Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:26:52.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Meaning and Language

from II - Logic and Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2009

By
Josef Stern
Edited by
Steven Nadler  and
T. M. Rudavsky
Steven Nadler
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
T. M. Rudavsky
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access

Summary

It may be anachronistic to speak of the philosophy of language before Frege, but philosophers have been concerned with questions of meaning and language since Plato, and medieval Jewish philosophers were no exception. Nonetheless these topics are part of the infrastructure of medieval Jewish philosophy rather than its primary subject matter. Where medieval Jewish philosophers discuss questions of language and the nature of meaning, it is generally piecemeal and subsidiary to larger projects: in introductions to grammars and lexicons; in exegetical contexts such as the interpretation of Gen. 2:20, “And the man gave names, and so on”; to explain why the rabbis call Hebrew lashon ha-qodesh, the holy language; while addressing metaphysical questions such as divine attributes; or, as translations are produced, in introductions to or commentaries on the logical treatises of the Organon, especially De Interpretatione. We do not find among the Jews the same rich literature on topics such as significance, supposition, and the semantics of terms and propositions that we find among the Latin scholastics. To uncover and analyze the medieval Jewish philosophers’ opinions on these issues, the scholar must extract them from other discussions and texts, beginning with the Bible.

According to scripture, the very first words ever uttered – “Let there be light” – are God’s, announcing the creation of light and thereby bringing it into existence. Each of the first three creations is also completed by an act of divine naming: light is called “Day,” the firmaments “Heavens,” and so on. Thus, an opening announcement by God and a final naming frame each of these acts of creation, perhaps to suggest that the way the world presents itself, divided into objects and structured according to kinds, is determined as well as represented by language. The rabbis expand this role of divine speech to encompass all of creation: “With ten utterances,” R. Yohanan states, “the world was created” and God is “He who spoke and the world is created.”3 Divine language preexists the created world.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy
From Antiquity through the Seventeenth Century
 , pp. 230 - 266
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Fārābī, (1931). Iḥsā⼹ al-⼹ulūm. Amin, ⼹Uthman (ed.), Cairo: Maktabat al-Khanji.Google Scholar
Al-Fārābī, (1957). “Al-Fārābī’s Introductory Risalah on Logic,” Dunlop, D.M. (ed. and trans.). The Islamic Quarterly. 3:.Google Scholar
Al-Fārābī, (1970/2005). Kitāb al-Hūrūf. in Khalidi, M.A. (trans.) and Mahdi, M. (ed.), Medieval Islamic Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Al-Fārābī, (1981). Al-Fārābī’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione. Zimmermann, F.W. (trans.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Altmann, Alexander (1987). “Maimonides on the Intellect and the Scope of Metaphysics,” in Altmann, A., Von der mittelalterlichen zur modernen Aufklärung. Tübingen: J.C. Mohr.Google Scholar
Aquinas, St. Thomas (1964). Summa Theologia. 60 vols. London: Blackfriars.Google Scholar
Aslanoff, Cyril (1996). “La réflexion linguistique hébraïque dans l⼹horizon intellectuel de l⼹occident médiéval: essai de comparaison des traités de grammaire hébraïque et provençale dans la perspective de l⼹histoire des doctrines grammaticales,” Revues des études juives. 155:.Google Scholar
Black, Deborah L. (1990). Logic and Aristotle’s ‘Rhetoric’ and “Poetics’ in Medieval Arabic Philosophy. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Black, Deborah L. (1992). “Aristotle’s ‘Peri hermeneias’ in Medieval Latin and Arabic Philosophy: Logic and the Linguistic Arts,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Supplementary Volume 17:.Google Scholar
Blaustein, M. (1986). “Aspects of Ibn Bājja’s Theory of Apprehension,” in Pines, S. and Yovel, Y. (eds.), Maimonides and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Boethius, (1877–80). Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii commentarii in librum Aristoteli [Peri hermeneias]. 2 vols., Meiser, K. (ed.). Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Brody, Robert (2006). Rav Se⼸adya Gaon. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center.Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, (1972). Grammatica Speculativa of Thomas of Erfurt. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cohen, Mordechai Z. (2003). Three Approaches to Biblical Metaphor: From Abraham ibn Ezra and Maimonides to David Kimhi. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Crescas, Ḥasdai (1990). ⼹Or Ha-Shem. Fisher, S. (ed.). Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Duran, Profiat (1865). Ma⼸aseh Efod. Friedlaender, J. and Kohn, J. (eds.). Vienna.Google Scholar
