Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
English Nouns
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Using extensive data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (Davies, 2008), this groundbreaking book shows that the syntactic patterns in which English nominalizations can be found and the range of possible readings they can express are very different from what has been claimed in past theoretical treatments, and therefore that previous treatments cannot be correct. Lieber argues that the relationship between form and meaning in the nominalization processes of English is virtually never one-to-one, but rather forms a complex web that can be likened to a derivational ecosystem. Using the Lexical Semantic Framework (LSF), she develops an analysis that captures the interrelatedness and context dependence of nominal readings, and suggests that the key to the behavior of nominalizations is that their underlying semantic representations are underspecified in specific ways and that their ultimate interpretation must be fixed in context using processes available within the LSF.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Adger, David 2003. Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou, Artemis 2001. Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalizations and Ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Alexiadou, Artemis 2011. Statives and nominalization. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 40. 2552.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Iordachioaia, Gianina, & Soare, Elena 2010. Number/aspect interactions in the syntax of nominalizations: A distributed approach. Journal of Linguistics 46.3. 537574.
Alexiadou, Artemis & Schäfer, Florian 2010. On the syntax of episodic vs. dispositional -er nominals. In Alexiadou, A. & Rathert, M., eds. Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 938.
Anshen, Frank & Aronoff, Mark 1981. Morphological productivity and phonological transparency. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 26.1. 6372.
Arndt-Lappe, Sabine 2014. Analogy in suffix rivalry: The case of English -ity and -ness. English Language and Linguistics 18.3. 497548.
Aronoff, Mark 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark & Cho, Sungeun 2001. The semantics of -ship suffixation. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 167173.
Baayen, Harald 1989. A corpus-based approach to morphological productivity. PhD dissertation. Free University, Amsterdam.
Baayen, Harald & Lieber, Rochelle 1991. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 29. 801843.
Baeskow, Heike 2010. His Lordship’s -ship and the King of Golfdom. Against a purely functional analysis of suffixhood. Word Structure 3.1. 1130.
Baeskow, Heike 2012. -Ness and -ity: Phonological exponents of n or meaningful nominalizers of different adjectival domains. Journal of English Linguistics 40.1. 640.
Barker, Chris 1998. Episodic -ee in English: A thematic role constraint on new word formation. Language 74. 694727.
Bauer, Laurie 1987. -ee by gum! American Speech 62. 315319.
Bauer, Laurie 1993. More -ee words. American Speech 62. 222224.
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle, & Plag, Ingo 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bauer, Laurie & Renouf, Antoinette 2001. A corpus-based study of compounding in English. Journal of English Linguistics 29. 101123.
Benveniste, Emile 1966. La forme et le sens dans le language. Le Langage: Actes du XIIIe congrès des sociétés e philosophie de langue française. Neuchatel: La Baconnière. 2740.
Bierwisch, Manfred 1990/1991. Event nominalizations: Proposals and problems. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 40.1–2. 1984.
Bisetto, Antoinette & Scalise, Sergio 2005. The classification of compounds. Lingua e linguaggio 4.2. 319332.
Black, Max 1962. Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bolinger, Dwight 1968. Judgments of grammaticality. Lingua 21: 3440.
Booij, Geert 1986. Form and meaning in morphology: The case of Dutch ‘agent’ nouns. Linguistics 24. 503517.
Booij, Geert & Lieber, Rochelle 2004. On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch. Linguistics 42.2. 327353.
Borer, Hagit 2009. Categorizing roots. Handout of an invited talk. CASTL Colloquium. University of Tromsø (cited in Fabregas, Antonio 2014).
Borer, Hagit 2013. Taking Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bowers, John 2010. Non-event nominals and argument structure. Lingua 121: 11941206.
Bruening, Benjamin 2013. By phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax 16.1. 141.
Bruening, Benjamin 2014. Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32. 363422.
Chomsky, Noam 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. & Rosenbaum, P., eds. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn. 184221.
Chomsky, Noam 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, Ariel 2014. A semantic explanation for the external argument generalization. Talk given at Semantics of Derivational Morphology workshop. Düsseldorf.
