Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:23:19.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Logic and language: Traditional logic

from PART 2 - PHILOSOPHY AND ITS PARTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Get access

Summary

LOGIC 1350–1600

The study of Aristotle

The Organon of Aristotle played a central role throughout the period, at least in principle. During the medieval period, the Organon was divided into two parts. The Categories and the De interpretatione along with Porphyry's Isagoge formed the Logica vetus, which was already known in the twelfth century. The Prior and Posterior Analytics, the Topics and the Sophistici elenchi formed the Logica nova, which became known only during the twelfth century. Both the Logica vetus and the Logica nova were firmly embedded in the university curriculum, with the single exception of the Topics. It was not included in the list of books prescribed by the Vienna statutes of 1389 or in the list of books read at Erfurt in 1420, and at Greifswald in 1456 it was to be lectured on only for the master's degree, although at all these places the other books of the Organon were specifically mentioned as part of the undergraduate course. In many places, including Paris, only four books of the Topics were to be read; and it was sometimes specified that these books were to be I, II, VI and VIII. An obvious result of humanist influence in the sixteenth century was the renewed attention paid to the Topics, though this interest was not to last.

There were several waves of commentaries during the period after 1350. Some of these were on individual books from the Organon, such as the commentary on the Prior Analytics by Marsilius of Inghen, which was published in Venice in 1516, and the commentary on the Posterior Analytics by Paul of Venice, which had been published seven times by 1518, nearly always in Venice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ailly, Pierre d' (1980). Concepts and Insolubles: An Annotated Translation, ed. Spade, P. V., Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Ailly, Pierre d' (1522). Perutilis logica, Venice (repr. Hildesheim, 1974).Google Scholar
Angelelli, I. (1970). ‘The techniques of disputation in the history of logic’, The Journal of Philosophy, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, (1516–17). Dialectica cum quinque vocibus Porphyrii, trans. Argyropulos, J., comment. Eck, J., 2 vols., Augsburg.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1597). Organum, ed. and trans. Pace, G., Frankfurt (repr. Hildesheim, 1967).Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1973a). ‘Andreas Kesler and the later theory of consequences’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1973b). ‘The doctrine of exponibilia in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries’, Vivarium, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1974a). Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period, Dordrecht–Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1976). ‘Agostino Nifo's reinterpretation of medieval logic’, Rivista critica di storia della filosofia, 31.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1977). ‘Thomas Bricot (d. 1516) and the liar paradox’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1978a). ‘A note on Paul of Venice and the Oxford Logica of 1483’, Medioevo, 4.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1978b). ‘Multiple qualification and the use of special qualifiers in early sixteenth-century logic’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1978c). ‘Theories of proposition: some early sixteenth-century discussions’, Franciscan Studies, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1979a). ‘The Libelli sophistarum and the use of medieval logic texts at Oxford and Cambridge in the early sixteenth century’, Vivarium, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1979b). ‘A note on an early printed logic text in Edinburgh University Library’, The Innes Review, 30.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1981a).‘“Do words signify ideas or things?” The scholastic sources of Locke's theory of language’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1982). ‘The structure of mental language: some problems discussed by early sixteenth-century logicians’, Vivarium, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1984). ‘Locke on language’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1985). ‘English Obligationes texts after Roger Swyneshed: the tracts beginning “Obligatio est quaedam ars”’, in The Rise of British Logic, ed. Lewry, P. O., Toronto.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. (1986). ‘Renaissance man as logician: Josse Clichtove (1472–1543) on disputations’, History and Philosophy of Logic, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine, (1975). De dialectica, ed. Pinborg, J., trans. Jackson, B. D., Dordrecht–Boston.Google Scholar
