Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: May 2011

11 - Climate envelope models in systematics and evolutionary research: theory and practice

from Section 3 - Biogeography, migration and ecological niche modelling



Climatic information from distribution data of a species can be used to compute its climate envelope. Climate envelope models (CEMs) are employed to predict potential geographic ranges of species as a function of climate by comparing the climate envelope with climatic conditions at locations of unknown occurrence. CEMs find their way into applied sciences such as conservation management and risk assessment, but they also perform well in systematics and evolutionary research, often supplementary to other methods. Although the application of CEM approaches is developing rapidly, there is a considerable lack of theoretical background. We summarise theoretical assumptions behind CEMs, describe how they work and discuss possible pitfalls when interpreting results. In addition, we provide examples from our ongoing research on the Afrotropical reed frogs, genus Hyperolius (Hyperoliidae). We delimit the potential distribution of a recently recognised taxon within the Hyperolius cinnamomeoventris species complex and propose possible speciation scenarios for H. mitchelli and H. puncticulatus.


Climate and the geographic distribution of species

It is known that climate elements and factors have an important influence on the distribution of plant and animal species; likewise, the ecological niche concept has been well discussed (Grinnell, 1917; James et al., 1984). In recent years, there has been a remarkable increase in availability of information on climatic parameters in geographic space, including remote regions. There has also been improved recording of species distribution data.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Araújo, M. B. and Guisan, A. (2006). Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 1677–1688.
Araújo, M.B. and Pearson, R. G. (2007). Equilibrium of species' distributions with climate. Ecography, 28, 693–695.
Araújo, M. B., Cabeza, M., Thullier, W., Hannah, L. and Williams, P. H. (2004). Would climate change drive species out of reserves? An assessment of existing reserve-selection methods. Global Change Biology, 10, 1618–1626.
Beaumont, L. J., Hughes, L. and Poulsen, M. (2005). Predicting species distributions: use of climatic parameters in BIOCLIM and its impact on predictions of species' current and future distributions. Ecological Modelling, 186, 250–269.
Beaumont, L. J., Hughes, L. and Pitman, A. J. (2008). Why is the choice of future climate scenarios for species distribution modelling important?Ecology Letters, 11, 1135–1146.
Broennimann, O., Treier, U. A., Müller-Schärer, H. et al. (2007). Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecology Letters, 10, 701–709.
Busby, J. R. (1991). BIOCLIM: a bioclimatic analysis and prediction system. In Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Biological Surveys and Data Analysis, ed. Margules, C. R. and Austin, M. P.. Melbourne: CSIRO, pp. 64–68.
Carnaval, A. C. and Moritz, C. (2008). Historical climate modelling predicts patterns of current biodiversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Journal of Biogeography, 25, 1187–1201.
Carpenter, G., Gillison, A. N. and Winter, J. (1993). DOMAIN: a flexible modeling procedure for mapping potential distributions of plants and animals. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2, 667–680.
Dormann, C. F., McPherson, J., Araújo, M. B. et al. (2007). Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography, 30, 609–628.
Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Anderson, R. P. et al. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29, 129–151.
Elton, C. (1927). Animal Ecology. London: Sedgwick and Jackson.
Fielding, A. H. and Bell, J. F. (1997). A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation, 24, 38–49.
Fisher, J., Lindenmayer, D. B., Nix, H. A., Stein, J. L. and Stein, J. A. (2001). Climate and animal distribution: a climatic analysis of the Australian marsupialTrichosurus caninus. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 293–304.
Fitzpatrick, M. C., Weltzin, J. F., Sanders, N. J. and Dunn, R. R. (2007). The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range?Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 24–33.
Flato, G. M., Boer, G. J., Lee, W. G. et al. (2000). The Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis global coupled model and its climate. Climate Dynamics, 16, 451–467.
Frost, D. R. (2010). Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 5.4. New York, NY: American Museum of Natural History.
Gordon, C., Cooper, C., Senior, C. A. et al. (2000). The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Climate Dynamics, 16, 147–168.
Graham, C. H., Ron, S. R., Santos, J. C., Schneider, C. J. and Moritz, C. (2004). Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution, 58, 1781–1793.
Graham, C. H., Elith, J., Hijmans, R. J. et al. (2008). The influence of spatial errors in species' occurrence data used in distribution models. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 239–247.
Grinnell, J. (1917). The niche-relationships of the California Thrasher. Auk, 34, 427–433.
Gu, W. and Swihart, R. K. (2004). Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models. Biological Conservation, 116, 195–203.
Guisan, A. and Thuiller, W. (2005). Predicting species distributions: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, 8, 993–1009.