Copestake, Ann & Briscoe, Ted 1996. Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. In Pustejovsky, James & Boguraev, Brad, eds. Lexical Semantics: The Problem of Polysemy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1568.
Davies, Mark 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990–2015. Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
DiSciullo, Anna Maria & Williams, Edwin 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fabregas, Antonio 2012. Zero nouns with and without objects. Nordlyd 39.1. 6394.
Fabregas, Antonio 2014. Argument structure and morphologically underived nouns in Spanish and English. Lingua 141. 97120.
Fabregas, Antonio & Marin, Rafael 2012. The role of Aktionsart in deverbal nouns: State nominalizations across languages. Journal of Linguistics 48. 3570.
Fradin, Bernard 2011. Remarks on state denoting nominalizations. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 40. 7399.
Gibson, Edward, Piantadosi, Steve & Fedorenko, Kristina 2011. Using Mechanical Turk to obtain and analyze English acceptability judgments. Language and Linguistics Compass 5.8. 509524.
Greenbaum, Sidney 1976. Syntactic frequency and acceptability. Lingua 40. 99113.
Greenbaum, Sidney 1977. Judgments of syntactic acceptability and frequency. Studia Linguistica 31. 83105.
Grimshaw, Jane 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grimshaw, Jane 2011. Deverbal nominalization (Article 51). In von Heusinger, K., Maienborn, C., and Portner, P., eds. Semantics (HSK 32, vol. 2). Berlin: De Gruyter. 12921313.
Hanks, Patrick 2013. Lexical Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi 2009. The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In Giannakidou, A. & Rathert, M., eds. Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 321343.
Heyvaert, Liesbet 2001. Deverbal -er suffixation as morphological equivalent of the clausal subject-finite unit. Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium. Preprint 176.
Higginbotham, James 1985. On Semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 547593.
Householder, H. 1973. On arguments from asterisks. Foundations of Language 10.3. 365376.
van Hout, Angeliek, Kamiya, Masaaki & Roeper, Thomas 2013. Passivization, reconstruction and edge phenomena: Connecting English and Japanese nominalizations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 137159.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackendoff, Ray 2009. Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In Lieber, R. & Štekauer, P., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 105128.
Jespersen, Otto 1943. A Modern Engilsh Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI. Morphology. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.
Kittay, Eva 1992. Semantic fields and the individuation of content. In Lehrer, A. & Kittay, E., eds. Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Ehrlbaum. 229252.
Lebeaux, David 1986. The interpretation of derived nominals. In Farley, A., Farley, P., & McCullough, K.-E., eds. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 22.Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 231247.
Lees, Robert 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press/The Hague: Mouton.
Lehrer, Adrienne 1974. Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Lehrer, Adrienne 1993. Semantic fields and frames: Are they alternatives? In Lutzeier, Peter Rolf, ed. Studies in Lexical Field Theory. Berlin: DeGruyter. 149162.
Levin, Beth & Hovav, Malka Rappaport 1988. Non-event -er nominals: a probe into argument structure. Linguistics 26. 10671083.
Lieber, Rochelle 1983. Argument linking and compounds in English. Linguistic Inquiry. 14. 251286.
Lieber, Rochelle 1992. Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lieber, Rochelle 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lieber, Rochelle 2006. The category of roots and the roots of categories. Morphology 16. 2. 247272.
Lieber, Rochelle 2009. A lexical semantic approach to compounding. In Lieber, R. & Štekauer, P., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 78104.
Lieber, Rochelle 2010a. On the lexical semantics of compounds: Non-affixal (de)verbal compounds. In Scalise, S. & Vogel, I., eds. Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 127144.
Lieber, Rochelle 2010b. Toward an OT morphosemantics: The case of –hood, -dom, and –ship. In Olsen, S., ed. New Impulses in Word Formation. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 17. 6180.
Lieber, Rochelle 2015. The semantics of transposition. Morphology. DOI 10.1007/s11525-015-9261-4.
Lieber, Rochelle 2016. The lexical semantic approach to compounding. In ten Hacken, P., ed. The Semantics of Compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3853.
