Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: June 2012

1 - Introduction to the Methodological Issues Associated With Cross-Cultural Research

Summary

Although once considered to be at the margins of psychological science, the study of culture has blossomed into one of the most important areas of research today. Studies involving cultural variables appear more frequently than ever before in mainstream journals in developmental, clinical, personality, and social psychology, as well as in specialty journals such as the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Culture and Psychology, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, and the Journal of Cross Cultural Management (van de Vijver, 2006). Theorists are also increasingly incorporating culture as an important variable into their theories and models of psychological processes.

The methodological backbone spurring the blossoming of cultural science in psychology is cross-cultural research, in which two or more cultural groups are compared on psychological variables of interest. This is true regardless of the theoretical approach or perspective one adopts in understanding cultural influences on mind and behavior. For instance, methodological differences used to exist between those who called themselves cross-cultural psychologists versus those who called themselves cultural psychologists, with the former basing most of their work on cross-cultural comparison and the latter arguing that such comparisons were unwarranted, unjustified, and unnecessary (Greenfield, 1997; Shweder, 1999). Today, however, even those who call themselves cultural psychologists clearly use cross-cultural research methods as the method of choice in conducting research (e.g., Heine et al., 2001; Kitayama, Mesquita, & Karasawa, 2006; Markus, Uchida, Omoregie, Townsend, & Kitayama, 2006).

References
Berry, J. W.Poortinga, Y. H.Segall, M. H.Dasen, P. R. 2002 Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applicationsCambridge, EnglandCambridge University Press
Brouwers, S. A.Van Hemert, D. A.Breugelmans, S. M.Van de Vijver, F. J. R. 2004 A historical analysis of empirical studies published in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 35 251
Campbell, D. T. 1961 The mutual methodological relevance of anthropology and psychologyHsu, F. L.Psychological anthropology333Homewood, ILDorsey
Chinese Culture Connection 1987 Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of cultureJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 18 143
Galchenko, I.Van de Vijver, F. J. R. 2007 The role of perceived cultural distance in the acculturation of exchange students in RussiaInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations 31 181
Georgas, J.Berry, J. W. 1995 An ecocultural taxonomy for cross-cultural psychologyCross-Cultural Research 29 121
Greenfield, P. M. 1997 Culture as process: Empirical methods for cultural psychologyBerry, J. W.Poortinga, Y. H.Pandey, J.Handbook of cross-cultural psychology301New YorkAllyn and Bacon
Heine, S. J.Kitayama, S.Lehman, D. R.Takata, T.Ide, E.Leung, C. 2001 Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selvesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 599
Hofstede, G. 2001 Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nationsThousand Oaks, CASage
House, R. J.Hanges, P. J.Javidan, M.Dorfman, P.Gupta, V. 2004 GLOBE, cultures, leadership, and organizations: GLOBE study of 62 societiesNewbury Park, CASage
Inglehart, R. 1997 Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societiesPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press
Kitayama, S.Cohen, D. 2007 Handbook of cultural psychologyNew YorkGuilford Press
Kitayama, S.Mesquita, B.Karasawa, M. 2006 Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United StatesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 890
Markus, H. R.Uchida, Y.Omoregie, H.Townsend, S. S. M.Kitayama, S. 2006 Going for the gold: Models of agency in Japanese and American contextsPsychological Science 17 103
Matsumoto, D.Yoo, S. H. 2006 Toward a new generation of cross-cultural researchPerspectives on Psychological Science 1 234
Poortinga, Y. H. 1989 Equivalence of cross cultural data: An overview of basic issuesInternational Journal of Psychology 24 737
Poortinga, Y. H.Van de Vijver, F. J. R. 1987 Explaining cross-cultural differences: Bias analysis and beyondJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 18 259
Shweder, R. A. 1999 Why cultural psychology?Ethos 27 62
Schwartz, S. H. 1992 Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countriesZanna, M.Advances in experimental social psychology1Orlando, FLAcademic Press
Smith, P. B. 2004 Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication styleJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 35 50
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. 2006 Culture and psychology: A SWOT analysis of cross-cultural psychologyJing, Q.Zhang, H.Zhang, K.Psychological science around the world279LondonPsychology Press
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. 2009 Types of cross-cultural studies in cross-cultural psychologyOnline readings in psychology and cultureInternational Association for Cross-Cultural Psychologyhttp://orpc.iaccp.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11%3Avandevijver&catid=3%3Achapter&Itemid=4