Cornette, J., Le roi de guerre. Essai sur la souveraineté dans la France du Grand Siècle (Paris: Payot, 1993).Google Scholar

Crawford, J., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Edelstein, D., The Terror of Natural Right. Republicanism, the Cult of Nature, and the French Revolution (Chicago University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Franck, T. M., The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., On Law and War (Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., An Introduction to International Institutional Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar

Lindstedt, J. and Löytömäki, S., Sotasyyllisyysoikeudenkäynti (Helsinki: Oikeusministeriön julkaisuja, 2010, No. 22/2010) (War Responsibility Trials (Helsinki: Publications of the Ministry of Justice, 2010, No. 22/2010)).Google Scholar

Prost, M., The Concept of Unity in Public International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar

Schauer, F., Playing by the Rules. A Philosophical Examination of Rule-based Decision-making in Law and in Life (Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Stone, J., Conflict through Consensus. United Nations Approaches to Aggression (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Weber, M., On Law in Economy and Society, ed. Rheinstein, M. (New York: Touchstone, 1954).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Hegemonic Regimes’, in Young, M. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law. Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 305–24.Google Scholar

de Vitoria, F., ‘On the Law of War’, in Pagden, A. and Lawrance, J. (eds.), Political Writings (Cambridge University Press, 1991), 293–327.Google Scholar

Anderson, M., ‘Reconceptualizing Aggression’, Duke Law Journal, 60 (2010), 411–51.Google Scholar

Broms, B., ‘The Definition of Aggression’, Recueil des Cours, 154 (1977), 299–399.Google Scholar

Kacker, D., ‘Coming Full Circle: The Rome Statute and the Crime of Aggression’, Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 33 (2010), 257–88.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., ‘Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication’, Harvard Law Review, 89 (1977), 1685–778.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Solidarity Measures: State Responsibility as a New International Order’, British Yearbook of International Law, 72 (2001), 349–55.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘“The Lady Doth Protest too Much”. Kosovo, and the Turn to Ethics in International Law’, Modern Law Review, 65 (2002), 159–75.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Between Impunity and Show Trials’, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 6 (2002), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression: A Reply to Andreas Paulus’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1129–46.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

Murphy, S., ‘Aggression, Legitimacy and the International Criminal Court’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1147–56.Google Scholar

Paulus, A., ‘Second Thoughts on the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1117–28.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘The Complex Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 897–904.Google Scholar

Stahn, C., ‘The “End”, the “Beginning of the End” or the “End of the Beginning”? Introducing Debates and Voices on the Definition of “Aggression”’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 875–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisbord, N., ‘Prosecuting Aggression’, Harvard International Law Journal, 49 (2008), 161–220.Google Scholar

Borchard, E., ‘The Multilateral Pact. “The Renunciation of War”’, an address delivered at the Williamstown Institute of Politics, 22 August 1928), available at: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/kbbor.asp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

General Assembly, Declaration on the Enhancement of the Effectiveness of the Principle of Refraining from the Threat or Use of Force in International Relations, 18 November 1987, UN Doc. A/RES/42/22.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Manila Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes, 15 November 1982, UN Doc. A/ Res/ 37/10.Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1996), 266; Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schwebel, 311.Google Scholar

‘The Responsibility to Protect’, Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, December 2001.Google Scholar

Bazargan, S. and Rickless, S. (eds.), The Ethics of War (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Chatterjee, D. K. (ed.), The Ethics of Preventive War (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Duff, A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S. and Tadros, V. (eds.), The Constitution of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘The Conditions of Liability to Preventive Attack’, in Chatterjee, D. K. (ed.), The Ethics of Preventive War (Cambridge University Press, 2013), 121–44.Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘War Crimes and Immoral Action in War’, in Duff, A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S., and Tadros, V. (eds.), The Constitution of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2013), 151–84.Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘Liability, Proportionality, and the Number of Aggressors’, in Bazargan, S. and Rickless, S. (eds.), The Ethics of War (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘The Limits of Self-Defence’, in Coons, C. and Weber, M. E. (eds.), The Ethics of Self-Defence (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Major Post-Westphalian Shifts and Some Important Neo-Westphalian Hesitations in the State Practice on the International Law on the Use of Force’, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 1 (2014), 11–54.Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘Proportionality and Just Cause: A Comment on Kamm’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 11 (2014), 428–53.Google Scholar