Lieber, Rochelle forthcoming. On the interplay of facts and theory. In Siddiqi, D. & Harley, H., eds. Morphological Metatheory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lieber, Rochelle & Baayen, Harald 1997. A semantic principle of auxiliary selection in Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15. 789845.
Lieber, Rochelle & Baayen, Harald 1999. Nominalizations in a calculus of lexical semantic representations. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap, eds. Yearbook of Morphology 1998. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 175198.
Lyons, John 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marchand, Hans 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word Formation, 2nd ed. Munich: Beck.
Melloni, Chiara 2007. Polysemy in Word Formation: The Case of Deverbal Nominals. Verona: University of Verona Dissertation.
Melloni, Chiara 2011. Event and Result Nominals: A Morpho-semantic Approach. Bern: Peter Lang.
Newmeyer, Frederick 2009. Current challenges to the lexicalist hypothesis: An overview and a critique. In Lewis, W., Karimi, S. & Harley, H., eds. Time and Again: Theoretical Perspectives on Formal Linguistics: In Honor of D. Terence Langendoen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 91117.
Pustejovsky, James 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pustejovsky, James 1998. The semantics of lexical underspecification. Folia Linguistica 32. 3–4. 323347.
Pustejovsky, James 2011. Coercion in a general theory of argument selection. Linguistics 49. 6. 10411431.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth 1992. -ER nominals: Implications for the theory of argument structure. In Stowell, T. & Wehrli, E., eds. Syntax and Semantics vol. XXVI: Syntax and the Lexicon. New York: Academic Press. 127153.
Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ricoeur, Paul 1975/1977. The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation and Meaning of Language. Trans. Czerny, Robert. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Riddle, Elizabeth 1985. A historical perspective on the productivity of the suffixes -ness and -ity. In Fisiak, Jacek, ed. Historical Semantics, Historical Word-Formation. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 435461.
Roeper, Thomas 1993. Explicit syntax in the lexicon: The representation of nominalizations. In Pustejovsky, J., ed. Semantics and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 185220.
Roeper, Thomas & Siegel, Muffy 1978. A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. Linguistic Inquiry 9. 197260.
Roy, Isabelle 2010. Deadjectival nominalizations and the structure of the adjective. In Alexiadou, A. & Rathert, M. eds. Interface Explorations: Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.129158.
Roy, Isabelle & Soare, Elena 2011. Nominalizations: New insights and theoretical implications. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 40. 723.
Ryder, Mary Ellen 1999. Bankers and Blue-chippers: An account of -er formations in present-day English. English Language and Linguistics 3. 269297.
Saussure, Ferdinand 1916/1983. Course in General Linguistics. Translated & annotated by Harris, Roy. London: Duckworth.
Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antoinette 2009. The classification of compounds. In Lieber, R. & Štekauer, P., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3453.
Schütze, Carson 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Selkirk, Elisabeth 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sichel, Ivy 2010. Event-structure constraints on nominalization. In Alexiadou, A. & Rathert, M., eds. Interface Explorations: Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: Walter de Gruter. 159198.
Snyder, William 1998. On the aspectual properties of English derived nominals. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25. 125139.
Sprouse, Jon & Almeida, Diogo 2012. Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 48. 3. 609652.
Steffensen, Sune & Fill, Alvin (2014). Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Language Sciences 41. 625.
Štekauer, Pavol 1998. An Onomasiological Theory of English Word Formation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Trips, Carola 2009. Lexical Semantics and Diachronic Morphology: The Development of -hood, -dom, and -ship in the History of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Vendler, Zeno 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Verkuyl, Henk 1972. Semantic primitives. Linguistische Forschungen. No. 22, Frankfurt: Athenäum.
Verkuyl, Henk 1989. Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 12. 3964.
Verkuyl, Henk 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verkuyl, Henk 1999. Aspectual Issues: Studies on Time and Quantity. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Wasow, Thomas & Arnold, Jennifer 2005. Intuitions in Linguistic Argumentation. Lingua 115. 11. 14811496.
Wunderlich, Dieter 2011. Operations on argument structure (Article 84). In Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, K. & Portner, P., eds. Semantics (HSK, vol. 3). Berlin: De Gruyter. 22242259.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.