References

Gerry Mackie

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490293.020

Albertoni, Ettore A. 1987. Mosca and the Theory of Elitism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Allard, Crispin. 1995. “Lack of Monotonicity – Revisited.” Representation 33: 48–50CrossRef Google Scholar

Alt, James. 1983. “The Evolution of Tax Structures.” Public Choice 41: 181–223CrossRef Google Scholar

Amadae, S. M., and Bruce, Bueno de Mesquita. 1999. “The Rochester School: The Origins of Positive Political Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 269–295CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, Thornton. 1993. Creating the Constitution: The Convention of 1787 and the First Congress. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1952. “The Principle of Rationality in Collective Decisions.” In Arrow (1984, 45–58)Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1960. “Introductory Notes.” Portfolio and Art News Annual 4: 76–78Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963/1951. Social Choice and Individual Values, second edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1967. “Values and Collective Decision-Making.” In Peter Laslett and W. G. Runciman, eds., Philosophy, Politics and Society, third series. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Reprinted in Arrow (1984)

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1973. “Formal Theories of Social Welfare.” In Arrow (1984, 115–132)Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1984. Social Choice and Justice: Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1987. “Oral History I: An Interview.” In Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory, ed. George R. Feiwel. New York: New York University Press

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1997. “The Functions of Social Choice Theory.” In Kenneth J. Arrow, Amartya Sen, and Kotaro Suzumura, eds., Social Choice Reexamined, vol. I. New York: St. Martin's Press

Ashworth, John. 1995. Slavery, Capitalism, and Politics in the Antebellum Republic, vol. I, Commerce and Compromise: 1820–1850. Cambridge University Press

Austen-Smith, David. 1987. “Sophisticated Sincerity: Voting over Endogenous Agendas.” American Political Science Review 81: 1323–1329CrossRef Google Scholar

Austen-Smith, David, and Banks, Jeffrey S.. 1998. “Social Choice Theory, Game Theory, and Positive Political Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 259–287CrossRef Google Scholar

Baddeley, Alan. 1994. “The Magical Number Seven: Still Magic After All These Years?” Psychological Review 101: 353–356CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Barber, William J. 1995. “Chile con Chicago: A Review Essay.” Journal of Economic Literature 33: 1941–1949Google Scholar

Barker, Ernest. 1951. Principles of Social and Political Theory. London: Oxford University Press

Barnard, William D. 1974. Dixiecrats and Democrats: Alabama Politics, 1942–1950. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press

Baron, David P., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83: 1181–1206CrossRef Google Scholar

Barry, Brian, and Russell Hardin. 1982. Rational Man and Irrational Society. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications

Bartholdi, John J., III, and Orlin, James B.. 1991. “Single Transferable Vote Resists Strategic Voting.” Social Choice and Welfare 8: 341–354CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartholdi, John J., III, Tovey, Craig A., and Trick, Michael A.. 1989. “Voting Schemes for which It Can Be Difficult to Tell Who Won the Election.” Social Choice and Welfare 6: 157–165CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartholdi, John J., III, Tovey,, Craig A. and Trick, Michael A.. 1992a. “The Computational Difficulty of Manipulating an Election.” Social Choice and Welfare 6: 227–241CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartholdi, John J., III, Tovey,, Craig A. and Trick, Michael A.. 1992b. “How Hard Is It to Control an Election?” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 16: 27–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Beer, Samuel H. 1960. “New Structures of Democracy: Britain and America.” In Samuel H. Beer, Leon D. Epstein, Louis Hartz, Charles E. Lindblom, and J. Roland Pennock, eds., Democracy in the Mid-Twentieth Century. St. Louis: Washington University Press

Bell, Daniel. 1974. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. London: Heinemann

Berg, Sven. 1985. “Paradox of Voting under an Urn Model: The Effect of Homogeneity.” Public Choice 47: 377–387CrossRef Google Scholar

Bernholz, Peter. 1975. “Logrolling and the Paradox of Voting: Are They Logically Equivalent?” American Political Science Review 69: 961–962CrossRef Google Scholar

Bjurulf, Bo, and Richard, Niemi. 1978. “Strategic Voting in Scandinavian Parliaments.” Scandinavian Political Studies 1(n.s.): 5–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge University Press

Block, Cheryl D. 1998. “Truth and Probability – Ironies in the Evolution of Social Choice Theory.” Washington University Law Quarterly 76: 975–1036Google Scholar

Blydenburgh, John C. 1971. “The Closed Rule and the Paradox of Voting.” Journal of Politics 33: 57–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Bohman, James. 1996. Public Deliberation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bordes, Georges, and Tideman, Nicolaus. 1991. “Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives in the Theory of Voting.” Theory and Decision 30: 163–186CrossRef Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert. 2000. “Walrasian Economics in Retrospect.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 1411–1439CrossRef Google Scholar

Bradley, Patrick. 1995, “STV and Monotonicity: A Hands-On Assessment.” Representation 33: 46–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Brennan, Geoffrey, and Alan Hamlin. 2000. Democratic Devices and Desires. Cambridge University Press

Brennan, Geoffrey, and Loren Lomasky. 1993. Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge University Press

Bucolo, Placido, ed. 1980. The Other Pareto. London: Scolar Press

Budge, Ian. 1993. “Issues, Dimensions, and Agenda Change in Postwar Democracies: Longterm Trends in Party Election Programs and Newspaper Reports in Twenty-Three Democracies.” In William H. Riker, ed., Agenda Formation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Burnham, James. 1943. The Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom. London: Putnam

Burnham, W. Dean. 1955. Presidential Ballots: 1836–1892. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Burnham, W. Dean. 1999. “Constitutional Moments and Punctuated Equilibria: A Political Scientist Confronts Bruce Ackerman's We the People.” Yale Law Journal 108: 2237–2277CrossRef Google Scholar

Byrd, Robert C. 1988. The Senate, vol. I. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office

Cain, Michael J. G. 2001. In William F. Shughart III and Laura Razzolini, eds., The Elgar Companion to Public Choice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar

Calvert, Randall L., and Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1994. “Strategy and Sophisticated Voting in the Senate.” The Journal of Politics 56: 349–376CrossRef Google Scholar

Caplan, Russell L. 1988. Constitutional Brinksmanship: Amending the Constitution by National Convention. New York: Oxford University Press

Caplin, Andrew, and Nalebuff, Barry. 1988. “On 64% Majority Rule.” Econometrica 56 (July): 787–814CrossRef Google Scholar

Caplin, Andrew, and Nalebuff, Barry. 1991. “Aggregation and Social Choice: A Mean Voter Theorem.” Econometrica 59: 1–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Chamberlin, John R. 1985. “Investigation into the Relative Manipulability of Four Voting Systems.” Behavioral Science 30: 195–203CrossRef Google Scholar

Chamberlin, John R., Cohen, Jerry L., and Coombs, Clyde H.. 1984. “Social Choice Observed: Five Presidential Elections of the American Psychological Association.” Journal of Politics 46: 479–502CrossRef Google Scholar

Citrin, Jack and Donald Philip Green. 1990. “The Self-Interest Motive in American Public Opinion.” In Samuel Long, ed., Research in Micropolitics, vol. III. Greenwich: JAI Press

Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Cohen, Joshua. 1986. “An Epistemic Conception of Democracy.” Ethics 97 (October): 26–38CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohn, Jonathan. 1999. “Irrational Exuberance: What Did Political Science Forget about Politics?” New Republic, October 25

Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Collie, Mellisa P. 1988. “The Legislature and Distributive Policy Making in Formal Perspective.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13: 427–458CrossRef Google Scholar

Colman, Andrew M., and Pountney, Ian. 1978. “Borda's Paradox: Theoretical Likelihood and Electoral Occurrences.” Behavioral Science 23: 15–21CrossRef Google Scholar

Congressional Quarterly Almanac, vol. XIII. 1957. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly News Features

Congressional Quarterly Almanac, vol. XXVI. 1970. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly News Features

Conlan, Timothy J., Margaret T. Wrightson, and David R. Beam. 1990. Taxing Choices: The Politics of Tax Reform. Washington: Congressional Quarterly

Cooter, Robert and Rappoport, Peter. 1984. “Were the Ordinalists Wrong about Welfare Economics?” Journal of Economic Literature 22: 507–530Google Scholar

Cowen, Tyler. 1993. “The Scope and Limits of Preference Sovereignty.” Economics and Philosophy 9: 253–269CrossRef Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1987. “Electoral Equilibria under Alternative Voting Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science. 31: 82–108CrossRef Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science. 34: 903–935CrossRef Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge University Press

Cox, Gary W. 1999. “The Empirical Content of Rational Choice Theory: A Reply to Green and Shapiro.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 11: 147–169CrossRef Google Scholar

Cox, Gary, and Tutt, Timothy N.. 1984. “Universalism and Allocative Decision Making in the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors.” Journal of Politics 46: 546–555CrossRef Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. University of Chicago Press

Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Davidson, Donald. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Davidson, Donald. 1986. “Judging Interpersonal Interests.” In Jon Elster and Aanund Hylland, eds., Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Cambridge University Press

Davidson, Donald. 1991a. “Epistemology Externalized.” Dialectica 45: 191–202CrossRef Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1991b. “Three Varieties of Knowledge.” In A. J. Ayer Memorial Essays, ed. A. Phillips Griffiths. Cambridge University Press

Davies, Todd, and Raja Shah. 2003. “Intuitive Preference Aggregation: Tests of Independence and Consistency.” Presented at Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, March 21, Nashville

Denzau, Arthur, Riker, William, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1985. “Farquharson and Fenno: Sophisticated Voting and Home Style.” American Political Science Review 79: 1117–1134CrossRef Google Scholar

DeVoto, Bernard. 1957. The Year of Decision, 1846. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode

Divine, Robert A., et al. 1999. America: Past and Present. New York: Longman

Dobra, John L. 1983. “An Approach to Empirical Studies of Voting Paradoxes: An Update and Extension.” Public Choice 41: 241–250CrossRef Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row

Drew, Elizabeth. 2000. The Corruption of American Politics: What Went Wrong and Why. New York: Overlook Press

Dryzek, John. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press

Dryzek, John, and List, Christian. 2003. “Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation.” British Journal of Political Science 33: 1–28CrossRef Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael. 1997. Principles of Electoral Reform. Oxford University Press

Dummett, Michael. 1998. “The Borda Count and Agenda Manipulation.” Social Choice and Welfare 15: 287–296CrossRef Google Scholar

Dumond, Dwight Lowell. 1931. The Secession Movement: 1860–1861. New York: Macmillan Company

Eakin, Emily. 2000. “Political Scientists Are in a Revolution Instead of Watching.” The New York Times, November 4

Eckel, Catherine C., and Grossman, Philip J.. 1996. “Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games.” Games and Economic Behavior 16: 181–189CrossRef Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge University Press

Elster, Jon. 1986a. “Introduction.” In Jon Elster, ed., Rational Choice. New York University Press

Elster, Jon. 1986b. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Elster and Aanund Hylland, eds., Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Cambridge University Press

Elster, Jon, ed. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press

Enelow, James M. 1997. “Cycling and Majority Rule.” In Dennis C. Mueller, ed., Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press

Farquharson, Robin. 1969. Theory of Voting. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Farrand, Max, ed. 1966. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, 4 vols. New Haven: Yale University Press

Farrand, Max. 1913. The Framing of the Constitution of the United States. New Haven: Yale University Press

Farrell, David M. 2001. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave

Fay, Brian. 1996. Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science: A Multicultural Approach. Oxford: Blackwell

Fehr, Ernst, and Fischbacher, Urs. 2002. “Why Social Preferences Matter. The Impact of Non-Selfish Motives on Competition, Cooperation and Incentives.” Economic Journal 112: C1–C33CrossRef Google Scholar

