Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:10:54.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Fine-Needle Aspiration of Soft Tissue and Bone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2021

By
Lester J. Layfield
Edited by
Ji-Weon Park ,
Paolo Gattuso ,
Vijaya B. Reddy  and
Shahla Masood
Ji-Weon Park
Affiliation:
Rush University, Chicago
Paolo Gattuso
Affiliation:
Rush University, Chicago
Vijaya B. Reddy
Affiliation:
Rush University, Chicago
Shahla Masood
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

To adequately diagnosis soft tissue myelolipoma one must confirm absence of hematologic abnormalities and presence of lesion within soft tissue rather than bone marrow or adrenal

Type
Chapter
Information
Differential Diagnosis in Cytopathology , pp. 506 - 547
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Akerman, M, Rydholm, A. Aspiration cytology of lipomatous tumors: a 10-year experience at an orthopedic oncology center. Diagn Cytopathol 1987; 3: 295–301.Google Scholar
Chen, X, Yu, K, Tong, GX, et al. Fine needle aspiration of pleomorphic lipoma of the neck: report of two cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2010; 38(3): 184–187.Google Scholar
Domanski, HA, Carien, B, Jonsson, K, et al. Distinct cytologic features of spindle cell lipoma. A cytologic-histologic study with clinical, radiologic, electron microscopic, and cytogenetic correlations. Cancer 2001; 93(6): 381–389.Google Scholar
Guo, Z, Voytovich, M, Kurtycz, DFI, Hoerl, HD. Fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of spindle-cell lipoma: a case report and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathl 2000; 23: 362–365.Google Scholar
López-Ríos, F, Albert, N, Perez-Barrios, A, de Agustin, PP. Fine-needle aspiration of pleomorphic lipoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2001; 24: 296–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pathan, SK, Kapila, K, Al-Ayadhy, B, Abdeen, S. Spindle cell lipoma: an uncommon tumour with distinctive morphology. Cytopathology 2007; 18(2): 123–125.Google Scholar
Rigby, HS, Wilson, YG, Cawthorn, SJ, Ibrahim, NB. Fine needle aspiration of pleomorophic lipoma: a potential pitfall of cyto-diagnosis. Cytopathology 1993; 4: 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walaas, L, Kindblom, L-G. Lipomatous tumors: a correlative cytologic and histologic study of 27 tumors examined by fine needle aspiration cytology. Human Pathol 1985; 16: 6–18.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Gill, KR, Hasan, MK, Menke, DM, Wallace, MB. Presacral myelolipoma: diagnosis by EUS-FNA and Trucut biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71(4)849–850.Google Scholar
Gong, Y, Sun, X. Fine-needle aspiration of presacral myelolipoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34(1): 29–30.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Amate, A, Rios-Martin, JJ, Diaz-Delgado, M, et al. Cytological diagnosis of a presacral myelolipoma: a case report diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2008; 36(12): 921–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akerman, M, Rydholm, A. Aspiration cytology of lipomatous tumors: a 10 year experience at an orthopedic oncology center. Diagn Cytopathol 1987; 3: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Maghraby, HQ, Khalbuss, WE, Rao, UN, et al. Fine needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of dedifferentiated liposarcoma: Cytomorphology and MDM2 amplification by FISH. Cytojournal 2010; 7: 5. Doi:10.4103/1742-6413.62257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Attal, H, Jensen, J, Reyes, CV. Myxoid liposarcoma of the anterior mediastinum. Diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Acta Cytol 1995; 39: 511–513.Google Scholar
Chufal, SS, Chufal, KS, Pant, P, et al. Hypercellular round cell liposarcoma: A comprehensive cytomorphologic study and review of 8 cases. J Cytology 2017; 34(2): 78–83.Google Scholar
Dey, P. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of a well differentiated liposarcoma. A report of two cases. Acta Cytol 2000; 44(3): 459–462.Google Scholar
Geethamani, V, Savithri, R, Suquna, BV, Niveditha, SR. Cytomorphology of dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the subcutis of the upper back with axillary lymph node metastasis; a case report. Acta Cytol 2010; 54(3); 333–336.Google Scholar
