Bayliss, H. R. & Beyer, F. R. 2015. Information retrieval for ecological syntheses. Research Synthesis Methods, 6, 136–148.
Bowler, D., Buyung-Ali, L., Healey, J. R., et al. 2010. The Evidence Base for Community Forest Management as a Mechanism for Supplying Global Environmental Benefits and Improving Local Welfare: A STAP Advisory Document. Washington, DC: Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel. Global Environment Facility.
Boyack, K. W. & Klavans, R. 2014. Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic, global model and map of science. Journal of The Association for Information Science and Technology, 65, 670–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22990 Cook, C. N., Mascia, M. B., Schwartz, M. W., et al. 2013. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge–action boundary. Conservation Biology, 27, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12050 Dicks, L. V., Walsh, J. C. & Sutherland, W. J. 2014. Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a ‘4S’ hierarchy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.004 Frantzi, K., Ananiadou, S. & Mima, H. 2000. Automatic recognition of multi-word terms: the C-value/NC-value method. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007999900023 Grubert, E. & Siders, A. 2016. Benefits and applications of interdisciplinary digital tools for environmental meta-reviews and analyses. Environmental Research Letters, 11, 093001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748–9326/11/9/093001 Haddaway, N. R., Land, M. & Macura, B. 2016. ‘A little learning is a dangerous thing’: a call for better understanding of the term ‘systematic review’. Environment International, 99, 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.020 Haddaway, N. R. 2017. Response to ‘Collating science-based evidence to inform public opinion on the environmental effects of marine drilling platforms in the Mediterranean Sea’. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 612–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.043
Haddaway, N. R. & Crowe, S. 2018. Experiences and lessons in stakeholder engagement in environmental evidence synthesis: a truly special series. Environmental Evidence, 7, art11.
Higgins, J. & Green, S. 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1. Cochrane Collaboration. Available from http://handbook-5–1.cochrane.org (accessed 8 March 2018). Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2016. The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The Milbank Quarterly, 94, 485–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468–0009.12210 Kløcker Larsen, R. & Nilsson, A.E. 2017. Knowledge production and environmental conflict: managing systematic reviews and maps for constructive outcome. Environmental Evidence, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-017–0095-x Kohl, C., McIntosh, E. J., Unger, S., et al. 2018. Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools. Environmental Evidence, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018–0115-5 Land, M., Macura, B., Bernes, C., et al. 2017. A five-step approach for stakeholder engagement in prioritisation and planning of environmental evidence syntheses. Environmental Evidence, 6(25). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-017–0104-0 Leisher, C., Temsah, G., Booker, F., et al. 2016. Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map. Environmental Evidence, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016–0057-8 Lowndes, J. S. S., Best, B. D., Scarborough, C., et al. 2017. Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1, 160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017–0160
McKinnon, M. C., Cheng, S. H., Dupre, S., et al. 2016. What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries. Environmental Evidence, 5(8).
McKinnon, M. C., Cheng, S., Dicks, L., et al. 2018 Seek higher standards to honestly assess conservation effectiveness. Mongabay. Available online on 17 April 2018.
O’Leary, B. C., Kvist, K., Bayliss, H. R., et al. 2016. The reliability of evidence reviews in environmental science and conservation. Environmental Science Policy, 64, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.012 O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J., et al. 2015. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Systematic Reviews, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046–4053-4–5 Ojanen, M., Zhou, W., Miller, D. C., et al. 2017. What are the environmental impacts of property rights regimes in forests, fisheries and rangelands? Environmental Evidence, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-017–0090-2 Owens, S. 2000. ‘Engaging the public’: information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environment and Planning A, 32, 1141–1148. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3330 Pullin, A. S., Knight, T. M., Stone, D. A., et al. 2004. Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biological Conservation, 119, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.007 Roll, U., Correia, R. A. & Berger-Tal, O. 2018. Using machine learning to disentangle homonyms in large text corpora. Conservation Biology, 32, 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13044 Shemilt, I., Khan, N., Park, S., et al. 2016. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the efficiency of study identification methods in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5, 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016–0315-4 Sundin, A., Andersson, K. & Watt, R. 2018. Rethinking communication: integrating storytelling for increased stakeholder engagement in environmental evidence synthesis. Environmental Evidence, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018–0116-4 Walsh, J. C., Dicks, L. V. & Sutherland, W. J. 2014. The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners’ management decisions. Conservation Biology, 29, 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12370 Westgate, M. J., Barton, P. S, Pierson, J. C., et al. 2015. Text analysis tools for identification of emerging topics and research gaps in conservation science. Conservation Biology, 29, 1606–1614. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12605 Woodcock, P., Pullin, A. S. & Kaiser, M. J. 2014. Evaluating and improving the reliability of evidence in conservation and environmental science: a methodology. Biological Conservation, 176, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.04.020 Woodcock, P., O’Leary, B. C., Kaiser, M. J., et al. 2017. Your evidence or mine? Systematic evaluation of reviews of marine protected area effectiveness. Fish and Fisheries, 18, 668–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12196 Young, N., Corriveau, M., Nguyen, V. M., et al. 2016. How do potential knowledge users evaluate new claims about a contested resource? Problems of power and politics in knowledge exchange and mobilization. Journal of Environmental Management, 184, 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.006