Fehrenbacher, Don E. 1995. Sectional Crisis and Southern Constitutionalism. Baton Rouge: Lousiana State University Press

Feld, Scott L., and Grofman, Bernard. 1986. “Partial Single-Peakedness: An Extension and Clarification.” Public Choice 51: 71–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Feld, Scott L., and Grofman, Bernard. 1992. “Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Cycle? Evidence from 36 Elections.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 4: 231–237CrossRef Google Scholar

Feldman, Allen M. 1980. Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff

Feldman, Allen M. 1991. “Welfare Economics.” In John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman, eds., The New Palgrave: The World of Economics. New York: W. W. Norton

Felsenthal, Dan S., and Machover, Moshe. 1995. “Who Ought to Be Elected and Who Is Elected? An Empirical Investigation of 92 Elections under Three Procedures.” Electoral Studies. 14: 143–169CrossRef Google Scholar

Felsenthal, Dan S., Maoz, Zeev, and Rapoport, Amnon. 1993. “An Empirical Evaluation of Six Voting Procedures: Do They Really Make Any Difference?” British Journal of Political Science 23: 1–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1966. The Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress. Boston: Little Brown

Ferejohn, John, Fiorina, Morris P., and McKelvey, Richard D.. 1987. “Sophisticated Voting and Agenda Independence in the Distributive Setting.” American Journal of Political Science 31: 169–193CrossRef Google Scholar

Fine, Benjamin. 1957. “President Pushes School Help Bill.” The New York Times, July 4, sec. 1, p. 15

Finer, Samuel E. 1966. Vilfredo Pareto: Sociological Writings. London: Pall Mall Press

Fiorina, Morris P., and Plott, Charles. 1978. “Committee Decisions under Majority Rule: An Experimental Study.” American Political Science Review 72: 575–598CrossRef Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P., and Kenneth A. Shepsle. 1982. “Equilibrium, Disequilibrium, and the General Possibility of a Science of Politics.” In Peter C. Ordeshook and Kenneth A. Shepsle, eds., Political Equilibrium. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff

Fischer, David Hackett. 1989. Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America. Oxford University Press

Fogel, Robert William. 1989. Without Consent or Contract. New York: W. W. Norton

Fogel, Robert William. 1992. “Problems in Modeling Complex Dynamic Interactions: The Political Realignment of the 1850s.” Economics and Politics 4: 215–254CrossRef Google Scholar

Freehling, William W. 1990. The Road to Disunion, vol. I, Secessionists at Bay: 1776–1854. New York: Oxford University Press

Gallagher, Michael. 1999. “The Results Analysed.” In Michael Gallagher and Michael Laver, eds., How Ireland Voted, 1997. Boulder: Westview Press

Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor. 1995. “Intervention and Intransitivity: Public Opinion, Social Choice, and the Use of Military Force Abroad.” World Politics 47: 534–554CrossRef Google Scholar

Gehrlein, William V. 1983. “Condorcet's Paradox.” Theory and Decision. 15: 161–197CrossRef Google Scholar

Gehrlein, William V. 1995. “Condorcet Efficiency and Social Homogeneity.” In William A. Barnett, Melvin J. Hinich, and Norman J. Schofield, eds., Political Economy: Institutions, Competition, and Representation. Cambridge University Press

Gehrlein, William V. 1997. “Condorcet's Paradox and the Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules.” Mathematica Japonica 45: 173–199Google Scholar

Gibbard, Allan. 1973. “Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result.” Econometrica 41: 587–601CrossRef Google Scholar

Gillroy, John Martin, and Maurice Wade, eds. 1992. The Moral Dimensions of Public Policy Choice. University of Pittsburgh Press

Ginsberg, Allen. 1956. Howl and Other Poems. San Francisco: City Lights Books

Glazer, Amihai, and McMillan, Henry. 1982. “Amend the Old or Address the New: Broad-Based Legislation When Proposing Policies is Costly.” Public Choice 74: 43–58Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert. 1992. Motivating Political Morality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Goodin, Robert. 1995/1986. “Laundering Preferences.” In Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge University Press

Goodin, Robert, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1996. A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford University Press

Goodin, Robert, and Roberts, K. W. S.. 1975. “The Ethical Voter.” American Political Science Review 69: 926–928CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodman, Leo, and Markowitz, Harry. 1952. “Social Welfare Functions Based on Individual Rankings.” American Journal of Sociology 58: 257–262CrossRef Google Scholar

Green, Donald P., and Ian Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Griffin, James. 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Grofman, Bernard. 1984. “The General Irrelevance of the Zero Sum Assumption in the Legislative Context.” In M. J. Holler, ed., Coalitions and Collective Action. Würzburg: Physica-Verlag

Grofman, Bernard, and Feld, Scott L.. 1988. “Rousseau's General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective.” American Political Science Review 82: 567–576CrossRef Google Scholar

Grofman, Bernard, and Guillermo Owen. 1986. Information Pooling and Group Decision-Making. London: JAI Press

Grofman, Bernard, and Andrew Reynolds. 2001. “Electoral Systems and the Art of Constitutional Engineering: An Inventory of the Main Findings.” In Ram Mudambi, Pietro Navarra, and Giuseppe Sobbrio, eds., Rules and Reason. Cambridge University Press

Groseclose, Tim, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 1996. “Buying Supermajorities.” American Political Science Review 90: 303–315CrossRef Google Scholar

Gross, Donald. 1979. “Conference Committees, Sophisticated Voting, and Cyclical Majorities.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4(1): 79–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1984, 1987. Theory of Communicative Action, vols. I and II. Boston: Beacon Press

Hamilton, Alexander, John Jay, and James Madison. n.d. (1937)/1787. The Federalist: A Comment on the Constitution of the United States. New York: The Modern Library

Hamilton, Charles V. 1991. Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. New York: Atheneum