Jo, VY, Applications of ancillary testing in the cytologic diagnosis of soft tissue neoplasms. Surg Pathol Clin 2016; 11(3): 633–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekhi, B, Desai, S, Jamphekar, NA. Epithelioid variant of a pleomorphic liposarcoma displaying arborizing vascular arrangements on cytology smears: a case report of an interesting cytomorphologic pattern in an uncommon tumor. Act Cytol 2012; 54(5 Suppl): 963–967.Google Scholar
Sazadowska, A, Lasota, J. Fine needle aspiration cytology of myxoid liposarcoma; a study of 18 tumors. Cytopathology 1993; 4(2): 99–106.Google Scholar
Shattuck, MC, Victor, TA. Cytologic features of well-differentiated sclerosing liposarcoma in aspirated samples. Acta Cytol 1988; 32: 896–901.Google Scholar
Vicandi, B, Jimenez-Hefferman, J, Lopez-Ferrer, P, et al. Cytologic features of round cell liposarcoma. A report on five patients. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2003; 99: 28–32.Google Scholar
Akerman, M, Domanski, HA. The complex cytological features of synovial sarcoma in fine needle aspirates, an analysis of four illustrative cases. Cytopathology 2007; 18(4): 234–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akerman, M, Ryd, W, Skytting, B. Fine-needle aspiration of synovial sarcoma: criteria for diagnosis. Retrospective reexamination of 37 cases, including ancillary diagnostics. A Scandinavian Sarcoma Group study. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 28: 232–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergman, S, Brownlee, NA, Geisinger, KR, et al. Diagnostic pitfalls associated with fine-needle aspiration biopsy in a patient with the myxoid variant of monophasic fibrous synovial sarcoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34: 761–767.Google Scholar
Collins, BT, Janney, CG, Ong, M, Cortese, C. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of monophasic spindle synovial sarcoma of lung with fluorescence in situ hybridization identification of t(x; 18) translocation: a case report. Act Cytol 2009; 53(1): 105–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewing, CA, Zakowski, MF, Lin, O. Monophasic synovial sarcoma: a cytologic spectrum. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30(1): 19–23.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, SE, Bergman, S, Pettenati, MJ, Gulley, ML. The usefulness of cytogenetic analysis in fine need aspirates for the histologic subtyping of sarcomas. Mod Pathol 2006; 19(6): 815–819.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, SE, Teot, LA, Stanley, MW, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of synovial sarcoma: a cytomorphologic analysis of primary, recurrent and metastatic tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106: 769–775.Google Scholar
Klijanienko, J, Caillaud, J-M, Lagace, R, Viehl, P. Cytohistologic correlations in 56 synovial sarcomas in 36 patients. The Institut Curie experience. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 27: 96–102.Google Scholar
Rekhi, B, Basak, R, Desai, SB, Jambhekar, NA. Immunohistochemical validation of TLEI, a novel marker for synovial sarcomas. Indian J Med Res 2012; 136(5): 766–775.Google Scholar
Canacci, AM, Nunez, C, Getty, P, Abdul-Karim, F. Diagnosis of malignant granular cell tumor metastic to bone by fine needle aspiration cytology: a case report. Acta Cytol 2010; 54(2): 190–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimino-Mathews, A, Illei, PB, Ali, SZ. Atypical granular cell tumor of the thyroid: cytomorphologic features on fine needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2011; 39(8): 608–611.Google Scholar
El Aouni, N, Laurent, I, Terrier, P, et al. Granular cell tumor of the breast. Diag Cytopathol 2007; 35(11): 725–727.Google Scholar
Koshy, J, Schnadig, V, Nawgiri, R. Is fine needle aspiration cytology a useful diagnostic tool for granular cell tumors? A cytohistological review with emphasis on pitfalls. CytoJournal 2014; 11: 28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, K, Madden, JF, Olatidoye, BA, Dodd, LG. Features of benign granular cell tumor on fine-needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 1999; 43: 552–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazur, MT, Shultz, JJ, Myers, JL. Granular cell tumor. Immunohistochemical analysis of 21 benign tumors and one malignant tumor. Acta Pathol Lab Med 1990; 114: 692–696.Google Scholar
Carter, JE, Evans, TN, Tucker, JA. Cytologic diagnosis of alveolar soft part sarcoma of the lower extremity by fine needle aspiration and correlation with core biopsy: A case report. Acta Cytol 2008; 52: 459–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Ferrer, P, Jimenez-Hefferman, JA, Vicardi, B, et al. Cytologic features of alveolar soft part sarcoma: report of three cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 27: 115–119.Google Scholar
