Bibliography
Beatty, J. (2016). What are narratives good for? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 58, 33–40.
Beatty, J. (2006). Replaying life’s tape. The Journal of Philosophy, 103(7), 336–362.
Beatty, J. (1995). The evolutionary contingency thesis. Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences, 45, 81.
Ben-Menahem, Y. (1997). Historical contingency. Ratio, 10(2), 99–107.
Boyd, N. M. (2018). Evidence Enriched. Philosophy of Science, 85(3), 403–421.
Bressman, N. R., Farina, S. C., & Gibb, A. C. (2016). Look before you leap: visual navigation and terrestrial locomotion of the intertidal killifish Fundulus heteroclitus. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology, 325(1), 57–64.
Brigandt, I. (2013). Integration in biology: philosophical perspectives on the dynamics of interdisciplinarity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences Volume 44, Issue 4, Part A, December 2013, Pages 461–465
Brigandt, I. (2010). Beyond reduction and pluralism: toward an epistemology of explanatory integration in biology. Erkenntnis, 73(3), 295–311.
Brigandt, I. (2007). Typology now: homology and developmental constraints explain evolvability. Biology & Philosophy, 22(5), 709–725.
Brigandt, I. (2003). Homology in comparative, molecular, and evolutionary developmental biology: the radiation of a concept. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 299(1), 9–17.
Brigandt, I. & Griffiths, P. E. (2007). The importance of homology for biology and philosophy. Biology & Philosophy, 22(5), 633–641.
Bromham, L. (2016). Testing hypotheses in macroevolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 55, 47–59.
Brown, C., Laland, K., & Krause, J. (eds.). (2008). Fish Cognition and Behavior. John Wiley & Sons.
Brown, R. L. (2014). What evolvability really is. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65(3), 549–572.
Buckner, C. (2013). Morgan’s Canon, meet Hume’s Dictum: avoiding anthropofabulation in cross-species comparisons. Biology & Philosophy, 28(5), 853–871.
Calcott, B. (2009). Lineage explanations: explaining how biological mechanisms change. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(1), 51–78.
Calcott, B., Levy, A., Siegal, M. L., Soyer, O. S., & Wagner, A. (2015). Engineering and biology: counsel for a continued relationship. Biological Theory, 10(1), 50–59.
Candea, M. (2018). Comparison in Anthropology: the improbable method. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Currie, A. (2019a). Scientific Knowledge and the Deep Past: History Matters. Cambridge University Press.
Currie, A. (2019b). Simplicity, one-shot hypotheses and paleobiological explanation. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 41(1), 10.
Currie, A. M. (2019c). Epistemic optimism, speculation, and the historical sciences. PTPBio, 11(7), 2011–2015.
Currie, A. M. (2018). Rock, Bone, and Ruin: An Optimist’s Guide to the Historical Sciences. MIT Press.
Currie, A. (2016). Ethnographic analogy, the comparative method, and archaeological special pleading. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 55, 84–94.
Currie, A. M. (2014). Venomous dinosaurs and rear-fanged snakes: homology and homoplasy characterized. Erkenntnis, 79(3), 701–727.
Currie, A. (2013). Convergence as evidence. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64(4), 763–786.
Currie, A. M. (2012). Convergence, contingency & morphospace. Biology & Philosophy, 4(27), 583–593.
Currie, A. & Killin, A. (2016). Musical pluralism and the science of music. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(1), 9–30.
Currie, A. & Walsh, K. (2018). Newton on Islandworld: Ontic-driven explanations of scientific method. Perspectives on Science, 26(1), 119–156.
Dacey, M. (2016). The varieties of parsimony in psychology. Mind & Language, 31(4), 414–437.
Desjardin, E. (2011). Historicity and experimental evolution. Biology & Philosophy, 26, 339–364.
Dunbar, R. I. (2009). The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 36(5), 562–572.
Dwyer, D. M. & Burgess, K. V. (2011). Rational accounts of animal behaviour? Lessons from C. Lloyd Morgan’s canon. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 24(4), 349–364.
Emmerton, J. (2001). Birds’ Judgments of Number and Quantity. Avian Visual Cognition.
Ereshefsky, M. (2012). Homology thinking. Biology & Philosophy, 27(3), 381–400.
