Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:34:06.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

List of References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2010

Sarah Elise Wiliarty
Affiliation:
Wesleyan University, Connecticut
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The CDU and the Politics of Gender in Germany
Bringing Women to the Party
, pp. 240 - 259
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addis, Elizabeth. 2000. “Gender in the Reform of the Italian Welfare State” in Gonzalez, Maria Jose, Jurado, Teresa, and Naldini, Manuela (eds.), Gender Inequalities in Southern Europe: Women, Work and Welfare in the 1990s, London: Frank Cass, pp. 122–49.Google Scholar
Agence France Press, various dates.
Ágh, Atilla. 1995. “Partial Consolidation of the East-Central European Parties: The Case of the Hungarian Socialist Party,” Party Politics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ágh, Atilla. 1997. “Defeat and Success as Promoters of Party Change: The Hungarian Socialist Party after Two Abrupt Changes,” Party Politics, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 427–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ágh, Atilla. 2002. “The Dual Challenge and the Reform of the Hungarian Socialist Party,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 35, Issue 3, pp. 269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allern, Elin H. and Pedersen, Karina. 2007. “The Impact of Party Organisational Changes on Democracy,” West European Politics, Vol. 30, Issue 1, pp. 68–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altbach, Edith. 1984. “The New German Women's Movement,” in Edith Altbach, J. Clause, Schultz, D., and Stephan, N. (eds.), German Feminism: Readings in Politics and Literature, 3–26. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Margaret Lavinia. 1981. Windthorst: A Political Biography. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, Christopher K. and Fish, M. Steven. 1999. “The Art of Being Indispensible: Noncharismatic Personalism in Contemporary Political Parties,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Associated Press Germany, various dates.
Banaszak, Lee Ann. 1998. “East-West Differences in German Abortion Opinion,” Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 545–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen, and Rucht, Dieter. 2003. Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bardi, Luciano and Morlino, Leonardo. 1992. “Italy,” in Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter (eds.), Party Organizations: A Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960–1990. London: Sage Publications, pp. 458–618.Google Scholar
,Basic Program, Austrian People's Party. 1995. Basic Program. Passed at the ÖVP's National Congress on April 22, 1995.
,Basic Program, Austrian People's Party. 1999. Party Statutes, version from April 23, 1999.
Beccalli, Bianca. 1994. “The Modern Women's Movement in Italy,” New Left Review, Issue 204, pp. 86–112.Google Scholar
Becker, Winifried. 1987. CDU und CSU 1945–1950: Vorläufer, Gründung und regionale Entwicklung bis zum Entstehen der CDU-Bundespartei. Mainz: Hase und Koehler.Google Scholar
Bell, David S. and Criddle, Byron. 1988. The French Socialist Party: The Emergence of a Party of Government. Second edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Belloni, Frank P. and Beller, Dennis C. (eds.). 1978. Faction Politics: Political Parties and Factionalism in Comparative Perspective. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Bertone, Chiara. 2002. Whose Needs? Women's Organizations' Claims on Child Care in Italy and Denmark. Aalborg: FREIA, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
Bertone, Chiara. 2003. “Claims for Child Care as Struggles Over Needs: Comparing Italian and Danish Women's Organizations,” Social Politics, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 229–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettio, Francesca and Plantenga, Janneke. 2004. “Comparing Care Regimes in Europe,” Feminist Economics, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, Hans-Georg. 1994. Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, Hans-Georg and Immerfall, Stefan. 1998. The New Politics of the Right: Neo-Populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bimbi, Franca. 2000. “The Family Paradigm in the Italian Welfare State (1947–1996)” in Gonzalez, Maria Jose, Jurado, Teresa, and Naldini, Manuela (eds.), Gender Inequalities in Southern Europe: Women, Work and Welfare in the 1990s, London: Frank Cass, pp. 72–88.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark and Katz, Richard S.. 2005. “From Catch-all Politics to Cartelisation: The Political Economy of the Cartel Party,” West European Politics, Vol. 28, Issue 1, pp. 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bösch, Frank. 2001. Die Adenauer-CDU: Gründung, Aufstieg und Krise einer Erfolgspartei, 1945–1969. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.Google Scholar
Bösch, Frank. 2002. Macht und Machtverlust: Die Geschichte der CDU. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.Google Scholar
Boysen, Jacqueline. 2005. Angela Merkel: Eine Karriere. Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar
Bremme, Gabriele. 1956. Die politische Rolle der Frau in Deutschland: Eine Untersuchung über den Einfluβ der Frauen bei Wahlen und ihre Teilnahme in Partei und Parlament. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Bruning, Gwennaële and Plantenga, Janneke. 1999. “Parental Leave and Equal Opportunities: Experiences in Eight European Countries,” Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchhaas, Dorothee. 1981. Die Volkspartei: Programmatische Entwicklung der CDU, 1950–1973. Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian. 2000. “Deliberative Democracy versus Direct Democracy – Plus Political Parties!” in Saward, Michael (ed.), Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 195–209.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian and Keman, Hans. 1990. Parties and Democracy: Coalition Formation and Government Functioning in Twenty States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Familie, Bundesministerium für, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. 1998. Frauen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.Google Scholar
Familie, Bundesministerium für, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. 2006. Erziehungsgeld, Elternzeit. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.Google Scholar
Der Bundeswahlleiter – Veröffentlichungen zur Wahl zum 17. Deutschen Bundestag am 27. September 2009 [cited January 7, 2010]. Available from http://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/de/bundestagswahlen/BTW_BUND_09/veroeffentlichungen/.
Burgess, Katrina and Levitsky, Steven. 2003. “Explaining Populist Party Adaptation in Latin America: Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Party Change in Argentina, Mexico, Peru and Venezuela,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 881–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussemaker, Jet. 1998. “Rationales of Care in Contemporary Welfare States: The Case of Childcare in the Netherlands,” Social Politics, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 70–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussemaker, Jet and Kersbergen, Kees. 1999. “Contemporary Social-Capitalist Welfare States and Gender Inequality,” in Sainsbury, Diane (ed.), Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald E.. 1974. Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Electoral Choice, Second Edition. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Leslie. 1991. Italian Family Matters: Women, Politics and Legal Reform. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calloni, Marina. 2001. “Debates and Controversies on Abortion in Italy,” in Stetson, Dorothy McBride (ed.), Abortion Politics, Women's Movements, and the Democratic State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Caul, Miki L. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties,” Party Politics, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,CDU. 1975. “Woman and Society,” from CDU National Party Congress Protocol.
