Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T19:41:55.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

48 - General relativity

from 11 - Philosophy and the exact sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Thomas Ryckman
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Thomas Baldwin
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

The initial empirical corroboration of the General Theory of Relativity (GTR) was announced to the world at a packed joint meeting of the Royal Society of London and the Royal Astronomical Society on 6 November 1919. Lengthy data analysis of solar eclipse observations, made the previous May by a joint British expedition to Brazil and to an island off the coast of West Africa, confirmed that the GTR-predicted amount of ‘bending’ of light rays in the solar gravitational field had indeed been found. Under a portrait of Isaac Newton, J. J. Thompson, president of the Royal Society, pronounced this ‘the most important result obtained in connection with the theory of gravitation since Newton’s day, and … one of the highest achievements of human thought’ (quoted from Pais 1982: 305). There followed the ‘relativity-rumpus’ (Sommerfeld 1949: 101), a public clamour that, regarding a purely scientific theory without apparent military or technological application, was completely unprecedented, and is, as yet, unmatched. Almost overnight, Albert Einstein, hitherto largely unknown outside the rarefied (and by present standards, miniscule) circle of theoretical physicists, became world famous and a favoured target of anti-Semitism.

A plausible explanation of this astonishing spectacle points to the exhausted state of European culture, eager for diversion after the ravages of four years of world war, political revolution, and an influenza pandemic in which millions perished. Diversion the theory certainly provided, with the novelty of claims made on its behalf and its aura of incomprehensibility. But even among the scientifically literate, there was considerable controversy and misunderstanding concerning the theory’s physical content as well as its philosophical implications.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbour, J. (1999). ‘The Development of Machian Themes in the Twentieth Century’ in Butterfield, J. (ed.), The Arguments of Time, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barbour, J. B. and Pfister, H. (eds.) (1995). Mach’s Principle; From Newton’s Bucket to Quantum Gravity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Bergmann, P. (1965). ‘Physics and Geometry’ in Bar-Hillel, Y., Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science; Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishers.Google Scholar
Bergmann, P. (1980). Remarks in ‘Open Discussion’ following papers by Hawking, S. and Unruh, W. in Woolf, H. (ed.), Some Strangeness in the Proportion, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishers.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (1995). Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1930). ‘On the Instability of the Einstein World’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. (1916). Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, Leipzig: J. Barth; trans. 1923 Perrett, W. and Jeffrey, G. B.The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity’, in Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H., and Weyl, H., The Principle of Relativity; repr. New York: Dover, 1952.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1917). ‘Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Sitzungsberichte der Preuβ;ischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Math.-Phys. Kl.; trans. 1952 Perrett, W. and Jeffrey, G. B., ‘Cosmological Considerations on the General Theory of Relativity’, in Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H., and Weyl, H., The Principle of Relativity, 1923; repr. New York: Dover, 1952.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1918). ‘Prinzipielles zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Annalen der Physik 55Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1921). ‘Geometrie und Erfahrung’, Sitzungsberichte der Preuflischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Math.-Phys. Kl.; separately issued in expanded form and trans. 1923 Perrett, W. and Jeffrey, G. B., ‘Geometry and Experience’ in Sidelights on Relativity, New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1949). ‘Autobiographical Notes’ in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1952). ‘Relativity and the Problem of Space’, Appendix V, in Einstein, A., Relativity: The Special and General Theory, 15th edn, New York: Crown Publishers, 1961.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1983). Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. (1972). Albert Einstein – Creator and Rebel (written in collaboration with Dukas, Helen), New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1986). The Advancement of Science, and its Burdens, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hubble, E. (1929). ‘A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-galactic Nebulae’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (USA) 15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kretschmann, E. (1917). ‘Über den physikalischen Sinn der Relativitätspostulate, A. Einstein’s neue und seine ursprüngliche Relativitätstheorie’, Annalen der Physik 53Google Scholar
Norton, J. D. (1989). ‘How Einstein Found his Field Equations’ in Howard, D. and Stachel, J. (eds.), Einstein and the History of General Relativity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Norton, J. D. (1993). ‘General Covariance and the Foundations of General Relativity: Eight Decades of Dispute’, Reports on Progress in Physics 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pais, A. (1982). ‘Subtle is the Lord’: The Life and Science of Albert Einstein, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1928). Philosophie der Raum-Zeit Lehre, Berlin and Leipzig: de Gruyter; trans. The Philosophy of Space and Time, New York: Dover, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryckman, T. A. (1992). ‘(P)oint-(C)oincidence Thinking’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23Google Scholar
Ryckman, T. A. (2004). The Reign of Relativity: Philosophy in Physics, 1915–25, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smolin, L. (1992). ‘Space and Time in the Quantum Universe’ in Ashtekar, A. and Stachel, J. (eds.), Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, A. (1949). ‘To Albert Einstein’s Seventieth Birthday’ in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Stachel, J. (1986). ‘What a Physicist Can Learn from the Discovery of General Relativity’ in Ruffini, R. (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishers.Google Scholar
Stachel, J. (1989). ‘Einstein’s Search for General Covariance, 1912–1915’ in Howard, D. and Stachel, J. (eds.), Einstein and the History of General Relativity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser. (Based on a paper circulating privately since 1980.)Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1989). ‘The Cosmological Constant Problem’, Reviews of Modern Physics: 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyl, H. (1918). Raum-Zeit-Materie, Berlin: Springer Verlag. 4th edn 1921, trans. 1922 Brose, H., Space-Time-Matter, London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • General relativity
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.051
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • General relativity
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.051
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • General relativity
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.051
Available formats
×