Ereshefsky, M. (2009). Homology: integrating phylogeny and development. Biological Theory, 4(3), 225–229.
Ereshefsky, M. (2007). Psychological categories as homologies: lessons from ethology. Biology & Philosophy, 22(5), 659–674.
Ereshefsky, M. (1998). Species pluralism and anti-realism. Philosophy of Science, 65(1), 103–120.
Ereshefsky, M. & Turner, D. (2019). Historicity and explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 65, 103–120.
Finkelman, L. (2019). Betting & hierarchy in paleontology. Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 11, 1–6.
Fitzpatrick, S. (2017). Against Morgan’s Canon. In Andrews, K. & Beck, J. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds, Routledge NY, pp. 437–447.
Fitzpatrick, S. (2008). Doing away with Morgan’s Canon. Mind & Language, 23(2), 224–246.
Forber, P. (2009). Introduction: A primer on adaptationism. Biology & Philosophy, 24(2), 155–159.
Ghiselin, M. T. (2016). Homology, convergence and parallelism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1685), 20150035.
Ghiselin, M. T. (2005). Homology as a relation of correspondence between parts of individuals. Theory in Biosciences, 124(2), 91–103.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2001). Three kinds of adaptationism. In Orzack, S. H. & Sober, E. (eds.), Adaptationism and Optimality, Cambridge University Press, pp.335–357.
Goswami, A., Milne, N., & Wroe, S. (2011). Biting through constraints: cranial morphology, disparity and convergence across living and fossil carnivorous mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1713), 1831–1839.
Goswami, A., Weisbecker, V., & Sánchez‐Villagra, M. R. (2009). Developmental modularity and the marsupial–placental dichotomy. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 312(3), 186–195.
Gould, S. J. (1990). Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. WW Norton & Company.
Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 205(1161), 581–598.
Grantham, T. A. (2007). Is macroevolution more than successive rounds of microevolution? Palaeontology, 50(1), 75–85.
Grantham, T. A. (1999). Explanatory pluralism in paleobiology. Philosophy of Science, 66, S223–S236.
Griffiths, P. E. (2007). The phenomena of homology. Biology & Philosophy, 22(5), 643–658.
Griffiths, P. E. (1996). The historical turn in the study of adaptation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47(4), 511–532.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
Hall, B. K. (2012). Parallelism, deep homology, and evo-devo. Evolution & Development, 14, 33–39.
Hall, B. K. (2007). Homoplasy and homology: Dichotomy or continuum? Journal of Human Evolution, 52(5), 473–479.
Hall, B. K. (2003). Descent with modification: the unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 78(3), 409–433.
Harvey, P. H. & Purvis, A. (1991). Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature, 351(6328), 619–624.
Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. (1991). The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Vol. 239). Oxford University Press.
Haslanger, S. (2000). Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be? Noûs, 34(1), 31–55.
Inkpen, R. & Turner, D. (2012). The topography of historical contingency. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 6(1), 1–19.
Karin-D’Arcy, M. (2005). The modern role of Morgan’s canon in comparative psychology. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 18(3), 179–201.
Kendig, C. (2015). Homologizing as kinding. In Kendig, C. (ed.), Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice, (Routledge, pp. 126–146.
Kitcher, P. (2003). Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Lever, J., Krzywinski, M., & Altman, N. S. (2017). Points of significance: principal component analysis. Nature Methods, 14(7), 641–642.
Levy, A. & Currie, A. (2015). Model organisms are not (theoretical) models. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(2), 327–348.
Lewens, T. (2009). Seven types of adaptationism. Biology & Philosophy, 24(2), 161.
Mayr, E. (2000). Darwin’s influence on modern thought. Scientific American, 283(1), 78–83.
Livezey, B. C. (1992). Morphological corollaries and ecological implications of flightlessness in the kakapo (Psittaciformes: Strigops habroptilus). Journal of Morphology, 213(1), 105–145.
Logan, C. J., Avin, S., Boogert, N., Buskell, A., Cross, F. R., Currie, A., … & Shigeno, S. (2018). Beyond brain size: uncovering the neural correlates of behavioral and cognitive specialization. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews.
Losos, J. (2017). Improbable Destinies: How Predictable is Evolution?. Penguin UK.