,CDU. 1985. “A New Partnership,” from CDU National Party Congress Protocol.
,CDU-Bundesgeschäftsstelle. 1965. Frau und Arbeitswelt – morgen. Kongress berufstätiger Frauen der CDU vom 2.–4. Dezember 1964 in Bochum. Bonn: Presse- und Informationsdienste der Christlich Demokratischen Union Deutschlands, Verlagsgesellschaft, mgH.Google Scholar
,CDU-Bundesgeschäftsstelle. 1973. “Grundsatzprobleme der Familienpolitik: Anhörung von Sachverständigen der Kommission der CDU/CSU-Bundestagsfraktion, der CDU und CSU ‘Familie’ Vorsitzender: Dr. Hermann Götz, MdB, und ‘Frauen’ Vorsitzende: Dr. Helga Wex, MdB. Am 24. September 1973.” Bonn.
,CDU-Bundesgeschäftsstelle. 1974. “Die Familie – Unsere Zukunft,” Argumente, Dokumente, Materialien. Familienpolitischer Kongress der CDU am 4./5. Oktober 1974 in Münster.
,CDU-Bundesgeschäftsstelle. 1991. “Dokumentation: Positionen zum verbesserten Schutz des ungeborenen Kindes in Deutschland.”
,CDU-Bundesgeschäftsstelle. 1991. Minutes from the meetings of the Commission “Schutz des ungeborenen Kindes,” Konrad-Adenauer-Haus, various dates.
CDU National Party Congress. 1975, 1985, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1994 (February), 1994 (November), 1995 (October), 1996 (October). Protocol of the National Party Congress. Bonn: Presse- und Informationsdienste der Christlich Demokratischen Union Deutschlands, Verlagsgesellschaft, mgH.
,CDU Statutes.[cited April 12, 2010]. Available fromhttp://www.cdu.de/doc/pdfc/080121-CDU-statut.pdf
Chandler, William M. 1988. “Party System Transformations in the FRG,” in Wolinetz, Steven B. (ed.), Parties and Party Systems in Liberal Democracies. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chandler, William M. 1989. “The Christian Democrats,” in Merkl, Peter H. (ed.), The Federal Republic of Germany at Forty. New York and London: New York University Press, pp. 287–313.Google Scholar
Chandler, William M. 1993. “The Christian Democrats and the Challenge of Unity,” in Padgett, Stephen (ed.), Parties and Party Systems in the New Germany. Dartmouth Publishing Company Ltd.: England.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 1996. The Rule of the Many. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, Clay. 1989. Reluctant Realists: The CDU/CSU and West German Ostpolitik. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, Clay. 1993. “Disquiet on the Eastern Front: The Christian Democratic Union in Germany's New Länder,” German Politics, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 200–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, Clay. 1994. “The Chancellor as Manager: Helmut Kohl, the CDU and Governance in Germany,” West European Politics, Vol. 17, Issue 4, pp. 28–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, Clay. 1998. “Party Management as a Leadership Resource: Kohl and the CDU/CSUGerman Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 90–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,” in Hamlin, Alan and Pettit, Philip (eds.), The Good Polity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins and Collier, David. 1979. “Inducements versus Constraints: Disaggregating ‘Corporatism,’American Political Science Review, Vol. 73, Issue 4, pp. 967–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, Barbara. 2000. Radical Feminism: A Documentary Reader. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Czarnowski, Gabriele. 1994. “Abortion as Political Conflict in Unified Germany,” Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp 252–68.Google Scholar
Däubler-Gmelin, Herta and Faerber-Husemann, Renate. 1987. §218–Der tägliche Kampf um die Reform. Mit einem dokumentarischen Anhang von Dorothea Brück über Angriffe auf die Reform des §218 seit der “Wende.”Bonn: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1973. Beyond God the Father: Toward a Philosophy of Women's Liberation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1978. Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1984. Pure Lust: Elemental Feminist Philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson-Schmich, Louise K. 2006. “Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas: Evidence from the German Länder, 1990–2000,” Party Politics, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ddp, Nachrichtenagentur, various dates.