Neu, M., ‘Why McMahan’s Just Wars are only Justified and Why that Matters’, Ethical Perspectives, 19 (2012), 235–55.Google Scholar

Arnold, R. and Quénivet, N. N. R., International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law: Towards a New Merger in International Law (Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).Google Scholar

Bricmont, J., Humanitarian Imperialism: Using Human Rights to Sell War (Delhi: Aakar Books, 2007).Google Scholar

Cryer, R. and Boister, N., Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal: Charter, Indictment, and Judgments (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Cushman, T., The Human Rights Case for the War in Iraq: A Consequentialist View (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

de Vattel, É., The Law of Nations; Or Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns …: A Work Tending to Display the True Interest of Powers, trans. from the French (Philadelphia: Pitt, Nicklin & T. Johnson, 1829).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., Of War and Law (Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Macklem, P., The Sovereignty of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Meron, T., Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law (Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Provost, R., International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walzer, M., Just And Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument With Historical Illustrations, 4th edn (New York: Basic Books, 2006).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘The Effect of Rights on Political Culture’, in Alston, P. (ed.), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazar, S., ‘The Morality and Law of War’, in Marmor, A. (ed.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Law (London: Routledge, 2012), 364–79.Google Scholar

Lichtenberg, J., ‘How to Judge Soldiers Whose Cause is Unjust’, in Rodin, D. and Shue, H. (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers (Oxford University Press, 2008), 112–30.Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘The Morality of War and the Law of War’, in Rodin, D. and Shue, H. (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers (Oxford University Press, 2008), 19–43.Google Scholar

Office of the United States Chief of Counsel For Prosecution of Axis Criminality, ‘Chapter IX Launching of Wars of Aggression’, in Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (The Red Set), vol. I (8 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1946), 370–874.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘The Human Right to Peace’, in Eide, A., Möller, J. Th. and Ziemele, I. (eds.), Making Peoples Heard. Essays on Human Rights in Honour of Gudmundur Alfredsson (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011), 43–57.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Freedom from Fear and the Human Right to Peace’, in Keane, D. and McDermott, Y. (eds.), The Challenge of Human Rights: Past, Present and Future (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012), 36–51.Google Scholar

af Jochnick, C. and Normand, R., ‘Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War’, Harvard International Law Journal, 35 (1994), 49–95.Google Scholar

Alston, P., ‘Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann’, European Journal of International Law, 13 (2002), 815–44.Google Scholar

Arneson, R. J., ‘Just Warfare Theory and Noncombatant Immunity’, Cornell International Law Journal, 39 (2006), 663–88.Google Scholar

Bellin, E., ‘The Iraqi Intervention and Democracy in Comparative Historical Perspective’, Political Science Quarterly, 119 (2004), 595–608.Google Scholar

Benbaji, Y., ‘The War Convention and the Moral Division of Labour’, Philosophical Quarterly, 59 (2009), 593–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennoune, K., ‘Toward a Human Rights Approach to Armed Conflict: Iraq 2003’, UC Davis Journal of International Law & Policy, 11 (2004), 171–228.Google Scholar

Boister, N., ‘The Application of Collective and Comprehensive Criminal Responsibility for Aggression at the Tokyo International Military Tribunal: The Measure of the Crime of Aggression?’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 425–47.Google Scholar

Bomann-Larsen, L., ‘Licence to Kill? The Question of Just vs. Unjust Combatants’, Journal of Military Ethics, 3 (2004), 142–60.Google Scholar

Burnham, G., Lafta, R., Doocy, S. and Roberts, L., ‘Mortality after the 2003 Invasion of Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Cluster Sample Survey’, The Lancet, 368 (2006), 1421–28.Google Scholar