Lograno, R, Wojtowycz, MM, Wunderlich, DW, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the diagnosis of alveolar soft part sarcoma presenting with lung metastatases. Acta Cytol 1999; 43: 464–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakely, PE Jr, McDermott, JE, Ali, SZ. Cytopathology of alveolar soft part sarcoma: a report of 10 cases. Cancer 2009; 117(6): 500–507.Google Scholar
Barwad, A, Dey, P, Das, A. Fine needle aspiration cytology of epithelioid sarcoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2011: 39(7): 517–520.Google Scholar
Cardillo, M, Zakowski, MF, Lin, O. Fine-needle aspiration of epithelioid sarcoma: Cytology findings in nine cases. Cancer 2001; 93(4): 246–251.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, T, Matsuno, Y, Shimoda, T, et al. Proximal type epithelioid sarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Mod Pathol 2001; 14: 655–663.Google Scholar
Ikeda, K, Tate, G, Suzuki, T, Mitsuya, T. Fine needle aspiration cytology of primary proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma of the perineum: a case report. Acta Cytol 2005; 49(3): 314–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohar-Marinsek, Z, Zidar, A. Epithelioid sarcoma in FNAB smears. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 11: 367.Google Scholar
Sullivan, L, Folpe, AL, Pawei, BR, et al. Epitheloid sarcoma is associated with a high percentage of SMARCB1 deletions. Med Pathol 2013; 26(3): 365–392.Google Scholar
Zeppa, P, Errico, ME, Palombini, L. Epithelioid sarcoma: report of two cases diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy with immunocytochemical correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 21: 405–408.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almeida, MM, Nunes, AM, Frable, WJ. Malignant melanoma of soft tissue. A report of three cases with diagnosis of fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1994; 38: 241–246.Google Scholar
Creager, AJ, Pitman, MB, Geisinger, KR. Cytologic features of fine-needle aspirates and exfoliative specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2002; 117: 217–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rau, AR, Kini, H, Verghese, R. ‘Tigroid’ background in fine-needle aspiration cytology of clear cell sarcoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34: 355–357.Google Scholar
Shabb, NS, Boulos, F, Tawil, A, et al. Clear cell sarcoma (malignant melanoma of soft parts): fine-needle aspiration cytology of highly pigmented tumor. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 28: 313–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, TR, Chow, T-C, Chan, OW-H, et al. Clear cell sarcoma diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration: cytologic, histology and ultrastructural features; potential pitfalls; and literature review. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 26: 174–180.Google Scholar
Akhtar, M, Kfoury, H, Haider, A, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of extra-renal malignant rhabdoid tumor. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 11: 271–276.Google Scholar
Perez, JS, Perez-Guillermo, M, Bernal, AB, et al. Malignant rhabdoid tumor of soft tissues: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8: 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, TA, Klijanienko, J, Couturier, J, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of renal and extrarenal rhabdoid tumors: the experience of the Institut Curie regarding 20 tumors in 13 patients. Cancer Cytopathol 2011; 119(1): 49–57.Google Scholar
White, FV, Dehner, LP, Belchis, DA, et al. Congenital disseminated malignant rhabdoid tumor: a distinct clinicopathologic entity demonstrating abnormalities of chromosome 22q11. Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23: 249.Google Scholar
Elsheikh, T, Silverman, JF, Wakely, PE Jr, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis (eosinophilic granuloma) of bone in children. Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 7: 261–266.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, SE, Wenger, DE, Gilchrist, GS, et al. Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis (histiocytosis X) of bone: a cliniciopathologic analysis of 263 pediatric and adult cases. Cancer 1995; 76: 2471.Google Scholar
Malhotra, P, Tandon, R, Singh, N, et al. Cytoplasmic processes: a distinct cytomorphologic feature of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Acta Cytol 2005; 49(5): 580–582.Google Scholar
