Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- I 1870–1914
- II 1914–1945
- 8 Logic and philosophy: the analytic programme
- 28 Logical atomism
- 29 The scientific world conception: logical positivism
- 30 The achievements of the Polish school of logic
- 31 Logic and philosophical analysis
- 9 The diversity of philosophy
- 10 Knowledge, language, and the end of metaphysics
- 11 Philosophy and the exact sciences
- 12 Mind and its place in nature
- 13 Philosophy and social science
- 14 Ethics, religion, and the arts
- 15 Law and politics
- Biobibliographical appendix
- Bibliography
- INDEX
- References
29 - The scientific world conception: logical positivism
from 8 - Logic and philosophy: the analytic programme
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- I 1870–1914
- II 1914–1945
- 8 Logic and philosophy: the analytic programme
- 28 Logical atomism
- 29 The scientific world conception: logical positivism
- 30 The achievements of the Polish school of logic
- 31 Logic and philosophical analysis
- 9 The diversity of philosophy
- 10 Knowledge, language, and the end of metaphysics
- 11 Philosophy and the exact sciences
- 12 Mind and its place in nature
- 13 Philosophy and social science
- 14 Ethics, religion, and the arts
- 15 Law and politics
- Biobibliographical appendix
- Bibliography
- INDEX
- References
Summary
Logical positivism had almost as many names as it had roots. Among the terms used by its promoters were: logical positivism, logical empiricism, scientific empiricism, consistent empiricism, and other, similar names. All these names came fairly late in the day, stemming from around 1930, when the work of the logical positivists was first being brought before the English-speaking philosophical community. The initial public statement by the Vienna Circle, the Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis (Scientific World Conception: The Vienna Circle; Neurath et al. 1929 [1973]), eschews all of these terms, adopting instead the general term ‘scientific world conception’. This term was chosen in self-conscious opposition to the then dominant idealist, conservative, Catholic Austrian Weltanschauung philosophy. The Vienna Circle offered a scientific way of conceiving the world, not an intuitive grasp of the world’s ineffable essence and meaning.
The more general term is useful. It warns us away from expecting to find a short-list of doctrines about which the logical positivists agreed. It reminds us, also, that logical positivism grew up in an Austro-Germanic context. This context provided much of the philosophical training of the logical positivists; it also supplied the arationalist philosophical perspectives, Weltanschauungslehre and Lebensphilosophie (philosophy of life), against which the Vienna Circle publicly situated itself. Thus, while I will here, for ease of reference, employ the term ‘logical positivism’, the reader should bear in mind that this term suggests a greater commonality of project than one actually finds among the logical positivists (for attempts to situate the development of logical positivism within its broader intellectual context, see the essays in Uebel 1991 and Giere and Richardson 1996, as well as Galison 1990; the essential reference work on the career of logical positivism is Stadler 1997).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945 , pp. 391 - 400Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
References
and (1992). Science and Subjectivity: The Vienna Circle and Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
(1928a). Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin: Weltkreis. Trans. 1967 , The Logical Structure of the World, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1928b). Scheinproblems in der Philosophy, Berlin: Weltkreis. Trans. 1967 , Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1934). Logische Syntax der Sprache, Vienna: Springer Verlag. Trans. 1937 , The Logical Syntax of Language, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1936). ‘Von Erkenntnistheorie zur Wissenschaftslogik’ (‘From Epistemology to the Logic of Science’), in Actes du Congrès Internationale de Philosophie Scientifique, Sorbonne, Paris, 1935, vol. I, Paris: Hermann and Cie.Google Scholar
, , and (1996). Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1938). ‘Unity of Science as a Social Problem’ in , , and (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. I, no 1, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1934). ‘The Logical Character of the Principle of Induction’, Philosophy of Science 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). ‘Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logical Positivism and Architectural Modernism’, Critical Inquiry 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996). Origins of Logical Empiricism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
and (1993). Wien-Berlin-Prag: Der Aufstieg der wissenschaftlichen Philosophie (Vienna-Berlin-Prague: The Rise of Scientific Philosophy), Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
(1982). Schlick und Neurath. Ein Symposion (Schlick and Neurath: A Symposium), Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
(1975). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985). Zurück zu Schlick. Eine Neubewertung von Werk und Wirkung (Back to Schlick. A New Evaluation of his Work and Influence), Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
(1937). Logical Positivism, Pragmatism and Scientific Empiricism, Paris: Hermann et Cie.Google Scholar