Hansson, Bengt. 1973. “The Independence Condition in the Theory of Social Choice.” Theory and Decision 4: 25–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. 1976. “Hollow Victory: The Minimum Winning Coalition.” American Political Science Review 70: 1202–1214CrossRef Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. 1993. “Public Choice Versus Democracy.” In David Copp, Jean Hampton, and John E. Roemer, eds., The Idea of Democracy. Cambridge University Press

Hauptmann, Emily. 1996. Putting Choice Before Democracy: A Critique of Rational Choice Theory. Albany: SUNY Press

Haynes, George H. 1938. The Senate of the United States: Its History and Practice. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin

Hennessy, Alistair. 1969. “Latin America.” In Ghita Ionescu and Ernest Gellner, eds., Populism: Its Meanings and Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson

Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, Camerer, Colin, Fehr, Ernst, Ginitis, Herbert, and McElreath, Richard. 2001. “In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies.” American Economic Review 91: 73–78CrossRef Google Scholar

Hesseltine, William B. 1962. The Tragic Conflict: The Civil War and Reconstruction. New York: George Braziller

Hill, Steven. 2002. Fixing Elections: The Failure of America's Winner Take All Politics. New York: Routledge

Hinich, Melvin J., and Michael C. Munger. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Hinich, Melvin J., and Michael C. Munger. 1997. Analytical Politics. Cambridge University Press

Hoebeke, Christopher Hyde. 1995. The Road to Mass Democracy: Original Intent and the Seventeenth Amendment. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers

Holmes, Stephen. 1990. “The Secret History of Self-Interest.” In Jane Mansbridge, ed., Beyond Self-Interest. University of Chicago Press

Holt, James. 1967. Congressional Insurgents and the Party System: 1909–1916. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1990a. “Arrow's Theorem: Ordinalism and Republican Government.” Iowa Law Review 75: 949–973Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1990b. “Legislation, Well-Being and Public Choice.” University of Chicago Law Review 57: 63–116CrossRef Google Scholar

Hume, David. 1975. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd edn., ed. P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Jacobsen, Kurt. 2001. “Unreal, Man.” The Guardian (UK), April 3

Jay, William. 1849. A Review of the Causes and Consequences of the Mexican War. Boston, MA: Benjamin D. Mussey

Jenkins, Jeffery A., and Irwin Morris. 2002. “Running to Lose? John C. Breckinridge and the Presidential Election of 1860.” Manuscript

Jevons, William Stanley. 1871. Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan

Jillson, Calvin C. 1979. “The Executive in Republican Government: The Case of the American Founding.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 9: 386–402Google Scholar

Johannsen, Robert W. 1973. Stephen A. Douglas. Oxford University Press

Jones, Bradford, Radcliff, Benjamin, Taber, Charles, and Tampone, Richard. 1995. “Condorcet Winners and the Paradox of Voting: Probability Calculations for Weak Preference Orders.” American Political Science Review 89: 137–146CrossRef Google Scholar

Joslyn, R. A. 1976. “The Impact of Decision Rules in Multi-candidate Campaigns: The Case of the 1972 Democratic Presidential Nomination.” Public Choice 25: 1–17CrossRef Google Scholar

Kasza, Gregory. 2001. “Perestroika: For an Ecumenical Science of Politics.” PSOnline, September, www.apsanet.org

Katznelson, Ira and Helen Milner, eds., 2002. Political Science: The State of the Discipline. New York: W. W. Norton

Kavka, Gregory S. 1991. “Is Individual Choice Less Problematic than Collective Choice?” Economics and Philosophy 7: 143–165CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelly, Jerry S. 1988. Social Choice Theory: An Introduction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag

Kinder, Donald R. and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 495–527CrossRef Google Scholar

Kinder, Donald R. and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11: 129–161CrossRef Google Scholar

King, Ronald F., and Ellis, Susan. 1996. “Partisan Advantage and Constitutional Change: The Case of the Seventeenth Amendment.” Studies in American Political Development 10: 69–102CrossRef Google Scholar

Koford, Kenneth J. 1982. “Centralized Vote Trading.” Public Choice 39: 245–268CrossRef Google Scholar

Kramer, Gerald H. 1973. “On a Class of Equilibrium Conditions for Majority Rule.” Econometrica 41: 285–297CrossRef Google Scholar

Kramer, Gerald H. 1977. “A Dynamic Model of Political Equilibrium.” Journal of Economic Theory 16: 310–334CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith, and Rivers, Douglas. 1990. “Sophisticated Voting in Congress: A Reconsideration.” Journal of Politics 52: 548–578CrossRef Google Scholar

Kuga, Kiyoshi, and Nagatani, Hiroaki. 1974. “Voter Antagonism and the Paradox of Voting.” Econometrica 42 (November): 1045–1067CrossRef Google Scholar

Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter. 2001a. “An Empirical Example of the Condorcet Paradox of Voting in a Large Electorate.” Public Choice 107: 135–145CrossRef Google Scholar

Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter. 2001b. “Intransitivity and Robustness in Social Choice: Evidence from Danish Election Surveys.” Public Choice Society, Conference, San Antonio Texas, 9–11 March

Kuttner, Robert. 1996. Everything for Sale: The Virtues and Limits of Markets. University of Chicago Press

Kyvig, David E. 1996. Explicit and Authentic Acts: Amending the U. S. Constitution, 1776–1995. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas

Lagerspetz, Eerik. 1993. “Social Choice in the Real World.” Scandinavian Political Studies 16(1): 1–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Lagerspetz, Eerik. 1997. “Social Choice in the Real World II: Cyclical Preferences and Strategic Voting in the Finnish Presidential Elections.” Scandinavian Political Studies 20(1): 53–67CrossRef Google Scholar

Laing, J.D, and S. Olmstead. 1978. “An Experimental and Game-Theoretic Study of Committees. In Peter C. Ordeshook, ed., Game Theory and Political Science. New York University Press

Laing, J. D., and Slotznick, Benjamin. 1987. “Viable Alternatives to the Status Quo.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 31: 63–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Laing, J. D., and Slotznick, Benjamin. 1991. “When Anyone Can Veto: A Laboratory Study of Committees Governed by Unanimous Rule.” Behavioral Science 36: 179–195CrossRef Google Scholar

