Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:35:46.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

19 - Plant strategies

from Part VI - Terrestrial Plant Ecology

Gordon B. Bonan
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
Get access

Summary

Chapter summary

A plant uses the carbon gained during photosynthesis for maintenance and survival, to grow new materials such as foliage or roots, and for reproduction. Nitrogen and other nutrients are required to support these processes, and a plant must allocate its limited available resources among growth, maintenance, and reproduction in a manner such that the species persists over time. Different strategies for allocating resources, collectively known as life history patterns, have evolved through natural selection that allow plant species to persist in certain environments. A successful strategy might be to invest heavily in reproductive effort. The plant could be small, short lived, and have copious, widely dispersed seeds, such as a herbaceous annual. An equally successful strategy might be to be large, long lived, and have a small crop of large seeds, such as a tree. This life history favors maintenance over reproduction. There are multiple life history patterns that allow success in a given environment, but not all are successful in all environments. The environment selectively determines which strategy is successful. These life histories ensure the persistence of multiple species across the landscape in accordance with resource gradients and disturbance regimes. They give pattern to the arrangement of plant populations and communities in space and time. Three conceptualizations of plant strategies are the classifications of species into: r- and K-selected life histories; ruderal, competitor, and stress tolerator plants; and early and late successional species.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Climatology
Concepts and Applications
, pp. 275 - 291
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, W. G. and Gadgil, M., 1973. Growth form and reproductive effort in goldenrods (Solidago, Compositae). American Naturalist, 107, 651–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, M. G., Burk, J. H., Pitts, W. D., Gilliam, F. S., and Schwartz, M. W., 1999. Terrestrial Plant Ecology, 3rd edn. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A., 1979. The physiological ecology of plant succession. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10, 351–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A., 1996. Plants in Changing Environments: Linking Physiological, Population, and Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, 320 pp.Google Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A., 1997. Allocation of resources in plants: state of the science and critical questions. In Plant Resource Allocation, ed. Bazzaz, F. A. and Grace, J.. Academic Press, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Bloom, A. J., Chapin, III F. S., and Mooney, H. A., 1985. Resource limitation in plants – an economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 363–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. B., Levis, S., Kergoat, L., and Oleson, K. W., 2002. Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: an integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16, 1021, doi:10.1029/2000GB001360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bormann, F. H. and Likens, G. E., 1979. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, 253 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, M. G. R. and Dewar, R. C., 1994. Carbon allocation in trees: a review of concepts for modeling. Advances in Ecological Research, 25, 59–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabot, B. F. and Hicks, D. J., 1982. The ecology of leaf life spans. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 229–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, F. S., 1991. Integrated responses of plants to stress. BioScience, 41, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R. S., Townshend, J. R. G., and Hansen, M. C., 1999. Continuous fields of vegetation characteristics at the global scale at 1-km resolution. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104D, 16 911–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R. S., Hansen, M. C., and Townshend, J. R. G., 2000a. Global continuous fields of vegetation characteristics: a linear mixture model applied to multi-year 8 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 1389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R. S., Hansen, M. C., Townshend, J. R. G., Janetos, A. C., and Loveland, T. R., 2000b. A new global 1-km dataset of percentage tree cover derived from remote sensing. Global Change Biology, 6, 247–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, A. D., 1993. The prediction and physiological significance of tree height. In Vegetation Dynamics and Global Change, ed. Solomon, A. M. and Shugart, H. H.. Chapman and Hall., pp. 101–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadgil, M. and Solbrig, O. T., 1972. The concept of r- and K-selection: evidence from wild flowers and some theoretical considerations. American Naturalist, 106, 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, R., 1965. The Climate Near the Ground. Harvard University Press, 611 pp.Google Scholar
Gleeson, S. K. and Tilman, D., 1992. Plant allocation and the multiple limitation hypothesis. American Naturalist, 139, 1322–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, S. T. and Richards, J. H., 1990. Larches: deciduous conifers in an evergreen world. BioScience, 40, 818–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, S. T., Vogel, J. G., Norman, J. M., et al., 1997. Carbon distribution and aboveground net primary production in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102D, 29 029–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, J., 1997. Toward models of resource allocation by plants. In Plant Resource Allocation, ed. Bazzaz, F. A. and Grace, J.. Academic Press, pp. 279–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, C. C. and Running, S. W., 1977. Leaf area of mature northwestern coniferous forests: relation to site water balance. Ecology, 58, 893–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P., 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Wiley, 222 pp.Google Scholar