and (1996). Encyclopedia and Utopia: The Life and Work of Otto Neurath (1882–1945), Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
(1981). Otto Neurath und der Wiener Kreis, Wissenschaftlichkeit als revolutionärer politischer Anspruch (Scientific Status as Revolutionary Politics), Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
, , and (1929). Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis, Vienna: Wolf. Trans. 1973 and , ‘Scientific World Conception. The Vienna Circle’ in (ed. and ), Empiricism and Sociology, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
(1931). Empirische Soziologie, Vienna: Springer. Partial Trans. 1973 and , ‘Empirical Sociology’ in (ed. and ), Empiricism and Sociology, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1933). Einheitswissenschaft und Psychologie, Vienna: Gerold. Trans. 1987 , ‘Unified Science and Psychology’ in (ed.), The Unity of Science, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
and (1994). Otto Neurath oder die Einheit von Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft (Otto Neurath or the Unity of Science and Society). Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
(1986). Questione de Forme: Logique et proposition analytique de Kant à Carnap, Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard. Trans. 1989 , Questions of Form: Logic and the Analytic Proposition from Kant to Carnap, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (1936). ‘Truth by Convention’ in (ed.), Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead, New York: Longman. Reprinted 1976 in , The Ways of Paradox, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1920). Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori, Berlin: Springer Verlag. Trans. 1965 , The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1924). Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Braunschweig: Vieweg. Trans. 1969 , Axiomatization of the Theory of Relativity, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1928). Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Berlin: de Gruyter. Trans. 1958 and , The Philosophy of Space and Time, New York: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1939). ‘Dewey’s Theory of Science’ in (ed.), The Philosophy of John Dewey, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
(1944). Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1951). The Rise of Scientific Philosophy, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1956). The Direction of Time, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1994). ‘Planning Science: Otto Neurath and the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science’, British Journal for the History of Science 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). ‘Carnap’s Principle of Tolerance, Empiricism and Conventionalism’ in and (eds.), Reading Putnam, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1984). Carnap’s Early Conventionalism: An Inquiry into the Background of the Vienna Circle, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
and (1994). Logic, Language, and the Structure of Scientific Theories, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
(1910). ‘Das Wesen der Wahrheit nach der modernen Logik’, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie und Soziologie 34 Trans. 1979 , ‘The Nature of Truth in Modern Logic’ in (ed. and ), Philosophical Papers, vol. I, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
(1917). Raum und Zeit in der gegenwärtigen Physik, Berlin: Springer Verlag. Trans. 1979 , ‘Space and Time in Contemporary Physics’ in (ed. and ), Philosophical Papers, vol. I, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1918, 1925). Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, Berlin: Springer. Trans. of 2nd edn 1974 and , General Theory of Knowledge, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
(1930). ‘Die Wende der Philosophie’, Erkenntnis 1 Trans. 1979 , ‘The Turning-Point in Philosophy’ in (ed. and ), Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1932). ‘Positivismus und Realismus’, Erkenntnis 3 Trans. 1979 , ‘Positivism and Realism’ in (ed. and ), Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1934). ‘Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis’, Erkenntnis 4 Trans. 1979 , ‘On the Foundation of Knowledge’ in (ed. and ), Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). ‘Aspects of the Social Background and Position of the Vienna Circle at the University of Vienna’ in (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Studien zum Wiener Kreis. Ursprung, Entwicklung und Wirkung des Logischen Empirismus im Kontext, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Trans. 2001 , The Vienna Circle: Studies in the Origins, Development and Influence of Logical Empiricism, Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
(1992). Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within: The Emergence of Neurath’s Naturalism in the Vienna Circle’s Protocol Sentence Debate, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
(1996a). ‘Anti-Foundationalism and the Vienna Circle’s Revolution in Philosophy’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996b). ‘The Enlightenment Ambition of Epistemic Utopianism: Otto Neurath’s Theory of Science in Historical Perspective’ in and (1996).Google Scholar
(1989). Reflexive Epistemology: The Philosophical Legacy of Otto Neurath, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by