Breton, Michel, and Truchon, Michel. 1997. “A Borda Measure for Social Choice Functions.” Mathematical Social Sciences 34: 249–272CrossRef Google Scholar

Levin, Jonathan, and Nalebuff, Barry. 1995. “An Introduction to Vote-Counting Schemes.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 3–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewin, Leif. 1991. Self-Interest and Public Interest in Western Politics. Oxford University Press

Lewis, Anthony. 1956. “School Aid and Tangled Politics.” The New York Times, July 8, sec. IV, p. 1

Lichbach, Mark I. 1996. The Cooperator's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Lindsay, Alexander Dunlop. 1935. Essentials of Democracy. London: Oxford University Press

Linz, Juan. 1994. “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?” In Juan Linz, and Arturo Valenzuela, eds., The Failure of Presidential Democracy, vol. I, Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Lippincott, Benjamin Evans. 1938. Victorian Critics of Democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

List, Christian. 2001. Mission Impossible? The Problem of Democratic Aggregation in the Face of Arrow's Theorem. D.Phil. thesis in politics, Nuffield College, Oxford. http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/users/list/mission_impossible.htm

List, Christian. 2002. “Intradimensional Single-Peakedness and the Multidimensional Arrow Problem.” Theory and Practice 52: 287–301Google Scholar

List, Christian. 2003. “Are Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility Indeterminate?” Erkentniss 58: 229–260CrossRef Google Scholar

List, Christian and Goodin, Robert E.. 2001. “Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” Journal of Political Philosophy 9: 277–306CrossRef Google Scholar

Little, I. M. D. 1952. “Social Choice and Individual Values.” Journal of Political Economy 60: 422–432CrossRef Google Scholar

Lutz, Donald S., and James R. Williams. 1976. Minimum Winning Coalitions in Legislatures: A Review of the Evidence. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications

Ma, Barry K., and Weiss, Jeffrey H.. 1993. “On Some Generalizations of a Mean Voter Theorem.” Economics Letters 42: 185–188CrossRef Google Scholar

Mackay, Alfred F. 1980. Arrow's Theorem: The Paradox of Social Choice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Mackie, Gerry. 1996. “Ending Footbinding and Infibulation: A Convention Account.” American Sociological Review 61: 99–1017CrossRef Google Scholar

Mackie, Gerry. 1998. “All Men are Liars. Is Democracy Meaningless?” In Jon Elster, ed., Deliberative Democracy Cambridge University Press

McDonald, Forrest. 1985. Novus Ordo Seclorum: The Intellectual Origins of the U. S. Constitution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas

McKelvey, Richard D. 1976. “Intransitivities in Multi-dimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472–482CrossRef Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard D. 1979. “General Conditions for Global Intransivities in Formal Voting Models.” Econometrica 47: 1084–1111CrossRef Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard D. 1986. “Covering, Dominance, and Institution-Free Properties of Social Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 24: 68–96Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard D., and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1990. “A Decade of Experimental Research in Spatial Models of Elections and Committees.” In James M. Enelow, and Melvin J. Hinich, eds., Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge University Press

McKelvey, Richard D., and Schofield, Norman J.. 1986. “Structural Instability of the Core.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 15: 179–198CrossRef Google Scholar

McLean, Ian. 1995. “Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives before Arrow.” Mathematical Social Sciences 30: 107–126CrossRef Google Scholar

McLean, Ian, and Fiona Hewitt. 1994. Condorcet: Foundations of Political Theory and Social Choice. Aldershot: Edward Elgar

McLean, Ian, and Arnold B. Urken, eds. 1995. Classics of Social Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

McLean, Ian, Christian List, James Fishkin, and Robert Luskin. 2000. “Can Deliberation Induce Greater Preference Structuration? Evidence from Deliberative Opinion Polls.” Proceedings of the American Political Science Association

McPherson, James M. 1993. Ordeal by Fire, vol. I, The Coming of War. New York: McGraw-Hill

Mansbridge, Jane. 1990. Beyond Self-Interest. University of Chicago Press

Mansbridge, Jane. 1994. “Public Spirit in Political Systems.” In Henry J. Aaron, Thomas E. Mann, and Timothy Taylor, eds., Values and Public Policy. Washington: The Brookings Institution

Mashaw, Jerry L. 1989. “The Economics of Politics and the Understanding of Public Law.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 65: 123–160Google Scholar

May, Kenneth O. 1952. “A Set of Independent, Necessary, and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision.” Econometrica 20 (October): 680–684CrossRef Google Scholar

Merrill, Samuel, III. 1988. Making Multicandidate Elections More Democratic. Princeton University Press

Michaelsen, William B. 1987. Creating the American Presidency: 1775–1789. Lanham, MD: University Press of America

Miller, Arthur H., Tien, Charles, and Peebler, Andrew A.. 1996. “The American Political Science Review Hall of Fame: Assessments and Implications for an Evolving Discipline.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (1): 78Google Scholar

Miller, D. W. 2001. “Storming the Palace of Political Science.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, September 21

Miller, Dale T., and Rebecca K. Ratner. 1996. “The Power of the Myth of Self-Interest.” In Leo Montada and Melvin J. Lerner, eds., Current Societal Concerns About Justice. New York: Plenum Press

Miller, Dale T., and Ratner, Rebecca K.. 1998. “The Disparity between the Actual and the Assumed Power of Self-Interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 53–62CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miller, Gary J. 1997. “The Impact of Economics on Contemporary Political Science.” Journal of Economic Literature 35: 1173–1204Google Scholar

Miller, Gary J., and Oppenheimer, Joe A.. 1982. “Universalism in Experimental Committees.” American Political Science Review 76: 561–574CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, George A. 1994/1956. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review 101: 343–352CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, Nicholas, Grofman, Bernard, and Feld, Scott L.. 1989. “The Geometry of Majority Rule.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 4: 379–406CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, William Lee. 1997. Arguing about Slavery. New York: Alfred A. Knopf

