Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T11:58:37.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - A Complexity View of Ontogeny as a Window on Phylogeny

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Salikoko S. Mufwene
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Christophe Coupé
Affiliation:
Université Lumière Lyon II
François Pellegrino
Affiliation:
Université Lumière Lyon II
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Complexity in Language
Developmental and Evolutionary Perspectives
, pp. 165 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, Steven M. (1998). Real time modulation of speech-orofacial motor performance by means of motion sense. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31(6), 511534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, Allen & Hooper, Joan B. (eds.) (1978). Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul (1998). Functional Phonology: Formalizing the Interactions Between Articulatory and Perceptual Drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Camazine, Scott, Deneubourg, Jean-Louis, Franks, Nigel, Sneyd, James, Theraulaz, Guy, & Bonabeau, Eric (2001). Self-Organization in Biological Systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Lei-Mei & Kent, Raymond D. (2005). Consonant-vowel co-occurrence patterns in Mandarin-learning infants, J. Child Lang. 32, 507534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The Sound Patterns of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: G. P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Davis, Barbara L. & Bedore, Lisa M. (April, 2013). Knowing and Doing: An Emergence Approach to Speech Acquisition, New York: Routledge, Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Barbara L., McCaffrey, Helen, Von Hapsburg, Deborah, & Warner-Czyz, Andrea (2005). Perceptual Influences on Motor Control: Infants with Varied Hearing Levels, Volta Review, Vol. 105(1), 727.Google Scholar
Davis, Barbara L. & MacNeilage, Peter F. (1995). The Articulatory Basis of Babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 11991211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, Barbara L. & MacNeilage, Peter F. (2000). An Embodiment Perspective on the Acquisition of Speech Perception. Phonetica, 57(Special Issue), 229241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, Barbara L., MacNeilage, Peter F., & Matyear, Christine (2002). Acquisition of Serial Complexity in Speech Production: A Comparison of Phonetic and Phonological Approaches to First Word Production. Phonetica, 59, 75107.Google Scholar
Dekkers, Joost (2000). Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax and Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand (1916). Course in General Linguistics (Harris, R., Trans.). Peru, IL: Carus Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Descartes, Rene (1637). The Philosophical Works of Descartes (Haldane, E. S. & Ross, G. T. R., Trans. Vol. Volume 1). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald M. (1992). Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve-Neumann, Christina, Davis, Barbara L., & MacNeilage, Peter F. (2000). Contingencies governing production of fricatives, affricates and liquids in babbling. Applied Psycholinguistics, (21), 341363.Google Scholar
Giulivi, Sara, Whalen, Douglas H., Goldstein, Louis M., Nam, Hosung, & Levitt, Andrea G. (2011). An Articulatory Phonology Account of Preferred Consonant-Vowel Combinations. Language Learning and Development, 7 (3), 202225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauffman, Stuart (1995). At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kern, Sophie & Davis, Barbara L. (2009). Emergent complexity in early vocal acquisition: Cross-linguistic comparisons of canonical babbling. In Chitoran, Iona, Coupé, Christophe, Marsico, Egideo & Pellegrino, Francoise (eds.), Approaches to Phonological Complexity. Phonology and Phonetics Series, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 353376.Google Scholar
Kim, Namhee (2010). Consonant Assimilation in Early Phonological Development: A Phonetic Perspective, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Kim, Namhee & Davis, Barbara L. (April 2009). Consonant Assimilation in early words, A Phonetic Perspective, Society for Research in Child Language Development, Denver: ColoradoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lee, Suyoung, Davis, Barbara L., & MacNeilage, Peter F. (2008). Segmental properties of input to infants: A study of Korean. Journal of Child Language, 35(3), 591617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindblom, Bjorn, & Maddieson, Ian (1988). Phonetic Universals in Consonant Systems. In Hyman, L. M. & Li, C. N. (eds.), Language, Speech, and Mind (6278). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Bjorn, Krull, Diana, Stark, Johan (1993). Phonetic Systems and Phonological Development. In Boysson Bardies, Benedicte, de Schoen, Jusczyk, Peter, MacNeilage, Peter, Morton (eds.), Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life. Kluwer: Dordrecht, 399409.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Bjorn (2008). The target hypothesis, dynamic specification, and segmental independence. In Davis, Barbara L. & Zajdo, Krisztina (eds.), Syllable Development: The Frame Content Theory and Beyond (327354). New York: Routlege/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, Peter F. & Davis Barbara, L. (1990). Acquisition of Speech Production: Frames, then Content. In Jeannerod, Marc (ed.), Attention and Performance XIII; Motor Representation and Control, Hillsdale, NJ: LEA, 452468.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, Peter F., Davis, Barbara L., Kinney, Ashlyn & Matyear, Christine (2000a). The Motor Core of Speech: A Comparison of Serial Organization Patterns in Infants and Languages. Invited submission to Special Millenium Issue. Child Development, 71(1), 153163.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, Peter F., Davis, Barbara L., Matyear, Christine & Kinney, Ashlyn (2000b). Origin of Speech Output Complexity in Infants and in Languages. Psychological Science, 10(5), 459460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNeilage, Peter F. & Davis, Barbara L. (2000c). Origin of the Internal Structure of Words. Science, 288, 527531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian & Rose, Yvan (2005). A Shared Database for the Study of Phonological Development, PhonBank, available at http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/phon/.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian (1984). Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian & Precoda, Kristin 1991. Syllable Structure and Phonetic Models. UCLA Working Papers Phonetica, 78, 3849.Google Scholar
Oyama, Susan (2000). Evolution's Eye: A System's View of the Biology-Culture Divide. Durham, SC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K. & Steffans, M. L. (1994). “Syllables and Segments in Infant Vocalizations and Young Children” (speech). In Yavas, M., (ed.), First and Second Language Phonology 4561, San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. (2010). Evolutionary Psychology and the Origins of Language. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 8(4), 289307.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K. (1980). The emergence of the sounds of speech in infancy. In Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Kavanagh, J. F. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds.), Child Phonology 1: Production. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, Francoise, Marisco, Egidio, Chitoran, Ioana, & Coupe, Christophe (eds.) (2009). Approaches to Phonological Complexity, Phonology and Phonetics Series, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya, & Stengers, Isabelle (1984). Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, & Smolensky, Paul (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Smith, Linda B., & Breazeal, Cynthia (2007). The Dynamic Lift of Developmental Processes. Developmental Science, 10(1), 6168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Esther (1991). Motor Aspects of Emergent Speech: A Dynamic Approach. In Krasnegor, N., Rumbaugh, D., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (eds.), Biological and Behavioral Determinants of Language Development (339362). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thelen, Esther (1995). Motor Development: A New Synthesis. American Psychologist, 50(2), 7995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinbergen, Nicolas (1963). On Aims and Methods of Ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410433.Google Scholar
Von Hapsburg, Deborah & Davis, Barbara L. (2006). Exploring the Effect of Auditory Sensitivity on Canonical Babbling, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 809822.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan, & Rosch, Eleanor (1991). The Embodied Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, Marilyn May (1992). Early Syllables and the Construction of Phonology in Ferguson, Menn, Stoel-Gammon, (eds.), Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications, 393422, Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O., & Holldöbler, Bert (1988). Dense heterarchies and mass communication as the basis of organization in ant colonies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 6568.Google Scholar
Woolhouse, R. S. (1988). The Empiricists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zlatic, Larissa, MacNeilage, Peter F., Matyear, Christine, & Davis, Barbara L. (1997). Babbling of twins in a bilingual environment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18(4), 453469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×