Bush, J. A., ‘“The Supreme … Crime” and its Origins: The Lost Legislative History of the Crime of Aggressive War’, Columbia Law Review, 102 (2002), 2324–423.Google Scholar

de Mesquita, B. B. and Downs, G. W., ‘Intervention and Democracy’, International Organization, 60 (2006), 627–49.Google Scholar

Dill, J., ‘Should International Law Ensure the Moral Acceptability of War?’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 26 (2013), 253–70.Google Scholar

Durand, A., ‘Gustave Moynier and the Peace Societies’, International Review of the Red Cross, 36 (1996), 532–50.Google Scholar

Engle, K., ‘Calling in the Troops: The Uneasy Relationship among Women’s Rights, Human Rights, and Humanitarian Intervention’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 20 (2007), 189–226.Google Scholar

Falk, R., ‘Haiti Intervention: A Dangerous World Order Precedent for the United Nations’, Harvard International Law Journal, 36 (1995), 341–58.Google Scholar

Farer, T., ‘Un-Just War Against Terrorism and the Struggle to Appropriate Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 30 (2008), 356–403.Google Scholar

Freeman, M., ‘International Law and Internal Armed Conflicts: Clarifying the Interplay between Human Rights and Humanitarian Protections’, Journal of Humanitarian Assistance (2000), https://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/152, last accessed 3 November 2015.Google Scholar

Gattini, A., ‘The UN Compensation Commission: Old Rules, New Procedures on War Reparations’, European Journal of International Law, 13 (2002), 161–81.Google Scholar

Gerwin, M., ‘Peace, Honesty, and Consent: A Hobbesian Definition of “Peace”’, Peace Research, 23 (1991), 75–85.Google Scholar

Gillard, E-C., ‘Reparation for Violations of International Humanitarian Law’, International Review of the Red Cross, 85 (2003), 529–53.Google Scholar

Glanville, L., ‘The Antecedents of “Sovereignty as Responsibility”’, European Journal of International Relations, 17 (2010), 233–55.Google Scholar

Goodman, R., ‘The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 819–53.Google Scholar

Hsiao-Rei Hicks, M. et al., ‘The Weapons That Kill Civilians: Deaths of Children and Noncombatants in Iraq, 2003–2008’, New England Journal of Medicine, 360 (2009), 1585–88.Google Scholar

Kahl, C. H., ‘In the Crossfire or the Crosshairs? Norms, Civilian Casualties, and US Conduct in Iraq’, International Security, 32 (2007), 7–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Occupied Zone: A Zone of Reasonableness?’, Israel Law Review, 41 (2008), 13–40.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Human Rights Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Institutional Power’, Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 1 (2010), 47–58.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and Mégret, F., ‘The Regulation of Non-International Armed Conflicts: Can a Privilege of Belligerency be Envisioned in the Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts?’, International Review of the Red Cross, 96(893) (2014), 29–66.Google Scholar

Kretzmer, D., ‘The Inherent Right to Self-Defence and Proportionality in Jus Ad Bellum’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 235–82.Google Scholar

Lazar, S., ‘The Responsibility Dilemma for Killing in War: A Review Essay’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 38 (2010), 180–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luban, D., ‘Just War and Human Rights’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 9 (1980), 160–81.Google Scholar

Luban, D., ‘The Legacies of Nuremberg’, Social Research, 54 (1987), 779–829.Google Scholar

Luban, D., ‘A Theory of Crimes against Humanity’, Yale Journal of International Law, 29 (2004), 85–167.Google Scholar

Lubell, N., ‘Challenges in Applying Human Rights Law to Armed Conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, 87 (2005), 737–54.Google Scholar

Macklem, P., ‘What is International Human Rights Law: Three Applications of a Distributive Account’, McGill Law Journal, 52 (2007), 575–604.Google Scholar

