Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:21:55.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Direct behavioral indicators as a conservation and management tool

from Part IV - Behavioral indicators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

Burt P. Kotler
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Douglas W. Morris
Affiliation:
Lakehead University, Canada
Joel S. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
Oded Berger-Tal
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
David Saltz
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Here is an exercise to try with your students or colleagues regarding wildlife conservation and management. Tell them they are managing an area containing a population of an endangered, charismatic, flagship wildlife species, say mountain nyala in Bale Mountains National Park, Ethiopia. Invite them to write down the one or two things they would most want to know in order to best manage the population. The answers will vary. Some may inquire into the population size or density; others may want to know what the nyala are eating; others may want to know about the nyalas’ levels of genetic heterozygosity. But what we really want to know is “what is the state of the population in terms of growth rate and relationship to resource density?” “what are the threats to the population?” and “what are the population's prospects for the future?” Are these questions we can answer? Will knowledge of population size or genetics or diet allow us to answer these? Or can answers best be obtained from other information? If so, how can such information be acquired? What are the best indicators?

Ideally, indicators of population well-being must be reliable. Further, they should be easy to measure, respond quickly to environmental change and forecast the future. Measurements of population sizes are frequently used in management decisions and may excel in identifying when small population issues are of concern, but are woefully inadequate as indicators of population processes. Such metrics do not necessarily respond quickly to environmental change. Most populations experience time-lagged dynamics. But time lags mean that density is a trailing indicator of current conditions. We must search elsewhere for leading indicators – indicators that predict the future rather than simply recapitulating the past. Perhaps we can find our indicators in the traits of organisms that have been shaped by evolution (Grafen 1982, Lucas & Grafen 1985, Mitchell & Valone 1990). One attractive class of characteristics comes from foraging theory and measures of behavior (Stephens & Krebs 1986). These can be classified into behavioral indicators based on diet, patch use or habitat selection.

Consider indicators of population well-being further. An example involving the Baltic tellin (Macoma balthica) illustrates this well. Baltic tellins, benthic bivalves from the Dutch Wadden Sea, suffer predation from red knots (Calidris canutus) (van Gils et al. 2009).