Sholl, LM, Hornick, JL, Pinkus, JL, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of langerin in Langerhans cell histiocytosis and pulmonary inflammatory and infectious diseases. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31(6): 947–952.Google Scholar
Van Heerde, P, Maarten Egler, R. The cytology of Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis (histiocytosis X). Cytopathology 1991; 2: 149–158.Google Scholar
Allison, DV, Wakely, PE Jr., Siddiqui, MT, Ali, SZ. Nodular fasciitis: a frequent diagnostic pitfall on fine-needle aspiration. Cancer Cytopathol 2017; 125: 20–29.Google Scholar
Anglo-Henry, MR, Seaquist, MB, Marsh, WL. Fine needle aspiration of proliferative fasciitis. A case report . Acta Cytol 1985; 29: 882–886.Google Scholar
Dahl, I, Akerman, M. Nodular fasciitis: a correlative cytologic and histologic study of 13 cases. Acta Cytol 1981; 25: 215–223.Google Scholar
Dodd, LG, Martinez, S. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of pseudosarcomatous lesions of soft tissue. Diagn Cytopathol 2001; 24: 28–35.Google Scholar
Klapsinou, E, Despoina, P, Dimitra, D. Cytologic findings and potential pitfalls in proliferative myositis and myositis ossificans diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology: report of four cases and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 2012; 40(3): 239–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Layfield, LJ, Crim, J, Gupta, D. Fine-needle aspiration findings in nodular myositis: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 13: 343–346.Google Scholar
Wong, NL. Fine needle aspiration cytology of pseudosarcomatous reactive proliferative lesions of soft tissue. Acta Cytol 2002; 46(6): 1049–1055.Google Scholar
Barwad, A, Banik, T, Gorsi, U, Dey, P. Fine needle aspiration cytology of myositis ossificans. Diagn Cytopathol 2011; 39(6): 432–434.Google Scholar
Mokhtari, M, Kumar, PV, Rezazadeh, S. Confusing cytological findings in myositis ossificans. Acta Cytol 2012; 56(5): 565–570.Google Scholar
Popok, SM, Naib, ZM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of myositis ossificans. Diagn Cytopathol 1985; 1: 236–240.Google Scholar
Röösen, B, Herrlin, K, Rydholm, A, Akerman, M. Pseudomalignant myositis ossificans. Clinical, radiologic and cytologic diagnosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: 457–460.Google Scholar
Wakely, PE, Almedia, M, Frable, WJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology of myositis ossificans. Mod Pathol 1994; 7: 23–25.Google Scholar
Domanski, HA, Carlen, B, Sloth, M, Rydholm, A. Elastofibroma dorsi has distinct cytomorphologic features, making diagnostic surgical biopsy unnecessary: cytomorphologic study with clinical, radiologic and electron microscopic correlations. Diagn Cytopathol 2003: 29: 327–333.Google Scholar
Harigupal, M, Seshan, SV, DeLellis, RA, et al. Aspiration cytology of elastofibroma dorsi: case report with ultrastructural and immunohistochemical findings. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 26: 310–313.Google Scholar
Vincent, J, Maleki, Z. Elastofibroma: cytomorphologic, histologic, and radiologic findings in five cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2012; 40 (Suppl 2): E99–E103.Google Scholar
Apple, SK, Nieberg, RK, Hirschowitz, SL. Fine needle aspiration diagnosis of fibromatosis colli: a report of three cases. Acta Cytol 1997; 41: 1373–1376.Google Scholar
Kurtycz, DF, Logrono, R, Hoerl, HD, Heatley, DG. Diagnosis of fibromatosis colli by fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 23: 338–342.Google Scholar
McLeod, DL, Geisinger, KR, MB III, Hopkins, Silverman, JF. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the fibromatoses: a clinical and cytopathologic assessment. Acta Cytol 1987; 31: 683.Google Scholar
Raab, SS, Silverman, JF, McLeod, DL, et al. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of fibromatoses. Acta Cytol 1993; 37: 323–328.Google Scholar
Tanwar, P, Gupta, N, Kumar Vasishta, R, Singh, G. Fine needle aspiration cytology in fibromatosis. J Cytol 2012; 29(1): 66–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Wakely, PE Jr, Prince, WG, Frable, WJ. Sternomastoid tumor of infancy (fibromatosis colli): diagnosis by aspiration cytology. Mod Pathol 1989; 2: 378–381.Google Scholar
Zaharopoulos, P, Wang, JY. Fine-needle aspiration cytology in fibromatoses. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8: 73–78.Google Scholar
