Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:05:41.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Friends, Foes, Flatmates: On the Relationship between Law and (Empirical) Bioethics

from Part I - Theoretical Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

By
Richard Huxtable
Edited by
Jonathan Ives ,
Michael Dunn  and
Alan Cribb
Jonathan Ives
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Michael Dunn
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Alan Cribb
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Empirical Bioethics
Theoretical and Practical Perspectives
 , pp. 84 - 102
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annas, G. 1991. Ethics Committees: From Ethical Comfort to Ethical Cover. Hastings Center Report. 21:18–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arras, J. 2013. Theory and Bioethics, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Zalta, E.N., ed. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/theory-bioethics/.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T. 1991. Philosophical Ethics: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T., Childress, J. 2013. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birks, P. 2000. Rights, Wrongs, and Remedies. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 20(1):1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownsword, R. 2008. Bioethics: Bridging from Morality to Law? In Freeman, M. (ed.), Law and Bioethics: Current Legal Issues. Volume 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownsword, R. 1991. Towards a Rational Law of Contract. In Wilhelmsson, T. (ed.), Perspectives of Critical Contract Law. Dartmouth: Aldershot. Pp. 241–272.Google Scholar
van der Burg, W. 2010. Law and Ethics: The Twin Disciplines. Erasmus Working Paper Series on Jurisprudence and Socio-Legal Studies No. 10–02. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract (no. = 1631720), 2.Google Scholar
Butt, P. 2001. Legalese versus Plain Language. Amicus Curiae. 35:28–32.Google Scholar
Callahan, D. 1996. Escaping from Legalism: Is It Possible? Hastings Center Report. 26(6):34–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, D. 1973. Bioethics as a Discipline. The Hastings Center Studies. 1(1):66–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, A. 2000. ‘My Country Tis of Thee’: The Myopia of American Bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 3(2):195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coggon, J, 2010. Assisted Dying and the Context of Debate: ‘Medical Law’ versus ‘End-of-Life Law’. Medical Law Review. 18:541–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowley, C. 2005. The Dangers of Medical Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics. 31:739–742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, N., Sabin, J. 1997. Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures, Democratic Deliberation and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 26(4):303–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, A., Wilkinson, S. 2009. Philosophical Clinical Ethics. Clinical Ethics. 4:36–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, P. 1959. The Enforcement of Morals. Proceedings of the British Academy. XLV:129–151.Google Scholar
Foster, C. 2009. Choosing Life, Choosing Death: The Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Ethics and Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. 2008. Law and Bioethics: Constructing the Inter-Discipline. In Freeman, M. (ed.), Law and Bioethics: Current Legal Issues. Volume 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, L. 1969. The Morality of Law (revised ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Genn, H., Partington, M., Wheeler, S. 2006. Law in the Real World: Improving our Understanding of How Law Works. Nuffield Foundation. Para. 16.Google Scholar
Giubilini, A., Minerva, F. 2013. After-Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live? Journal of Medical Ethics. 39:261–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, H. 1965. Review: Fuller, the Morality of Law. Harvard Law Review. 78:1281–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. 1963. Law, Liberty and Morality. Oxford University Press, Stanford, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedgecoe, A. 2004. Critical Bioethics: Beyond the Social Science Critique of Applied Ethics. Bioethics. 18(2):120–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heywood, R. 2015. R.I.P. Sidaway: Patient-Oriented Disclosure: A Standard Worth Waiting For? Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11. Medical Law Review. 23(3):455–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxtable, R. 2012. Law, Ethics and Compromise at the Limits of Life: To Treat or Not to Treat? London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxtable, R. 2007. Euthanasia, Ethics and the Law: From Conflict to Compromise. London: Routledge-Cavendish.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxtable, R., Ost, S. 2015. Voices Carry? The Voice of Bioethics in the Courtroom and Voice of Law in Bioethics. In Huxtable, R., ter Meulen, R. (eds.), The Voices and Rooms of European Bioethics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jonsen, A. 1998. The Birth of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keown, J. (ed.) 1997. Euthanasia Examined: Ethical, Clinical and Legal Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maclean, A. 2008. Magic, Myths, and Fairy Tales: Consent and the Relationship between Law and Ethics. In Freeman, M. (ed.), Law and Bioethics: Current Legal Issues. Volume 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 11–135.Google Scholar
McLean, S. 2008. Clinical Ethics Committees: A Due Process Wasteland? Clinical Ethics. 3:99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, S. 2007. Law, Ethics and Health Care. In Ashcroft, R., Dawson, A., Draper, H., McMillan, J. (eds.), Principles of Health Care Ethics (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. Pp. 193–198.Google Scholar
Meller, S., Barclay, S. 2011. Mediation: An Approach to Intractable Disputes between Parents and Paediatricians. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 96:619–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miola, J. 2007. Medical Ethics and Medical Law: A Symbiotic Relationship. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Miola, J. 2006. The Interaction of Medical Law and Medical Ethics. Clinical Ethics. 1(1):22–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, J. 2006. Law and the Demoralisation of Medicine. Legal Studies. 26(2):185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2006. Critical Care Decisions in Foetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Para. 2.2.Google Scholar
Priaulx, N. 2013. The Troubled Identity of the Bioethicist. Health Care Analysis. 21(1):6–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawls, J. 1972. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Regan, T. 2004. The Case for Animal Rights (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reich, W. 1995. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Volume I. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Riddall, J. 1999. Jurisprudence (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rothstein, M. 2009. The Role of Law in the Development of American Bioethics. J Int Bioethique. 20(4):73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, C. 1994. Bioethics in the Language of the Law. Hastings Center Report. 24(4):16–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheehan, M. 2016. Metaethics, Relativism and Empirical Bioethics. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silber, T. 1982. Bioethics: An Interdisciplinary Enterprise. Journal of Religion and Health. 21(1):21–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slote, M. 1995. Law in Virtue Ethics. Law and Philosophy. 14(1):91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solum, L. 2003. Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue-Centered Theory of Judging. Metaphilosophy. 34(1/2):178–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperling, D. 2008. Law and Bioethics: A Rights-Based Relationship and Its Troubling Implications. In Freeman, M. (ed.), Law and Bioethics: Current Legal Issues. Volume 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 52–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirrat, G. 2003. How to Approach Ethical Issues: A Guide. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 5:214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, M., Reynolds, D. 1998. Where Law and Bioethics Meet … and Where They Don’t!! University of Detroit Mercy Law Review. 75:607–620.Google ScholarPubMed
Teel, K. 1975. The Physician’s Dilemma: A Doctor’s View: What the Law Should Be. Baylor Law Review. 27:6–9.Google ScholarPubMed
van Theil, G., van Deldan, J. 2016. Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model: The Case of Ashley X. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veatch, R., Miller, F. (eds.) 2001. The Internal Morality of Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 26(6).Google Scholar
De Vries, M., Van Leeuwen, E. 2010. Reflective Equilibrium and Empirical Data: Third Person Moral Experiences in Empirical Medical Ethics. Bioethics. 24(9):490–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, D., Burton, M. (eds.) 2013. Research Methods in Law. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, S. 2004. Law & Bioethics: From Values to Violence. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 32:293–306, 293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×