Americans for Community Development. (n.d.). Laws. Retrieved April 29, 2017, from https://americansforcommunitydevelopment.org/laws/.Google Scholar

Akintoye, A., Beck, M., & Hardcastle, C. (2003).Public-private partnerships: Managing risks and opportunities. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar

Alpaslan, C. M., Green, S. E., & Mitroff, I. I. (2009). Corporate governance in a context of crises: Towards a stakeholder theory of crisis management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(1): 38–49.Google Scholar

American Bar Association. (1990). Other constitution statutes: Potential for confusion. The Business Lawyer, 45(4): 2253–2271.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, S. M. (1993). Independent directors and the ALI corporate governance project. George Washington Law Review, 61: 1034–1083.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, S. M. (2011). Article: Dodd-Frank: Quack federal corporate governance round II. Minnesota Law Review. 95: 1779–1821.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A. (2005). The case for increasing shareholder power. Harvard Law Review, 115(3): 833–914.Google Scholar

Belinfanti, T., & Stout, L. A. (2017). Contested visions: The value of systems theory for corporate law. Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berle, A.A. Jr., & Means, G. C. (1932).The modern corporation and private property. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Berner, M. M., Amos, J. M., & Morse, R. S. (2011). What constitutes effective citizen participation in local government views from city stakeholders. Public Administration Quarterly, 35(1): 128–63.Google Scholar

Bertus, M., Jahera, J. S. Jr., & Yost, K. (2008). Sarbanes-Oxley, corporate governance, and strategic dividend decisions. Unpublished article, Auburn University.Google Scholar

Blair, M. M., & Stout, L. (1999). A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review, 85(2): 248–392.Google Scholar

Boatright, J. R. (1994). Fiduciary duties and the shareholder-management relation: Or, what’s so special about shareholders? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 393–407.Google Scholar

Boatright, J. R. (2000).Ethics and the conduct of business. 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bovaird, T. (2004). Public-private partnerships: From contested topics to prevalent practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2): 199–215.Google Scholar

Brugha, R., & Varvasovsky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3): 239–246.Google Scholar

Bryson, J. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Management Review, 6(1): 21–53.Google Scholar

Carlson, C. A practical guide to collaborative governance. (2007). Portland, OR: Policy Consensus Initiative.Google Scholar

Ciepley, D. (2013). Beyond public and private: Toward a political theory of the corporation. American Political Science Review, 107(1): 139–158.Google Scholar

Citizens United v. FEC, 558 US 310 (2010).Google Scholar

Chapin, T. (2002). Beyond the Entrepreneurial City: Municipal Capitalism in San Diego. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(5): 565–581.Google Scholar

Cremers, M., & Sepe, S. M. (2016). Article: The shareholder value of empowered boards. Stanford Law Review, 68: 67–148.Google Scholar

Cummings, B. (2012). Benefit corporations: How to enforce a mandate to promote the public interest. Columbia Law Review, 112(3): 578–627.Google Scholar

De Schepper, S., Dooms, M., & Haezendonck, E. (2014). Stakeholder dynamics and responsibilities in Public-Private Partnerships: A mixed experience. International Journal of Project Management, 32: 1210–1222.Google Scholar

Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 204 Mich. 459 (1919).Google Scholar

Donaldson, C., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.Google Scholar

Dorf, M. C., & Fagan, J. A. (2003). Problem solving courts: From innovation to institutionalization. American Criminal Law Review, 40: 1501–1511.Google Scholar

Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98(2): 267–473.Google Scholar

Dougherty, T. J. (2016). The director’s handbook. New Providence, NJ: Corporation Services Company.Google Scholar

eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. Newmark. 16 A 3d 1 (2010).Google Scholar

Elhauge, E. (2005). Sacrificing corporate profits in the public interest. New York University Law Review, 80(3): 733–869.Google Scholar

Fiorino, D. J. (1999). Rethinking environmental regulation: Perspectives on law and governance. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 23: 441–469.Google Scholar

Fisch, J. E. (2006). Symposium: Robert Clark’s corporate law: Twenty years of change: Measuring efficiency in corporate law: The role of shareholder primacy. Iowa Journal of Corporate Law, 31: 637–674.Google Scholar

Fort, T. (1997). The corporation as mediating institution: An efficacious synthesis of stakeholder theory and corporate constituency statutes. Notre Dame Law Review, 73(1): 173–203.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 409–421.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1999). Response: Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review 24(2): 233–36.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times. September 13: 33.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. T., & Mason, D. (2005). Stakeholder management and the public subsidization of Nashville’s coliseum. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(1): 93–118.Google Scholar

Ghere, R. K. (2001). Ethical futures and public-private partnerships: Peering far down the track. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 1: 303–319.Google Scholar

Gillan, S., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors: A global perspective. Journal of Applied Finance, 13(2): 4–22.Google Scholar

Greiling, D., & Halachmi, A. (2012). Introduction: Public private partnerships: Accountability and governance. Public Administration Quarterly, 36(2): 133–139.Google Scholar

Hallett, M. A. & Rogers, R. (1994). The push for “truth in sentencing”: Evaluating competing stakeholder constructions: The case for contextual constructionism in evaluation research. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17(2): 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, H. & Kraakman, R. (2001). Essay: The end of history for corporate law. Georgetown Law Journal, 89(2): 439–468.Google Scholar

Hasnas, J. (1998). The normative theories of business ethics. A guide for the perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1): 19–42.Google Scholar