Elamrani-Jamal, A. (1983). Logique aristotélienne et grammaire arabe. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad (2001). Review of Zwiep (1997), Revues des études juives. 160:.Google Scholar
Gersonides, (1987). The Wars of the Lord, volume 2: Books Two, Three, Four. Feldman, Seymour (trans.). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E. (1992). “Jewish and Islamic Philosophy of Language,” in Dascal, Marcelo, Gerhardus, Dietfried, Lorenz, Kuno, and Meggle, Georg (eds.). Philosophy of Language: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gronemann, Selig (1869). De Profiatii Durani (Efodaei) Vita Ac Studiis. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Gyekye, Kwame (1989). “Al-Fārābī on the Logic of the Arguments of the Muslim Philosophical Theologians,” Journal of the History of Philosophy. 27:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Steven (2007). “Shem Tov Ibn Falaquera,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.seop.leeds.ac.uk/entries/falaquera/.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1959). “Aristotle and the Ambiguity of Ambiguity,” Inquiry. 2:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1971). “Different Kinds of Equivocation in Aristotle,” Journal of the History of Philosophy. 9:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1973). Time and Necessity, Studies in Aristotle’s Theory of Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ibn Ezra, Abraham (2002). Yesod Mora ve-Sod Torah. The Foundation of Piety and the Secret of the Torah, an Annotated Critical Edition. Cohen, Joseph and Simon, Uriel (eds.), Ramat Gan, Israel: Bar Ilan University Press.Google Scholar
Ibn Falaquera, Shem Tov ben Joseph (1902). Reshit Ḥokhmah, in David, M.. (ed.), Shemtob ben Josef ibn Falaqueras Propadeutik der Wissenschaften Reshith Chokmah. Berlin.Google Scholar
Ibn Kaspi, Joseph (1905/06). Mishneh Kesef (2 vol). Last, I. (ed.). Presburg/Krakow.Google Scholar
Ibn Kaspi, Joseph (1907). Sharshot Kesef, in Last, I.. (ed.). “‘Sharshot Kesef,’ The Hebrew Dictionary of Roots, by Joseph ibn Caspi,” Jewish Quarterly Review. old series, 19:.Google Scholar
Ibn Tibbon, Samuel (1987). Perush ha-Millot ha-Zarot, in Even-Shmuel, Y.. (ed.), Moreh ha-Nevukhim. Jerusalem: Mossad HaRav Kook.Google Scholar
Jospe, Raphael (1989). “The Superiority of Oral over Written Communication. Judah Hal-Levi’s Kuzari and Modern Jewish Thought,” in Neusner, J., Frerichs, E.S., and Sarna, N. M.. (eds.), From Ancient Israel to Modern Judaism. Intellect in Quest of Understanding. Essays in Honor of Marvin Fox. vol. 3. Atlanta, GA: Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
Kellner, Menachem (2004). “Maimonides on the ‘Normality’ of Hebrew,” in Malino, Jonathan (ed.), Judaism and Modernity: The Religious Philosophy of David Hartman. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
King, Peter (2007). “Rethinking Representation in the Middle Ages,” in Lagerlund, Henrik (ed.), Representation and Objects of Thought in Medieval Philosophy. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kirchheim, R. (1857). “Schreiben des Herrn R. Kirchheim in Frankfurt a.M. an Hernn Ignaz Blumenfeld in Wien,” in Blumenfeld, I.. (ed.), Ozar Nehmad II. Briefe und Abhandlungen judische Literatur betreffend von den bekanntesten judischen Gelehrten. Vienna.Google Scholar
Kraemer, Joel L. (1986a). Humanism in the Renaissance of Islam: The Cultural Revival during the Buyid Age. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Kraemer, Joel L. (1986b). Philosophy in the Renaissance of Islam: Abu Sulayman al-Sijistani and his Circle. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman (1974). “Aristotle on Spoken Sound Significant by Convention,” in Corcoran, J.. (ed.), Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretations. Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1969). Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maimonides, (1904/1960). Moreh Nevukhim. Vilna.Google Scholar
Maimonides, (1938). Treatise on the Art of Logic. Efros, Israel (trans. and ed.), “Maimonides’ Treatise on Logic (Makalah Fi-Sina ⼸at Al-Mantiq).” Proceedings of the American Academy of Jewish Research. 8: [English sect.]; 8: [Hebrew sect.].Google Scholar