Ali, SZ, Hoon, V, Hoda, S, et al. Solitary fibrous tumor. A cytologic-histologic study with clinical, radiologic, and immunohistochemical correlations. Cancer 1997; 81: 116–121.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, AC, Salomao, DR, Keeney, GL, Mascimento, AG. Solitary fibrous tumor: a study of cytologic features of six cases diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2001; 25: 172–176.Google Scholar
Gupta, N. Barwad, A, Katamuthu, K, et al. Solitary fibrous tumour: a diagnostic challenge for the cytopathologist. Cytopathology 2012; 23(4): 250–235.Google Scholar
Tani, E, Weide, J, Astrom, K, et al. FNA cytology of solitary fibrous tumors and the diagnostic value of STAT6 immunocytochemistry. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126(1): 36–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domanski, HA. FNA diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 32(5): 299–302.Google Scholar
Domanski, HA, Gustafson, P. Cytologic features of primary, recurrent, and metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Cancer 2002; 96: 351–361.Google Scholar
Klijanienko, J, Caillaud, JM, Lagace, R. Fine needle aspiration of primary and recurrent dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30(4): 261–265.Google Scholar
Layfield, LJ, Gopez, EV. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of giant cell fibroblastoma: case report and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 26: 398–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llombart, B, Sanmartín, O, López-Guerrero, JA, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: clinical, pathological, and genetic (COL1A1-PDGFB) study with therapeutic implications. Histopathology 2009; 54(7): 860–872.Google Scholar
Powers, CN, Hurt, MA, Frable, WJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9: 145–250.Google Scholar
Cozzolino, I, Caleo, A, DiCrescenzo, V, et al. Cytological diagnosis of adult-type fibrosarcoma of the neck in an elderly patient. Report of one case and review of the literature. BMC Surg 2013; (Suppl 2): 542.Google Scholar
Enjoji, M, Hashimoto, HL. Diagnosis of soft tissue sarcomas. Pathol Res Pract 1984; 178: 215–226.Google Scholar
Dahl, I, Hagmar, B, Idvall, I. Benign solitary neurilemoma (schwannoma). A correlative cytological and histological study of 28 cases. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand [A] 1984; 92: 91–101.Google Scholar
Domanski, HA, Akerman, M, Engellau, J, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of neruilemmoma (schwannoma). A clinicocytopathologic study of 116 patients. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34: 403–412.Google Scholar
Kapila, K, Mathur, S, Verma, K. Schwannomas: a pitfall in the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenomas on fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 27: 53–59.Google Scholar
Klijanienko, J, Caillaud, JM, Lagace, R. Cytohistologic correlations in schwannomas (neurilemmomas) including “ancient,” cellular, and epithelioid variants. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34: 517–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laforga, JB. Cellular schwannoma: report of a case diagnosed intraoperatively with the aid of cytologic imprints. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 29: 95–100.Google Scholar
Mooney, EE, Layfield, LJ, Dodd, LG. Fine-needle aspiration of neural lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 20: 1–5.Google Scholar
Ramzy, I. Benign schwannoma: demonstration of Verocay bodies using fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 1977; 21: 316–319.Google Scholar
Zbieranowski, I, Bedard, YC. Fine needle aspiration of schwannomas. Value of electron microscopy and immunocytochemistry in the preoperative diagnosis. Acta Cytol 1989; 33: 381–384.Google Scholar
Dodd, LG, Scully, S, Layfield, LJ. Fine-needle aspiration of epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (epithelioid malignant schwannoma). Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 17: 200–204.Google Scholar
Ducatman, BS, Scheithauer, BW, Piepgras, DG, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinicopathologic study of 120 cases. Cancer 1986; 57: 2006–2021.Google Scholar
Gupta, K, Dey, P, Vashisht, R. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 2014; 31(1): 1–4.Google Scholar
McGee, RS, Ward, WG, Kilpatrick, SE. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: a fine-needle aspiration biopsy study. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 17: 298–305.Google Scholar
