Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:41:20.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - OLD IRANIAN CALENDARS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Get access

Summary

PART I. ELEMENTS OF THE CALENDAR. DEFINITIONS

I. I. The number of calendars in use among the many civilizations of our globe, past and present, is legion. However, notwithstanding their diversity they all have, or at one time had, two main elements in common: a lunar serving to define smaller, not strictly equal, units of time, and a solar measuring the “year”, i.e., the cyclical recurrence of the seasons. Evidently, the latter alone is of importance to agriculture and thus meets the practical needs of a higher stage of civilization, while the former, being of little practical value, could in theory have been dispensed with as soon as a sedentary community had found means and ways to establish a primitive solar calendar. But in practice, such a radical break with tradition occurred only in exceptional cases.

In point of fact, of all calendars known in history there are only four that were – or at least were intended to be – oriented by the Sun alone: the Egyptian, the Achaemenian Later Avestan, the Julian-Gregorian and that developed by the central-American Mayas and later adopted by the neighbouring Aztecs. But even in the Egyptian and in the Julian calendars, as still in our modern Gregorian, the lunar element is not suppressed completely. As is well-known, it plays a decisive role in the determination of Easter, which fact bears witness to the importance of the religious element even in the most recent phase of a multi-millenary evolution. For at all times and places we find that calendar and religion form an inseparable unity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiet, P., Laglyptique mésopotamienne archaïque (Paris, 1961), pl. 51, no. 706.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×