Communication Accommodation Theory Negotiating Personal Relationships and Social Identities across Contexts
Book contents
- Communication Accommodation Theory
- Communication Accommodation Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Social Origins of CAT
- 2 Theoretical Perspectives on Interpersonal Adjustments in Language and Communication
- 3 Accommodative Strategies as Core of the Theory
- 4 Methods of CAT Inquiry
- 5 The “Dark Side” of CAT
- 6 CAT and Talk in Action
- 7 Intergroup Accommodation, Social Categories, and Identities
- 8 Accommodating Health
- 9 CAT on Trial
- 10 Communication Accommodation Theory: Integrations and New Framework Developments
- Index
- References
4 - Methods of CAT Inquiry
Quantitative Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2016
Edited by
Book contents
- Communication Accommodation Theory
- Communication Accommodation Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Social Origins of CAT
- 2 Theoretical Perspectives on Interpersonal Adjustments in Language and Communication
- 3 Accommodative Strategies as Core of the Theory
- 4 Methods of CAT Inquiry
- 5 The “Dark Side” of CAT
- 6 CAT and Talk in Action
- 7 Intergroup Accommodation, Social Categories, and Identities
- 8 Accommodating Health
- 9 CAT on Trial
- 10 Communication Accommodation Theory: Integrations and New Framework Developments
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Communication Accommodation TheoryNegotiating Personal Relationships and Social Identities across Contexts, pp. 60 - 84Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Acosta, J. C., & Ward, N. G. (2011). Achieving rapport with turn-by-turn, user-responsive emotional coloring. Speech Communication, 53, 1137–1148.Google Scholar
Candiotti, A., Zuberbühler, K., & Lemasson, A. (2012). Convergence and divergence in Diana monkey vocalizations. Biology Letters, 8, 382–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Agostino, T. A., & Bylund, C. L. (2011). The nonverbal accommodation analysis system (NAAS): Initial application and evaluation. Patient Education and Counseling, 85, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Gamon, M., & Dumais, S. (2011). Mark my words! Linguistic style accommodation in social media. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on the World Wide Web (pp. 745–754). ACM. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1105.0673.pdf.Google Scholar
Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farzadnia, S., & Giles, H. (2015). Patient-provider care: A communication accommodation theory perspective. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 3, 17–34.Google Scholar
Gasiorek, J. (2015). Perspective-taking, inferred motive, and perceived accommodation in nonaccommodative conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. Advance online publication: doi:10.1177/0261927X15584681.Google Scholar
Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2012). Effects of inferred motive on evaluations of nonaccommodative communication. Human Communication Research, 38, 309–331.Google Scholar
Giles, H. (1973) Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87–105.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Davis, S., Gasiorek, J., & Giles, J. (2013). Successful aging: A communication guide to empowerment. Barcelona, Spain: Editorial Aresta.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Maass, A. (Eds.). (2016). Advances in intergroup communication. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Soliz, J. (2014). Communication accommodation theory. In Braithwaite, D. O. & Schrodt, P. (Eds.). Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (2nd edn., pp. 161–174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Goode, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2013). Linguistic synchrony in parasocial interaction. Communication Studies, 64, 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, E. (2009). Communication accommodation theory of Howard Giles. A first look at communication theory (pp. 387–399). Boston. MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hajek, C. (2015). Gay men in early midlife: Intergenerational accommodation for approval, reclaimed status, and distinctiveness. Language and Communication, 41, 46–56.Google Scholar
Harwood, J., Soliz, J. & Lin, M.C. (2006). Communication accommodation theory. In Braithwaite, D. O. & Baxter, L. A. (Eds.), Engaging theories of family communication (pp. 19–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hosek, A. M. (2015). The intergroup perspective in the classroom: An examination of group-based categorization and relational outcomes between students and teachers. Communication Research Reports, 32, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2010). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Littlejohn, S. W. (1999) Theories of human communication (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
McDonald, D. D., Gifford, T., & Walsh, S. (2011). Effect of a virtual pain coach on older adults’ pain communication: A pilot study. Pain Management Nursing, 12, 50–56.Google Scholar
McDonald, D. D., & Molony, S. L. (2004). Postoperative pain communication skills for older adults. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 26, 836–852.Google Scholar
McDonald, D. D., Shea, M., Rose, L., & Fedo, J. (2009). The effect of pain question phrasing on older adult pain information. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 37, 1050–1060.Google Scholar
Pitts, M. J., & Harwood, J. (2015). Communication accommodation competence: The nature and nurture of accommodative resources across the lifespan. Language and Communication, 41, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Giles, H., Bartolucci, G., & Henwood, K. (1986). Psycholinguistics and social psychological components of communication be and with the elderly. Language and Communication, 6, 1–24.Google Scholar
Soliz, J., & Giles, H. (2014). Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and meta-analytical review of Communication Accommodation Theory. In Cohen, E. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 38 (pp. 108–143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tomko, S. L., & Rosenfeld, R. (2006 December). Shaping to convergence: Experiments with speech graffiti. Spoken Language Technology Workshop. IEEE.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by