Guisan, A. and Zimmermann, N. (2000). Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135, 147–186.
Hanley, J. and McNeil, B. (1982). The meaning of the use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29–36.
Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Araújo, M. B. et al. (2006). Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modeling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography, 30, 751–777.
Hijmans, R. J. and Graham, C. H. (2006). The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species' distributions. Global Change Biology, 12, 2272–2281.
Hijmans, R. J., Guarino, L. and Rojas, E. (2002). DIVA-GIS: A Geographical Information System for the Analysis of Biodiversity Data. Manual. Lima: International Potato Center.
Hijmans, R. J., Guarino, L., Jarvis, A. et al. (2005a). DIVA-GIS, version 5.2. Manual.
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. and Jarvis, A. (2005b). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965–1978.
Hirzel, A. H. and Lay, G. (2008). Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 1372–1381.
Hortal, J., Jiménez-Valverde, A., Gómez, J. F., Lobo, J. M. and Baselga, A. (2008). Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed environmental niche of the species. OIKOS, 117, 847–858.
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415–427.
Hutchinson, G. E. (1978). An Introduction to Population Ecology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hutchinson, M. F. (1995). Interpolating mean rainfall using thin plate smoothing splines. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9, 385–403.
Hutchinson, M. F. (2004). Anusplin version 4.3. Canberra: Centre for Resource and Environment Studies, Australian National University.
James, F. C., Johnston, R. F., Warner, N. O., Niemi, G. and Boecklen, W. (1984). The Grinnellian niche of the Wood Thrush. American Naturalist, 124, 17–47.
Jiménez-Valverde, A. and Lobo, J. M. (2006). The ghost of unbalanced species distribution data in geographical model predictions. Diversity and Distributions, 12, 512–524.
Jiménez-Valverde, A., Lobo, J. M. and Hortal, J. (2008). Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modeling. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 885–890.
Kiehl, J. T. and Gent, P. R. (2004). The Community Climate System Model, version 2. Journal of Climate, 17, 1666–1669.
Köhler, J., Scheelke, K., Schick, S., Veith, M. and Lötters, S. (2005). Contribution to the taxonomy of hyperoliid frogs (Amphibia, Anura, Hyperoliidae): advertisement calls of twelve species from East and Central Africa. African Zoology, 40, 127–142.
Kozak, K. H., Graham, C. H. and Wiens, J. J. (2008). Integrating GIS-based environmental data into evolutionary biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 141–148.
Kremen, C., Cameron, A., Moilanen, A. et al. (2008). Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resolution planning tools. Science, 320, 222–226.
Lobo, J. M., Jiménez-Valverde, A. and Real, R. (2008). AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17, 145–151.
Lötters, S., Rotich, D., Scheelke, K. et al. (2004). Bio-sketches and partitioning of syntopic reed frogs, genus Hyperolius (Amphibia: Hyperoliidae), in two humid tropical African forest regions. Journal of Natural History, 38, 1969–1997.
Lötters, S., Rödder, D., Bielby, J. et al. (2008). Meeting the challenge of conserving Madagascar's megadiverse amphibians: addition of a risk assessment for the chytrid fungus. PLoS Biology, 6.
Martinez-Meyer, E., Peterson, A. T. and Navarro-Siguenza, A. G. (2004). Evolution of seasonal ecological niches in the Passerina buntings (Aves: Cardinalidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 1151–1157.
Monserud, R. A. and Leemans, R. (1992). Comparing global vegetation maps with kappa statistics. Ecological Modelling, 62, 275–293.
New, M., Hulme, M. and Jones, P. D. (1999). Representing twentieth century space-time climate variability. Part 1: development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. Journal of Climate, 12, 829–856.
New, M., Hulme, M. and Jones, P. D. (2000). Representing twentieth century space-time climate variability. Part 2: development of 1901–96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. Journal of Climate, 13, 2217–2238.
Nix, H. (1986). A biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes. In Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia, ed. Longmore, R.. Canberra: Bureau of Flora and Fauna, pp. 4–15.
Pearce, J. and Ferrier, S. (2000). An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species' distribution models using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling, 128, 128–147.
Pearman, P. B., Guisan, A., Broennimann, O. and Randin, C. F. (2007). Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 149–158.
Pearman, P. B., Randin, C. F., Broennimann, O. et al. (2008). Prediction of plant species' distributions across six millennia. Ecology Letters, 11, 357–369.
Pearson, R.G. (2007). Species' Distribution Modeling for Conservation Educators and Practitioners: Synthesis. New York, NY: American Museum of Natural History.
Pearson, R. G., Raxworthy, C. J., Nakamura, M. and Peterson, A. T. (2007). Predicting species' distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 102–117.
Peterson, A. T. (2003). Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 78, 419–433.