Detterbeck, Klaus. 2005. “Cartel Parties in Western Europe?” Party Politics, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 173–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittrich, Karl. 1983. “Testing the Catch-all Thesis: Some Difficulties and Problems,” in Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter (eds.), Western European Party Systems, Continuity and Change. London: Sage, pp. 257–66.Google Scholar
Domes, Jürgen. 1964. Mehrheitsfraktion und Bundesregierung: Aspekte des Verhältnisses der Fraktion der CDU/CSU im zweiten und dritten Deutschen Bundestag zum Kabinett Adenauer. Cologne: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doormann, Lottemi. 1980. Wartet nicht auf bess're Zeiten: Frauenpolitik aus Bonn und Alternativen der Frauenbewegung. Cologne: Pahl-Rugenstein Verlag.Google Scholar
Doormann, Lottemi. 1983. “Die neue Frauenbewegung: Zur Entwicklung seit 1968,” in Hervé, F. (ed.), Geschichte der deutschen Frauenbewegung. Cologne: Pahl-Rugenstein, pp. 237–72.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activities in the Modern State. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1955. The Political Role of Women. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Echols, Alice. 1990. Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America, 1967–75. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Edinger, Lewis J. and Nacos, Brigitte L.. 1998. From Bonn to Berlin: German Politics in Transition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Egen, Peter. 1971. Die Entstehung des Evangelischen Arbeitskreises der CDU/CSU. Phd Dissertation. Bochum University.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah. 1986. The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Elder, Charles D. and Cobb, Roger W.. 1983. The Political Use of Symbols. New York and London: Longman.Google Scholar
Engelbrech, Gerhard, Gruber, Hannelore and Jungkunst, Maria. 1997. “Erwerbsorientierung und Erwerbstätigkeit ost- und westdeutscher Frauen unter veränderten gesellschaftlichen Rahmenbedingungen,” Miteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Ergas, Yasmine. 1982. “1968–1979. Feminism and the Italian Party System: Women's Politics in a Decade of Turmoil,” Comparative Politics, Vol 14, Issue 3, pp. 253–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, Colette and Hebson, Gail (eds.). 2006. ‘Making Work Pay’ Debates from a Gender Perspective: A Comparative Review of Some Recent Policy Reforms in Thirty European Countries. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
Falke, Wolfgang. 1982. Die Mitglieder der CDU: Eine empirische Studie zum Verhältnis von Mitglieder- und Organisationsstruktur der CDU 1971–1977. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Feist, Ursula and Hoffmann, Hans-Jürgen. 1999. “Dokumentation und Kurzanalyzen: Die Bundestagswahlanalyse 1998: Wahl des Wechsels,” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, Heft 2, pp. 215–51.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 1987. “Equality and Autonomy: Feminist Politics in the United States and West Germany,” in Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod and Mueller, Carol McClurg (eds.), The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity, and Public Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 171–95.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 1993. “The Rise and Fall of ‘Mommy Politics’: Feminism and Unification in (East) Germany,” Feminist Studies, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 1994. “‘The Time of Chaos Was the Best’: Feminist Mobilization and Demobilization in East Germany,” Gender and Society, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 597–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 1995. “Patriarchies and Feminisms: The Two Women's Movements of Unified Germany,” Social Politics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 1997. “German Unification and Feminist Identity,” in Scott, Joan W., Kaplan, Cora, and Keates, Debra (eds.), Transitions, Environments, Translations: Feminisms in International Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 46–55.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 2006. “Angela Merkel: What Does it Mean to Run as a Woman?” German Politics and Society, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. Forthcoming. Sisterhood Since the Sixties: German Feminism, American Liberalism, and Global Gender Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ferree, Myra Marx, Anthony Gamson, William, Gerhards, Jürgen, and Rucht, Dieter. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuchtwanger, E. J. 1993. From Weimar to Hitler: Germany, 1918–33. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firestone, Shulamith. 1970. The Dialectic of Sex. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Fischer, Claus. 1997. Wahlergebnisse in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und in den Ländern, 1946–1997, insgesamt und nach Alter und Geschlecht. Sankt Augustin: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James. 1995. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
FOCUS magazine, various dates.
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, various dates.
Frankfurter Rundschau, various dates.
,Frauen Union der CDU. 1991. Leitsaetze der Frauen-Union zur Neuregelung des §218 StGB 1991. beschlossen vom Bundesvorstand der Frauen-Union am 12. Juli 1991.
,Frauen-Union der CSU (ed.). 1997. 50 Jahre Frauen-Union in Bayern. Augsburg: Hofmann-Druck GmbH.
French, Marilyn. 1985. Beyond Power: On Women, Men and Morals. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
Friedan, Betty. 1974. The Feminine Mystique. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, Ute. 1983. “The Old and New Women's Movements in the Federal Republic of Germany,” in Drewitz, Ingeborg (ed.), The German Women's Movement: The Social Role of Women in the 19th Century and the Emancipation Movement in Germany. Bonn: Hohwacht.Google Scholar
Galtry, Judith and Callister, Paul. 2005. “Assessing the Optimal Length of Parental Leave for Child and Parental Well-being – How Can Research Inform Policy?” Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 219–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gante, Michael. 1991. §218 in der Diskussion: Meinungs- und Willensbildung, 1945–1976. Dusseldorf: Droste Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
General Anzeiger, various dates.
Gerhard, Ute. 1982. “A Hidden and Complex Heritage: Reflections on the History of Germany's Women's Movements,” Women's Studies International Forum, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 561–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green Party statutes.
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guadagnini, Marila. 1993. “A ‘Partitocrazia’ Without Women: the Case of the Italian Party System,” in Lovenduski, Joni and Norris, Pippa (eds.), Gender and Party Politics, pp. 168–204.
Guadagnini, Marila. 1998. “The Debate on Women's Quotas in Italian Electoral Legislation,” Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 97–102.Google Scholar
Guadagnini, Marila. 2005. “Gendering the Debate on Political Representation in Italy: a Difficult Challenge,” in Lovenduski, Joni (ed.), State Feminism and Political Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurland, Arcadius Rudolph Lang. 1980. Die CDU/CSU: Ursprünge und Entwicklung bis 1953. Emig, Dieter (ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Siv S. and Frank, P. Stafford. 1995. “Links between Early Childhood Programs and Maternal Employment in Three Countries,” The Future of Children, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 161–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hank, Karsten, Kreyenfeld, Michaela, and Spiess, C. Katharina. 2004. “Kinderbetreuung und Fertilität in Deutschland,” Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 228–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmel, Robert and Janda, Kenneth 1994, “An Integrated Theory of Party goals and Party Change,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 259–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmel, Robert, Heo, Uk, Tan, Alexander & Janda, Kenneth. 1995. “Performance, Leadership, Factions and Party Change: an Empirical Analysis,” West European Politics, Vol.18, Issue 1, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haungs, Peter. 1992. “Die CDU: Prototyp einer Volkspartei,” in Mintzel, Alf and Oberreuter, Heinrich (eds.), Parteien in der Bundesrepublic Deutschland. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, pp. 172–216.Google Scholar
,Haus der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (ed.). 1997. Ungleiche Schwestern? Frauen in Ost- und Westdeutschland: Anspruch und Alltag Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterscheide. Catalog to the exhibit of the same name.