Type
Chapter
Information
Conservation Behavior
Applying Behavioral Ecology to Wildlife Conservation and Management
, pp. 307 - 351
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateman, P.W. and Fleming, P.A. 2014. Switching to plan B: changes in the escape tactics of two grasshopper species (Acrididae: Orthoptera) in response to repeated predatory approaches. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 68:457–465.Google Scholar
Bauwens, D. and Thoen, C. 1981. Escape tactics and vulnerability to predation associated with reproduction in the lizard Lacerta vivipara.Journal of Animal Ecology, 50:733–743.Google Scholar
Berger-Tal, O., Nathan, J., Meron, E. and Saltz, D. 2014. The exploration-exploitation dilemma: a multidisciplinary framework. PLoS One, 9:e95693.Google Scholar
Berger-Tal, O. and Saltz, D. 2014. Using the movement patterns of reintroduced animals to improve reintroduction success. Current Zoology, 60:515–526.Google Scholar
Blumstein, D.T. and Fernández-Juricic, E. 2010. A Primer of Conservation Behavior. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M. 1991. Human distance and birds: tolerance and response distances of resident and migrant species in India. Environmental Conservation, 18:158–165.Google Scholar
Cagnacci, F., Boitani, L., Powell, R.A. and Boyce, M.S. 2010. Animal ecology meets GPS-based radio telemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 365:2157–2162.Google Scholar
Crook, D. 2004. Movements associated with home-range establishment by two species of lowland river fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 61:2183–2193.Google Scholar
Dwyer, C.M. 2004. How has the risk of predation shaped the behavioural responses of sheep to fear and distress?Animal Welfare, 13:269–281.Google Scholar
Eliassen, S., Jorgensen, C., Mangel, M. and Giske, J. 2007. Exploration or exploitation: life expectancy changes the value of learning in foraging strategies. Oikos, 116:513–523.Google Scholar
Fryxell, J.M., Hazell, M., Borger, L.et al. 2008. Multiple movement modes by large herbivores at multiple spatiotemporal scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105:19114–19119.Google Scholar
Getz, W.M. and Saltz, D. 2008. A framework for generating and analyzing movement paths on ecological landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105:19066–19071.Google Scholar
Goettert, T., Schoene, J., Zinner, D., Hodges, J.K. & Boeer, M. 2010. Habitat use and spatial organisation of relocated black rhinos in Namibia. Mammalia, 74:35–42.Google Scholar
Jeltsch, F., Bonte, D., Pe'er, G.et al. 2013. Integrating movement ecology with biodiversity research – exploring new avenues to address spatiotemporal biodiversity dynamics. Movement Ecology, 1:6Google Scholar
Johnson, C.J., Parker, K.L., Heard, D.C. and Gillingham, M.P. 2002. Movement parameters of ungulates and scale-specific responses to the environment. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71: 225–235.Google Scholar
Li, B.B., Belasen, A., Pafilis, P., Bednekoff, P. and Foufopoulos, J. 2014. Effects of feral cats on the evolution of anti-predatory behaviours in island reptiles: insights from an ancient introduction. Proceeding of the Royal Society B, 281: 20140339
Manor, R. and Saltz, D. 2005. Human impacts on gazelle habitat use patterns and flight distance in a heavily disturbed area in Israel. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69:1683–1690.Google Scholar
Miller, K.A., Garner, J.P. and Mench, J.A. 2006. Is fearfulness a trait that can be measured with behavioural tests? A validation of four tests for Japanese quail. Animal Behaviour, 71:1323–1334.Google Scholar
Mǿller, A.P. 2008. Flight distance and population trends in European breeding birds. Behavioral Ecology, 19:1095–1102.Google Scholar
Nathan, R., Getz, W.M., Revilla, E.et al. 2008. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105:19052–19059.Google Scholar
Nolet, B.A. and Rosell, F. 1994. Territoriality and time budgets in beavers during sequential settlement. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 72:1227–1237.Google Scholar
Richardson, C.T. and Miller, C.K. 1997. Recommendations for protecting raptors from human disturbance: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25:634–638.Google Scholar
Schlacher, T.A., Weston, M.A., Lynn, D. and Connolly, R.M. 2013. Setback distances as a conservation tool in wildlife–human interactions: testing their efficacy for birds affected by vehicles on open-coast sandy beaches. PLoS ONE, 8:e71200.Google Scholar
Stankowich, T. and Blumstien, D.T. 2005. Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272:2627–2634.Google Scholar
Stankowich, T. 2008. Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance: a review and meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 141:2159–2173.Google Scholar
Tarlow, E.M. and Blumstein, D.T. 2007. Evaluating methods to quantify anthropogenic stressors on wild animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102:429–451.Google Scholar
Taylor, A.C. and Knight, R.L. 2003. Behavioral responses of wildlife to human activity: terminology and methods. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 31:1263–1271.Google Scholar
Ward, A.L.W. and Cupal, J.J. 1979. Telemetered heart rate of three elk as affected by activity and human disturbance. In: Ward, A.L.W. and Cupal, J.J. (eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Dispersed Recreation and Natural Resource Management: A Focus on Issues, Opportunities and Priorities. Logan: Utah State University. pp. 47–55.
Weston, M.A., McLeod, E.M., Blumstein, D.T. and Guay, P.-J. 2012. A review of flight initiation distances and their application to managing disturbance to Australian birds. Emu, 112:269–286.Google Scholar
Ydenberg, R.C. and Dill, L.M. 1986. The economics of fleeing from predators. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 16:229–249.Google Scholar
Zidon, R., Saltz, D., Shore, L.S. and Motro, U. 2009. Behavioral changes, stress, and survival following reintroduction of Persian fallow deer from two breeding facilities. Conservation Biology, 23:1026–1035.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×