Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Preface
- 1 Images of discourse: interpretive, functional, critical, and structurational
- 2 Interpretive approaches to organizational discourse
- 3 Functional approaches: metaphor in organization change and development
- 4 Critical approaches: Michel Foucault's conceptions of discourse
- 5 A structurational approach to discourse
- 6 Analyzing discourse I: discourse as situated symbolic action
- 7 Analyzing discourse II: a tale of three discourses
- Index
- References
3 - Functional approaches: metaphor in organization change and development
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Preface
- 1 Images of discourse: interpretive, functional, critical, and structurational
- 2 Interpretive approaches to organizational discourse
- 3 Functional approaches: metaphor in organization change and development
- 4 Critical approaches: Michel Foucault's conceptions of discourse
- 5 A structurational approach to discourse
- 6 Analyzing discourse I: discourse as situated symbolic action
- 7 Analyzing discourse II: a tale of three discourses
- Index
- References
Summary
In chapter 1 we suggested that functional approaches view discourse as language-based communication to be employed by managerial and social actors for achieving certain organizationally (and often personally) relevant ends. Discourse is seen as a tool at actors' disposal rather than as a constraining, dominating feature of social life (as in the critical approach); or as a shaping influence and a window to the ideational, symbolic world of organizations (as in the interpretive approach). In this chapter we illustrate functional approaches to organizational discourse through a discussion of how aspects of discourse, particularly metaphors, can be employed in efforts to accomplish more effective organization change and development.
One key underlying assumption of functionally oriented approaches, often left implicit, is the interpretive insight that organizational discourse can not only provide access to the conceptual world of organizations but can also be used as an avenue for influencing this world. Effective organizational change and development presents a set of perennial managerial problems. A discourse perspective highlights and illustrates that dealing with such problems is not just about the “hard” structural aspects of organizations, but requires an in-depth appreciation of the cultural, human aspects of organizations, and taking corresponding actions based on this appreciation.
Soft aspects of Effective Change Management and the Role of Discourse
The management of change poses a fundamental challenge to managers, which has prompted an immense amount of practitioner-oriented literature on how to effectively manage change (e.g. Champy and Nohria, 1996; Kotter, 1996).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Discourse, Interpretation, Organization , pp. 55 - 78Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
and 1992. The role of metaphors in organizational change. Change agent and change target perspectives. Group & Organization Management, 17: 242–249.Google Scholar
, and 1993. Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46: 681–703.Google Scholar
and 1990. Generative metaphor intervention: A new behavioral approach for working with systems divided by conflict and caught in defensive perception. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26: 219–239.Google Scholar
1994. Making the invisible visible: Using analogically-based methods to surface unconscious organizational processes. Organization Development Journal, 12 (4): 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. 1993. More about metaphor. In (ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edn.), pp. 19–4. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
1995. Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as “Tamara-Land.” Academy of Management Journal, 38: 997–1035.Google Scholar
1992. Cognitive mapping and repertory grids for qualitative survey research. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 287–307.Google Scholar
and 1996. Fast forward: The best ideas on managing business change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
and 1999. Transforming an organization: Using models to foster a strategic conversation. California Management Review, 41 (3): 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1992. The use of metaphors in organizational assessment and change. Group & Organization Management, 17: 229–241.Google Scholar
1991. Inspiring others: The language of leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 5 (1): 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1991. Systems of interpretation and the function of metaphor. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 21: 171–195.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. R. and Sims, D. 2002. Enabling strategic metaphor in conversation: A technique of cognitive sculpting for explicating knowledge. In and (eds.), Mapping strategic knowledge:63–85. London: Sage.
and 2001. Metaphor and meaning:An intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 274–303.Google Scholar
and (eds.) 1996. Metaphor and organizations. London: Sage.
Grant, D., Keenoy, T. and Oswick, C. 1998. Organizational discourse: Of diversity, dichotomy and multi-disciplinarity. In , , and (eds.), Discourse and organization:1–13. London: Sage.