Haussman, Melissa and Sauer, Birgit (eds.). 2007. Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Women's Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Heidenheimer, Arnold J. 1960. Adenauer and the CDU: The Rise of the Leader and the Integration of the Party. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, Ludger. 2000. “Is there Life after Kohl? The CDU Crisis and the Future of Party Democracy in Germany,” Government and Opposition, Vol. 35, Issue 4, pp. 419–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helwerth, Ulrike and Schwarz, Gislinde. 1995. Von Muttis und Emanzen: Feministinnen in Ost- und Westdeutschland. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Hinich, Melvin J. and Munger, Michael C.. 1997. Analytical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hochgeschurz, Marianne. 1995. “Zwischen Autonomie und Integration – Die neue (west)deutsche Frauenbewegung,” in Hervé, Florence (ed.), Geschichte der deutschen Frauenbewegung. Cologne: PapyRossa Verlag.Google Scholar
Hoecker, Beate. 1995. Politische Partizipation von Frauen: Kontinuität und Wandel des Geschlechterverhältnisses in der Politik – ein einführendes Studienbuch. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holz, Petra. 2004. Zwischen Tradition und Emancipation: CDU-Politikerinnen in der Zeit von 1946 bis 1960. Königstein: U. Helmer.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving, R. E. M. 1979. The Christian Democratic Parties of Western Europe. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jarausch, Konrad. 1994. The Rush to German Unity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jesse, Eckhard. 1985. Wahlrecht zwischen Kontinuität und Reform: Eine Analyse der Wahlrechtssystemdiskussion und der Wahlrechtsänderungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1949–1983. Düsseldorf: Droste.Google Scholar
Johnson, James. 2006. “Political Parties and Deliberative Democracy?” in Katz, Richard S. and Crotty, William J. (eds.), Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
,Juristen-Vereinigung Lebensrecht e. V. (ed.). 1985. Schriftenreihe der Juristen-Vereinigung Lebensrecht e. V. zu Köln, Nr. 1. Cologne.
Kaden, Albrecht. 1964. Einheit Oder Freiheit? Die Wiedergründung der SPD 1945/46. Berlin/Bonn: Verlag J.H.W. Dietz Nachfolger GmbH.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kamenitsa, Lynn. 2001. “Abortion Debates in Germany,” in Stetson, Dorothy McBride (ed.), Abortion Politics, Women's Movements, and the Democratic State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamenitsa, Lynn and Geissel, Brigitte. 2005. “WPAs and Political Representation in Germany,” in: Lovenduski, Joni (ed.), State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 106–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Gisela. 1992. Contemporary Western European Feminism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Katholische Nachrichten Agentur, various dates.
Katz, Richard. 1997. Democracy and Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard and Mair, Peter (eds.). 1992. Party Organizations: A Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960–1990. London: Sage Publications.
Katz, Richard, and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party,” Party Politics, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard and Mair, Peter. 1996. “Cadre, Catch-all or Cartel? A Rejoinder,” Party Politics, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 525–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary. 1987. “Comparing the Feminist Movements of the United States and Western Europe: An Overview,” in Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod and Mueller, Carol McClurg (eds.), The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity, and Public Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary and Mueller, Carol McClurg (eds.). 1987. The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity, and Public Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Katzenstein, Peter. 1987. Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semisovereign State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Keller-Kühne, Angela and Klein, Sabine (eds.). 1998. 50 Jahre Frauen-Union der CDU: Katalog zur Ausstellung. Bad Honnef: Archiv für Christlich-Demokratische Politik der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, e.V.
Kensinger, Loretta. 1997. “(In)Quest of Liberal Feminism,” Hypatia, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 178–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketting, Evert. 1994. “Netherlands,” in Rolston, Bell and Eggert, Anna (eds.), Abortion in the New Europe: A Comparative Handbook. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, pp. 173–86.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. “The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems,” in LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron (eds.), Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 177–200.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. “The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited,” Political Studies, Vol. 37, Issue 3, pp. 400–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. In collaboration with McGann, Anthony J.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Citizens, Politicians, and Party Cartelization: Political Representation and State Failure in Post-Industrial Democracies,” European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 37, Issue 2, pp. 149–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Ethel. 1987. “The Diffusion of Consciousness in the United States and Western Europe,” in Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod and Mueller, Carol McClurg (eds.), The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity, and Public Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 23–43.Google Scholar
Kleinmann, Hans-Otto. 1993. Geschichte der CDU, 1945–1982. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.Google Scholar
Klein-Schonnefeld, Sabine. 1994. “Germany,” in Rolston, Bill and Eggert, Anna (eds.), Abortion in the New Europe: A Comparative Handbook. Westport, CT: Greenwood, pp. 113–38.Google Scholar
Knapp, Andrew and Wright, Vincent. 2006. The Government and Politics of France. Fifth Edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knapp, Andrew and Sawicki, Frédéric. 2008. “Political Parties and the Party System,” in Cole, Alistair, Galès, Patrick, and Levy, Jonah D. (eds.), Developments in French Politics 4. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 42–59.Google Scholar
Knijn, Trudie. 1998. “Social Care in the Netherlands,” in Lewis, Jane (ed.), Gender, Social Care and Welfare State Restructuring in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Knijn, Trudie. 2008. “Private Responsibility and Some Support. Family Policies in the Netherlands,” in Ostner, Ilona and Schmitt, Christoph (eds.), Family Policies in the Context of Family Change: The Nordic Countries in Perspective, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knijn, Trudie and Kremer, Monique. 1997. “Gender and the Caring Dimension of Welfare States: Toward Inclusive Citizenship,” Social Politics, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 328–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koelble, Thomas A. 1991. The Left Unraveled: The Impact of the New Left on the British Labour Party and the West German Social Democratic Party, 1968–1988. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kolinsky, Eva. 1991. “Political Participation and Parliamentary Careers: Women's Quotas in West Germany,” West European Politics, Vol. 14, Issue 1, pp. 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolinsky, Eva. 1993. “Party Change and Women's Representation in Unified Germany,” in Lovenduski, Joni and Pippa, (eds.), Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kolinsky, Eva. 1998. “Women, Work and Family in the New Länder: Conflicts and Experiences,” German Politics, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 101–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (ed.). 1991. “Tagungsprotokoll,” from Schutz des ungeborenen Kindes: Fachtagung der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung am 25. und 26. April 1991 in St. Augustin. St. Augustin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
,Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (ed.). 1992. “Tagungsprotokoll,” from Schutz des ungeborenen Kindes: Fachtagung der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung am 28. und 29. November 1991 in St. Augustin. St. Augustin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
Koole, Ruud. 1996. “Cadre, Catch-all or Cartel? A Comment on the Notion of the Cartel Party,” Party Politics, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koole, Ruud and Velde, Hella. 1992. “The Netherlands,” in Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter (eds.), Party Organizations: A Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960–1990. London: Sage Publications, pp. 619–731.Google Scholar
Köpl, Regina. 2001. “State Feminism and Policy Debates on Abortion in Austria,” in Stetson, Dorothy McBride (ed.), Abortion Politics, Women's Movements, and the Democratic State: A Comparative Study of State Feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gertrud and Kramer, Johannes. 1976. “Der Einfluss der Sozialausschüsse der Christlich-Demokratischen Arbeitnehmerschaft auf die CDU: Ein Beitrag zur Parteientheorie,” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 46–7, pp. 17–46.Google Scholar
Kreyenfeld, Michaela, and Hank, Karsten. 2000. “Does the Availability of Child Care Influence the Employment of Mothers? Findings from Western Germany,” Population Research and Policy Review, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 317–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krug, Stefanie, and Rauter, Ulrich. 1998. “Einleitung,” in ,Gesellschaft für Informationstechnologie und Pädagogik am IMBSE (eds.), Beschäftigungsrisiko Erziehungsurlaub: Die Bedeutung des “Erziehungsurlaubs” für die Entwicklung der Frauenerwerbstätigkeit. Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Sabine. 1997. “The NGOization of Feminism: Institutionalization and Institution Building within the German Women's Movements,” in Scott, Joan W., Kaplan, Cora, and Keates, Debra (eds.), Transitions, Environments, Translations: Feminisms in International Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 101–20.Google Scholar
Langguth, Gerd. 2001. Das Innenleben der Macht: Krise und Zukunft der CDU. Berlin: Ullstein Verlag.Google Scholar
Langguth, Gerhard. 2005. Angela Merkel. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael and Schofield, Norman. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1979. “Liberal Corporatism and Party Government,” in Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard (eds.), Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage Publications, pp. 147–84.Google Scholar
Lehner, Oskar. 1994. “Austria,” in Rolston, Bill and Eggert, Anna (eds.), Abortion in the New Europe: A Comparative Handbook. Westport, CT: Greenwood, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Leitner, Sigrid, Ostner, Ilona, and Schmitt, Christoph. 2008. “Family Policies in Germany,” in Ostner, Ilona and Schmitt, Christoph (eds.), Family Policies in the Context of Family Change: The Nordic Countries in Perspective, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, Robert and Wertman, Douglas A.. 1989. Italian Christian Democracy: The Politics of Dominance. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepszy, Norbert and Koecke, Christian. 2000. “Der niederländische Christlich-demokratische Appell (CDA),” in Hans-Joachim, Veen (ed.), Christlich-demokratische und konservative Parteien in Westeuropa, 5. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, pp. 119–260.Google Scholar
Leslie, John. 2002. Parties and Other Social Functions, PhD Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Leslie, John, and Wiliarty, Sarah Elise. 2009. “Gate Crashers and Engraved Invitations: Integrating Women Activists in the SPD and CDU from the 1960s to the 1980s,” in McLeay, Elizabeth, MacMillan, KateLeslie, and John (eds.), Women and Politics in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2001. “Organization and Labor-Based Party Adaptation: the Transformation of Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective,” World Politics, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jane. 2001. “The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: Implications for Work and Care,” Social Politics, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 152–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jane, Knijn, Trudie, Martin, Claude and Ostner, Ilona. 2008. “Patterns of Development in Work/Family Reconciliation Policies for Parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s,” Social Politics, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 261–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, Richard. 1978. Föderalismusdiskussion innerhalb der CDU/CSU: Von der Parteigründung bis zur Verabschiedung des Grundgesetzes. Mainz: Hase und Koehler.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1968. The Politics of Accommodation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments. An Introduction,” in Lipset, and Rokkan, , (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments. Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Lösche, Peter and Walter, Franz. 1992. Die SPD: Klassenpartei, Volkspartei, Quotenpartei. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 1986. Women and European Politics: Contemporary Feminism and Public Policy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni and Outshoorn, Joyce (eds.). 1986. The New Politics of Abortion. London: Sage Publications.
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005a. “Introduction: State Feminism and the Political Representation of Women,” in Lovenduski, Joni (ed.), State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni (ed.). 2005b. State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Lovenduski, Joni and Norris, Pippa (eds.). 1993. Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni and Randall, Vicki. 1993. Contemporary Feminist Politics: Women and Power in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucardie, Paul and ten Napel, Hans-Martien. 1994. “Between Confessionalism and Liberal Conservatism: the Christian Democratic Parties of Belgium and the Netherlands,” in Hanley, David (ed.), Christian Democracy in Europe: A Comparative Perspective. London and New York: Pinter Publishers, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
Lutz, Hedwig. 2004. Wiedereinsteig und Beschäftigung von Frauen mit Kleinkindern: Ein Vergleich der bisherigen Karenzregelung mit der Übergangsregelung zum Kinderbetreuungsgeld. Vienna: Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
Lynch, Julia. 2006. Age in the Welfare State: The Origins of Social Spending on Pensioners, Workers, and Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, Howard and Wright, Vincent. 1977. “The French Left Under the Fifth Republic: The Search for Identity in Unity,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 3–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machos, Csilla. 2002. Organisationsstrukturen linken Parlamentsparteien in Ostmitteleuropa. Erkrath: Toennes Satz + Druck GmbH.Google Scholar
Madison, James. n.d. The Federalist. New York: Random House, number 10.
