Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:39:33.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Higher-Order Cognition and Intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Jean E. Pretz
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

We define higher-order cognition as information processing phenomena in which the metacognitive factors of monitoring and control play the fundamental role. This term is practically synonymous with complex cognition, because compound problems rely on the processes of monitoring and control to much greater extent than simple problems do. In this chapter, we review the literature on the relationships between human intelligence and complex, higher-order information processing. First, we will discuss the criteria of complexity of cognitive tasks. Then, we will provide a selection of empirical data concerning intelligence and problem solving. A section will be devoted to the studies that directly address the problem of the role of metacognition in intelligence. The chapter ends with the discussion of basic methodological problems involved in the study of relationships between higher-order cognition and intelligence.

INTELLIGENCE AND COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY

Intelligence is frequently defined as the ability to solve complex problems (Sternberg & Detterman, 1986). According to Carlstedt, Gustafsson, & Ullstadius (2000), who commented on the results of the survey conducted by Linda Gottfredson (1997), two aspects of human intelligence appear essential: quick adaptation to new situations and efficient solution of complex cognitive tasks. Hence, to determine who is intelligent we need to work out the criteria based on either novelty or complexity. In practice, the complexity criterion is more frequently applied, at least in measurement, because novel tasks and situations are hard to arrange in controlled conditions of psychological assessment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cognition and Intelligence
Identifying the Mechanisms of the Mind
, pp. 122 - 141
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press
Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. X, pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Carlson, J. S., & Widaman, K. F. (1987). Elementary cognitive correlates of g: Progress and prospects. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), Speed of information processing and intelligence (pp. 69–100). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Carlstedt, B., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Ullstadius, E. (2000). Item sequencing effects on the measurement of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 28, 145–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404–431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, J. B. (1976). Psychometric tests as cognitive tasks: A new “structure of intellect.” In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 27–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. E. (1995). The suddenness of insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 125–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Deary, I. J. (2000). Simple information processing and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 267–284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(270), entire issueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embretson, S. E. (1995). The role of working memory capacity and general control processes in intelligence. Intelligence, 20(2), 169–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (1995). Cognitive psychology: A student's handbook. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frensch. P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groborz, M., & Nęecka, E. (2003). Creativity and cognitive control: Explorations of generation and evaluation skills. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2/3), 183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Erlbaum
Hunt, E. B. (1980). Intelligence as an information processing concept. The British Journal of Psychology, 71, 449–474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, E. B., & Lansman, M. (1982). Individual differences in attention. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 207–254). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger
Kossowska, M. (1996). Zwiąazki strategii poznawczych, inteligencji i osobowości [Relationships between cognitive strategies, intelligence, and personality]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Jagiellonian University
Kossowska, M., & Nęecka, E. (1994). Do it your own way: Cognitive strategies, intelligence, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity? Intelligence, 14(4), 389–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyllonen, P. C., Lohman, D. F., & Woltz, D. J. (1984). Componential modeling of alternative strategies for performing spatial tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1325–1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, G. E. (1990). Novelty as “representational complexity”: A cognitive interpretation of Sternberg and Gastel (1989). Intelligence, 14, 235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohman, D. F. (2000). Complex information processing and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 285–340). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
MacLeod, C. M., Hunt, E., & Mathews, N. N. (1978). Individual differences in the verification of sentence–picture relationships. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshalek, B., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1983). The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 107–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press
Moses, L. J., & Baird, J. A. (1999). Metacognition. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 533–535). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nęecka, E. (1992). Cognitive analysis of intelligence: The significance of working memory processes. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 1031–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nęecka, E. (1999). Learning, automaticity, and attention: An individual differences approach. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants (pp. 161–181). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Nęecka, E., Gruszka, A., & Orzechowski, J. (1996). Selective attention in gifted children. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 27, 39–51Google Scholar
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention and action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum PressCrossRef
Orzechowski, J. (1999). Nieliniowo-równolegly model rozumowania przez analogięa różnice indywidualne w funkcjonowaniu poznawczym człowieka [Non-linear parallel model of information processing and individual differences in human cognition]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Jagiellonian University
Piaget, J. (1972). The Psychology of intelligence. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield Adams
Primi, R. (2002). Complexity of geometric inductive reasoning tasks: Contribution to the understanding of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 41–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigas, G., Carling, E., & Brehmer, B. (2002). Reliability and validity of performance measures in microworlds. Intelligence, 30, 463–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, T. W., James, M., Owen, A. M., Sahakian, B. J., Lawrence, A. D., McInnes, L., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1998). A study of performance on tests from the CANTAB battery sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction in a large sample of normal volunteers: Implications for theories of executive functioning and cognitive aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 474–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenzwajg, P., & Corroyer, D. (2002). Strategy development in a block design task. Intelligence, 30, 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rychlicka, A., & Nęecka, E. (1990). Syllogistic reasoning, intelligence, and dogmatism. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 21, 3–15Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1980). How much intelligence is there in artificial intelligence? Intelligence, 4, 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of ‘intelligence’ and the principles of cognition. London: Macmillan
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (Ed.) (1986). What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 624–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. C. (1974). An analysis of behavior in the hobbits–orcs problem. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, P., & Warr, P. (1996). Intelligence, elementary cognitive components and cognitive styles as predictors of complex task performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Wittmann, W. W., & Süß, H.-M. (1999). Investigating the paths between working memory, intelligence, knowledge, and complex problem solving performances via Brunswik symmetry. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, & R. D. Roberts, (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants (pp. 77–108). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×