Moore, Glover. 1967. The Missouri Controversy: 1819–1821. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith

Morison, Elting. 1971. “Election of 1860.” In Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., Fred L. Israel, and William P. Hansen, eds., History of American Presidential Elections: 1789–1968, vol. II. New York: Chelsea House

Morris, John D. 1957a. “School Aid Bill Killed in House by 208–203 Vote.” The New York Times, July 26, sec. I, p. 1

Morris, John D. 1957b. “Democrats Blame President for School Aid Bill Defeat.” The New York Times, July 27, sec. I, p. 1

Morrison, Chaplain W. 1967. Democratic Politics and Sectionalism: The Wilmot Proviso Controversy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press

Moulin, Hervé. 1988. Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making. Cambridge University Press

Mueller, Dennis C. 1989. Public Choice II. Cambridge University Press

Mueller, Dennis C. 1996. Constitutional Democracy. Oxford University Press

Murdoch, Iris. 1992. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. London: Penguin

Mutz, Diane, and Mondak, Jeffery J.. 1997. “Dimensions of Sociotropic Behavior: Group-Based Judgments of Fairness and Well-Being.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 284–308CrossRef Google Scholar

Myerson, Roger B. 1995. “Analysis of Democratic Institutions: Structure, Conduct and Performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 77–89CrossRef Google Scholar

Myerson, Roger B., and Weber, Robert J.. 1993. “A Theory of Voting Equilibria.” American Political Science Review 87: 102–115CrossRef Google Scholar

Neufeld, John L., Hausman, William J., and Rapoport, Ronald B.. 1994. “A Paradox of Voting: Cyclical Majorities and the Case of Muscle Shoals.” Political Research Quarterly 47: 423–438CrossRef Google Scholar

Nevins, Allan. 1950. The Emergence of Lincoln, vol. II, Prologue to Civil War: 1859–1861. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons

Niemi, Richard G. 1969. “Majority Decision-Making with Partial Unidimensionality.” American Political Science Review 63 (June): 488–497CrossRef Google Scholar

Niemi, Richard G. 1983. “Why So Much Stability?: Another Opinion.” Public Choice 41: 261–270CrossRef Google Scholar

Niemi, Richard G., and Wright, J. R.. 1987. “Voting Cycles and the Structure of Individual Preferences.” Social Choice and Welfare 4: 173–183CrossRef Google Scholar

Niou, Emerson, and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1985. “Universalism in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 29: 246–258CrossRef Google Scholar

Nitzan, Shmuel. 1985. “The Vulnerability of Point-Voting Schemes to Preference Variation and Strategic Manipulation.” Public Choice 47: 349–370CrossRef Google Scholar

Nurmi, Hannu. 1987. Comparing Voting Systems. Dordrecht: D. Reidel

Nurmi, Hannu. 1992. “An Assessment of Voting System Simulations.” Public Choice 73: 459–487CrossRef Google Scholar

Ordeshook, Peter C. 1982. “Political Disequilibrium and Scientific Inquiry: A Comment on William H. Riker's ‘Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions.’” In Peter C. Ordeshook and Kenneth A. Shepsle, eds., Political Equilibrium. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff

Ordeshook, Peter C. 1986. Game Theory and Political Theory. Cambridge University Press

Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge University Press

Pareto, Vilfredo. 1963. The Mind and Society: A Treatise on General Sociology. New York: Dover

Pellikaan, Huib, and Robert J. van der Veen. 2002 Environmental Dilemmas and Policy Design. Cambridge University Press

Pettit, Philip. 1996. “Institutional Design and Rational Choice.” In Robert Goodin, ed., The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Pildes, Richard H., and Anderson, Elizabeth S.. 1990. “Slinging Arrows at Democracy: Social Choice Theory, Value Pluralism, and Democratic Politics.” Columbia Law Review 90 (8): 2121–2214CrossRef Google Scholar

Plamenatz, John. 1973. Democracy and Illusion. London: Longman

Plott, Charles. 1971. “Recent Results in the Theory of Voting.” In M. Intriligator, ed., Frontiers of Quantitative Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland

Plott, Charles. 1976. “Axiomatic Social Choice Theory: An Overview and Interpretation.” American Journal of Political Science 20: 511–596CrossRef Google Scholar

Plott, Charles, and Levine, Michael. 1978. “A Model of Agenda Influence on Committee Decisions.” American Economic Review 68: 146–160Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press

Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1999. “D-NOMINATE After 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political Economic History of Roll Call Voting.” Available at http://voteview.gsia.cmu.edu

Poole, Keith T., Howard Rosenthal, and Boris T. Shor. 1999. Voteview for Windows 2.0.0: Roll Call Displays of the U. S. Congress, 1789–1988. Available at http://voteview.gsia.cmu.edu

Popkin, Samuel. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. University of Chicago Press

Potter, David M. 1976. The Impending Crisis: 1848–1861. New York: Harper

Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press

Radcliff, Benjamin. 1993. “The Structure of Voter Preferences.” Journal of Politics 55: 714–719CrossRef Google Scholar

Radcliff, Benjamin. 1994. “Collective Preferences in Presidential Elections.” Electoral Studies 13: 50–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Radner, Roy, and Jacob Marschak. 1954. “Note on Some Proposed Decision Criteria.” In R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs, and R. L. Davies, eds., Decision Processes. New York: John Wiley

Rae, D. W. 1969. “Decision Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice.” American Political Science Review 63 (March): 40–56CrossRef Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press

Ray, Paramesh. 1973. “Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives.” Econometrica 41: 987–993CrossRef Google Scholar

Redman, Eric. 1973. The Dance of Legislation. New York: Simon and Schuster

Regenwetter, Michel, and Grofman, Bernard. 1998. “Approval Voting, Borda Winners, and Condorcet Winners: Evidence from Seven Elections.” Management Science 44: 520–533CrossRef Google Scholar