Maguire, G. E. 1998. Conservative Women: A History of Women and the Conservative Party, 1874–1997. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott and Zoco, Edurne. 2007. “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition – Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies,” Party Politics, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 155–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1990. “Continuity, Change and the Vulnerability of Party,” in Mair, Peter and Smith, Gordon (eds.), Understanding Party System Change in Western Europe. London: Frank Cass, pp. 169–87.Google Scholar
Maleck-Lewy, Eva. 1994. Und wenn ich nun Schwanger bin? Frauen zwischen Selbstbestimmung und Bevormundung. Berlin: Aufbau Taschenbach.Google Scholar
Maleck-Lewy, Eva. 1997. “The East German Women's Movement After Unification,” in Scott, Joan W., Kaplan, Cora, and Keates, Debra (eds.), Transitions, Environments, Translations: Feminisms in International Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 121–7.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1987. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation,” Political Theory, Vol. 15, pp. 338–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Andrei S. 1986. The Politics of West German Trade Unions: Strategies of Class and Interest Representation in Growth and Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Markovits, Andrei S., and Gorski, Philip S.. 1993. The German Left: Red, Green and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. and Studlar, Donley T.. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member Districts and Proportional Representation Systems: Canada and Norway,” Journal of Politics, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 707–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, John. 1973. “Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curviliear Disparity,” Political Studies, Vol. 21, pp. 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Amy G. 1995. Gender Bias and the State: Symbolic Reform at Work in Fifth Republic France. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Mazur, Amy G. (ed.). 2001. State Feminism, Women's Movements, and Job Training: Making Democracies Work in a Global Economy. New York and London: Routledge.
McKay, Joanna. 2004. “Women in German Politics: Still Jobs for the Boys?” German Politics, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melich, Tanya. 1998. The Republican War against Women: An Insider's Report from behind the Lines. Updated edition. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Mesner, Maria. 1994. Frauensache? Zur Auseinandersetzung um den Schwangerschaftsabbruch in Österreich nach 1945. Vienna: J&V.Google Scholar
Meyer, Sibylle and Schulze, Eva. 1998. “After the Fall of the Wall: The Impact of the Transition on East German Women,” Political Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracies. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Miethe, Ingrid. 1999. “From ‘Mother of the Revolution’ to ‘Fathers of Unification’: Concepts of Politics among Women Activists Following German Unification,” Social Politics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1970. “The Subjection of Women,” in Rossi, Alice X., ed., Essays on Sex Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Millet, Kate. 1970. Sexual Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Moeller, Robert G. 1993. Protecting Motherhood: Women and the Family in the Politics of Postwar West Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Molitor, Ute. 1992. Wählen Frauen anders?: zur Soziologie eines frauenspezifischen politischen Verhaltens in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Molitor, Ute and Neu, Viola. 1999. “Das Wahlverhalten der Frauen bei der Bundestagswahl 1998: Kaum anders als das der Männer,” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, Vol. 2, pp. 252–67.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly. 2006. Working Mothers and the Welfare State: Religion and the Politics of Work-Family Policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J., and Zippel, Kathrin. 2003. “Paid to Care: The Origins and Effects of Care Leave Politics in Western Europe,” Social Politics, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 49–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. 1997. “Die Österreichische Volkspartei,” in Dachs, Herbert, Gerlich, Peter, Gottweis, Herbert, Horner, Franz, Kramer, Helmut, Lauber, Volkmar, Müller, Wolfgang C., Tálos, Emmerich (eds.), Handbuch des politischen Systems Österreichs: Die Zweite Republik. Vienna: Manzsche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung, pp. 265–85.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. and Steininger, Barbara. 1994. “Christian Democracy in Austria: the Austrian People's Party,” in Hanley, David (ed.), Christian Democracy in Europe. London: Francis Pinter, pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare. 1999. Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mushaben, Joyce Marie. 1995. “Second-class Citizenship and its Discontents: Women in the New Germany,” in Merkl, Peter H. (ed.), The Federal Republic of Germany at Forty-Five. New York: New York University Press, pp. 80–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mushaben, Joyce Marie. 1997. “Concession or Compromise? The Politics of Abortion in United Germany,” German Politics, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mushaben, Joyce Marie. 2006. “Deconstructing Gender in German Politics: The ‘Extreme Make-Over’ of Chancellor Angela Merkel,” paper prepared for Thirteenth German Studies Association Conference, Pittsburgh, September 28-October 1, 2006.
Nave-Herz, Rosemarie. 1997. Die Geschichte der Frauenbewegung in Deutschland. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.Google Scholar
Neidhardt, Friedhelm. 1996. “Öffentliche Diskussion und politische Entscheidung. Der deutsche Abtreibungskonflikt 1970–1994,” in Neidhardt, Friedhelm (ed.), Protest – öffentliche Meinung – Politik. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, pp. 59–80.Google Scholar
Zeitung, Neue Züricher, various dates.