Martinez, J. and Bouvier, A., ‘Assessing the Relationship between Jus in Bello and Jus Ad Bellum: An “Orthodox” View’, American Society of International Law: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 100 (2006), 109–12.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘Epilogue to an Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court’s Third Party Jurisdiction and the Looming Revolution of International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 12 (2001), 247–68.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘L’étatisme spécifique du droit international’, Revue québécoise de droit international (RQDI), 24 (2012), 105–29.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘Missions autorisées par le conseil de sécurité à l’heure de la R2P: au-delà du jus in bello?’, Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, 52 (2013), 205–40.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘The Apology of Utopia: Reflections on Some Koskenniemian Themes with Particular Emphasis on Massively Institutionalized Human Rights Law’, Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 27 (2013), 455–97.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘Response to Claus Kreß: Leveraging the Privilege of Belligerency in Non-International Armed Conflict Towards Respect for the Jus in Bello’, International Review of the Red Cross, 96 (2014), 44–66.Google Scholar

Mégret, F. and Pinto, F., ‘“Prisoners’ Dilemmas”: The Potemkin Villages of International Law?’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 16 (2003), 467–90.Google Scholar

Meisels, T., ‘Combatants: Lawful and Unlawful’, Law and Philosophy, 26 (2007), 31–65.Google Scholar

Meron, T., ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’, American Journal of International Law, 94 (2000), 239–78.Google Scholar

Milanovic, M., ‘Norm Conflict in International Law: Whither Human Rights’, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 20 (2009), 69–131.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S., ‘A Few Words on Non-Intervention’, New England Review (1990–), 27 (2006), 252–64.Google Scholar

Modirzadeh, N. K., ‘The Dark Sides of Convergence: A Pro-Civilian Critique of the Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict’, International Law Studies Series, US Naval War College, 86 (2010) 349–410.Google Scholar

Orford, A., ‘Muscular Humanitarianism: Reading the Narratives of the New Interventionism’, European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999), 679–711.Google Scholar

Rocheleau, J., ‘Combatant Responsibility for Fighting in Unjust Wars’, Social Philosophy Today, 26 (2010), 93–106.Google Scholar

Rodin, D., ‘Liability of Ordinary Soldiers for Crimes of Aggression’, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 6 (2007), 591–607.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Lex Specialis – Belt and Suspenders – The Parallel Operation of Human Rights Law and the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Conundrum of Jus Ad Bellum’, Israel Law Review, 40 (2007), 592–613.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Freedom from Fear, Human Rights, and the Crime of Aggression’, Studies in Transnational Legal Policy, 43 (2011), 167–72.Google Scholar

Schachter, O., ‘The Legality of Pro-Democratic Invasion’, American Journal of International Law, 78 (1984), 645–50.Google Scholar

Scharf, M. P., ‘Tainted Provenance: When, if Ever, Should Torture Evidence be Admissible’, Washington & Lee Law Review, 65 (2008), 129–72.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘Genocide and Atrocity Crimes’, Genocide Studies and Prevention, 1 (2006), 229–50.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘Atrocity Crimes Framing the Responsibility to Protect’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 40 (2007), 111–35.Google Scholar

Schmitt, M. N., ‘Wound, Capture, or Kill: A Reply to Ryan Goodman’s “The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants”’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 855–61.Google Scholar

Sellars, K., ‘Imperfect Justice at Nuremberg and Tokyo’, European Journal of International Law, 21 (2010), 1085–102.Google Scholar

Simpson, G., ‘“Stop Calling it Aggression”: War as Crime’, Current Legal Problems, 61 (2008), 191–228.Google Scholar

Smith, M. E., ‘NATO, the Kosovo Liberation Army, and the War for an Independent Kosovo: Unlawful Aggression or Legitimate Exercise of Self-Determination’, Army Law (2001), 1–22.Google Scholar

Smith, T. W., ‘Can Human Rights Build a Better War?’, Journal of Human Rights, 9 (2010), 24–44.Google Scholar

Solomon, S., ‘Targeted Killings and the Soldiers’ Right to Life’, ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 14 (2007), 99–120.Google Scholar

