Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:20:10.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Cognitive Change and Material Culture

A Distributed Perspective

from Part II - Higher Levels of Consciousness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2020

By
Michael Wheeler
Edited by
Ian Hodder
Ian Hodder
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Whichever way one looks at it, studying ancient minds is a challenge. This is largely because the main investigative strategies that have proven to be so successful in unravelling the secrets of modern minds are rendered unavailable. Long-dead subjects cannot sign up for reaction time laboratory experiments, and decomposed brains aren’t suitable for neuroimaging. Call this epistemological quandary ‘the problem of ancient minds’. Given that the questions addressed by this volume concern the existence and character of changes in consciousness and cognition at the Neolithic site of Çatalhöyük, there seems little doubt that the problem of ancient minds will be prowling the pages of the various chapters, just itching to make a nuisance of itself.

Type
Chapter
Information
Consciousness, Creativity, and Self at the Dawn of Settled Life , pp. 90 - 106
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, F. and Aizawa, K. (2008), The Bounds of Cognition, Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. (1994), “Natural Deduction in Connectionist Systems”, Synthese vol. 101, pp. 433–463.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. (1996), “What Knowledge Must Be in the Head in Order to Acquire Language’, in Communicating Meaning: The Evolution and Development of Language, eds. Velichkovsky, B. and Rumbaugh, D. M., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. (1991), Connectionism and the Mind: An Introduction to Parallel Processing in Networks, Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1997), Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2003), Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2008), Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. (1998), “The Extended Mind”, Analysis, Vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 7–19.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1991), Consciousness Explained, Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1975), The Language of Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. and Pylyshyn, Z. (1988), “Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis”, Cognition, Vol. 28, pp. 3–71.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995), Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L. (2013), How Things Shape the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Menary, R. (ed.) (2010), The Extended Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mithen, S. (1996), The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science, London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. (1976), “Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search”, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putt, S. S., Wijeakumar, S., Franciscus, R. G. and Spencer, J. P. (2017), “The Functional Brain Networks That Underlie Early Stone Age Tool Manufacture”, Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 1, Article number: 0102, doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0102.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. (1998), “Mind and Matter: Cognitive Archaeology and External Symbolic Storage”, in Cognition and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Symbolic Storage, eds. Renfrew, C. & Scarre, C., Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. (2012), “Towards a Cognitive Archaeology: Material Engagement and the Early Development of Society”, in Archaeological Theory Today, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, pp. 124–145.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1992), Before Writing (Vol. 1): From Counting to Cuneiform, Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Tribble, E. B. (2005), “Distributing Cognition in the Globe”, Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 135–155.Google Scholar
Tribble, E. B. (2011), Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Watkins, T. (2010), “New Light on Neolithic Revolution in South-West Asia”, Antiquity, vol. 84, no. 325, pp. 621–634.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. (2004), “Is Language the Ultimate Artefact?”, Language Sciences, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 693–715.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. (2005), Reconstructing the Cognitive World: The Next Step, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. (2010a), “In Defense of Extended Functionalism”, in The Extended Mind, ed. Menary, R., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 245–270.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. (2010b), “Minds, Things and Materiality”, in The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind, eds. Renfrew, C. and Malafouris, L., Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 29–37.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. (2011), “Embodied Cognition and the Extended Mind”, in The Continuum Companion to Philosophy of Mind, ed. Garvey, J., London: Continuum, pp. 220–238.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. (2015), “A Tale of Two Dilemmas: Cognitive Kinds and the Extended Mind”, in Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice, ed. Kendig, C., London: Routledge, pp. 175–185.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. and Clark, A. (2008), “Culture, Embodiment and Genes: Unravelling the Triple Helix’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 363, pp. 3563–3575.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×