Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:09:43.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Party and the intellectuals: phase two

from PART II - THE SEARCH FOR A CHINESE ROAD, 1958–1965

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Get access

Summary

THE DENIGRATION OF INTELLECTUAL ENDEAVOR IN THE GREAT LEAP FORWARD

The suppression of specific intellectuals in the Anti-Rightist campaign turned into anti-intellectualism in general in the Great Leap Forward (GLF). The leadership's hope of using the intellectuals as key figures in China's modernization had been dashed when both intellectuals and students criticized the Party in the Hundred Flowers. After a decade of indoctrination and ideological remolding campaigns, intellectuals still questioned Party policies. The leadership's disillusion with the intellectuals was reflected in Propaganda Director Lu Ting-i's statements in the GLF period. Whereas in the Hundred Flowers he had used Mao's slogan to encourage intellectuals with Western learning to participate actively in the nation building, effort, in a Kuang-ming Daily article of 13 March 1958 he rejected Western learning as “poisonous weeds”: “There is bankruptcy in bourgeois philosophy, science, social sciences, literature and arts. The only value in studying them is that we can learn to recognize them as ‘poisonous weeds’ and by weeding, use them as fertilizer.”

Even though the intellectuals in the GLF were less direct objects of attack than in the Anti-Rightist Campaign, their relative position in Chinese society deteriorated further. In contrast to the Hundred Flowers period, the GLF emphasized political reliability rather than professional skill. A new slogan was advanced, calling on people in all walks of life, including intellectuals, to be “Red and expert,” with the emphasis on “Red” As the movement gained momentum, the emphasis shifted almost wholly to redness. Intelligence was equated with political commitment and was no longer regarded as the monopoly of the few, and this change presaged the Cultural Revolution.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ch'i, Pen-yii and Chieh, Lin, ‘Comrade Chien Po-tsan's outlook on history should be criticized’, Hung-ch'i (24 March 1966).Google Scholar
Chiang, Ch'ing, ‘Do new services for the people’, Tung fang hung (The east is red), 3 June 1967.Google Scholar
En-lai, Chou, ‘On literature and art’, Wen-i pao (Literary gazette), February 1979.Google Scholar
Feng, Kuan and Yu-shih, Lin, ‘Some problems of class analysis in the study of the history of philosophy’, Che-hsueh yen-chiu (Philosophical research), 6 (1963).Google Scholar
Ho-shui, Tien, ‘When one cannot be both red and expert’, Cbung-kuo ch'ing-nien pao, 26 December 1964.Google Scholar
Kuo-chiin, Lin, ‘Meetings of Immortals drive the intellectuals forward in self-remolding’, JMJP, 16 May 1961.Google Scholar
Nan-yuan, Su, ‘The Lin family shop is a picture for prettifying the bourgeoisie’, JMJP, 29 May 1965.Google Scholar
Szu-ch'i, Ai, ‘Surreptitious substitution of the theory of the reconciliation of contradictions and class for revolutionary dialectics must not be permitted’, JMJP, 20 May 1965.Google Scholar
T'o, Teng, ‘Sing the praise of Lake T'ai’, KMJP, 7 September 1960.Google Scholar
Tung-hui, Wu, ‘Destroy the black backstage manager of “The three-family village”’, KM]P 18 June 1967.Google Scholar
Wei, Ts'ung, ‘Yang Hsien-chen and the “Identity of thinking and existence”’, KMJP, 11 December 1964.Google Scholar
Wei-min, Chin and Yun-ch'u, Lin, ‘Some queries on the spirit of the times’, JMJP, 2 August 1964.Google Scholar
Wen-sheng, Rung, ‘Sun Yeh-fang's theory is a revisionist fallacy’, JM]P, 8 August 1966.Google Scholar
Wen-yuan, Yao, ‘A theory which causes socialist literature and art to degenerate’, KMJP, 20 December 1964.Google Scholar
Wu, Nan-hsing (Wu, Han, Teng, T'o, and Liao, Mo-sha). San-chia ts'un cha-chi (Notes from a three-family village). Peking: Jen-min wen-hsueh ch'u-pan-she, 1979.
Yu-lan, Feng, ‘Criticism and self-criticism in discussion about Confucianism’, Che-hsueh yen-chiu (Philosophical research), 1963.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×