Boethius, of Dacia (1960–). Opera (Corpus philosophorum Danicorum medii aevi), Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Bottin, F. (1981). ‘Alcune correzioni ed aggiunte al censimento dei codici di Paolo Veneto’, Quaderni per la storia dell' Università di Padova, 14.Google Scholar
Brerewood, Edward (1619). Elementa logicae, London.Google Scholar
Breytkopf, Gregorius (1507). Parvorum logicalium opusculum, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Broadie, A. (1983). George Lokert: Late-Scholastic Logician, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Brockliss, L. W. B. (1981a). ‘Philosophical teaching in France, 1600–1740’, History of Universities, 1.Google Scholar
Buonamici, Francesco (1637). Institutionum logicarum libri duo, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Burana, Johannes Franciscus (1539). Aristotelis Priora resolutoria, Paris.Google Scholar
Buridan, Jean (1499). Compendium totius logicae, Venice (repr. Frankfurt a. M., 1965).Google Scholar
Buridan, Jean (1976). Tractatus de consequentiis, ed. Hubien, H., Louvain–Paris.Google Scholar
Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (1982). ed. Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, John (1584). Summa veterum interpretum in universam dialecticam Aristotelis …, London.Google Scholar
Collegium, Conimbricense (1607). In universam dialecticam, Cologne (repr. Hildesheim, 1976).Google Scholar
Cornelius, P. (1965). Languages in Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Century Imaginary Voyages, Geneva.Google Scholar
Cranz, F. E. (1978). ‘The publishing history of the Aristotle commentaries of Thomas Aquinas’, Traditio, 34.Google Scholar
Dolz, Johannes (1511). Syllogismi, Paris.Google Scholar
Du Trieu, Philip (1662). Manuductio ad logicam, Oxford.Google Scholar
English Logic in Italy (1982). ed. Maierù, A., Naples.Google Scholar
Enzinas, Fernando (1528). Tractatus de compositione propositions mentalis, Lyons.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. M. (1981). ‘Change and resistance to change: a consideration of the development of English and German universities during the sixteenth century’, History of Universities, I.Google Scholar
Fonseca, Pedro da (1615–29). Commentarii in libros metaphysicorum, Cologne (repr. Hildesheim, 1964).Google Scholar
Gansiniec, R. (1960). Metrijicale Marka z Opatowca i traktaty gramatyczne XIV i XV wieku, Wroclaw.Google Scholar
Gebwiler, Johannes (1511). Magistralis totius parvuli artis logices compilatio, Basle.Google Scholar
George, of Brussels (1491a). Expositio super Summulis magistri Petri Hyspani, Paris.Google Scholar
Grazia, M. (1980). ‘The secularization of language in the seventeenth century’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, T. (1971). ‘Logical grammar, grammatical logic and humanism in three German universities’, Studies in the Renaissance, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, of Ghent (1520). Summae quaestionum ordinarium II, Paris (repr. St Bona venture, N.Y., 1953).Google Scholar
Hubien, H. (1975). ‘John Buridan on the fourth figure of the syllogism’, Revue internationale de philosophie, 113.Google Scholar
Hunnaeus, Augustinus (1584). Prodidagmata de dialecticis, Antwerp.Google Scholar
IJsewijn, J. (1971). ‘Alexander Hegius (†1498): Invectiva in modos significandi’, Forum for Modern Language Studies, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannes, Magistris (1487). Quaestiones super totum cur sum logicae, Venice.Google Scholar
John, of St Thomas (1930). Cursus philosophicus Thomisticus, 1: Ars togica, Turin–Rome.Google Scholar
Knowlson, J. (1975). Universal Language Schemes in England and France, 1600–1800, Toronto–Buffalo.Google Scholar
Lefèvre d'Étaples, Jacques (1520). Artificiales nonnulle introductiones, ed. Clichtove, J., Paris.Google Scholar
Lhotsky, A. (1965). Die Wiener Artistenfakultät 1365–1497, Graz–Vienna–Cologne.Google Scholar
Maierù, A. (1969). ‘Lo Speculum puerorum sive terminus est in quern di Riccardo Billingham’, Studi medievali, ser. III, 10.Google Scholar
Maierù, A. (1972). Terminologia logica della tarda scolastica, Rome.Google Scholar
Maiolus, Laurentius (1497). Epiphyllides in dialecticis, Venice.Google Scholar
Markowski, M. (1971). Buridanizm w Polsce w Okresie Przedkopernikanskim, Wrocław, etc.Google Scholar
Marsilius, of Inghen (1516). Quaestiones super libros Priorum analyticorum, Venice (repr. Frankfurt, 1968).Google Scholar
Martinich, A. (1981). Thomas Hobbes: Computatio sive logica, New York.Google Scholar
McConica, J. K. (1979). ‘Humanism and Aristotle in Tudor Oxford’, English Historical Review, 94.Google Scholar
