Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: June 2014

5 - Confucian Familialism and Public Reasoning

Summary

In Chapter 4, I argued that for Confucian democracy to be socially meaningful and politically practicable in increasingly pluralizing East Asian societies, both Confucianism and democracy must undergo dialectical transformations and constrain each other, thus creating the societal condition favorable for it. What was central to my argument was that as long as we understand Confucian democracy as a democracy operating on Confucian habits and mores that broadly constitute Confucian public reason, Confucian virtues must be differentiated into moral virtues concerned with a person’s moral well-being qua human being and civic virtues related to the polity’s public character and its reproduction and that only the latter should be relevant to the general public. I differentiated Confucian public reason from its liberal counterpart of the kind advocated by deontological liberals in terms of a freestanding conception of justice completely separate from the “background culture” in civil society, and argued that such an understanding of public reason as solely concerned with the standard for appraising the legitimacy of basic structures is too narrow to apply to a Confucian pluralist democratic society in which public reason (more accurately public reasons) derives from the background culture or the culture of civil society. In the Confucian democracy that I propose, public reason is more than what is required of judges, legislators, governmental officials, or the candidates for public office who are concerned with the constitutional essentials of the regime or who are dealing with basic constitutional structure in the (formal) public political forum. More important, public reason is what ordinary citizens appeal to in deliberating political questions and public policies in the public space of democratic civil society.

Ridge, Michael, “Hobbesian Public Reason,” Ethics 108 (1998), 538–68
Wall, Steven, “Perfectionism, Public Reason, and Religious Accommodation,” Social Theory and Practice 31 (2005), 281–304, 281
Gauss, Gerald F., Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)
Rawls, John, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, ed. Kelly, Erin (Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2001)
Rawls, , Law of Peoples, 171
Stout, Jeffrey, Democracy & Tradition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)
Roberts Skerrett, K., “Political Liberalism and the Idea of Public Reason: A Response to Jeffrey Stout’s Democracy and Tradition,” Social Theory and Practice 31 (2005), 173–90, 177, emphasis in original
Macedo, Stephen, Diversity and Distrust: Civic Education in a Multicultural Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), 169
Barber, Benjamin R., The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988)
Galston, William A., “Two Concepts of Liberalism,” Ethics 105 (1995), 516–34
Cohen, Joshua, “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy,” in Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996)
Shapiro, Ian, The State of Democratic Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003)
Warren, Mark E., “Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development,” Perspectives on Politics 9 (2011), 269–89
Hall, Cheryl, “Recognizing the Passion in Deliberation: Toward a More Democratic Theory of Deliberative Democracy,” Hypatia 22 (2007), 81–95, 81
Sanders, Lynn, “Against Deliberation,” Political Theory 25 (1997), 347–76
Walzer, Michael, “Deliberation and What Else?,” in Thinking Politically: Essays in Political Theory, ed. Miller, David (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007)
Krause, Sharon, “Desiring Justice: Motivation and Justification in Rawls and Habermas,” Contemporary Political Theory 4 (2005), 363–85
Okin, Susan M., “Reason and Feeling in Thinking about Justice,” Ethics 99 (1989), 229–49
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis, though primarily Kantian-rationalists, do not see the relationship between reason and passion in terms of stark opposition. See their Why Deliberative Democracy? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), 50–51
Damasio, Antonio R., Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain (New York: HarperCollins, 1994)
Frazer, Michael L., “John Rawls: Between Two Enlightenments,” Political Theory 35 (2007), 756–80, 760
Markell, Patchen, “Making Affect Safe for Democracy? On ‘Constitutional Patriotism,’Political Theory 28 (2000), 38–63
Ivanhoe, Philip J., “Virtue Ethics and the Chinese Confucian Tradition,” in The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics, ed. Russell, Daniel C. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 49
Liu, Xiusheng, “Mencius, Hume, and Sensibility Theory,” Philosophy East and West 52 (2002), 75–97
Frazer, Michael L., The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Ames, Roger T. and Rosemont, Henry Jr., The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation (New York: Ballantine Books, 1998)
Fingarette, Herbert, Confucius: The Secular as Sacred (New York: Harper, 1972)
Weiming, Tu, “The Creative Tension between Jen and Li,” Philosophy East and West 18 (1968), 29–39
Shun, Kwong-loi, “Jen and Li in the Analects,” Philosophy East and West 43 (1993), 457–79
Lai, Karyn, “Li in the Analects: Training in Moral Competence and the Question of Flexibility,” Philosophy East and West 56 (2006), 69–83
Bloom, Irene (trans.), Mencius, ed. Ivanhoe, Philip J. (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009)
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Emile, or On Education, trans. Bloom, Allan (New York: Basic Books, 1979), 221
Boyd, Richard, “Pity’s Pathologies Portrayed: Rousseau and the Limits of Democratic Compassion,” Political Theory 32 (2004), 519–46, 529
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, The First and Second Discourses, ed. Masters, Roger D., trans. Masters, Roger D. and Masters, Judith R. (New York: St. Martin’s, 1964), 130
Norden, Bryan W. Van, “Mengzi and Xunzi: Two Views of Human Agency,” in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, ed. Kline III, T. C. and Ivanhoe, Philip J. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2000), 103–34
Nivison, David S., The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy (Chicago: Open Court, 1996), 94–101
Weiming, Tu, “Probing the ‘Three Bonds’ and ‘Five Relationships’ in Confucian Humanism,” in Confucianism and the Family, ed. Slote, Walter H. and DeVos, George A. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998), 126
Nivison, David S., “Two Roots or One,” in Ways of Confucianism, 133–48
de Bary, Wm. Theodore, The Trouble with Confucianism [Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991], 1
Kim, Sungmoon, “Beyond Liberal Civil Society: Confucian Familism and Relational Strangership,” Philosophy East and West 60 (2010), 476–98
Galston, William A., Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)
Macedo, Stephen, Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990)
Liu, Qingping, “Filiality versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as ‘Consanguinitism,’Philosophy East and West 53 (2003), 234–50
Republicanism, trans. Shugaar, Antony (New York: Hill and Wang, 2002)
Kateb, George, “Is Patriotism a Mistake?,” in Patriotism and Other Mistakes (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006), 3–20
Thompson, Dennis F., “Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands,” American Political Science Review 74 (1980), 905–16
Nussbaum, Martha C., “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism,” in For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism, ed. Cohen, Joshua (Boston: Beacon, 1996), 3–17
Weber, Max, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. and ed. Gerth, Hans H. and Mills, C. W. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1958), 280