Neumann, Sigmund. 1956. “Towards a Comparative Study of Political Parties,” in Neumann, Sigmund (ed.), Modern Political Parties. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 395–421.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2005. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northcutt, Wayne. 1985. The French Socialist and Communist Party under the Fifth Republic, 1958–1981. New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, Moisei. 1902. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce. 1986a. “The Rules of the Game: Abortion Politics in the Netherlands,” in Lovenduski, Joni and Outshoorn, Joyce (eds.), The New Politics of Abortion. London: Sage Publications, pp. 5–26.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce. 1986b. De politieke strijd rondom de abortuswetgeving in Nederland 1964–1984. Den Haag: VUGA.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce. 2001. “Policy-Making on Abortion: Arenas, Actors, and Arguments in the Netherlands,” in Stetson, Dorothy McBride (eds.), Abortion Politics, Women's Movements, and the Democratic State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 205–27.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce (ed.). 2004. The Politics of Prostitution: Women's Movements, Democratic States, and the Globalization of Sex Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Padgett, Stephen. 1994. “Introduction: Chancellors and the Chancellorship,” in Padgett, Stephen (ed.), Adenauer to Kohl: The Development of the German Chancellorship. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pappi, Franz Urban. 1973. “Parteiensystem und Sozialstruktur in der Bundesrepublik,” Politische Vierteljahresschriften, Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 191–213.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Democracy – Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) [cited January 7, 2010]. Available from http://www.ipu.org/english/home.htm
Pelinka, Anton and Rosenberger, Sieglinde. 2003. Österreichische Politik: Grundlagen – Strukturen – Trends. Vienna: WUV.Google Scholar
Pelinka, Anton. 1998. Austria: Out of the Shadow of the Past. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pfau-Effinger, Birgit. 2005. “Culture and Welfare State Policies: Reflections on a Complex Interrelation,” Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 34, Part 1, pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pircher, Erika. 1990. “Fallbeispiel 2: Frauenbewegung der Democrazia Cristiana,” in Pelinka, Anton, Pircher, Erika, and Rosenberger, Sieglinde (eds.), Organisationsformen von Fraueninteressen in Parteien westlicher Demokratien – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung christlich-demokratischer und konservativer Parteien. Innsbruck: Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Plantenga, Janneke. 1996. “For Women Only? The Rise of Part-Time Work in the Netherlands,” Social Politics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantenga, Janneke, Schippers, Joop and Siegers, Jacques. 1999. “Towards an Equal Division of Paid and Unpaid Work: The Case of the Netherlands,” Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey. 1977. Christian Democracy in Western Germany: The CDU/CSU in Government and Opposition, 1945–1976. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Prinzing, Marlis. 2006. Lothar Späth: Wandlungen eines Rastlosen. Zurich: Orell Füssli Verlag AG.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rattinger, Hans. 1994. “Attitudes Towards the Abortion Law in Germany, 1990–1992: Determinants and Political Implications,” German Politics, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Gerhard A. and Niehuss, Merith. 1991. Wahlen in Deutschland, 1946–1991: Ein Handbuch. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Ritter, Gerhard A. and Niehuss, Merith. 1995. Wahlen in Deutschland, 1990–1994. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Rohnstock, Katrin. 1994. Stiefschwestern: Was Ost-Frauen und West-Frauen voneinander denken. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, Sieglinde. 1990. “Fallbeispiel 1: Die Österreichesche Frauenbewegung (ÖFB),” in Pelinka, Anton, Pircher, Erika, and Rosenberger, Sieglinde (eds.), Organisationsformen von Fraueninteressen in Parteien westlicher Demokratien – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung christlich-demokratischer und konservativer Parteien. Innsbruck: Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Rucht, Dieter. 2003. “Interactions between Social Movements and States in Comparative Perspective,” in Banaszak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen, and Rucht, Dieter (eds.), Women's Movements Facing a Reconfigured State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242–74.Google Scholar
Rymph, Catherine E. 2006. Republican Women: Feminism and Conservatism from Suffrage through the Rise of the New Right. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Saalfed, Thomas. 2005. “Political Parties,” in Green, Simon and Paterson, William E. (eds.), Governance in Contemporary Germany: The Semisovereign State Revisited. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Part I and II. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
,SPD Statutes. [cited April 12, 2010]. Available from http://www.spd.de/de/pdf/rechtliches/071026_spd-statut.pdf
Scarrow, Susan. 1996. Parties and Their Members: Organizing for Victory in Britain and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarrow, Susan. 2006. “Party Subsidies and the Freezing of Party Competition: Do Cartel Mechanisms Work?West European Politics, Vol. 29, Issue 4, pp. 619–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Schenk, Herrad. 1981. Die feministische Herausforderung. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Schindler, Peter. 1999. Datenhandbuch zur Geschichte des Deutschen Bundestages 1949 bis 1999. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1991. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schley, Nicole. 2005. Angela Merkel: Deutschlands Zukunft ist weiblich. Munich: Knaur Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ute. 1987. Zentrum oder CDU: Politischer Katholizismus zwischen Tradition und Anpassung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Ute. 1997. Von der Blockpartei zur Volkspartei? Die Ost-CDU im Umbruch, 1989–1994. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1979. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” in Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard (eds.), Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage Publications, pp. 7–52.Google Scholar
Schönbohm, Wolfgang. 1985. Die CDU wird moderne Volkspartei: Selbstverständnis, Mitglieder, Organisation und Apparat 1950–1980. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Wolfgang. 1998. “Das katholische Milieu auf dem Rückzug: Der Arbeitnehmerflügel der CDU nach der Ära Kohl,” in Dürr, Tobias and Soldt, Rüdiger (eds.), Die CDU nach Kohl. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH, pp. 175–91.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, Alice. 1981. 10 Jahre Frauenbewegung: So fing es an!Cologne: EMMA-Verlag.Google Scholar
Sehrbrock, Ingrid. 1990. Letter to CDU Business Office (CDU-Bundesgeschäftsstelle). 11 July 1990. Women's Union Archive, Konrad-Adenauer-Haus. Bonn.
Sferza, Serenella. 2002. “Party Organization and Party Performance: The Case of the French Socialist Party,” in Gunther, Richard, Ramón-Montero, José, and Linz, Juan J. (eds.), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1991. Models of Multiparty Electoral Competition. New York. Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Smith, Gordon. 1982. “The German Volkspartei and the Career of the Catch-all Concept,” in Döring, Herbert and Smith, Gordon (eds.), Party Government and Political Culture in West Germany. New York: St. Martin's, pp. 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Gordon. 1990. “Core Persistence: System Change and the ‘People's Party,’” in Mair, Peter and Smith, Gordon (eds.), Understanding Party System Change in Western Europe. London: Frank Cass, pp. 157–68.Google Scholar
Speil, Wolfgang. 1991. Betriebliche Wirkungen des Erziehungsurlaubs. Hannover: Materialien des Instituts für Entwicklungsplanung und Strukturforschung 151.Google Scholar
Spiegel, , various dates.
Bundesamt, Statistisches. 1987. Frauen in Familie, Beruf und Gesellschaft: Ausgabe 1987. Mainz: Verlag W. Kohlhammer GmbH.Google Scholar
Bundesamt, Statistisches. 2005. “Wahl zum 16. Deutschen Bundestag am 18. September 2005.” Wiesbaden.
Stern, various dates.
Stetson, Dorothy McBride (ed.). 2001a. Abortion Politics, Women's Movements, and the Democratic State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Stetson, Dorothy McBride. 2001b. “Introduction: Abortion, Women's Movements, and Democratic Politics,” in Stetson, Dorothy McBride (ed.), Abortion Politics, Women's Movements, and the Democratic State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetson, Dorothy McBride and Mazur, Amy G. (eds.). 1995. Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Stock, Wolfgang. 2005. Angela Merkel: Eine politische Biographie. Munich: Olzog Verlag.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1990. “A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 565–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuttgarter Nachrichtung, various dates.