Steinhoff, U., ‘Rights, Liability, and the Moral Equality of Combatants’, Journal of Ethics, 16 (2012), 339–66.Google Scholar

Tomasevski, K., ‘The Right to Peace’, Current Research on Peace and Violence, 5 (1982), 42–69.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C., ‘Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law’, European Journal of International Law, 21 (2010), 15–23.Google Scholar

Watkin, K., ‘Controlling the Use of Force: A Role for Human Rights Norms in Contemporary Armed Conflict’, American Journal of International Law, 98 (2004), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wooldridge, F. and Elias, O., ‘Humanitarian Considerations in the Work of the United Nations Compensation Commission’, International Review of the Red Cross, 85 (2003), 555–81.Google Scholar

Wright, Q., ‘The Law of the Nuremberg Trial’, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 38–72.Google Scholar

Wright, Q., ‘The Outlawry of War and the Law of War’, American Journal of International Law, 47 (1953), 365–76.Google Scholar

Zolo, D., ‘Who is Afraid of Punishing Aggressors? On the Double-Track Approach to International Criminal Justice’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5 (2007), 799–807.Google Scholar

Bankovic, Stojanovic, Stoimedovski, Joksimovic and Sukovic v. Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, App. No. 52207/99, ECtHR (2001).Google Scholar

Georgia v. Russia, Case No. 38263/08, ECtHR, 13 December 2011.Google Scholar

Smith and others v. The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41.Google Scholar

Compensation Claims Commission, ‘The Report and Recommendation of the Panel of Commissioners Concerning the First Instalment of “F2” Claims’, UN Doc. S/AC.26/1999/23.Google Scholar

Compensation Claims Commission, ‘Report and Recommendations Concerning the Third Instalment of “F2” Claims’, UN Doc. S/AC.26/2002/7.Google Scholar

Compensation Claims Commission, ‘Report and Recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners Concerning the Fourth Instalment of “F1” Claims’, UN Doc. S/AC.26/2000/13.Google Scholar

Council of Europe, Human Rights of Members of the Armed Forces, Recommendation CM/Rec (2010) 4 of the Committee of Ministers and Explanatory Memorandum, 2010.Google Scholar

Decision No. 19, Doc. A/AC 26/1992/19, 24 March 1994.Google Scholar

Decision No. 11, ‘Eligibility for Compensation of Members of the Allied Coalition Armed Forces’, Doc. A/SC 26/1992/11, 26 June 1992.Google Scholar

Docherty, B. and Garlasco, M. E., ‘Off Target: The Conduct of the War and Civilian Casualties in Iraq’, Report (New York: Human Rights Watch, 2009), available at: http://dspace.africaportal.org/jspui/handle/123456789/17195, last accessed 3 January 2015.Google Scholar

Kovalick, D., ‘Amnesty International and the Human Rights Industry’, Counterpunch (2012), available at: www.counterpunch.org/2012/11/08/amnesty-international-and-the-human-rights-industry, last accessed 3 January 2015.Google Scholar

Rowley, C., ‘The Problem with Human Rights/Humanitarian Law taking Precedence over the Nuremberg Principle: Torture is Wrong but so is the Supreme War Crime’, Antiwar.com Blog, 11 January 2013.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C., Introduction to International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Dubber, M. and Hörnle, T., Criminal Law: A Comparative Approach (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Ferencz, B., Enforcing International Law: A Way to World Peace (2 vols., Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1983).Google Scholar

Foster, N. G. and Sule, S., German Legal System and Laws (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Gur-Arye, M., Actio Libera in Causa in Criminal Law (Jerusalem: Harry Sacher Institute, 1984).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Collective Security under International Law (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1957, reprinted by Lawbook Exchange, 2001).Google Scholar

Kutz, C., Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

List, C. and Pettit, P., Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Ohlin, J. D. and Fletcher, G. P., Defending Humanity: When Force is Justified and Why (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Parfit, D., Reasons and Persons (Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples: With the Idea of Public Reason Revisited (Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Sayapin, S., The Crime of Aggression in International Criminal Law: Historical Development, Comparative Analysis and Present State (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2014).Google Scholar

