Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: February 2016

9 - Processes, Strategies, and Knowledge in Creative Thought: Multiple Interacting Systems

from SECTION TWO - CREATIVITY AND REASON IN COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE

Summary

To a naïve person, creativity looks to be a lot of fun. You get to make up something new – something that might, in fact, change the world. However, the evidence we have gathered in recent years suggests that for those actually doing creative work, although it may be fun, it is also challenging. Most creative efforts fail (Huber, 1998). Creative people look to the past and, potentially, past failures (Antes & Mumford, 2009). Criticism, including self-criticism, appears critical to the success of creative efforts (Cropley, 2006; Gibson & Mumford, 2013). Creative people must worry about constraints on their solutions (Medeiros, Partlow, & Mumford, 2015) and the acceptance of their ideas by others (Rubenson & Runco, 1992).

Although many factors contribute to the difficulty of creative work, the fundamental nature of creative thought may also play an important role. Ultimately, creativity is a complex form of performance involving the production of solutions of high quality, originality, and elegance (Besemer & O'Quin, 1993; Christiaans, 2002) to problems that are complex, novel, ill defined, and poorly structured (Mumford & Gustafson, 1988, 2012). It is commonly held that the production of these problem solutions depends on three key cognitive capacities: (1) knowledge, (2) strategies used in working with this knowledge, and (3) the processes these strategies are being used to execute. Each of these components of creative thought has been studied in isolation. For example, Finke, Ward, and Smith (1992) have studied the impact of knowledge on creative problem solving. Mumford et al. (1997) have studied the impact of processing activities on creative problem-solving. The impact of both cross-process strategies, such as divergent thinking, and process-specific strategies, such as feature search and mapping, on creative problem solving has been examined in studies by Acar and Runco (2012) and Baughman and Mumford (1995).

This research has begun to provide us with a sounder and stronger understanding of the nature of creative thought. By the same token, the difficulty of creative work may lie not only in the difficulty of executing each of these discrete cognitive operations, but also in the nature of the interactions observed among these cognitive capacities as people seek to generate creative problem solutions. In this chapter, we examine some of the interactions likely to be observed among knowledge, processes, and strategies as people seek to generate creative problem solutions.

Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2012). Psychoticism and creativity: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 341–350.
Antes, A. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). Effects of time frame on creative thought: Process versus problem-solving effects. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 166–182.
Barrett, J. D., Peterson, D. R., Hester, K. S., Robledo, I. C., Day, E. A., Hougen, D. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Thinking about applications: Effects on mental models and creative problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 199–212.
Baughman, W. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1995). Process analytic models of creative capacities: Operations involved in the combination and reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 37–62.
Besemer, S. P., & O'Quin, K. (1993). Assessing creative products: Progress and potentials. In Isaksen, S. G., Murdock, M. C., Firestien, R. L., & Trefiinger, D. J. (Eds.), Nurturing and developing creativity: The emergence of a discipline (pp. 331–349). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Blair, C. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for unoriginality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 197–227.
Bink, M. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2000). Cognitive regularities in creative activity. Review of General Psychology, 4, 59–78.
Byrne, C. L., Shipman, A. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). The effects of forecasting on creative problem-solving: An experimental study. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 119–138.
Carlson, W. B., & Gorman, M. E. (1992). A cognitive framework to understand technological creativity: Bell, Edison, and the telephone. In Wever, R. J., & Perkins, D. N. (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 48–79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Christiaans, H. H. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Communication Research Journal, 14, 41–54.
Cropley, A. J. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 391–404.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1994) The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium. New York: Harper Collins.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.
Estes, W. K. (1991). Cognitive architectures from the standpoint of an experimental psychologist. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 1–29.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Friedrich, T. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). The effects of conflicting information on creative thought: A source of performance improvements or decrements?. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 265–281.
Gibson, C., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Evaluation, criticism, and creativity: Criticism content and effects on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 314–331.
Goldvarg, E., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Naive causality: A mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25, 565–610.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1997). The analogical mind. American Psychologist, 52, 35–44.
Huber, J. C. (1998). Inventions and inventivity as a special kind of creativity, with implications for general creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 58–72.
Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., Hunsicker, C. M., Mumford, M. D., & Ligon, G. S. (2008). Applying multiple knowledge structures in creative thought: Effects on idea generation and problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 137–154.
Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52, 57–66.
Licuanan, B. F., Dailey, L. R., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 1–27.
Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 231–246.
Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Social innovation: Enhancing creative performance through causal analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 123–140.
Marcy, R. T., (2010). Leader cognition: Improving leader performance through causal analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
Medeiros, K. E., Partlow, P. J., & Mumford, M. D. (2015). Leader cognition in vision formation: Simplicity and negativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 448–469.
Merrifield, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Frick, J. W. (1962). The role of intellectual factors in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 76, 1–21.
Mobley, M. I., Doares, L., & Mumford, M. D. (1992). Process analytic models of creative capacities: Evidence for the combination and reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 125–156.
Mumford, M. D. (2001). Something old, something new: Revisiting Guilford's conception of creative problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 267–276.
Mumford, M. D., Antes, A. L., Caughron, J. J., Connelly, S., & Beeler, C. (2010). Cross-field differences in creative problem-solving skills: A comparison of health, biological, and social sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 14–26.
Mumford, M. D., Barrett, J. D., & Hester, K. S. (2012). Background data: Use of experiential knowledge in personnel selection. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (pp. 353–382). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Maher, M. A., Costanza, D. P., & Supinski, E. P. (1997). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: IV. Category combination. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 59–71.
Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Supinski, E. P., & Maher, M. A. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: II. Information encoding. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 77–88.
Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., Baughman, W. A., & Marks, M. A. (1994). Creativity and problem solving: Cognition, adaptability, and wisdom. Roeper Review, 16, 241–246.
Mumford, M. D., Friedrich, T. L., Caughron, J. J., & Antes, A. L. (2009). Leadership development and assessment: Describing and rethinking the state of the art. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments (pp. 84–107), New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.
Mumford, M. D., (2012). Creative thought: Cognition and problem solving in dynamic systems. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), The creativity research handbook: Volume Two (pp. 33–78), New York: Hampton Press.
Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., Robledo, I. C., Peterson, D. R., Day, E. A., Hougen, D. F., & Barrett, J. D. (2012). Mental models and creative problem-solving: The relationship of objective and subjective model attributes. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 311–330.
Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2000). Development of leadership skills: Experience and timing. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 87–114.
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 30–47.
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter-Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122.
Mumford, M. D., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. R. (1994). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 3–39). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A, & Van Doorn, J. R. (2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5, 213–240.
Mumford, M. D., Steele, L., McIntosh, T., & Mulhearn, T. (in press). Developing creative capacity: Educational and organizational interventions. In Yi, C. (Ed.), The social dimension of creativity. Seoul, South Korea: KRIVET.
Mumford, M. D., Supinski, E. P., Baughman, W. A., Costanza, D. P., & Threlfall, K. V. (1997). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: V. Overall prediction. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 73–85.
Osburn, H. K., & Mumford, M. D. (2006). Creativity and planning: Training interventions to develop creative problem-solving skills. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 173–190.
Parnes, S. J., & Noller, R. B. (1972). Applied creativity: The creative studies project. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 164–186.
Peterson, D. R., Barrett, J. D., Hester, K. S., Robledo, I. C., Hougen, D. F., Day, E. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Teaching people to manage constraints: Effects on creative problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 335–347.
Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Puccio, G. S., & Cabra, S. F. (2012). Idea generation and idea evaluation: Cognitive skills and deliberate practices. In Mumford, M. D. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 189–215). San Diego: Elsevier.
Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., O'Connor Boes, J., & Runco, M. A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 9–23.
Robledo, I. C., Hester, K. S., Peterson, D. R., Barrett, J. D., Day, E. A., Hougen, D. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2012). Errors and understanding: The effects of error-management training on creative problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 220–234.
Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349–363.
Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. (1992). The psychoeconomic approach to creativity. New Ideas in Psychology, 10, 131–147.
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2010). Do tests of divergent thinking have an experiential bias?. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 144–148.
Runco, M. A., (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal. 24, 66–75.
Runco, M. A., Dow, G., & Smith, W. R. (2006). Information, experience, and divergent thinking: An empirical test. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 269–277.
Scott, G. M., Lonergan, D., & Mumford, M. (2005). Conceptual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 79–98.
Shipman, A. S., Byrne, C. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Leader vision formation and forecasting: The effects of forecasting extent, resources, and timeframe. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 439–456.
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Fields, domains, and individuals. In Mumford, M. D. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 67–86), Oxford: Elsevier.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stokes, P. D. (1999). Learned variability levels: Implications for creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 37–45.
Stokes, P. D. (2005). Creativity from constraints: The psychology of breakthrough. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Stokes, P. D. (2007). Using constraints to generate and sustain novelty. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 107–113.
Vincent, P. H., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163–178.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Weisberg, R. W. (2011). Frank Lloyd Wright's Fallingwater: A case study in inside-the-box creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 296–312.
Welling, H. (2007). Four mental operations in creative cognition: The importance of abstraction. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 163–177.