Vendraminelli, R, Cavazzana, AO, Poletti, A, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of malignant nerve sheath tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 559–562.Google Scholar
Wakely, PE Jr, Ali, SZ, Bishop, JA. The cytopathology of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: a report of 55 fine-needle aspiration cases. Cancer Cytopathol 2012; 230(5): 334–341.Google Scholar
Wang, AR, Weiss, SW, Reed, JA, Scott, G. PGP 9.5 and N-CAM are sensitive markers for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). Mod Pathol 2000; 13: 16A.Google Scholar
Domanski, HA, Akerman, M, Rissler, P, Gustafson, P. Fine needle aspiration of soft tissue leiomyosarcoma: and analysis of the most common cytologic findings and the value of ancillary techniques. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34(9): 597–604.Google Scholar
Klijanienko, J, Caillaud, JM, Lagace, R, Vielh, P. Fine-needle aspiration of leiomyosarcoma: a correlative cytohistopathological study of 96 tumors in 68 patients. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 28(3): 119–125.Google Scholar
Tao, LC, Davidson, DD. Aspiration biopsy cytology of smooth muscle tumors: a cytologic approach to the differentiation between leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma. Acta Cytol 1993; 37: 300.Google Scholar
Ali, F, Smilari, TF, Teichberg, P, Hajdu, SI. Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma of the heart metastatic to bone. Report of a case with fine-needle aspiration biopsy findings. Acta Cytol 1995; 39: 555–558.Google Scholar
Sengupta, S, Kumar Mondal, S, Mallick, MG, et al. Rule of cytology in diagnosis of soft tissue sarcomas with special reference to false positive cases. J Cytol 2009; 26(1): 15–19.Google Scholar
Berardo, MD, Powers, CN, Wakely, PE Jr, et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytopathology of malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 1997; 81: 228–237.Google Scholar
Fleshman, R, Mayerson, J, Wakely, PE Jr. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of high-grade sarcoma: a report of 107 cases. Cancer 2007; 111(6): 491–498.Google Scholar
Kim, K, Goldblatt, PJ. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma: cytologic, light microscopic and ultrastructural studies. Acta Cytol 1982; 26: 507–511.Google Scholar
Klijanienko, J, Caillaud, J-M, Lagace, R, Vielh, P. Comparative fine-needle aspiration and pathologic study of malignant fibrous histiocytoma: cytodiagnostic features of 95 tumors in 71 patients. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 29: 320–326.Google Scholar
Liu, K, Dodge, RK, Dodd, LG, Layfield, LJ. Logistic regression analysis of high-grade spindle cell neoplasms: a cytologic study. Acta Cytol 1999; 43: 593–600.Google Scholar
Walaas, L, Angervall, L, Hagmar, B, Säve-Söderbergh, J. A correlative cytologic and histologic study of malignant fibrous histiocytoma: an analysis of 40 cases examined by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1986; 2: 46–54.Google Scholar
Agarwal, PK, Gupta, M, Srivestava, A, Agarwal, S. Cytomorphology of giant cell tumor of tendon sheath. A report of two cases. Acta Cytol 1997; 41: 587–589.Google Scholar
Dodd, LG, Major, NM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of articular and periarticular lesions. Cancer (Cytopathology) 2002; 96: 157–165.Google Scholar
Gangane, N, Anshu, , Skivkumar, VB, Sharma, SM. Intranuclear inclusions in a case of pigmented villonodular synovitis of the ankle. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 29: 349–351.Google Scholar
Layfield, LJ, Moffatt, EJ, Dodd, LG, et al. Cytologic findings in tenosynovial giant cell tumors investigated by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 16(4): 317–325.Google Scholar
Lyer, VK, Kapila, K, Verma, K. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of giant cell tumor of tendon sheath. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 29: 105–110.Google Scholar
Wakely, PE, Frable, WJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology of giant cell tumor of tendon sheath. Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 102: 87–90.Google Scholar
Zhao, Z, Paquette, C, Shah, AA, et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of diffuse type tenosynovial giant cell tumors. Acta Cytol 2017; 61: 160–164.Google Scholar
Gupta, K, Dey, P, Goldsmith, R, Vasishta, RK. Comparison of cytologic features of giant-cell tumor and giant cell tumor of tendon sheath. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30(1): 14–18.Google Scholar