Slye, R. C. and Van Schaack, B., International Criminal Law: Essentials (New York: Aspen, 2009).Google Scholar

Solis, G. D., The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Zenker, R., Actio libera in causa: ein Paradoxon als öffentlicher Strafanspruch in einem vom Schuldprinzip geprägten Rechtsstaat (Münster: LIT Verlag, 2003).Google Scholar

Haque, A., ‘Laws for War’, in Ohlin, J. D. (ed.), Theoretical Boundaries of Armed Conflict and Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Modirzadeh, N. K., ‘Folk International Law: 9/11 Lawyering and the Transformation of the Law of Armed Conflict to Human Rights Policy and Human Rights Law to War Governance’, in Ohlin, J. D. (ed.), Theoretical Boundaries of Armed Conflict and Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Werle, G. and Burghardt, B., ‘Establishing Degrees of Responsibility: Modes of Participation in Article 25 of the ICC Statute’, in van Sliedregt, E. and Vasiliev, S. (eds.), Pluralism in International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2014), 301–19.Google Scholar

Ambos, K. and Alkatout, J., ‘Has “Justice Been Done”? The Legality of Bin Laden’s Killing under International Law’, Israel Law Review, 45 (2012), 341–66.Google Scholar

Corn, G. S., Blank, L. R., Jenks, C. and Talbot Jensen, E., ‘Belligerent Targeting and the Invalidity of a Least Harmful Means Rule’, International Law Studies, 89 (2013), 536–626.Google Scholar

Creegan, E., ‘Justified Uses of Force and the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 59–82.Google Scholar

DeGirolami, M., ‘Culpability in Creating the Choice of Evils’, Alabama Law Review, 60 (2009), 597–648.Google Scholar

Dimock, S., ‘Actio Libera in Causa’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 7 (2013), 549–69.Google Scholar

Goodman, R., ‘The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 819–53.Google Scholar

Hays Parks, W., ‘Part IX of the ICRC “Direct Participation in Hostilities” Study: No Mandate, No Expertise, and Legally Incorrect’, NYU Journal of International Law & Politics, 42 (2010), 769–830.Google Scholar

Herrmann, J., ‘Causing the Conditions of One’s Own Defense: The Multifaceted Approach of German Law’, Brigham Young University Law Review (1986), 747–67.Google Scholar

Herstein, O. J., ‘A Normative Theory of the Clean Hands Defense’, Legal Theory, 17 (2011), 171–208.Google Scholar

Husak, D., ‘Intoxication and Culpability’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 6 (2012), 363–79.Google Scholar

Jain, N., ‘The Control Theory of Perpetration in International Criminal Law’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 12 (2011), 157–98.Google Scholar

Katz, L., ‘Entrapment through the Lens of Actio Libera in Causa’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 7 (2013), 587–95.Google Scholar

Kessler Ferzan, K., ‘Provocateurs’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 7 (2013), 597–622.Google Scholar

Mantovani, F., ‘The General Principles of International Criminal Law: The Viewpoint of a National Criminal Lawyer’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1 (2003), 26–38.Google Scholar

Melzer, N., ‘Keeping the Balance between Military Necessity and Humanity: A Response to Four Critiques of the ICRC’s Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities’, NYU Journal of International Law & Politics, 42 (2010), 831–916.Google Scholar

Murphy, S. D., ‘Aggression, Legitimacy and the International Criminal Court’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 1147–56.Google Scholar

O’Connell, M. E., ‘Defining Armed Conflict’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 13 (2009), 393–400.Google Scholar

O’Connell, M. E. and Niyazmatov, M., ‘What is Aggression? Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 189–207.Google Scholar

Ohlin, J. D., ‘The Duty to Capture’, Minnesota Law Review, 97 (2013), 1268–342.Google Scholar

Ohlin, J. D., ‘The Combatant’s Privilege in Asymmetric and Covert Conflicts’, Yale Journal of International Law, 40 (2015), 337–93.Google Scholar