Love, A. C. (2007). Functional homology and homology of function: Biological concepts and philosophical consequences. Biology & Philosophy, 22(5), 691–708.
Love, A. C. (2003). Evolutionary morphology, innovation, and the synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology. Biology and Philosophy, 18(2), 309–345.
Maclaurin, J (2003) The good, the bad and the impossible: a critical notice of ‘theoretical morphology: the concept and its applications’ by George McGhee. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 463–476
Mariscal, C. (2015). Universal biology: Assessing universality from a single example. The impact of discovering life beyond earth.
Mayr, E. (1959). Darwin and the evolutionary theory in biology. In Meggers, B. J. (ed.), Evolution and Anthropology: A Centennial Appraisal, New York: Theo Gaus’ Sons, Inc, pp. 1–8.
McConwell, A. K. & Currie, A. (2017). Gouldian arguments and the sources of contingency. Biology & Philosophy, 32(2), 243–261.
McConwell, A. K. (2017). Contingency and individuality: A plurality of evolutionary individuality types. Philosophy of Science, 84(5), 1104–1116.
Mast, S. O. (1915). The behavior of fundulus, with especial reference to overland escape from tide-pools and locomotion on land. Journal of Animal Behavior, 5(5), 341.
McGhee, G. R. (2011). Convergent Evolution: Limited Forms Most Beautiful. MIT Press.
McGhee, G. R. (1999). Theoretical Morphology: The Concept and Its Applications. Columbia University Press, New York
Meketa, I. (2014). A critique of the principle of cognitive simplicity in comparative cognition. Biology & Philosophy, 29(5), 731–745
Millstein, R. L. (2000). Chance and macroevolution. Philosophy of Science, 67(4), 603–624.
Mitchell, S. D. (1997). Pragmatic laws. Philosophy of Science, 64, S468–S479.
Morgan, C. Lloyd. (1894). An Introduction to Comparative Psychology. London: Walter Scott.
Morris, S. C. (2003). Life’s Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. Cambridge University Press.
Müller, G. B. (2007). Evo–devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8(12), 943–949.
Nolan, D (1997). Quantitative parsimony. Quantitative Parsimony, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 48, 329–343.
Nyrup, R. (2018). Of Water Drops and Atomic Nuclei: Analogies and Pursuit Worthiness in Science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
O’Malley, M. (2014). Philosophy of Microbiology. Cambridge University Press.
Orzack, S. H. & Sober, E. (1994). Optimality models and the test of adaptationism. The American Naturalist, 143(3), 361–380.
Owen, R. (1843). Lectures on the Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Invertebrate Animals. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.
Panchen, A. L. (1999, May). Homology-history of a concept. In Bock, G. & Cardew, G. (eds.), Novartis Foundation Symposium, Wiley, pp. 5–17.Wiley.
Parke, E. C. (2014). Experiments, simulations, and epistemic privilege. Philosophy of Science, 81(4), 516–536.
Pearce, T. (2011). Evolution and constraints on variation: Variant specification and range of assessment. Philosophy of Science, (78), 739–751.
Pearce, T. (2012). Convergence and parallelism in evolution: A Neo-Gouldian account. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63, 429–448
Pigliucci, M. & Müller, G. B. (2010). Elements of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. MIT Press.
Potochnik, A. (2010). Explanatory independence and epistemic interdependence: A case study of the optimality approach. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(1), 213–233.
Powell, R. & Mariscal, C. (2014). There is grandeur in this view of life: the bio-philosophical implications of convergent evolution. Acta Biotheoretica, 62(1), 115–121.
Powell, R. & Mariscal, C. (2015). Convergent evolution as natural experiment: the tape of life reconsidered. Interface Focus, 5(6), 20150040.
Powell, R. (2007). Is convergence more than an analogy? Homoplasy and its implications for macroevolutionary predictability. Biology and Philosophy, 22(4), 565–578.
Powell, R. (2009). Contingency and convergence in macroevolution: a reply to John Beatty. The Journal of Philosophy, 106(7), 390–403.
Powell, R. (2020). Contingency and Convergence: Toward a Cosmic Biology of Body and Mind (Vol. 25). MIT Press.
Ramsey, G. & Peterson, A. (2012). Sameness in biology. Philosophy of Science, 79(2), 255–275.
