Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:00:55.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Assessment and management of risk

from Section 3 - Current practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2009

Neil Brimblecombe
Affiliation:
Nottingham University and Director of Nursing at South Staffordshire
Sonia Johnson
Affiliation:
University College London
Justin Needle
Affiliation:
City University London
Jonathan P. Bindman
Affiliation:
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Graham Thornicroft
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

The assessment and management of risk is central to mental health practice. This is true in all areas, but especially so in acute settings where risk to self or others is a common concern. The role of crisis resolution teams (CRTs) in England is to assess individuals in a crisis situation and offer home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission where possible. When home treatment is contemplated, risks of suicide, aggression, severe self-neglect and reckless behaviour need to be carefully assessed and decisions made about whether home treatment is likely to be safe. Strategies for monitoring and minimising risk in community settings need to be put in place to enable safe, but responsive, care to be provided. This chapter summarises research on risk in home treatment services and provides guidelines for assessing, monitoring and managing risk to service users, carers, professionals and the community.

Evidence

The CRTs act as gatekeepers to inpatient services (Department of Health, 2002) and hence work with individuals who, by definition, are potentially in need of high levels of support and care and are likely to present high levels of risk to themselves or, more rarely, to others. There is no evidence to date of increased risk of suicide or violence associated with the use of crisis services as opposed to more traditional approaches such as hospital admission.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleby, L., Shaw, J., Sherratt, J.et al. (2001). Safety First: Report of the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness. London: The Stationery Office.
Brimblecombe, N. (2001). Intensive home treatment for individuals with suicidal ideation. In Acute Mental Health Care in the Community: Intensive Home Treatment, ed. Brimblecombe, N.. London: Whurr, pp. 122–38.
Brimblecombe, N., O'Sullivan, G. and Parkinson, B. (2003). Home treatment as an alternative to inpatient admission: characteristics of those treated and factors predicting hospitalization. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 10, 683–7.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2002). Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide: Dual Diagnosis Good Practice Guide. London, Department of Health.
Disability Rights Commission (2006). Equal Treatment: Closing the Gap. London, Disability Rights Commission.
Gillies, D. and O'Brien, L. (2006). Interpersonal violence and mental illness: a literature review. Contemporary Nurse, 21, 277–86.Google Scholar
Hawton, K. (1987). Assessment of suicide risk. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 143–53.Google Scholar
Hawton, K., Sutton, L., Haw, C., Sinclair, J. and Deeks, J. (2005). Schizophrenia and suicide: systematic review of risk factors. British Journal of Psychiatry 187, 9–20.Google Scholar
Higgins, N., Watts, D., Bindman, J., Slade, M. and Thornicroft, G. (2005). Assessing violence risk in general adult psychiatry. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29, 131–3.Google Scholar
Hyman, S. E. (1994). The suicidal patient. In Manual of Psychiatric Emergencies, 3rd edn, ed. Hyman, S. E. and Tesar, G. E.. Boston: Little Brown.
Joy, C. B., Adams, C. E. and Rice, K. (2004). Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4, CD001087. Oxford: Update Software.
Lewis, S. and Roberts, A. R. (2001). Crisis assessment tools: the good, the bad, and the available. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 1, 19–28.Google Scholar
Nestor, P. G. (2002). Mental disorder and violence: personality dimensions and clinical features. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1973–8.Google Scholar
Saunders, K. and Hawton, K. (2005). Suicide prevention and audit. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 66, 627–30.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×