Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:39:49.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Drosophila and Zebrafish: Genetic Models for Cancer Metastasis

from MODELS AND TOOLS FOR METASTASIS STUDIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Elisa C. Woodhouse
Affiliation:
National Cancer Institute, United States
Kathleen Kelly
Affiliation:
National Institutes of Health, United States
David Lyden
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Danny R. Welch
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Bethan Psaila
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Medicine, London
Get access

Summary

Scientists have long used genetic models – in particular, mouse models – to study tumor metastasis. Other organisms have been useful for the genetic analysis of myriad biological processes, such as development, signal transduction, and cell growth. Recently, it has become evident that genetically tractable, nonmammalian models may significantly contribute to the study of cancer and metastasis. One such organism is the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster.

Since the 1970s, it has been known that Drosophila develop tumors in specific mutant lines. Scientists have gained an understanding of the molecular basis of these tumors, including the specific tumor suppressors mutated in these lines, the defects produced in the cell, and the way in which these disruptions lead to cancer in Drosophila. A key advantage of metastasis models using Drosophila is the ability to rapidly generate mutations in vivo and assess their effects. The research in this field has now matured from model development to discovery-based investigation. In this chapter, several aspects of the Drosophila models will be discussed, including tumor suppressors and their human homologs, the role of cell polarity in tumorigenesis and progression, and current approaches in Drosophila that are being used to understand metastasis and migration, along with examples of knowledge that has been gained through studies using each of the models.

