Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T11:12:14.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Empathy, social intelligence and aggression in adolescent boys and girls

from Part I - ‘Dysempathy’ in psychiatric samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

Kaj Björkqvist
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Åbo Akademi University
Tom F. D. Farrow
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Peter W. R. Woodruff
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

Introduction

My first insight into the possibility of a negative relationship between empathy and aggressiveness dates back to the early 1980s, when I was conducting research on the effects of violent film viewing on subsequent aggressive behaviour in children. There is good evidence that violent films indeed increase aggressive behaviour, at least among some viewers, and especially so if the viewer identifies with an aggressive hero (cf. Huesmann & Eron, 1986). However, in my readings of the research literature, I came across a few reports (e.g. Baron, 1971; Hartman, 1969; see also Bramel et al., 1968) in which violent films actually reduced the aggressiveness of viewers. In these cases, empathy towards the victim appears to have been the crucial intervening variable. In these films, pain cues of victims of violence were presented in a way that awakened feelings of empathy, and the viewer identified with the victim rather than with the perpetrator of aggression. Such films are regrettably few, however, within the violent film entertainment business. In my own research (Björkqvist, 1985), I found that film violence presented in a humorous way, making the viewer laugh at the victim, increased the aggressiveness of viewers more than realistic presentation of violence did. In films with a humorous aggressive content, the victim is objectified and dehumanized, and empathy is reduced. Also Feshbach (1988) suggests that regular television is not likely to increase empathy, rather the opposite.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×