Sanerkin, NG, Jeffree, GM. Cytology of Bone Tumours. A Colour Atlas with Text. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott Co, 1980: 91–100.Google Scholar
Sneige, N, Ayala, AG, Carrasco, CH, et al. Giant cell tumor of bone: a cytologic study of 24 cases. Diagn Cytopath 1985; 2: 111–117.Google Scholar
Vertani, A, Fulciniti, F, Boshci, R, et al. Fine needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of giant-cell tumor of bone. An experience with nine cases. Acta Cytol 1990; 34: 863–867.Google Scholar
Chhabra, S, Chopra, R, Handa, U, et al. Cytomorphologic features of chondroid neoplasms: a comparative study. Acta Cytol 2010; 54(6): 1101–1110.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, SE, Pike, EJ, Geisinger, KR, Ward, WG. Chondroblastoma of bone: use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy and potential diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 16: 65–71.Google Scholar
Krishnappa, A, Shobha, SN, Vijay-Shankar, S, Aradhya, S. Fine needle aspiration cytology or chondroblastoma: A report of two cases with brief review of pitfalls. J Cytol 2016; 33(1): 40–42.Google Scholar
Pohar-Marinsek, Z, Us-Krasovec, M, Lamovec, J. Chondroblastoma in fine needle aspirates. Acta Cytol 1992; 36: 367–370.Google Scholar
Akerman, M, Rydholm, A. Aspiration cytology of intramuscular myxoma. A comparative clinical, cytologic and histologic study of ten cases. Acta Cytol 1983; 27: 505–510.Google Scholar
Caraway, NP, Staerkel, GA, Fanning, CV, et al. Diagnosing intramuscular myxoma by fine-needle aspiration: a multidisciplinary approach. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 11: 255.Google Scholar
Wakely, Jr, PE, Bos, GD, Mayerson, J. The cytopathology of soft tissue mxyomas: ganglia, juxta-articular myxoid lesions, and intramuscular myxoma. Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 123(6): 858–865.Google Scholar
Akhtar, M, Ali, MA, Sabbah, R. Aspiration cytology of Ewing’s sarcoma: light and electron microscopic correlation. Cancer 1985: 556: 2051–2060.Google Scholar
Dahl, I, Akerman, M, Angerval, L. Ewing’s sarcoma of bone: a correlative cytological and histological study of 14 cases. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand (Sect A) 1986; 94: 363–369.Google Scholar
Fanning, TV, Katz, RL, Ayala, AG. Fine needle aspiration of Ewing’s sarcoma of bone: an analysis of 57 specimens. Acta Cytol 1985; 29: 932.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Perez-Atayde, AR, Fletcher, JA, et al. Cytology of typical and atypical Ewing’s sarcoma/PNET. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106: 620.Google Scholar
Sanati, S, Lu, DW, Schmidt, E, et al. Cytologic diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumor with paired prospective molecular genetic analysis. Cancer 2007; 111(3): 192–199.Google Scholar
Akhtar, M, Ali, MA, Bakry, M, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma: cytologic, histologic and ultrastructural correlations. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8: 465–474.Google Scholar
Das, K, Mirani, N, Hameed, M, et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma utilizing ThinPrep® liquid-based sample and cytospin preparations: a case confirmed by FKHR break-apart rearrangement by FISH probe. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34: 704–706.Google Scholar
de Jong, AS, Kessel-van Vark, M, van Heerde, P. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma; an immunocytochemical study. Acta Cytol 1987; 31: 573–577.Google Scholar
Klijanienko, J, Caillaud, JM, Orbach, D, et al. Cyto-histological correlations in primary, recurrent and metastic rhabdomyosarcoma: the institut Curie’s experience. Diagn Cytopathol 2007; 35(8): 482–487.Google Scholar
Seidal, T, Walaas, L, Kindblom, LG, Angervall, L. Cytology of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: a cytologic light microscopic, electron microscopic and immunohistochemical study of serum cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1988; 4: 242–299.Google Scholar
Chhabra, S, Chopra, R, Handa, U, et al. Cytomorphologic features of chondroid neoplasms: a comparative study. Acta Cytol 2010; 54(6): 1101–1110.Google Scholar
Dhawan, SB, Aggarwal, R, Mohan, H, Kumar, S. Cytodiagnosis of enchondroma. Cytopathology 2003; 14(3): 157–159.Google Scholar
Walaas, L, Kindblom, LG, Gunterberg, B, Bergh, P. Light and electron microscopic examination of fine-needle aspirates in the preoperative diagnosis of cartilaginous tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 1990; 5: 396–468.Google Scholar