Ohlin, J. D., Van Sliedregt, E. and Weigend, T., ‘Assessing the Control-Theory’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 26 (2013), 725–46.Google Scholar

Sassoli, M., ‘Taking Armed Groups Seriously: Ways to Improve their Compliance with International Humanitarian Law’, International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 1 (2010), 5–51.Google Scholar

Tiffany, L. P. and Anderson, C. A., ‘Legislating the Necessity Defense in Criminal Law’, Denver Law Journal, 52 (1975), 839–79.Google Scholar

Weigend, T., ‘Perpetration through an Organization: The Unexpected Career of a German Legal Concept’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9 (2011), 91–111.Google Scholar

Werle, G. and Jeßberger, F., ‘“Unless Otherwise Provided”: Article 30 of the ICC Statute and the Mental Elements of Crimes Under International Criminal Law’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 3 (2005), 35–55.Google Scholar

Wirth, S., ‘Co-Perpetration in the Lubanga Trial Judgment’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 971–95.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, Jugement rendu en application de l’article 74 du Statut, Concurring Opinion of Judge Christine van den Wyngaert, ICC-01/04-02/12, 18 December 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad al-Bashir, Decision on Prosecution’s Application for a Warrant of Arrest against Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09, 4 March 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad al-Bashir, Second Arrest Warrant, ICC-02/05-01/09, 12 July 2010.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, ICTY-IT-94-1-A, 2 October 1995.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Tadić, Judgment, ICTY-IT-94-1-T, 7 May 1997.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment of the Trial Chamber, ICC-01/04-01/06, 14 March 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment, Separate Opinion of Judge Adrian Fulford, ICC-01/04-01/06, 14 March 2012.Google Scholar

Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF), Pub. L. No. 107-40, § 2(a), 115 Stat. 224, 224 (2001).Google Scholar

Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (adopted 12 August 1949, entered into force 21 October 1950), 75 UNTS 135.Google Scholar

ICRC, ‘How is the Term “Armed Conflict” Defined in International Humanitarian Law?’, March 2008, available at: www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/opinion-paper-armed-conflict.pdf.Google Scholar

Ohlin, J. D., ‘Recapturing the Concept of Necessity’, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-90 (2013), 1–34, available at: www.ssrn.com/abstract=2230486.Google Scholar

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) (adopted 8 June 1977, entered into force 7 December 1978), 1125 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 1973 (2011) concerning Libya, 17 March 2011, UN Doc. S/RES/1973.Google Scholar

Testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Hearing on Protecting US Citizens’ Constitutional Rights during the War on Terrorism, 22 May 2013, available at: www.judiciary.house.gov/_files/hearings/113th/05222013/OConnell%2005222013.pdf.Google Scholar

Clarke, R. A., Cyber War (New York: HarperCollins, 2010).Google Scholar

Lee, N., Counterterrorism and Cybersecurity: Total Information Awareness (New York: Springer, 2013).Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., All the Missing Souls: A Personal History of the War Crimes Tribunals (Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Sekulow, J., The Rise of ISIS (New York: Simon & Shuster, 2014).Google Scholar

Tan, M., The Case Against the North Korean Criminal Regime: Constructive Engagement with the Worst Human Rights and Security Crisis in the World (Oxford: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar

Van Herpen, M. H., Putin’s Wars: The Rise of Russia’s New Imperialism (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014).Google Scholar

Wilson, A., Ukraine Crisis: What it Means for the West (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘Atrocity Crimes Framing the Responsibility to Protect’, in Cooper, R. H. and Kohler, J. Voïnov (eds.), Responsibility to Protect: The Global Moral Compact for the 21st Century (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 77–98.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘A Pragmatic Approach to the Crime of Aggression’, in Bellili, R. (ed.), International Criminal Justice: Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to its Review (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010), 609–19.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘Crimes Against Humanity and the Responsibility to Protect’, in Sadat, L. (ed.), Forging a Convention for Crimes Against Humanity (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 305–22.Google Scholar