Grime, J. P. and Jeffrey, D. W., 1965. Seedling establishment in vertical gradients of sunlight. Journal of Ecology, 53, 621–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. L., 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, 892 pp.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. and Ogden, J., 1970. The reproductive strategy of higher plants. I. The concept of strategy with special reference to Senecio vulgaris L. Journal of Ecology, 58, 681–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, M. and Smith, T., 1987. Plant succession: life history and competition. American Naturalist, 130, 168–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. T., 1966. Effects of microclimate on spring flowering phenology. Ecology, 47, 407–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikuzawa, K., 1991. A cost–benefit analysis of leaf habit and leaf longevity of trees and their geographical pattern. American Naturalist, 138, 1250–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, G. W., Sillett, S. C., Jennings, G. M., and Davis, S. D., 2004. The limits to tree height. Nature, 428, 851–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Körner, C., 1993. Scaling from species to vegetation: the usefulness of functional groups. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, ed. Schulze, E.-D. and Mooney, H. A.. Springer-Verlag, pp. 117–40.Google Scholar
Larcher, W., 1995. Physiological Plant Ecology, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, 506 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leishman, M. R. and Westoby, M., 1994. The role of large seed size in shaded conditions: experimental evidence. Functional Ecology, 8, 205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loehle, C., 1988. Tree life history strategies: the role of defenses. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O., 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, 203 pp.Google Scholar
Mencuccini, M. and Grace, J., 1994. Climate influences the leaf area/sapwood area ratio in Scots pine. Tree Physiology, 15, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monk, C. D., 1966. An ecological significance of evergreenness. Ecology, 47, 504–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, H. A. and Gulmon, S. L., 1982. Constraints on leaf structure and function in reference to herbivory. BioScience, 32, 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemani, R. R. and Running, S. W., 1989. Testing a theoretical climate–soil–leaf area hydrologic equilibrium of forests using satellite data and ecosystem simulation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 44, 245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemani, R. R. and Running, S. W., 1996. Implementation of a hierarchical global vegetation classification in ecosystem function models. Journal of Vegetation Science, 7, 337–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niklas, K. J., 2007. Maximum plant height and the biophysical factors that limit it. Tree Physiology, 27, 433–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, I. R. and Slatyer, R. O., 1980. The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio, 43, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raunkiaer, C., 1934. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. Clarendon Press, 632 pp.Google Scholar
Reich, P. B., Koike, T., Gower, S. T., and Schoettle, A. W., 1995. Causes and consequences of variation in conifer leaf life-span. In Ecophysiology of Coniferous Forests, ed. Smith, W. K. and Hinckley, T. M.. Academic Press, pp. 225–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Running, S. W., Loveland, T. R., Pierce, L. L., Nemani, R. R., and Hunt, E. R., Jr., 1995. A remote sensing based vegetation classification logic for global land cover analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 51, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. G., 1991. Effects of climate change on plant respiration. Ecological Applications, 1, 157–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, M. G. and Yoder, B. J., 1997. Hydraulic limits to tree height and tree growth. BioScience, 47, 235–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saverimuttu, T. and Westoby, M., 1996. Seedling longevity under deep shade in relation to seed size. Journal of Ecology, 84, 681–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, H. H., 1984. A Theory of Forest Dynamics: the Ecological Implications of Forest Succession Models. Springer-Verlag, 278 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, H. H., 1987. Dynamic ecosystem consequences of tree birth and death patterns. BioScience, 37, 596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, H. H., 1998. Terrestrial Ecosystems in Changing Environments. Cambridge University Press, 537 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H., Woodward, F. I., and Burton, P. J., 1993. Plant functional types. In Vegetation Dynamics and Global Change, ed. Solomon, A. M. and Shugart, H. H.. Chapman and Hall, pp. 272–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H., and Woodward, F. I. (eds.), 1997. Plant Functional Types: Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change. Cambridge University Press, 369 pp.Google Scholar
Tilman, D., 1988. Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, 360 pp.
Walters, M. B. and Reich, P. B., 2000. Seed size, nitrogen supply, and growth rate affect tree seedling survival in deep shade. Ecology, 81, 1887–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, R. H., 1983. Estimating forest growth and efficiency in relation to canopy leaf area. Advances in Ecological Research, 13, 327–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, R. H., 1991. Responses of evergreen trees to multiple stresses. In Response of Plants to Multiple Stresses, ed. Mooney, H. A., Winner, W. E., and Pell, E. J.. Academic Press, pp. 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, R. H. and Franklin, J. F., 1979. Evergreen coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. Science, 204, 1380–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waring, R. H. and Schlesinger, W. H., 1985. Forest Ecosystems: Concepts and Management. Academic Press, 340 pp.Google Scholar
Waring, R. H., Schroeder, P. E., and Oren, R., 1982. Application of the pipe model theory to predict canopy leaf area. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 12, 556–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westoby, M., Falster, D. S., Moles, A. T., Vesk, P. A., and Wright, I. J., 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 125–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, F. I., 1987. Climate and Plant Distribution. Cambridge University Press, 174 pp.Google Scholar
Woodward, F. I., 1993. Leaf responses to the environment and extrapolation to larger scales. In Vegetation Dynamics and Global Change, ed. Solomon, A. M. and Shugart, H. H.. Chapman and Hall, pp. 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, F. I. and Cramer, W., 1996. Plant functional types and climatic changes: introduction. Journal of Vegetation Science, 7, 306–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, I., 2004. Tall storeys. Nature, 428, 807–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., et al., 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Plant strategies
  • Gordon B. Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805530.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Plant strategies
  • Gordon B. Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805530.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Plant strategies
  • Gordon B. Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805530.020
Available formats
×