Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Part I Framings
- Part II Equity
- Part III Ethics
- 6 Ethics, politics, economics and the global environment
- 7 Human rights, climate change, and discounting
- 8 Climate change as a global test for contemporary political institutions and theories
- Part IV Reflexivity
- Index
- References
7 - Human rights, climate change, and discounting
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Part I Framings
- Part II Equity
- Part III Ethics
- 6 Ethics, politics, economics and the global environment
- 7 Human rights, climate change, and discounting
- 8 Climate change as a global test for contemporary political institutions and theories
- Part IV Reflexivity
- Index
- References
Summary
In its Fourth Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) has provided further confirmation that climate change will have serious impacts on human life. It reports that:
The global average surface temperature has increased, especially since about 1950. The updated 100-year trend (1906–2005) of 0.74°C ± 0.18°C is larger than the 100-year warming trend at the time of the TAR (1901–2000) of 0.6°C ± 0.2°C due to additional warm years. The total temperature increase from 1850–1899 to 2001–2005 is 0.76°C ± 0.19°C. The rate of warming averaged over the last 50 years (0.13°C ± 0.03°C per decade) is nearly twice that for the last 100 years.
(Solomon et al., 2007: 36)In addition to this, the IPCC projects that temperatures will continue to rise. It employed six different Special Report of Emission Scenarios (SRES) and these all found that temperatures will rise by 2090–2099 as compared to the temperatures between 1980 and 1999. In some scenarios temperatures will increase by 1.8°C (the best estimate of the B1 scenario). In others temperatures will increase by 4.0°C (the best estimate of the A1FI scenario). If we examine the ‘likely range,’ then the lower limit is 1.1°C and the higher limit is 6.4°C (Solomon et al., 2007: 70). Climate change will also involve a rise of sea levels. Again the IPCC employs six different SRES scenarios. In some, sea levels are projected to rise by 0.18–0.38 metres (B1 scenario) and on others the increase is projected to be 0.26–0.59 metres (A1FI scenario).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Climate Change, Ethics and Human Security , pp. 113 - 130Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
1999. Discounting, morality, and gaming. In and , eds., Discounting and Intergenerational Equity. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 13–21.Google Scholar
and 2002. Are the economic costs of stabilizing the atmosphere prohibitive?Ecological Economics, 42(1), 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al. 2007. Summary for Policymakers. In , , , and , eds., Climate Change 2007. Mitigation: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
and 2007. Ethics of the discount rate in the Stern review on the economics of climate change. World Economics, 8(1), 187–210.Google Scholar
and 2001. Justice, Posterity, and the Environment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility and global climate change. Leiden Journal of International Law, 18(4), 747–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009a. Global climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 12(4), 693–717.Google Scholar
2009b. Human rights, responsibilities and climate change. In and , eds., Global Basic Rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–47.Google Scholar
2009c. Climate change and the future: time, wealth and risk. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(2), 163–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009d. Climate change, human rights and moral thresholds. In , ed., Human Rights and Climate Change, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
et al. 2007. Human health. In , , , and , eds., Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 391–431.Google Scholar
, and 1994. Preferences for life saving programs: how the public discounts time and age. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8(3), 243–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. Commentary: The Stern review's economics of climate change. National Institute Economic Review, 199(1), 4–7.Google Scholar
2006. A social discount rate for climate damage to future generations based on regulatory law. Climatic Change, 76(1/2), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. Why Posterity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1989. The Rights of Future People. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 6(2), 159–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. The rights of animals and unborn generations. In Rights, Justice, and the Bounds of Liberty: Essays in Social Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 159–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. Measuring intergenerational time preference: are future lives valued less?Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2005. Declining discount rates: the long and the short of it. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32(4), 445–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. Relationship between increases in global mean temperature and impacts on ecosystems, food production, water and socio-economic systems. In , , , and , eds., Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–87.Google Scholar
, and 2005.Climate change and human health: estimating avoidable deaths and disease. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1409–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2000. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. In and , eds., Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 578–96.Google Scholar
and 1989. Anomalies: intertemporal choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), 181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., eds. 2003. Climate Change and Human Health: Risks and Responses. Geneva: World Health Organization.
et al. 2004. Chapter 20: Global Climate Change. In , , and , eds., Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attribution to selected Major Risk Factors. Geneva: World Health Organization, pp. 1543–649.Google Scholar
2003. Past and future: the case for a threshold notion of harm. In , and , eds., Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. The human right to a safe environment: philosophical perspectives on its scope and justification. Yale Journal of International Law, 18(1), 281–95.Google Scholar
1997. Discounting in economics and climate change. Climatic Change, 37(2), 315–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(3), 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2000. Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2006. Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al. 2000. The potential health impacts of climate variability and change for the United States: Executive Summary of the Report of the Health Sector of the US National Assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108(4), 367–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2003. Valuing the future: recent advances in social discounting. World Economics, 4(2), 121–41.Google Scholar
et al. 2007. Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(24), 10 288–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1982. The Rejection of Consequentialism: A Philosophical Investigation of the Considerations Underlying Rival Moral Conceptions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, 1967. Isolation, assurance and the social rate of discount. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81(1), 112–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1982. Approaches to the choice of discount rates for social benefit–cost analysis. In et al., eds., Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 325–53.Google Scholar
1981 [1907]. The Methods of Ethics, 7th edn. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
et al. 2007. Technical summary. In et al., eds., Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 20–91.Google Scholar
, and 1994. Environmental Economics: An Elementary Introduction. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
2007. A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(3), 703–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by