Lynn, W. J. III, ‘Defending a New Domain: The Pentagon’s Cyberstrategy’, Foreign Affairs, September/October 2010, 97–108, available at: www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66552/william-j-lynn-iii/defending-a-new-domain.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘How to Turn the Tide Using the Rome Statute’s Temporal Jurisdiction’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2 (2004), 26–34.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘The Complex Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 897–904.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘States Parties Approve New Crimes for International Criminal Court’, ASIL Insight, 14 (22 June 2010), 16, available at: http://www.asil.org/insights/year/2010.Google Scholar

Ash, T. G., ‘Putin’s Deadly Doctrine: “Protecting” Russians in Ukraine has Deadly Consequences’, New York Times, 20 July 2014, SR5.Google Scholar

Cumming-Bruce, N. and Sengupta, S., ‘UN to Send Team to Iraq for Inquiry on ISIS Acts’, New York Times, 2 September 2014, A8.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 2005 World Summit Outcome Resolution, 24 October 2005, UN Doc. A/RES/60/1.Google Scholar

Kerry, J., ‘Remarks at a Solo Press Availability’, US Embassy, Kylv, Ukraine, 4 March 2014, available at: www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2014/03/222882.htm.Google Scholar

McDonald, M., ‘“Crisis Status” in South Korea after North Shells Island’, New York Times, 23 November 2010.Google Scholar

Misztal, B. and Michek, J., ‘An Overview of ISIS Threat and US Response’, Bipartisan Policy Center, 25 September 2014, available at: www.bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/overview-isis-threat-and-us-response.Google Scholar

Musa, R., ‘Boko Haram Fighters Killed by Soldiers in Northern Cameroon’, The Independent, 27 August 2014, available at: www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/boko-haram-fighters-killed-by-soldiers-in-northern-cameroon-9695262.html.Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty (signed 4 April 1949, entered into force 24 August 1949), 34 UNTS 243.Google Scholar

Nuland, V., ‘Statement before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’, 10 April 2014, available at: www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/rm/2014/apr/224652.htm.Google Scholar

Power, S., ‘Remarks at a Security Council Session on Ukraine’, 28 August 2014, available at: www.usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/231127.htm.Google Scholar

Rand Corporation, Cyberwarfare, available at: www.rand.org/topics/cyber-warfare.html.Google Scholar

Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, ‘Rule of Terror: Living Under ISIS in Syria’, 14 November 2014, available at: www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/CoISyria/HRC_CRP_ISIS_14Nov2014.pdf.Google Scholar

Sang-hun, C., ‘North Korea Criticizes US Over New Sanctions’, New York Times, 4 January 2015.Google Scholar

Sanger, D. and Miller, E., ‘Pentagon to Consider Cyberattacks Acts of War’, New York Times, 1 June 2011, 10.Google Scholar

Sanger, D. and Perlroth, N., ‘US is Said to Find North Korea Behind Cyberattack on Sony’, New York Times, 18 December 2014, A1.Google Scholar

Sanger, D., Schmidt, M. and Perlroth, N., ‘Obama Vows a Response to Cyberattack on Sony’, New York Times, 20 December 2014, A1.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘Aggression is Now a Crime’, International Herald Tribune, 1 July 2010, 8.Google Scholar

Statement by the Press Secretary on the Executive Order, ‘Imposing Additional Sanctions with Respect to North Korea’, Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, 2 January 2015, available at: www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/01/02/statement-press-secretary-executive-order-entitled-imposing-additional-s?amp.Google Scholar

Transcript, Fatou Bensouda on the International Criminal Court and Gender Based Crimes, Council on Foreign Relations, 11 December 2014, available at: www.cfr.org/international-law/fatou-bensouda-international-criminal-court-gender-based-crimes/p33991.Google Scholar

Walker, S., Salem, H. and MacAskil, E., ‘Russian “Invasion” of Crimea Fuels Fear of Ukraine Conflict’, The Guardian, 28 February 2014, available at: www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/28/russia-crimea-white-house.Google Scholar