Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 20
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: November 2014

2 - Foundations of the Learning Sciences

from Part I - Foundations

Related content

Powered by UNSILO


Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5–11.
Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149, 91–130.
Azmitia, M. (1996). Peer interactive minds: Developmental, theoretical, and methodological issues. In P. B. Baltes & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 133–162). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.
Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–107.
Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307359.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., & The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt. (2005). Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3–4), 363–392.
Bradshaw, G. F. (1992). The airplane and the logic of invention. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 239–250). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp.229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Chalmers, D. J. (1993/2011). A computational foundation for the study of cognition. Journal of Cognitive Science, 12(4), 323–357.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.
Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 151–233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
Cremin, L. A. (1961). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, 1876–1957 (vol. 519). New York: Knopf.
Davenport, J. (2013). Reciprocal relations between research and practice: How improving curricular materials led to new research questions. Paper presentation to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco).
Dede, C. (2006). Evolving innovations beyond ideal settings to challenging contexts of practice. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 551–566). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
Dillenbourg, P., & Self, J. (1992). People power: A human-computer collaborative learning system. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, & G. McCalla (Eds.), The 2nd International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 608, Springer-Verlag, 651–660.
Dotger, B. H. (2010). “I had no idea”: Developing dispositional awareness and sensitivity through a cross-professional pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 805–812.
Dreyfus, H. L. (2002). Intelligence without representation – Merleau-Ponty’s critique of mental representation: The relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(4), 367–383.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.
Edelson, D. C., & Reiser, B. J. (2006). Making authentic practices accessible to learners: Design challenges and strategies. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 335–354). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget (vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The concept of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action. Behavioral and brain sciences, 20(01), 41–50.
Graesser, A. C., Halpern, D. F., & Hakel, M. (2008). 25 principles of learning. Washington, DC: Task Force on Lifelong Learning at Work and at Home. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from
Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.
Hawkins, J. (1997). The National Design Experiments Consortium: Final Report. New York: Center for Children and Technology, Educational Development Center.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.
Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. T. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning science to the classroom. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kolodner, J. L. (1991). The Journal of the Learning Sciences: Effecting changes in education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 1–6.
Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (2002). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Lamon, M., Secules, T., Petrosino, A. J., Hackett, R., Bransford, J. D., & Goldman S. R. (1996). Schools for thought: Overview of the project and lessons learned from one of the sites. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovation in learning: New environments for education (pp. 243–288). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Larkin, M., Eatough, V., & Osborn, M. (2011). Interpretative phenomenological analysis and embodied, active, situated cognition. Theory & Psychology, 21(3), 318–337.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lehrer, R., Kim, M. J., Ayers, E., & Wilson, M. (in press). Toward establishing a learning progression to support the development of statistical reasoning. To appear in A. P. Mahoney, J. Confrey, & K. H. Nyugen (Eds.), Learning over time: Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Linn, M. C., & Slotta, J. D. (2000). WISE science. Educational Leadership, 58(2), 29–32.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, R. T. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1063–1080.
McDonald, S. K., Keesler, V. A., Kauffman, N. J., & Schneider, B. (2006). Scaling-up exemplary interventions. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 15–24.
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and instruction, 14(1), 1–43.
Nathan, M. J. (1998). The impact of theories of learning on learning environment design. Interactive Learning Environments, 5, 135–160.
Nathan, M. J. (2012). Rethinking formalisms in formal education. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 125–148.
Nathan, M. J. (2014). Grounded mathematical reasoning. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 171–183). Routledge: New York.
Nathan, M. J., & Alibali, M. W. (2010). Learning sciences. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(3), 329–345.
Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1976). Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19(3), 113–126.
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Pashler, H., Bain, P. M., Bottge, B. A., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. IES Practice Guide. NCER 2007–2004. National Center for Education Research.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337.
Perfetti, C. A. (1989). There are generalized abilities and one of them is reading. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 307–335). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
RAND (2004). Expanding the Reach of Education Reforms: What Have We Learned about Scaling Up Educational Interventions?. RAND Health.
Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (Eds.) (2010). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. (vol. 1). Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, D. L., Martin, T., & Nasir, N. (2005). Designs for knowledge evolution: Towards a prescriptive theory for integrating first- and second-hand knowledge. In P. Gardenfors & P. Johansson (Eds.), Cognition, education, and communication technology (pp. 21–54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467–482.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Songer, N. B. (1996). Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms: A case of kids as global scientists. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(4), 297–327.
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.
Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking Mathematics in School: Studies of Teaching and Learning, (pp. 107–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., Shechtman, N., Kaput, J., & Hopkins, B. (2008). Scaling up innovative technology-based mathematics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 248–286.
Ur, S., & VanLehn, K. (1995). Steps: A simulated, tutorable physics student!. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6, 405–437.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.