Another organism that is amenable to genetic manipulations for which cancer models are being developed is the zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Type
Chapter
Information
Cancer Metastasis
Biologic Basis and Therapeutics
, pp. 15 - 24
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amsterdam, A, Sadler, KC, Lai, K, et al. (2004) Many ribosomal protein genes are cancer genes in zebrafish. PLoS Biol. 2: 0690–0698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arama, E, Dickman, D, Kimchie, Z, Shearn, A, Lev, Z (2000) Mutations in the β-propeller domain of the Drosophila brain tumor (brat) protein induce neoplasm in the larval brain. Oncogene. 19: 3706–3716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaucher, M, Goodliffe, J, Hersperger, E, Trunova, S, Frydman, H, Shearn, A (2007a) Drosophila brain tumor metastases express both neuronal and glial cell type markers. Dev Biol. 301: 287–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaucher, M, Hersperger, E, Page-McCaw, A, Shearn, A (2007b) Metastatic ability of Drosophila tumors depends on MMP activity. Dev Biol. 303: 625–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berghmans, S, Murphey, RD, Wienholds, E et al. (2005) tp53 mutant zebrafish develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102: 407–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betschinger, J, Mechtler, K, Knoblich, JA (2003) The Par complex directs asymmetric cell division by phosphorylating the cytoskeletal protein Lgl. Nature. 422: 326–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betschinger, J, Eisenhaber, F, Knoblich, JA (2005) Phosphorylation-induced autoinhibition regulates the cytoskeletal protein Lethal (2) giant larvae. Curr Biol. 15: 276–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biggs, J, Hersperger, E, Steeg, PS, Liotta, L, Shearn, A (1990) A Drosophila gene that is homologous to a mammalian gene associated with tumor metastasis codes for a nucleoside diphosphate kinase. Cell. 63: 933–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilder, D, Li, M, Perrimon, N (2000) Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors. Science. 289: 113–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borghese, L, Fletcher, G, Mathieu, J, et al. (2006) Systemic analysis of the transcriptional switch inducing migration of border cells. Dev Cell. 10: 497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumby, AM, Richardson, HE (2003) Scribble mutants cooperate with oncogenic Ras or Notch to cause neoplastic overgrowth in Drosophila. EMBO J. 22, 5769–5779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caussinus, E, Gonzalez, C (2005) Induction of tumor growth by altered stem-cell asymmetric division in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genetics. 37, 1125–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J, Jette, C, Kanki, JP, Aster, JC, Look, AT, Griffin, JD (2007) NOTCH1-induced T-cell leukemia in transgenic zebrafish. Leukemia. 21: 462–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eder, AM, Sui, X, Rosen, DG et al. (2005) Atypical PKCι contributes to poor prognosis through loss of apical-basal polarity and cyclin E overexpression in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102: 12519–12524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engel, M, Veron, M, Theisinger, B et al. (1995) A novel serine/threonine-specific protein phosphotransferase activity of Nm23/nucleoside-diphosphate kinase. Eur J. Biochem. 234: 200–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eulenberg, KG, Schuh, R (1997) The tracheae defective gene encodes a bZIP protein that controls tracheal cell movement during Drosophila embryogenesis. EMBO J. 16: 7156–7165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faucherre, A, Taylor, GS, Overvoorde, J, Dixon, JE, Hertog, J (2008) Zebrafish pten genes have overlapping and non-redundant functions in tumorigenesis and embryonic development. Oncogene. 27: 1079–1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feitsma, H, Cuppen, E (2008) Zebrafish as a cancer model. Mol Cancer Res. 6: 685–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardiol, D, Zacchi, A, Petrera, F, Stanta, G, Banks, L (2006) Human discs large and scrib are localized at the same regions in colon mucosa and changes in their expression patters are correlated with loss of tissue architecture during malignant progression. Int J Cancer. 119: 1285–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gateff, E (1978) Malignant neoplasms of genetic origin in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 200, 1448–1459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gateff, EA, Schneiderman, HA (1974) Developmental capacities of benign and malignant neoplasms of Drosophila. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 176: 23–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goessling, W, North, TE, Zon, LI (2007) New waves of discovery: modeling cancer in zebrafish. J Clin Oncol. 25: 2473–2479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grifoni, D, Garoia, F, Bellosta, P et al. (2007) aPKCζ cortical loading is associated with Lgl cytoplasmic release and tumor growth in Drosophila and human epithelia. Oncogene. 26: 5960–5965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hakem, A, Sanchez-Sweatman, O, You-Ten, A et al. (2005) RhoC is dispensable for embryogenesis and tumor initiation but essential for metastasis. Genes Dev. 19: 1974–1979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haramis, AP, Hurlstone, A, Velden, Y et al. (2006) Adenomatous polyposis coli-deficient zebrafish are susceptible to digestive tract neoplasia. EMBO Rep. 7: 444–449.Google ScholarPubMed
Hirata, J, Nakagoshi, H, Nabeshima, Y, Matsuzaki, F (1995) Asymmetric segregation of the homeodomain protein Prospero during Drosophila development. Nature. 377: 627–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horak, CE, Lee, JH, Elkahloun, AG et al. (2007) Nm23-H1 suppresses tumor cell motility by down-regulating the lysophosphatidic acid receptor EDG2. Cancer Res. 67: 7238–7246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeshima-Kataoka, H, Skeath, JB, Nabeshima, Y, Doe, CQ, Matsuzaki, F (1997) Miranda directs Prospero to a daughter cell during Drosophila asymmetric divisions. Nature. 390: 625–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karp, CM, Tan, TT, Mathew, R et al. (2008) Role of the polarity determinant Crumbs in suppressing mammalian epithelial tumor progression. Cancer Res. 68: 4105–4115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiyono, T, Hiraiwa, A, Fujita, M, Hayashi, Y, Akiyama, T, Ishibashi, M (1997) Binding of high-risk human papillomavirus oncoproteins to the human homologue of the Drosophila discs large tumor suppressor protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94: 11612–11616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klambt, C (1993) The Drosophila gene pointed encodes two ETS-like proteins which are involved in the development of the midline glial cells. Development. 117: 163–176.Google ScholarPubMed