Xiaojing, P, Xiangcheng, Y. Cytodiagnosis of bone tumors by fine-needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 1985; 29: 570–575.Google Scholar
Chhabra, S, Chopra, R, Handa, U, et al. Cytomorphologic features of chondroid neoplasms: a comparative study. Acta Cytol 2010; 54(6): 1101–1110.Google Scholar
Dodd, LG. Fine-needle aspiration of chondrosarcoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34: 413–418.Google Scholar
Estrada-Villasenor, E, Rico-Martinez, G, Linares-Gonzalez, LM. Diagnosis of a dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma of the pelvis by fine needle aspiration. A case report. Acta Cytol 2010; 54(2): 217–220.Google Scholar
Lerma, E, Tani, E, Brosjo, O, et al. Diagnosis and grading of chondrosarcoma on FNA biopsy material. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 28: 13–17.Google Scholar
Walaas, L, Kindblom, LG, Gunterberg, B, Bergh, P. Light and electron microscopic examination of fine-needle aspirates in the preoperative diagnosis of cartilaginous tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 1990; 5: 396–468.Google Scholar
Xiaojing, P, Xiangcheng, Y. Cytodiagnosis of bone tumors by fine-needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 1985; 29: 570–575.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Leon, N, Coll-Mesa, L, Rodriguez –Rodriguez, R., et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of primary or recurrent chordomas. Cytopathology 2011; 22(5): 340–342.Google Scholar
Layfield, LJ. Cytologic differential diagnosis of myxoid and mucinous neoplasms of the sacrum and parasacral soft tissues. Diagn Cytopathoil 2003; 28: 264–271.Google Scholar
Walaas, L, Kindblom, LG. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of chordoma: a study of 17 cases with application of electron microscopic, histochemical and immunocytochemical examination. Hum Pathol 1991; 22: 22–28.Google Scholar
Bishop, JA, Shum, CH, Sheth, S, et al. Small cell osteosarcoma: cytopathologic characteristics and differential diagnosis. Am J Clin Pathol 2010; 133(5): 756–761.Google Scholar
Dodd, LG, Scully, SP, Cothran, RL, Harrelson, JM. Utility of fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of primary osteosarcoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 27: 350–353.Google Scholar
Domanski, HA, Akerman, M. Fine-needle aspiration of primary osteosarcoma: A cytological-histological study. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 32(5): 269–275.Google Scholar
Layfield, LJ, Glasgow, BJ, Anders, KH, Mirra, JM. Fine needle aspiration of primary bone lesions. Acta Cytol 1987; 31: 177–184.Google Scholar
Nicol, KK, Ward, WG, Savage, PD, Kilpatrick, SE. Fine-needle biopsy of skeletal versus extraskeletal osteosarcoma. Cancer 1998; 84: 176–185.Google Scholar
Sathiyamoorthy, S, Ali, SZ. Osteoblastic osteosarcoma: cytomorphologic characteristcs and differential diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 2012; 56(5): 481–486.Google Scholar
Ward, WG, Kilpatrick, S. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of primary bone tumors. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2000; 373: 80–87.Google Scholar
Layfield, LJ, Mooney, EE, Dodd, LG. Not by blood alone: diagnosis of hemangiomas by fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 1998; 19: 250–254.Google Scholar
Sharm, SG, Aron, M, Kapila, K, Ray, R. Epithelioid hemangioma: morphological presentation on aspiration smears. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34: 830–833.Google Scholar
Gagner, J-P, Yim, JH, Yang, G-CH. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of epithelioid angiosarcoma: a diagnostic dilemma. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 33: 429–433.Google Scholar
Klijanienko, J, Caillaud, J-M, Lagace, R, Vielh, P. Cyto-histologic correlations in angiosarcoma including classic and epithelioid variants: the institut Curie’s experience. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 29: 140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markidou, S, Karydas, I, Papadopoulos, S, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology in primary breast angiosarcoma: a case report. Acta Cytol 2010; 54(5 Suppl): 764–770.Google Scholar
Minimo, C, Zakowski, M, Lin, O. Cytologic findings of malignant vascular neoplasms: a study of twenty-four cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 26: 349–355.Google Scholar
Pohar-Marinsek, Z, Lamovec, J. Angiosarcoma in FNA smears: diagnostic accuracy, morphology, immunocytochemistry and differential diagnoses. Cytopathology 2010; 21(5): 311–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×