Peterson, A. T. and Vargas, N. (1993). Ecological diversity in scrub jays, Aphelocoma coerulescens. In The Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origins and Distribution, ed. Ramamoorthy, T. P., Bye, R. and Fa, J.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 309–317.
Peterson, A. T. and Vieglais, D. A. (2001). Predicting species' invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. BioScience, 51, 363–371.
Peterson, A. T., Soberón, J. and Sánchez-Cordero, V. (1999). Conservation of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science, 285, 1265–1267.
Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M. and Shapire, R. E. (2004). A maximum entropy approach to species' distribution modeling. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning. New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 655–662.
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. and Schapire, R. E. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species' geographic distributions. Ecological Modeling, 190, 231–259.
Puliam, H. R. (2000). On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters, 3, 349–361.
Raxworthy, C. J., Ingram, C. M., Rabibisoa, N. and Pearson, R. G. (2007). Applications of ecological niche modeling for species' delimitation: a review and empirical evaluation using day geckos (Phelsuma) from Madagascar. Systematic Biology, 56, 907–923.
Rödder, D. (2009). ‘Sleepless in Hawaii’: does anthropogenic climate change enhance ecological and socioeconomic impacts of the alien invasive Eleutherodactylus coqui Thomas, 1966 (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae)?North-Western Journal of Zoology, 5, 16–25.
Rödder, D. and Böhme, W. (2009). Who is who? Comparison of the advertisement calls of two East African sister species of Hyperolius (Anura: Hyperoliidae). Salamandra, 45, 180–185.
Rödder, D. and Dambach, J. (2010). Review: modelling future trends of relict species. In Relict Species: Phylogeography and Conservation Biology, ed. Habel, J. C. and Assmann, T., New York, NY: Springer, pp. 373–382.
Rödder, D. and Lötters, S. (2009). Niche shift or niche conservatism? Climatic properties of the native and invasive range of the Mediterranean Housegecko Hemidactylus turcicus. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 18, 674–687.
Rödder, D. and Weinsheimer, F. (2009). Will future anthropogenic climate change increase the potential distribution of the alien invasive Cuban treefrog (Anura: Hylidae)?Journal of Natural History, 43, 1207–1217.
Rödder, D., Solé, M. and Böhme, W. (2008). Predicting the potential distribution of two alien invasive housegeckos (Gekkonidae: Hemidactylus frenatus, Hemidactylus mabouia). North-Western Journal of Zoology, 4, 236–246.
Rödder, D., Schmidtlein, S., Veith, M. and Lötters, S. (2009). Alien invasive Slider turtle in unpredicted habitat: a matter of niche shift or predictors studied?PLoS ONE, 4, e7843.
Rödder, D., Schlüter, A. and Lötters, S. (2010). Is the ‘Lost World’ lost? High endemism of amphibians and reptiles on South American tepuis in a changing climate. In Relict Species: Phylogeography and Conservation Biology, ed. Habel, J. C. and Assmann, T.. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 401–416.
Sax, D. F., Stachowicz, J. J., Brown, J. H. et al. (2008). Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 465–471.
Schiøtz, A. (1999). Treefrogs of Africa. Frankfurt: Chimaira.
Soberón, J. (2007). Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecology Letters, 10, 1115–1123.
Soberón, J. and Peterson, A. T. (2004). Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 359, 689–698.
Soberón, J. and Peterson, A. T. (2005). Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species' distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics, 2, 1–10.
Stockwell, D. B. R. and Noble, I. R. (1992). Introduction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis. Math and Computers in Simulation, 33, 385–390.
Stockwell, D. and Peters, D. (1999). The GARP modeling system problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13, 143–158.
Swets, K. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285–1293.
Thuiller, W. (2003). BIOMOD: optimising predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global Change Biology, 9, 1352–1362.
Thuiller, W., Albert, C., Araújo, M. B. et al. (2008). Predicting global change impacts on plant species' distributions: future challenges. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 9, 137–152.
Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L. and Nowak, M. A. (1994). Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371, 65–66.
Veith, M., Kosuch, J., Rödel, M. O. et al. (2009). Multiple evolution of sexual dichromatism in Afrotropical reed frogs. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 51, 388–393.
Waltari, E. and Guralnick, R. P. (2009). Ecological niche modelling of montane mammals in the Great Basin, North America: examining past and present connectivity of species across basins and ranges. Journal of Biography, 36, 148–161.
Waltari, E., Hijmans, R. J., Peterson, A. T. et al. (2007). Locating Pleistocene refugia: comparing phylogeographic and ecological niche model predictions. PLoS ONE, 7, 1–11.
Warren, D. L., Glor, R. E. and Turelli, M. (2008). Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution, 62, 2868–2883.
Wiens, J. J. and Graham, C. H. (2005). Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 36, 519–539.
Wisz, M. S., Hijmans, R. J., Peterson, A. T. et al. (2008). Effects of sample size on the performance of species' distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 763–773.