Regenwetter, Michel, Adams, James, and Grofman, Bernard. 2002. “On the (Sample) Condorcet Efficiency of Majority Rule: An Alternative View of Majority Cycles and Social Homogeneity.” Theory and Decision 53: 153–186CrossRef Google Scholar

Reilly, Benjamin. 2001. Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge University Press

Reston, James. 1956. “The Race between Politics and Education.” The New York Times, July 8, sec. IV, p. 9

Riker, William H. 1953. Democracy in the United States. New York: Macmillan

Riker, William H. 1958. “The Paradox of Voting and Congressional Rules for Voting on Amendments.” American Political Science Review 52: 349–366CrossRef Google Scholar

Riker, William H. 1961. “Voting and the Summation of Preferences: An Interpretive Bibliographic Overview of Selected Developments during the Last Decade.” American Political Science Review 55: 900–911Google Scholar

Riker, William H. 1963. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Riker, William H. 1965. “Arrow's Theorem and Some Examples of the Paradox of Voting.” In John M. Claunch, ed., Mathematical Applications in Political Science. Dallas: The Arnold Foundation

Riker, William H. 1980a. “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 74: 432–446CrossRef Google Scholar

Riker, William H. 1980b. “A Reply to Ordeshook and Rae.” In Peter C. Ordeshook and Kenneth A. Shepsle, eds., Political Disequilibrium. Boston: Kluwer

Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press

Riker, William H. 1984. “The Heresthetics of Constitution-Making: The Presidency in 1787, with Comments on Determinism and Rational Choice.” American Political Science Review 78: 1–16CrossRef Google Scholar

Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Riker, William H. 1990a. “Heresthetic and Rhetoric in the Spatial Model.” In James M. Enelow, and Melvin J. Hinich, eds., Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge University Press

Riker, William H. 1990b. “Political Science and Rational Choice.” In James E. Alt, and Kenneth A. Shepsle, eds., Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge University Press

Riker, William H. 1993. “Introduction.” In William H. Riker, ed., Agenda Formation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Riker, William H. and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1973. An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Riker, William H., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1988. “Constitutional Regulation of Legislative Choice: The Political Consequences of Judicial Deference to Legislatures.” Virginia Law Review 74: 373–402CrossRef Google Scholar

Risse, Mathias. 2001. “Arrow's Theorem, Indeterminacy, and Multiplicity Reconsidered.” Ethics 111: 706–734CrossRef Google Scholar

Robbins, Lionel. 1937/1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan and Co

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1995. “How China Could Have Won: The Nonneutrality of the Olympic Voting Rules.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 14(1): 140–142CrossRef Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1968/1762. The Social Contract, trans. Maurice Cranston. London: Penguin

Rowley, Charles K. 1993. “Introduction.” In Rowley, ed., Social Choice Theory, vol. I. Hants, UK: Cheltenham

Runciman, W. G. 1963. Social Science and Political Theory. Cambridge University Press

Saari, Donald G. 1990. “Susceptibility to Manipulation.” Public Choice 64: 24–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Saari, Donald G. 1995a. Basic Geometry of Voting. Berlin: Springer

Saari, Donald G. 1995b. “Mathematical Complexity of Simple Economics.” Notices of the AMS 42: 222–231Google Scholar

Saari, Donald G. 1997. “The Generic Existence of a Core for q-Rules.” Economic Theory 9: 219–260Google Scholar

Saari, Donald G. 2000a. “Mathematical Structure of Voting Paradoxes: I. Pairwise Votes.” Economic Theory 15: 1–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Saari, Donald G. 2000b. “Mathematical Structure of Voting Paradoxes: II Positional Voting.” Economic Theory 15: 55–102CrossRef Google Scholar

Saari, Donald G. 2001a. Chaotic Elections. American Mathematical Society

Saari, Donald G. 2001b. Decisions and Elections. Cambridge University Press

Saari, Donald G. 2003. “Capturing the ‘Will of the People.’” Ethics: 113: 333–349CrossRef Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul. 1977. The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, vol. IV, ed., H. Nagatani and K. Crowley. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Satterthwaite, Mark. 1975. “Strategy Proofness and Arrow's Conditions.” Journal of Economic Theory 10: 187–217CrossRef Google Scholar

Satterthwaite, Mark A. 2001. “Strategy-Proofness and Markets.” Social Choice and Welfare 18: 37–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Scarf, Herbert. 1960. “Some Examples of Global Instability of the Competitive Equilibrium.” International Economic Review 1: 157–172CrossRef Google Scholar

Schofield, Norman. 1978. “Instability of Simple Dynamic Games.” Review of Economic Studies 45: 575–594CrossRef Google Scholar

Schofield, Norman. 1982. “Instability and Development in the Political Economy.” In Peter C. Ordeshook and Kenneth A. Shepsle, eds., Political Equilibrium. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff

Schofield, Norman. 1995. “Democratic Stability.” In Jack Knight and Itai Sened, eds., Explaining Social Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Schwartz, Joseph M. 1995. The Permanence of the Political: A Democratic Critique of the Radical Impulse to Transcend Politics. Princeton University Press

Schwartz, Thomas. 1982. “Rationality and the Myth of the Maximum.” Nous 6: 97–117CrossRef Google Scholar

Sears, David O., and Carolyn L. Funk. 1991. “The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes.” In M. P. Zanna, ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. XXIV, 2–91. New York: Academic Press

Sellers, Charles. 1966. James K. Polk: Continentalist, 1843–1846. Princeton University Press

Sen, Amartya. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day

Sen, Amartya. 1982. Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Sen, Amartya. 1993. “Internal Consistency of Choice.” Econometrica 61 (May): 495–521CrossRef Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. 1995. “Rationality and Social Choice.” American Economic Review 85: 1–24Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. 1999. “The Possibility of Social Choice.” American Economic Review 89: 349–378CrossRef Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven. 1994. A Social History of Truth. University of Chicago Press

Shaviro, Daniel. 2000. When Rules Change. University of Chicago Press

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Mark S. Bonchek. 1997. Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behaviors, and Institutions. New York: W. W. Norton