Melanchthon, Philipp (1834–60). Opera quae super sunt omnia, ed. Bretschneider, C. G. and Bindseil, H. E., 28 vols., Halle–Braunschweig.Google Scholar
Monumenta Germaniae paedagogica (1887). ed. Kehrbach, K., V, Berlin.Google Scholar
Muñoz Delgado, V. (1972). ‘Lógica hispano-portuguesa hasta 1600 (notas bibliográfico-doctrinales)’, Repertorio de historia de las ciencias eclesiásticas en España, 4.Google Scholar
Nifo, Agostino (1521b). Dialectica ludicra, Venice.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1980). Late Scholastic and Humanist Theories of the Proposition, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Oliver, Thomas (1604). De sophismatum praestigiis cavendis admonitio, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ott, H. and Fletcher, J. M. (1964). The Medieval Statutes of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Freiburg im Breisgau, Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Padley, G. A. (1976). Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: The Latin Tradition, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Paul, of Pergula (1961). Logica and Tractatus de sensu composito et diviso, ed. Brown, M. A., St Bonaventure–Louvain–Paderborn.Google Scholar
Peter, of Spain (1972). Tractatus Called Afterwards Summule Logicales, ed. Rijk, L. M., Assen.Google Scholar
Philoponus, Joannes (1544c). In libros Priorum resolutivorum, Venice.Google Scholar
Pinborg, J. (1967). Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter, Münster.Google Scholar
Pratus, Alphonsus (1530). Quaestiones dialecticae supra libros Peri hermenias, Alcalá.Google Scholar
Raulin, Johannes (1500). In logicam Aristotelis, Paris.Google Scholar
Rijk, L. M. (1975). ‘Logica Cantahrigiensis: a fifteenth-century Cambridge manual of logic’, Revue internationale de philosophie, 29.Google Scholar
Rijk, L. M. (1977). ‘Logica Oxoniensis: an attempt to reconstruct a fifteenth-century Oxford manual of logic’, Medioevo, 3.Google Scholar
Risse, W. (1965). Bibliographia logica, 1: 1472–1800, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Francisco (1587). Minerva, Salamanca.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Robert (1618). Logicae artis compendium, Oxford.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B. (1981). Studies in Renaissance Philosophy and Science, London.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B. (1983a). Aristotle and the Renaissance, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. B. (1984). The Aristotelian Tradition and Renaissance Universities, London.Google Scholar
Seifert, A. (1976). Cognitio historica: Die Geschichte als Namengeberin der frühneuzeitlichen Empirie, Berlin.Google Scholar
Seton, John (1545). Dialectica, London.Google Scholar
Slaughter, M. M. (1982). Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smiglecius, Martinus (1658). Logica, Oxford.Google Scholar
Some Fourteenth-Century Tracts on the Probationes terminorum (1982). ed. Rijk, L. M., Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Soto, Domingo (1529). Introductiones dialectice, Burgos.Google Scholar
Soto, Domingo (1554). Summulae, Salamanca (repr. Hildesheim–New York, 1980).Google Scholar
Statuti delle università e dei collegi dello Studio bolognese (1888). ed. Malagola, C., Bologna.Google Scholar
Tartaretus, Petrus (1503a). Expositio super textu logices Aristotelis, Venice.Google Scholar
Thomas, Aquinas (1964). In Aristotelis libros Peri hermenias et Posteriorum analyticorum, Rome–Turin.Google Scholar
Thomas, of Erfurt (1972). Grammatica speculativa, ed. Bursill-Hall, G. L., London.Google Scholar
Thomas, I. (1964). ‘Medieval aftermath: Oxford logic and logicians in the seventeenth century’, in Oxford Studies Presented to Daniel Callus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Thomas, I. (1965). ‘The written liar and Thomas Oliver’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toletus, Franciscus (1596). Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in universam Aristotelis logicam, Cologne.Google Scholar
Toletus, Franciscus (1587). Introductio in dialecticam Aristotelis, Venice.Google Scholar
Trentman, J. A. (1976). ‘The study of logic and language in England in the early 17th century’, Historiographia Linguistica, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University Records and Life in the Middle Ages (1944). ed. Thorndike, L., New York.Google Scholar
Vives, Juan Luis (1979a). Against the Pseudodialecticians: A Humanist Attack on Medieval Logic, ed. and trans. Guerlac, R., Dordrecht–Boston.Google Scholar
Weiler, A. G. (1962). Heinrich von Gorkum († 1431): Seine Stellung in der Philosophie und der Theologie des Spätmittelalters, Hilversum–Einsiedeln.Google Scholar
Zabarella, Francesco (1655). De felicitate libri tres.Padua.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×