Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Chapter Summaries
- Part I Theoretical Foundations of Stakeholder Theory
- Part II Stakeholder Theory and Society
- Part III Stakeholder Theory in the Business Disciplines
- Part IV Stakeholder Theory in Education and Practice
- Part V New Voices in Stakeholder Thinking
- Chapter 15 Considering a Behavioral View of Stakeholders
- Chapter 16 Behavioral Stakeholder Theory
- Chapter 17 Sketches of New and Future Research on Stakeholder Management
- Chapter 18 Contextual Richness at the Core of New Stakeholder Research
- Index
- References
Chapter 15 - Considering a Behavioral View of Stakeholders
from Part V - New Voices in Stakeholder Thinking
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2019
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Chapter Summaries
- Part I Theoretical Foundations of Stakeholder Theory
- Part II Stakeholder Theory and Society
- Part III Stakeholder Theory in the Business Disciplines
- Part IV Stakeholder Theory in Education and Practice
- Part V New Voices in Stakeholder Thinking
- Chapter 15 Considering a Behavioral View of Stakeholders
- Chapter 16 Behavioral Stakeholder Theory
- Chapter 17 Sketches of New and Future Research on Stakeholder Management
- Chapter 18 Contextual Richness at the Core of New Stakeholder Research
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory , pp. 245 - 249Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 447–456.Google Scholar
Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4): 576–609.Google Scholar
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. (2016). Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 229–251.Google Scholar
Bundy, J., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2015). A burden of responsibility: The role of social approval at the onset of a crisis. Academy of Management Review, 40(3): 345–369.Google Scholar
Bundy, J., Shropshire, C., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2013). Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38(3): 352–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, J., Vogel, R. M., & Zachary, M. A. (2018). Organization-stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2): 476–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, M., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2): 197–232.Google Scholar
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Attribution theory as a guide for post-crisis communication research. Public Relations Review, 33(2): 135–139.Google Scholar
Crilly, D., Hansen, M., & Zollo, M. (2016). The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2): 705–729.Google Scholar
Devers, C. E., Dewett, T., Mishina, Y., & Belsito, C. A. (2009). A general theory of organizational stigma. Organization Science, 20(1): 154–171.Google Scholar
Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. (2005). Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3(4): 441–455.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (2011). Some thoughts on the development of stakeholder theory. In Phillips, R. A., ed., Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects, pp. 212–233. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greve, H. R. (2013). Microfoundations of management: Behavioral strategies and levels of rationality in organizational action. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2): 103–119.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1): 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keevil, A. A. C. (2014). Behavioral stakeholder theory. Unpublished dissertation, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Lange, D., & Washburn, N. T. (2012). Understanding Attributions of Corporate Social Irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37(2): 300–326.Google Scholar
Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6): 1152–1189.Google Scholar
Logsdon, J. M., & Wood, D. J. (2002). Reputation as an emerging construct in the business and society field: An introduction. Business & Society, 41(4): 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVea, J. F., & Freeman, R. E. (2005). A Names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management how focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1): 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, A., & Kolk, A. (2010). Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Muller, A. R., Pfarrer, M. D., & Little, L. M. (2014). A Theory of Collective Empathy in Corporate Philanthropy Decisions. Academy of Management Review, 39(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Petrenko, O. V., Aime, F., Ridge, J., & Hill, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 262–279.Google Scholar
Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. R. (2011). Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12): 1369–1386.Google Scholar
Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6): 1033–1049.Google Scholar
Scott, S., & Lane, V. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 43–62.Google Scholar
Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Hubbard, T. D. (2016). Reputation as a Benefit and a Burden? How Stakeholders’ Organizational Identification Affects the Role of Reputation Following a Negative Event. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1): 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4
- Cited by