Maimonides, (1963). The Guide of the Perplexed. 2 vols., Pines, Shlomo (trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maimonides, (1987). Pirkei Moshe Birefuah, Muntner, S. (ed.). Jerusalem Mossad Harav Kook.Google Scholar
Manekin, Charles H. (1990). “Belief, Certainty, and Divine Attributes in the Guide of the Perplexed,” Maimonidean Studies. 1:.Google Scholar
Manekin, Charles H. (1999). “Scholastic Logic and the Jews,” Bulletin de l⼹étude de la philosophie médievale. 41:.Google Scholar
Margoliouth, D.S. (1905). “The Discussion between Abu Bishr Matta and Abu Sa⼹id al-Sirafi on the Merits of Logic and Grammar,” The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. 37:.Google Scholar
Saruq, Menahem ben (1986). Maḥberet. Saenz-Badillos, A. (ed.). Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Mesch, Barry (1975). Studies in Joseph ibn Caspi. Fourteenth Century Philosopher and Exegete. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Naḥmanides, (1959–63). Perush ha-RaMBaN ⼸al ha-Torah. 3 vols. Chavel, C. (ed.). Jerusalem: Mossad HaRav Kook.Google Scholar
,Nissim of Marseilles (2000). Ma⼸aseh Nissim by R. Nissim of Marseilles. Kreisel, Howard (ed.). Jerusalem: Mekize Nirdamim. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, Gabriel (1973). Theories of the Proposition: Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Owen, G.E.L. (1965). “Aristotle on the Snares of Ontology,” in Bambrough, R. (ed), New Essays on Plato and Aristotle. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan (1967). Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter. Kopenhagen: Münster Westf.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan (1982). “Speculative Grammar,” in Kretzmann, Kenny, and Pinborg 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Shalom and Manekin, Charles (1989). “Philosophical Observations on Maimonides’ Critique of Galen,” Koroth: A Journal for the History of Medicine. 9:.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Shalom (1976–7). “The Theory of Names in Medieval Jewish Philosophy,” Iyyun. 27:. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Shalom (1981). “Logic, Language, and Scriptural Interpretation in the Writings of R. Joseph ibn Kaspi,” in Hallamish, M. and Kasher, A. (eds.),Religion and Language: Philosophical Essays. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects Ltd. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Gaon, Saadia (1969a). Ha-Egron: Kitāb ⼸usul al-shi al-ībrānī. Allony, N. (ed.). Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language.Google Scholar
Gaon, Saadia (1969c). Kitāb ⼹usul al-si⼸r al-⼸ibrāni. Allony, N. (ed.). Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language.Google Scholar
Gaon, Saadia (1970–71). Sefer Emunot Ve-De⼸ot. Qāfih, Yosef (trans.). Jerusalem; S. Rosenblatt (English trans). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I. (1980). “Avicenna on the Subject Matter of Logic,” Journal of Philosophy. 77:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholem, Gershom (1971). The Messianic Idea in Judaism. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Schreiner, Martin (1983). Gesammelte Schriften. Perlmann, M. (ed.). Hildesheim: Germany.Google Scholar
Steiner, Richard C. (2000).“Does the Biblical Hebrew Conjunction “Vav” Have Many Meanings, One Meaning, or No Meaning at All?” Journal of Biblical Literature. 119:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Josef (1986). “Language,” in Cohen, A. A. and Mendes-Flohr, P.. (eds.), Contemporary Jewish Religious Thought. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Stern, Josef (1989). “Logical Syntax as a Key to a Secret of the Guide of the Perplexed,” Iyyun. 38:. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Stern, Josef (1998). Problems and Parables of Law: Maimonides and Nahmanides on Reasons for the Commandments (Ta⼸amei Ha-Mitzvot). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Josef (2000). “Maimonides on Language and the Science of Language,” in Cohen, Robert and Levine, Hillel (eds.), Maimonides and the Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Stern, Josef (2005). “Maimonides’ Epistemology,” in Seeskin 2005a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A. (1938). “The Amphibolous Terms in Arisotle, Arabic Philosophy, and Maimonides,” Harvard Theological Review. 31:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A. (1961). “The Veracity of Scripture from Philo to Spinoza,” in Religious Philosophy: A Group of Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A. (1979). Repercussions of the Kalām in Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zwiep, Irene E. (1997). Mother of Reason and Revelation. A Short History of Medieval Jewish Linguistic Thought. Amsterdam: J.C. Gieben.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×