Allen, C., Metternicht, G. & Wiedmann, T. 2018. Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13, 1453–1467.
Bizikova, L. & Pinter, L. 2017. Indicator preferences in national reporting of progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. International Institute for Sustainable Development Briefing Note.
Brooks, T. M., Lamoreux, J. F. & Soberón, J. 2014. IPBES ≠ IPCC. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 543–545.
Brundtland Commission. 1987. World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Butchart, S. H. M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., et al. 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328, 1164–1168.
Carpenter, S., Mooney, H., Agard, J., et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 1305–1312.
Colchester, M. 2004. Conservation policy and indigenous peoples. Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 145–153.
Daily, G. C. 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washinton, DC: Island Press.
Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Joly, C., et al. 2015. A Rosetta Stone for nature’s benefits to people. PLoS Biology, 13, e1002040.
Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., et al. 2018. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science, 359, 270–272.
Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., et al. 2014. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science, 345, 401–406.
Gaston, K. J., Jackson, S. F., Cantú-Salazar, L., et al. 2008. The ecological performance of protected areas. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 93–113.
Hák, T., Janoušková, S. & Moldan, B. 2016. Sustainable Development Goals: a need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573.
Heubach, K. & Lambini, C. K. 2018. Distribution and selection of experts in the intergovernmental science–policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES): the case of the regional assessment for Africa. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31, S61–S77.
IPBES. 2016. The Assessment Report on Pollinators, Pollination and Food Production of the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (edited by S. G. Potts, V. Imperatriz-Fonseca & H. Ngo). Bonn: IPBES Secretariat.
IPBES. 2018b. IPBES Science and Policy for People and Nature. Available from www.ipbes.net/ IPBES. 2018c. Thematic Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration of the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (edited by R. Scholes, L. Montanarella, A. Brainich, et al.). Bonn: IPBES Secretariat. Available from www.ipbes.net/assessment-reports/ldr.
Jetzkowitz, J., van Koppen, C., Lidskog, R., et al. 2018. The significance of meaning. Why IPBES needs the social sciences and humanities. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31, S38–S60.
Kanie, N. 2014. Governance with multilateral environmental agreements: a healthy or ill-equipped fragmentation? In Conca, K. & Dabelko, G. D., editors, Green Planet Blues: Critical Perspectives on Global Environmental Politics (pp. 67–86). London: Hachette.
Kemp, L. 2016. Framework for the future? Exploring the possibility of majority voting in the climate negotiations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16, 757–779.
Leadley, P. W., Krug, C. B., Alkemade, R., et al. 2014. Progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: An assessment of biodiversity trends, policy scenarios and key actions. Global Biodiversity Outlook 4 (GBO-4) Technical Report. CBD Technical Series No. 78. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada. Available from www.cbd.int/GBO4.
MA. 2005. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Mace, G. M. 2014. Whose conservation? Science, 345, 1558–1560.
McArthur, J. W. 2014. The origins of the millennium development goals. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 34, 5–24.
Mora, C. & Sale, P. F. 2011. Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 434, 251–266.
O’Connor, D., Mackie, J., Van Esveld, D., et al. 2016. Universality, integration, and policy coherence for sustainable development: early SDG implementation in selected OECD countries. Working Paper. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. Available from www.wri.org/publication/universality_integration_and_policy_coherence.
Obermeister, N. 2017. From dichotomy to duality: addressing interdisciplinary epistemological barriers to inclusive knowledge governance in global environmental assessments. Environmental Science & Policy, 68, 80–86.
Peterson, G. D., Harmácková, Z. V., Meacham, M., et al. 2018. Welcoming different perspectives in IPBES: “Nature’s contributions to people” and “Ecosystem services”. Ecology and Society, 23(1), Art. 39.
Potts, S. G., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V., Ngo, H. T., et al. 2016. Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nature, 540, 220.
Reyers, B., Stafford-Smith, M., Erb, K.-H., et al. 2017. Essential variables help to focus sustainable development goals monitoring. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26, 97–105.
Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., et al. 2017. SDG Index and Dashboards Report 2017. New York, NY: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).
Scharlemann, J. P., Mant, R. C., Balfour, N., et al. 2016. Global Goals Mapping: The Environment–Human Landscape. A Contribution towards the NERC, The Rockefeller Foundation and ESRC initiative, Towards a Sustainable Earth: Environment–Human Systems and the UN Global Goals. Brighton:Sussex Sustainability Research Programme, University of Sussex, andCambridge:UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
Schmalzbauer, B. & Visbeck, M. 2016. The Contribution of Science in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Biological Conservation. Stuttgart/Kiel: German Committee Future Earth,
Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Teksoz, K., et al. 2017. National baselines for the Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG Index and Dashboards. Nature Geoscience, 10, 547–555.
Schröter, M., Albert, C., Marques, A., et al. 2016. National Ecosystem Assessments in Europe: a review. Bioscience, 66, 813–828.
SRC. 2016. The 2030 Agenda and Ecosystems: A Discussion Paper on the Links between the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and the Sustainable Development Goals. Stockholm: Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Stenseke, M. & Larigauderie, A. 2018. The role, importance and challenges of social sciences and humanities in the work of the intergovernmental science–policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES). Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31, S10–S14.
Tittensor, D. P., Walpole, M., Hill, S. L., et al. 2014. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science, 346, 241–244.
UN. 1992. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Rio: United Nations.
UNEP. 2012. Report of the Second Session of the Plenary Meeting to Determine Modalities and Institutional Arrangements for an Intergovernmental Science–policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services; Document UNEP/IPBES.MI/2/9. Available from www.ipbes.net/document-library-catalogue/unepipbesmi29.
Vadrot, A. B., Rankovic, A., Lapeyre, R., et al. 2018. Why are social sciences and humanities needed in the works of IPBES? A systematic review of the literature. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31, S78–S100.