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1981. “Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel: A Generalization.” American Journal of Political Science 25: 96–111CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1984. “Political Solutions to Market Problems.” American Political Science Review 78: 417–434CrossRef Google Scholar

Shiffrin, Richard M. and Nosofsky, Robert M.. 1994. “Seven Plus or Minus Two: A Commentary on Capacity Limitations.” Psychological Review 101: 357–361CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Skaperdas, Stergios. 2002. “Restraining the Genuine Homo Economicus: Why the Economy Cannot Be Divorced from Governance.” University of California, Irvine, manuscript

Snow, C. P. 1951. The Masters. London: Macmillan

Stampp, Kenneth M., ed. 1974. The Causes of the Civil War. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Stepan, Alfred, and Cindy Skach. 1994. “Presidentialism and Parliamentarism in Comparative Perspective.” In Juan Linz and Arturo Valenzuela, eds., The Failure of Presidential Democracy, vol. I, Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Stigler, George, and Becker, Gary. 1977. “De Gustibus non Disputandum.” American Economic Review 67: 76–90Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph. 2000. “The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 1441–1478CrossRef Google Scholar

Stratmann, Thomas. 1997. “Logrolling.” In Dennis C. Mueller, ed., Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press

Strom, Gerald S. 1990. The Logic of Lawmaking: A Spatial Theory Approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Sunstein, Cass R. 1988. “Constitutions and Democracies: An Epilogue.” In Jon Elster and Rune Slagstad, eds., Constitutions and Democracy. Cambridge University Press

Sunstein, Cass R. 1990. “Preferences and Politics.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20(3): 999Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. 1993. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Tabarrok, Alexander, and Spector, Lee. 1999. “Would the Borda Count Have Avoided the Civil War?” Journal of Theoretical Politics 11: 261–288CrossRef Google Scholar

Tangian, A. S. 2000. “Unlikelihood of Condorcet's Paradox in a Large Society.” Social Choice and Welfare 17: 337–365CrossRef Google Scholar

Tanguiane, A. S. 1991. Aggregation and Representation of Preferences: Introduction to Mathematical Theory of Democracy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag

Taylor, Michael J. 1969. “Proof of a Theorem on Majority Rule.” Behavioral Science 14 (May): 228–231CrossRef Google Scholar

Thagard, Paul. 1992. Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton University Press

Thomas, James D., and William H. Stewart. 1988. Alabama Government and Politics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press

Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1969/1851. Democracy in America, trans. George Lawrence. New York: Doubleday

Tovey, Craig A. 1995. “Dynamical Convergence in the Euclidean Spatial Model.” In William A. Barnett, Herve Moulin, Maurice Salles, Norman J. Schofield, eds., Social Choice, Welfare, and Ethics. Cambridge University Press

Tribe, Laurence. 1988. American Constitutional Law, 2nd edn. Mineola, NY: The Foundation Press

Tsetlin, Ilia, Michel Regenwetter, and Bernard Grofman. 2001. “The Impartial Culture Maximizes the Probability of Majority Cycles.” Manuscript

Tuck, Richard. 1993. “The Contribution of History.” In Robert E. Goodin and Philip Pettit, eds., A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Tullock, Gordon. 1992. “Is There a Paradox of Voting?” Journal of Theoretical Politics 4: 225–230CrossRef Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. 1988. Red, White, and Blue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Deemen, Adrian. 1999. “The Probability of the Paradox of Voting for Weak Preference Orderings.” Social Choice and Welfare 16: 171–182CrossRef Google Scholar

Deemen, Adrian, and Vergunst, Noel P.. 1998. “Empirical Evidence of Paradoxes of Voting in Dutch Elections.” Public Choice 97: 475–490CrossRef Google Scholar

Wald, Alan M. 1987. The New York Intellectuals. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press

Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge University Press

Walt, Stephen. 1999. “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies.” International Security 23: 5–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Weale, Albert. 1984. “Review Article: Social Choice Versus Populism? An Interpretation of Riker's Political Theory.” British Journal of Political Science. 14: 369–385CrossRef Google Scholar

Weale, Albert. 1995. “William Riker and the Theory of Democracy.” Democratization 2: 377–395CrossRef Google Scholar

Weber, Robert J. 1995. “Approval Voting.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 39–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R. 1979. “A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 245–262CrossRef Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R. 1998. “Political Stability and Civil War: Institutions, Commitment, and American Democracy.” In Robert H. Bates, Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry R. Weingast, eds., Analytic Narratives. Princeton University Press

Wiebe, Robert H. 1995. Self-Rule: A Cultural History of American Democracy. University of Chicago Press

Wildavsky, Aaron. 1974. The Politics of the Budgetary Process, 2nd edn. Boston: Little Brown

Wiles, Peter. 1969. “A Syndrome, not a Doctrine.” In Ghita Ionescu and Ernest Gellner, eds., Populism: Its Meanings and Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson

Williamson, Oliver E., and Sargent, Thomas J.. 1967. “Social Choice: A Probabilistic Approach.” The Economic Journal 77 (December): 797–813CrossRef Google Scholar

Wittman, Donald. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure. University of Chicago Press

Wolff, Robert Paul. 1970. In Defense of Anarchism. New York: Harper and Row

Worsley, Peter. 1969. “The Concept of Populism.” In Ghita Ionescu and Ernest Gellner, eds., Populism: Its Meanings and Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson

Young, H. Peyton. 1974. “An Axiomatization of Borda's Rule.” Journal of Economic Theory 9: 43–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Young, H. Peyton. 1988. “Condorcet's Theory of Voting.” American Political Science Review 82: 1231–1244CrossRef Google Scholar

Young, H. Peyton. 1997. “Group Choice and Individual Judgments.” In Dennis C. Mueller, ed., Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press

Zywicki, Todd J. 1994. “Senators and Special Interests: A Public Choice Analysis of the Seventeenth Amendment.” Oregon Law Review 73: 1007–1055Google Scholar