Knoblich, JA, Jan, LY, Jan, YN (1995) Asymmetric segregation of Numb and Prospero during cell division. Nature. 377: 624–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuphal, S, Wallner, S, Schimanski, CC et al. (2006) Expression of Hugl-1 is strongly reduced in malignant melanoma. Oncogene. 25: 103–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, SH, Wu, YL, Vega, VB et al. (2006) Conservation of gene expression signatures between zebrafish and human liver tumors and tumor progression. Nat Biotechnol. 24: 73–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langenau, DM, Feng, H, Berghmans, S, Kanki, JP, Kutok, JL, Look, AT (2005) Cre/lox-regulated transgenic zebrafish model with conditional myc-induced T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102: 6068–6073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langenau, DM, Keefe, MD, Storer, NY et al. (2007) Effects of RAS on the genesis of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Genes Dev. 21: 1382–1395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langenau, DM, Traver, D, Ferrando, AA et al. (2003) Myc-induced T cell leukemia in transgenic zebrafish. Science. 299: 887–890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawson, ND, Weinstein, BM (2002) In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish. Dev Biol. 248: 307–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le, X, Langenau, DM, Keefe, MD, Kutok, JL, Neuberg, DS, Zon, LI (2007) Heat shock-inducible Cre/Lox approaches to induce diverse types of tumors and hyperplasia in transgenic zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104: 9410–9415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C-Y, Robinson, KJ, Doe, CQ (2006a) Lgl, Pins, and aPKC regulate neuroblast self-renewal versus differentiation. Nature. 439: 594–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C-Y, Wilkinson, BD, Siegrist, SE, Wharton, RP, Doe, CQ (2006b). Brat is a Miranda cargo protein that promotes neuronal differentiation and inhibits neuroblast self-renewal. Dev Cell. 10: 441–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leone, A, Flatow, U, VanHoutte, K, Steeg, PS (1993) Transfection of human nm23-H1 into the human MDA-MB-435 breast carcinoma cell line: effects on tumor metastatic potential, colonization and enzymatic activity. Oncogene. 8: 2325–2333.Google ScholarPubMed
Lieschke, GJ, Currie, PD (2007) Animal models of human disease: zebrafish swim into view. Nat Rev Genet. 8: 353–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montell, D (2003) Border-cell migration: the race is on. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 4: 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montell, DJ, Rorth, P, Spradling, AC (1992) Slow border cells, a locus required for a developmentally regulated cell migration during oogenesis, encodes Drosophila C/EBP. Cell 71: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakagawa, S, Huibregtse, JM (2000) Human scribble (Vartul) is targeted for ubiquitin-mediated degradation by the high-risk papillomavirus E6 proteins and the E6AP ubiquitin-protein ligase. Mol Cell Biol. 20: 8244–8253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, F, Kalb, RG, Strittmatter, SM (2000) Molecular basis of senaphorin-mediated axon guidance. J Neurobiol. 44: 219–229.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nallamothu, G, Woolworth, JA, Dammai, V, Hsu, T (2008) awd, the homolog of metastasis suppressor gene Nm23, regulates Drosophila epithelial cell invasion. Mol Cell Biol. 28: 1964–1973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagliarini, RA, Xu, T (2003) A genetic screen in Drosophila for metastatic behavior. Science. 302: 1227–1231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patton, EE, Widlund, HR, Kutok, JL, et al. (2005) BRAF mutations are sufficient to promote nevi formation and cooperate with p53 in the genesis of melanoma. Curr Biol. 15: 249–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regala, RP, Weems, C, Jamieson, L, et al. (2005) Atypical protein kinase Ci is an oncogene in human non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 65: 8905–8911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolls, MM, Albertson, R, Shih, H-P, Lee, C-Y, Doe, CQ (2003) Drosophila aPKC regulates cell polarity and cell proliferation in neuroblasts and epithelia. J Cell Biol. 163: 1089–1098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabaawy, HE, Azuma, M, Embree, LJ, Tsai, HJ, Starost, MF, Hickstein, DD (2006) TEL-AML1 transgenic zebrafish model of precursor B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103: 15166–15171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schimanski, CC, Schmitz, G, Kashyap, A et al. (2005) Reduced expression of Hugl-1, the human homologue of Drosophila tumor suppressor gene lgl, contributes to progression of colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 24: 3100–3109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, CP, Jan, LY, Jan, YN (1997) Miranda is required for the asymmetric localization of Prospero during mitosis in Drosophila. Cell. 90: 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, JL, Amatruda, JF, Finkelstein, D, et al. (2007) A mutation in separase causes genome instability and increased susceptibility to epithelial cancer. Genes Dev. 21: 55–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepard, JL, Amatruda, JF, Stern, HM, et al. (2005) A zebrafish bmyb mutation causes genome instability and increased cancer susceptibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA. 102: 13194–13199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spana, EP, Doe, CQ (1995) The prospero transcription factor is asymmetrically localized to the cell cortex during neuroblast mitosis in Drosophila. Development. 121: 3187–3195.Google ScholarPubMed
Srivastava, A, Pastor-Pareja, JC, Igaki, T, Pagliarini, R, Xu, T (2006) Basement membrane remodeling is essential for Drosophila disc eversion and tumor invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104: 2721–2726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steeg, PS, Bevilacqua, G, Kopper, L et al. (1988) Evidence for a novel gene associated with low tumor metastatic potential. J Natl Cancer Inst. 80: 200–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, HM, Zon, LI (2003) Cancer genetics and drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 3: 533–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoletov, K, Klemke, R (2008) Catch of the day: zebrafish as a human cancer model. Oncogene. 27: 4509–4520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsuruga, T, Nakagawa, S, Watanabe, M et al. (2007) Loss of Hugl-1 expression associates with lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer. Oncology Res. 16: 431–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vidal, M, Warner, S, Read, R, Cagan, RL (2007) Differing Src signaling levels have distinct outcomes in Drosophila. Cancer Res. 67: 10278–10285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, X, Bo, J, Bridges, T, et al. (2006) Analysis of cell migration using whole-genome expression profiling of migratory cells in the Drosophila ovary. Dev Cell. 10: 483–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, RM, Sessa, A, Burke, C et al. (2008) Transparent adult zebrafish as a tool for in vivo transplantation analysis. Cell Stem Cell. 2: 183–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodhouse, EC, Fisher, A, Bandle, RW et al. (2003) Drosophila screening model for metastasis: Semaphorin 5c is required for l(2)gl cancer phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100: 11463–11468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodhouse, E, Hersperger, E, Shearn, A (1998) Growth, metastasis, and invasiveness of Drosophila tumors caused by mutations in specific tumor suppressor genes. Dev Genes Evol. 207: 542–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woods, DF, Bryant, PJ (1989) Molecular cloning of the lethal(1)discs large-1 oncogene of Drosophila. Dev Biol. 134: 222–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, HW, Kutok, JL, Lee, NH et al. (2004) Targeted expression of human MYCN selectively causes pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in transgenic zebrafish. Cancer Res. 64: 7256–7262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×