Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T20:26:30.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Law and conservation conflicts

from PART II - Contrasting disciplinary approaches to the study of conflict in conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Arie Trouwborst
Affiliation:
Tilburg Law School
Stephen M. Redpath
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
R. J. Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Kevin A. Wood
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University
Juliette C. Young
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
Get access

Summary

Conflict is a dominant notion within the legal discipline. In this chapter, I review some roles that law and legal research play with respect to conservation conflicts. I first introduce briefly law and legal research and then discuss the respective roles of law and legal research with regard to conservation conflicts. Although I focus my discussion on Europe, many if not most of the general principles are applicable elsewhere.

Law

Although most people have a general idea of what law is about, a universally accepted definition is lacking. In essence, law is a set of agreements, of various origins and serving various purposes. Those purposes include promoting and safeguarding different societal interests, for example the equality and individual freedoms of citizens, and the protection of health, safety and the natural environment – including biodiversity. One representative definition describes law as the sum of all rules and prescriptions for the promotion and protection of societal interests that have been publicly (governmentally) established and/or recognised and are, where necessary, enforced through penalties (Uylenburg and Vogelezang-Stoute, 2008).

Law serves several functions. Principally, it provides norms and safeguards. Law indicates what conduct is and is not permitted in society, and offers citizens the possibility to seek compliance by others with the rules involved. Furthermore, law provides a means for avoiding, mitigating and settling conflicts in society. Last but not least, governments use law as an instrument to achieve all manner of policy objectives – including nature conservation objectives.

A major source of law is legislation (i.e. the issuing of written, binding rules) by governments and other public entities at international, national, subnational and lower governmental levels. Other sources include judicial rulings (court decisions) and customary law (unwritten rules created through practice). Within domestic legal systems, a distinction can be drawn between private law (primarily concerned with relations between citizens or other private parties like companies) and public law (primarily concerned with the promotion of public interests).

Type
Chapter
Information
Conflicts in Conservation
Navigating Towards Solutions
, pp. 108 - 121
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baruch-Mordo, S., Breck, S. W., Wilson, K. R. and Broderick, J. (2011). The carrot or the stick? Evaluation of education and enforcement as management tools for human–wildlife conflicts. PloS ONE, 6, e15681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastmeijer, C. J. and Trouwborst, A. (2013). Welkom terug? De relevantie van het Europese gebiedenbeschermingsrecht voor de wolf en andere ‘terugkomers’. Milieu en Recht, 40, 80–91.Google Scholar
Birnie, P., Boyle, A. and Redgwell, C. (2009). International Law & the Environment. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. (2010). The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, M., Davies, P. and Redgwell, C. (2010). Lyster's International Wildlife Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chynoweth, P. (2008). Legal research. In: Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment, eds. Ruddock, L. and Knight, A., pp. 28–38. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Couzens, E. (2014). Whales and Elephants in International Conservation Law and Politics: A Comparative Study. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Darpö, J. (2011). Brussels advocates Swedish grey wolves: on the encounter between species protection according to Union law and the Swedish wolf policy. SIEPS Eur. Policy Anal., 2011(8), 1–19.Google Scholar
Donald, P. F., Sanderson, F. J., Burfield, I. J., Bierman, S. M., Gregory, R. D. and Waliczky, Z. (2007). International conservation policy delivers benefits for birds in Europe. Science, 317, 810–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Y. (2013). Population based species management across legal boundaries: the Bern Convention, Habitats Directive, and the gray wolf in Scandinavia. Georgetown Int. Environ. Law Rev., 25, 549–587.Google Scholar
Epstein, Y. and Darpö, J. (2013). The wild has no words: environmental NGOs empowered to speak for protected species as Swedish courts apply EU and international environmental law. J. Eur. Environ. Plan. Law, 10, 250–261.Google Scholar
Fisher, E., Lange, B., Scotford, E. and Carlarne, C. (2009). Maturity and methodology: starting a debate about environmental law scholarship. J. Environ. Law, 21, 213–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydon, M. J., Wilson, C. J. and Tew, T. (2010). Wildlife conflict resolution: a review of problems, solutions and regulation in England. Wildl. Res., 37, 731–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, V. (2007). International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, F. M. (2008). The growing conflict between humans and wildlife: law and policy as contributing and mitigating factors. J. Int. Wildl. Law Policy, 11, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillai, A. and Heptinstall, D. (2013). Twenty years of the Habitats Directive: a case study on species reintroduction, protection and management. Environ. Law Rev., 15, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redpath, S., et al. (2013). Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends Ecol. Evol., 28, 100–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, A. (1958). On Law and Justice. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
Samuel, G. (2008). Is law really a social science? A view from comparative law. Cambr. Law J., 67, 288–321.Google Scholar
Sanders, J. D. (2013). Wolves, lone and pack: Ojibwe treaty rights and the Wisconsin wolf hunt. Wisconsin Law Review, 2013(6), 1263–1294.Google Scholar
Siems, M. and Mac Síthigh, D. (2012). Mapping legal research. Cambr. Law J., 71, 651–676.Google Scholar
Smits, J. (2012). The Mind and Method of the Legal Academic. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouwborst, A. (2008). Seabird bycatch – deathbed conservation or a precautionary and holistic approach? J. Int. Wildl. Law Policy, 11, 293–333.Google Scholar
Trouwborst, A. (2010). Managing the carnivore comeback: international and EU species protection law and the return of lynx, wolf and bear to Western Europe. J. Environ. Law, 22, 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouwborst, A. (2014a). Exploring the legal status of wolf–dog hybrids and other dubious animals: international and EU law and the wildlife conservation problem of hybridization with domestic and alien species. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law, 23, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouwborst, A. (2014b). Country report: The Netherlands – gearing up for wolf comeback. IUCN Academy of Environmental Law E-Journal, 5, 224–230.Google Scholar
Trouwborst, A. and Bastmeijer, C. J. (2010). Lynxen en wolven: Het natuurbes-chermingsrecht en de terugkeer van grote roofdieren naar Nederland. Milieu en Recht, 37, 272–283.Google Scholar
Trouwborst, A. and Bastmeijer, C. J., with the cooperation of Backes, C. W. (2013b). Wolvenplan voor Nederland: Naar een gedegen juridische basis. Tilburg/Maastricht: Tilburg University and Maastricht University.Google Scholar
Trouwborst, A., Caddell, R. and Couzens, E. (2013a). To free or not to free? State obligations and the rescue and release of marine mammals: a case study of ‘Morgan the Orca’. Transnatl Environ. Law, 2, 117–144.Google Scholar
Uylenburg, R. and Vogelezang-Stoute, E. M. (2008). Toegang tot het Milieurecht: Een Inleiding voor Niet-Juristen. Fifth edition. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Van Hoecke, M. (2013). Methodologies of Legal Research: What Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Young, J., et al. (2005). Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodivers. Conserv., 14, 1641–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J., et al. (2007). Conflicts between biodiversity conservation and human activities in the central and eastern European countries. Ambio, 36, 545–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, J. C., et al. (2010). The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts: characteristics and management strategies. Biodivers. Conserv., 19, 3973–3990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×