Raup, D. M. (1966). Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems. Journal of Paleontology, 40(5), 1178–1190.
Rieppel, O. (2005). Modules, kinds, and homology. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 304(1), 18–27.
Sanford, G. M., Lutterschmidt, W. I., & Hutchison, V. H. (2002). The comparative method revisited. BioScience, 52(9), 830–836.
Sansom, R. (2003). Constraining the adaptationism debate. Biology and Philosophy, 18(4), 493–512.
Sayers, K., Lovejoy, C. O., Emery, N. J., Clayton, N. S., Hunt, K. D., Laland, K. N., … & Strier, K. B. (2008). The chimpanzee has no clothes: a critical examination of Pan troglodytes in models of human evolution. Current Anthropology, 49(1), 87–114.
Sober, E. (November 2009). Parsimony arguments in science and philosophy – A test case for naturalism p. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association Vol. 83, No. 2 (pp. 117–155). American Philosophical Association.
Sober, E. (1991). Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. MIT Press.
Sober, E. (1997). Two outbreaks of lawlessness in recent philosophy of biology. Philosophy of Science, 64, S458–S467.
Sober, E. (2005). Comparative psychology meets evolutionary biology. In Daston, L. & Mitman, G. (eds.), Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism, Columbia University Press, pp. 85–99.
Sterelny, K. (2005). Another view of life. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biol & Biomed Sci, 3(36), 585–593.
Suzuki, D. G. & Tanaka, S. (2017). A phenomenological and dynamic view of homology: homologs as persistently reproducible modules. Biological Theory, 12(3), 169–180.
Tucker, A. (1998). Unique events: The underdetermination of explanation. Erkenntnis, 48(1), 61–83.
Turner, A. (1997). Big Cats and their Fossil Relatives. Columbia University Press
Turner, D. (2011). Paleontology: A Philosophical Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Turner, D. (2000). The functions of fossils: inference and explanation in functional morphology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 31(1), 193–212.
Uyeda, J. C., Zenil-Ferguson, R., & Pennell, M. W. (2018). Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods. Systematic Biology, 67(6), 1091–1109.
Van Valkenburgh, B. & Jenkins, I. (2002). Evolutionary patterns in the history of Permo-Triassic and Cenozoic synapsid predators. The Paleontological Society Papers, 8, 267–288.
Vaesen, K. (2014). Chimpocentrism and reconstructions of human evolution (a timely reminder). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 45, 12–21.
Vermeij, G. J. (2006). Historical contingency and the purported uniqueness of evolutionary innovations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(6), 1804–1809.
Wagner, G. P. (2018). Homology, Genes, and Evolutionary Innovation. Princeton University Press.
Wagner, G. P. (2016). What is ‘homology thinking’ and what is it for?. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 326(1), 3–8.
Waters, C. K. (2007). Causes that make a difference. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(11), 551–579.
Witteveen, J. (2018). Typological thinking: then and now. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 330(3), 123–131.
Witteveen, J. (2016). ‘A temporary oversimplification’: Mayr, Simpson, Dobzhansky, and the origins of the typology/population dichotomy (part 2 of 2). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 57, 96–105.
Wong, T. W. (2020). Evolutionary contingency as non-trivial objective probability: Biological evitability and evolutionary trajectories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 101246. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848619300640 Wong, T. W. (2019). The evolutionary contingency thesis and evolutionary idiosyncrasies. Biology & Philosophy, 34(2), 22.
Worthy, T. H., Hand, S. J., Archer, M., Scofield, R. P., & De Pietri, V. L. (2019). Evidence for a giant parrot from the Early Miocene of New Zealand. Biology letters, 15(8), 20190467.
Worthy, T. H., De Pietri, V. L., & Scofield, R. P. (2017). Recent advances in avian palaeobiology in New Zealand with implications for understanding New Zealand’s geological, climatic and evolutionary histories. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 44(3), 177–211.
Worthy, T. H., Tennyson, A. J., & Scofield, R. P. (2011). An early Miocene diversity of parrots (Aves, Strigopidae, Nestorinae) from New Zealand. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 31(5), 1102–1116.
Zentall, T. R. (2018). Morgan’s Canon: Is it still a useful rule of thumb?. Ethology, 124(7), 449–457.
