Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T00:41:51.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Priming solutions for cardiopulmonary bypass circuits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Sunit Ghosh
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital, Cambridge
Florian Falter
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital, Cambridge
Albert C. Perrino, Jr
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suggested Further Reading

Cooley, DA, Beall, AC, Grondin, P. Open heart operations with disposable oxygenators, 5% dextrose prime, and normothermia. Surgery 1962; 52:713–19Google Scholar
Fang, WC, Helm, RE, Krieger, KH et al. Impact of minimum hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass on mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. Circulation 1997; 96 (9 suppl): II–194–9Google Scholar
Gurbuz, H, Durukan, A, Salman, N et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 6%, 130/0.4 vs. a balanced crystalloid solution in cardiopulmonary bypass priming: a randomized, prospective study. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 2013, 8: 71Google Scholar
Harris, EA, Seelye, ER, Barratt-Boyes, BG. Respiratory and acid-base changes during CPB in man. Br J Anaesth 1970; 42: 912–21Google Scholar
Hoeft, A, Korb, H, Mehlhorn, U et al. Priming of cardiopulmonary bypass with human albumin or ringer lactate: effect on colloid osmotic pressure and extravascular lung water. Br J Anaesth 1991; 66:7380Google Scholar
Lilley, A. The selection of priming fluids for cardiopulmonary bypass in the UK and Ireland. Perfusion 2002; 17:315319Google Scholar
Liskaser, FJ, Bellomo, R, Hayhoe, M et al. Role of pump prime in etiology and pathogenesis of cardiopulmonary bypass – associated acidosis. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:1170–73Google Scholar
Marelli, D, Paul, A, Samson, R et al. Does the addition of albumin to the prime solution in cardiopulmonary bypass affect outcome? A prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 98(5 Pt1):751756Google Scholar
Murphy, G, Hessel, E, Groom, R. Optimal perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: an evidence-based approach. Anesth Analg 2009;108(5):1394–417Google Scholar
Myburgh, J Finfer, S, Bellomo, R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med 2012 367: 19011911Google Scholar
Paone, G, Silverman, N. The paradox of on bypass transfusion thresholds in blood conservation. Circulation 1997; 96(suppl II):II 205208Google Scholar
Perner, A,Haase, N, Guttormsen, A, et al.; Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:124–34.Google Scholar
Rawn, JD. Blood transfusion in cardiac surgery: a silent epidemic revisited. Circulation 2007; 116(22):2523–4Google Scholar
Riegger, L, Voepel-Lewis, T, Kulik, T et al. Albumin versus crystalloid prime solution for cardiopulmonary bypass in young children. Crit Care Med 2002; 30(12):2649–54Google Scholar
Rosengart, TK, DeBois, WJ, Helm, RE. Retrograde autologous priming (RAP) for cardiopulmonary bypass: a safe and effective means of decreasing hemodilution and transfusion requirements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115(2):426–38Google Scholar
Russell, JA, Navickis, RJ, Wilkes, MM. Albumin versus crystalloid for pump priming in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004; 18(4):429–37Google Scholar
Skhirtladze, K, Base, E, Lassnigg, A, et al. Comparison of the effects of albumin 5%, hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 6%, and Ringer’s lactate on blood loss and coagulation after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112(2):255–64Google Scholar
Sun, P, Ji, B, Sun, Y, et al. Effects of retrograde autologous priming on blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in adults: a meta-analysis. Perfusion 2013; 28( 3):238–43Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×