Innes, J. E. (1998). Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64: 52–63.Google Scholar

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5: 419–436.Google Scholar

Jennings, M. M., & Happel, S. (2003). The post-Enron era for stakeholder theory: A new look at corporate governance and the Coase Theorem. Mercer Law Review, 54; 873–938.Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C. (1989). The evidence speaks loud and clear. Harvard Business Review, 67(6): 186–188.Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7(3): 297–317.Google Scholar

Johnson, L. (2013). Pluralism in corporate form: Corporate law and benefit corps. Regent University Law Review. 25(2): 269–298.Google Scholar

Jonas, C. (2016). Reply: “New governance” in legal thought and in the world: Some splitting as an antidote to overzealous lumping. Minnesota Law Review, 89: 471–495.Google Scholar

Kabanda, U. (2014). A Case Study of Bujagali Hydropower Public Private Partnership Project Between Uganda Government and Bujagali Energy Ltd in Electricity Generation in Africa. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering Technology, and Sciences, 8(1): 1–13.Google Scholar

Kacperczyk, A. (2009). With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 261–285.Google Scholar

Keay, A. (2011). The corporate objective, corporations, globalization and the law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Leland, S., & Read, D. (2012). Stimulating real estate development through public-private partnerships assessing the perceived opportunities and challenges. Public Administration Quarterly, 36(3): 311–340.Google Scholar

Lukensmeyer, C., & Torres, L. Public deliberation: A manager’s guide to citizen engagement. (2006). Washington, DC: IBM Center for Business and Government.Google Scholar

Luyet, V., Schlaepfer, R., Parlange, M., & Buttler, A. (2012). A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of Environmental Management, 11: 213–219.Google Scholar

Macey, J. R. (2008). Essay: A close read of an excellent commentary on Dodge v. Ford. Virginia Law and Business Review, 3; 177–90.Google Scholar

Marens, R., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Getting real: Stakeholder theory, managerial practice, and the general irrelevance of fiduciary duties owed to shareholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2): 272–293.Google Scholar

Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 166–179.Google Scholar

Millon, D. (1991). Redefining corporate law. Indiana Law Review, 24(2): 223–277.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principles of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886.Google Scholar

Mulligan, L. N. (2007). What’s good for the goose is not good for the gander: Sarbanes-Oxley-style nonprofit reforms. Michigan Law Review, 105(8): 1981–2009.Google Scholar

Moriarty, J. (2012). The connection between stakeholder theory and stakeholder democracy: An excavation and defense. Business & Society, 53(6): 820–852.Google Scholar

Murray, J. H. (2013). Choose your own master: Social enterprise, certifications, and benefit corporation status. American University Business Law Review, 2: 1–53.Google Scholar

O’Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (2007). A manager’s guide to resolving conflicts in collaborative networks. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.Google Scholar

Orts, E.W. (1992). Beyond shareholders: Interpreting corporate constituency statutes. George Washington Law Review. 61(1): 14–135.Google Scholar

Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly. 13(4): 479–502.Google Scholar

Reich, M. (1994). Political mapping of health policy: A guide for managing the political dimension of health policy. Boston, MA: Harvard School of Public Health.Google Scholar

Shutkin, W. A. (2000). The land that could be: Environmentalism and democracy in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Siebecker, M. R. (2010). A new discourse theory of the firm after Citizens United. The George Washington Law Review, 79(1): 161–231.Google Scholar

Smith, M. (1993). Pressure, power and policy: State autonomy and policy networks in Britain and the United States. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Smith, N.C., & Rönnegard, D (2016). Shareholder primacy, corporate social responsibility, and the role of business schools. Journal of Business Ethics. 134(3): 463–478.Google Scholar

Stephens, J., & Berner, M. (2011). Learning from your neighbor: The value of public participation evaluation for public policy dispute resolution. Journal of Public Deliberation, 7(1), Article No. 10.Google Scholar

Stout, L. A. (2012). The shareholder value myth. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar

Stout, L. A., Robé, J., Ireland, P., et al. (2016). The Modern Corporation Statement on Company Law. Retrieved August 16, 2017, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2848833.Google Scholar

Strine, L. E Jr.. (2012). Our continuing struggle with the idea that for-profit corporations seek profit. Wake Forest Law Review, 47: 135–172.Google Scholar

Strine, L. E. Jr. (2008). Breaking the corporate governance logjam in Washington: Some constructive thoughts on a responsible path forward. The Business Lawyer, 63(4): 1079–1107.Google Scholar

Trimble, M., & Lazaro, M. (2014). Evaluation criteria for participatory research: Insights from Coastal Uruguay. Environmental Management, 54: 122–137.Google Scholar

Van Der Weide, M. (1996). Against fiduciary duties to corporate stakeholders. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 21: 27–241.Google Scholar

Walker, G. & Daniels, S. (2001). Natural Resource Policy and the Paradox of Public Involvement: Bringing Scientists and Citizens Together. In Gray, G., Enzer, M., & Kusel, J., eds., Understanding community-based ecosystem management, pp. 253–269. New York: The Haworth Press,Google Scholar

Windsor, D. (2000). Moral activism and value harmonization in an integrating global economy. In Proceedings, 7th Annual International Conference Promoting Business Ethics, 2 vols. 1, 300–312.Google Scholar

Zingales, L. (2012). Do Business Schools Incubate Criminals? Bloomberg. July 16, 2012. Retrieved May 12, 2017, from www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2012–07-16/do-business-schools-incubate-criminals-.Google Scholar