. ‘Assessing survey-based measurement of personnel red tape with anchoring vignettes’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(3), 215–37.
Pandey, S. K. and Moynihan, D. P. 2006. ‘Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: testing the moderating role of culture and political support’. In Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. Jr., and Walker, R. M. (eds.), Public Services Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge University Press.
Pandey, S. K., Pandey, S., Breslin, R., and Broadus, E. 2017. Public Service Motivation Research Program: Key Challenges and Future Prospects. In Raadschelders, J. and Stillman, R. (eds.), Foundations of Public Administration. Irvine, CA: Melvin and Leigh, Chapter 19, pp. 314332.
Pandey, S. K. and Scott, P. G. 2002. ‘Red tape: a review and assessment of concepts and measures’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553–80.
Pandey, S. K. and Welch, E. W. 2005. ‘Beyond stereotypes a multistage model of managerial perceptions of red tape’, Administration & Society, 37(5), 542–75.
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford University Press.
Quratulain, S. and Khan, A. K. 2013. ‘Red tape, resigned satisfaction, public service motivation, and negative employee attitudes and behaviors: testing a model of moderated mediation’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 0734371X13511646.
Rainey, H. G., 1979. ‘Perceptions of incentives in business and government: implications for civil service reform’, Public Administration Review, 39(5), pp. 440–8.
Rainey, H. G. and Bozeman, B. 2000. ‘Comparing public and private organizations: empirical research and the power of the a priori’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447–70.
Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S., and Bozeman, B. 1995. ‘Research note: public and private managers’ perceptions of red tape’, Public Administration Review 55(6): 567–74.
Scott, P. G. and Pandey, S. K. 2000. ‘The influence of red tape on bureaucratic behavior: an experimental simulation’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4), 615–33.
Smith, R. S. 1999. ‘Contested memory: notes on Robert K. Merton’s “the Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect”’, The American Sociologist, 30(2), 6277.
Stazyk, E. C., Pandey, S. K., and Wright, B. E. 2011. ‘Understanding affective organizational commitment: the importance of institutional context’, The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 603–24.
Thomas, W. I. and Thomas, D. S. 1928. The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. Knopf.
Thompson, F. J. and Riccucci, N. M. 1998. ‘Reinventing government’, Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 231–57.
Torenvlied, R. and Akkerman, A. 2012. ‘Effects of managers’ work motivation and networking activity on their reported levels of external red tape’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3): 445–71.
Tummers, L., Weske, W., Bouwman, R., and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. 2016. ‘The impact of red tape on citizen satisfaction: an experimental study’, International Public Management Journal, 19(3), 320–41.
Van den Bekerom, P., Torenvlied, R., and Akkerman, A. 2015. ‘Managing all quarters of the compass? How internally oriented managerial networking moderates the impact of environmental turbulence on organizational performance’, The American Review of Public Administration, 46(6), 639–59.
Walker, R. M. and Brewer, G. A. 2008. ‘An organizational echelon analysis of the determinants of red tape in public organizations’, Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1112–27.
Welch, E. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘E-government and bureaucracy: toward a better understanding of intranet implementation and its effect on red tape’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 379404.