Stuttgarter Zeitung, various dates.
Süddeutsche Zeitung, various dates.
Süssmuth, Hans. 1990. Kleine Geschichte der CDU-Frauen-Union: Erfolge und Rückschläge 1948–1990. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
tageszeitung, various dates.
Teorell, Jan. 1999. “A Deliberative Defence of Intra-Party Democracy,” Party Politics, Vol. 5, Issue 3, pp. 363–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teske, Erin. 2007. More Coffins than Cradles: Low Fertility in Bologna, Italy. Middletown, CT: Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Thompson, Mark R. and Lennartz, Ludmilla. 2006. “The Making of Chancellor Merkel,” German Politics, Vol 15, No. 1, pp. 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, Rosemarie Putnam. 1998. Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction. Second Edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Trzcinski, Eileen. 1998. “Gender and German Unification,” Affilia-Journal of Women and Social Work, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Robert. 1970. “The Theory of Charismatic Leadership,” in Rustow, Dankwart A. (ed.), Philosophers and Kings: Studies in Leadership. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
Uertz, Rudolf. 1981. Christentum und Sozialismus in der frühen CDU: Grundlagen und Wirkungen der christlich-sozialen Ideen in der Union, 1945–1949. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oorschot, Wim. 2004. “Balancing Work and Welfare: Activation and Flexicurity Policies in the Netherlands, 1980–2000,” International Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 13, pp. 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velde, Hella. 1994. Vrouwen van de partij: De integratie van vrouwen in politieke partijen in Nederland, 1991–1990. Leiden: DSWO-Press.Google Scholar
Wel, Frits and Knijn, Trudie. 2001. “The Labor Market Orientation of Single Mothers on Welfare in the Netherlands,” Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 804–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Jelle and Hemerijck, A.. 1997. A Dutch Miracle: Job Growth, Welfare Reform, and Corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyme, Klaus. 1996. “Party Leadership and Change in Party Systems: Towards a Postmodern Party State?” Government and Opposition, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 135–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzenberg, Margritta. 2002. Wirtschaft und Statistik. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt, pp. 823–7.Google Scholar
Wahl, Angelika. 2006a. “Gender Equality in Germany: Comparing Policy Change across Domains,” West European Politics, Vol. 29, Issue 3, pp. 461–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, Angelika. 2006b. “Women and Political Representation in Germany: The Not-So-Unlikely Rise of Angela Merkel,” paper prepared for Thirteenth German Studies Association Conference, Pittsburgh, September 28-October 1, 2006.
Wahl, Angelika. 2008. “From Family Policy to Reconciliation Policy: How the Grand Coalition Reforms the German Welfare State,” German Politics and Society, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 25–9.Google Scholar
Wagner, Gert, Hank, Kartsen and Tillmann, Katja. 1995. Ausserhäusige Kinderbetreuung in Ostdeutschland – 1990 und 1994 im Vergleich zu Westdeutschland. Diskussionspapier aus der Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaft der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, No. 95–18. Available http://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/sowi.
Ware, Alan. 1979. The Logic of Party Democracy. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 2000. “The Decline of Mobilization,” in Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P. (eds.), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–76.Google Scholar
Welt, Die, various dates.
Wieck, Hans Georg. 1953. Die Entstehung der CDU und die Wiederbegründung des Zentrums im Jahre 1945. Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag.Google Scholar
Wieck, Hans Georg. 1958. Christliche und Freie Demokraten in Hessen, Rheinland-Pfalz, Baden und Württemberg, 1945/46. Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag.Google Scholar
Wiliarty, Sarah Elise. 2008a. “Angela Merkel's Path to Power: The Role of Internal Party Dynamics and Leadership,” German Politics, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiliarty, Sarah Elise. 2008b. “Chancellor Angela Merkel – A Sign of Hope or the Exception that Proves the Rule?” Politics and Gender, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 485–96.Google Scholar
Wilson, Frank L. 1994. “The Sources of Party Change: The Social Democratic Parties of Britain, France, Germany, and Spain,” in Lawson, Kay (ed.), How Political Parties Work: Perspectives from Within. Westport, CN: Praeger Press, pp. 263–83.Google Scholar
Wingen, Max. 1997. Familienpolitik: Grundlagen und aktuelle Probleme. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.Google Scholar
Wolinetz, Steven B. 1979. “The Transformation of Western European Party Systems Revisited,” West European Politics, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolinetz, Steven B. 1991. “Party System Change: The Catch-all Thesis Revisited,” West European Politics, Vol. 14, Issue 1, pp. 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1975. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: An Authoritative Text, Backgrounds, Criticism. Poston, Carol H. (ed.), New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Yoder, Jennifer A. 1999. From East Germans to Germans? The New Postcommunist Elites. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Brigitte. 1998. “The Strong German State and the Weak Feminist Movements,” German Politics, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 128–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Brigitte. 1999. Triumph of the Fatherland: German Unification and the Marginalization of Women. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Lisa. 1998. “Party, State and Political Competition in Canada: The Cartel Model Reconsidered,” Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 339–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Lisa. 2000. Feminists and Party Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel F. 1998. “The Adaptation of Ex-Communist Parties to Post-Communist East Central Europe: a Comparative Study of the East German and Hungarian Ex-Communist Parties,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 119–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S. 1979. The Politics of Faction: Christian Democratic Rule in Italy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • List of References
  • Sarah Elise Wiliarty, Wesleyan University, Connecticut
  • Book: The CDU and the Politics of Gender in Germany
  • Online publication: 17 November 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779442.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • List of References
  • Sarah Elise Wiliarty, Wesleyan University, Connecticut
  • Book: The CDU and the Politics of Gender in Germany
  • Online publication: 17 November 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779442.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • List of References
  • Sarah Elise Wiliarty, Wesleyan University, Connecticut
  • Book: The CDU and the Politics of Gender in Germany
  • Online publication: 17 November 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779442.013
Available formats
×