2001. An ethnographic study of culture in the context of organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37: 426–446.Google Scholar
2002. The contribution of a discursive view to understanding and managing organizational change. Strategic Change, 11: 253–261.Google Scholar
and 2001. Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of IT Implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 755–778.Google Scholar
and 2000. Discourse and the study of organization: Toward a structurational perspective. Human Relations, 53: 1251–1286.Google Scholar
and 1996. Organizational change and organizational culture at Hay Management Consultants. Long Range Planning, 29: 485–494.Google Scholar
1986. From ambushes to golden parachutes: Corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 800–837.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. M. and Andrews, J. A. 1983. Ambushes, shootouts and knights of the roundtable: The language of corporate takeovers. In , , , and (eds.), Organizational symbolism:145–155. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
and 1994. Exploring the mental models of competitive strategists: The case for a processual approach. Journal of Management Studies, 31: 525–551.Google Scholar
1989. Using imagery to facilitate organizational development and change. Group & Organization Studies, 14: 70–82.Google Scholar
1990. Mapping strategic thought. Chichester, England:Wiley.
2002. Metaphor in the literature of organizational analysis: A preliminary taxonomy and a glimpse at a humanities-based perspective. Organization, 9: 305–330.Google Scholar
and 2005. Answers for questions to come: Reflective dialogue as an enabler of strategic innovation. Journal of Organization Change Management, 18 (4): 338–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, C. and Heracleous, L. 2006. Constructing shared understandings. The role of embodied metaphors in organization development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42:207–226.CrossRef
1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
1996. Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
1990. The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1: 39–74.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In (ed.), Metaphor and thought:202–251. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
and 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
and 1988. The selection of communication media as an executive skill. Academy of Management Executive, 2: 225–232.Google Scholar
and 1997. Assessing the roller coaster of downsizing. Business Horizons, 40 (4): 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. Managing the metaphors of change. Organizational Dynamics, 22 (1): 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. Paradigms, metaphor and puzzle solving in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 660–671.Google Scholar
1983. More on metaphor: Why we cannot control tropes in administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 601–607.Google Scholar
1986. Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Morgan, G. 1996. An afterword: Is there anything more to be said about metaphor? In and (eds.), Metaphor and organization:227–240. London:Pitman.
and 1989. Organizational frame bending: Principles for managing reorientation. Academy of Management Executive, 3 (3): 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. Managing change: Course overview. Harvard Business School Teaching Note, 9–494–042.Google Scholar
and (eds.) 1996. Organisation development: Metaphorical explorations. London: Pitman.
and 1999. Images of an organization: The use of metaphor in a multinational company. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12: 501–523.Google Scholar
, and 2002. Metaphorical and analogical reasoning in organization theory: Beyond orthodoxy. Academy of Management Review, 27: 294–303.Google Scholar
Palmer, I. and Dunford, R. 1996. Understanding organisations through metaphor. In and (eds.), Organisation development: Metaphorical explorations:7–15. London: Pitman.
, and 1997. Changing the way we change. Harvard Business Review, November–December: 127–139.Google Scholar
1987. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24: 649–670.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 19:123–205. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.CrossRef
and 1982. Controlling tropes in administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 641–652.Google Scholar
Pondy, L. R. 1983. The role of metaphors and myths in organization and in the facilitation of change. In , , , and (eds.), Organizational symbolism:157–166. Greenwich, JAI Press.
and 1979. Beyond open systems model of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1:3–39.Google Scholar
and 1991. Organizational development and transformation. Annual Review of Psychology, 42:51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. How storytelling builds next-generation leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, Summer: 63–69.Google Scholar
1989. The role of metaphors in organization transformation. Human Relations, 42: 463–485.Google Scholar
1992. Organizational culture and leadership (2nd edn.). San Francisco, CA:JoseyBass.
Schön, D. A. 1979. Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In (ed.), Metaphor and thought:254–283. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
and 2001. Teaching old dogs new tricks: Implementing organizational learning in an Asian national police force. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37: 361–380.Google Scholar
1993. Analogical reasoning and knowledge generation in organization theory. Organization Studies, 14: 323–46.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1990. Introduction: Cartographic myths in organizations. In and (eds.), Mapping strategic thought:1–10. Chichester: Wiley.