Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Perspectives on Race
- Part II Perspectives on Social Class
- Part III Feminist Perspectives
- Chapter 8 Feminist Theories
- Chapter 9 Feminist Methodologies
- Part IV Specialty Areas
- Part V The Sociology of the Self
- Part VI The Sociology of the Life Course
- Part VII Culture and Behavior
- Part VIII Sociology's Impact on Society
- Part IX Related Fields
- Index
- References
Chapter 9 - Feminist Methodologies
from Part III - Feminist Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Perspectives on Race
- Part II Perspectives on Social Class
- Part III Feminist Perspectives
- Chapter 8 Feminist Theories
- Chapter 9 Feminist Methodologies
- Part IV Specialty Areas
- Part V The Sociology of the Self
- Part VI The Sociology of the Life Course
- Part VII Culture and Behavior
- Part VIII Sociology's Impact on Society
- Part IX Related Fields
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of SociologySpecialty and Interdisciplinary Studies, pp. 82 - 92Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Abbasgholizadeh, Mahboubeh. 2014. To do Something We are Unable to do in Iran: Cyberspace, the Public Sphere, and the Iranian Women's Movement. Signs 39(4): 831–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, M. Jacqui and Talpade Mohanty, Chandra. eds. 1997. Introduction: Genealogies, Legacies, Movements. In Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures. New York, NY, and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ali, Ayaan Hirsi. 2010. Nomad. A Personal Journey from Islam to America through a Clash of Civilizations. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Brown, Adriane and Thomas, Mary E.. 2014. I Just like Knowing They Can Look at It and Realize Who I Really Am: Recognition and the Limits of Girlhood Agency on MySpace. Signs 39(4): 949–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carbado, Devon W. and Gulati, Mitu. 2013. The Intersectional Fifth Black Woman. Du Bois Review 10(2): 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, Barbara. 2007. In New Black Feminist Criticism, 1985–2000. Edited by Bowles, Gloria, Giulia Fabi, M., and Keizer, Arlene R.. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2009[2000]. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd edn. New York, NY, and London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review 43(6): 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 2014. The Structural and Political Dimensions of Intersectional Oppression. In Intersectionality: A Foundations and Frontiers Reader. Edited by Grzanka, Patrick R.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathy. 2008. Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful. Feminist Theory 9(67): 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVault, Marjorie L. 1999. Liberating Method: Feminism and Social Research. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Donnan, Hastings and Magowan, Fiona. 2010. The Anthropology of Sex. New York, NY: Berg.Google Scholar
Frost, Nollaig and Elichaoff, Frauke. 2014. Feminist Research Practice: A Primer. In Feminist Research Practice: A Primer. Edited by Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy. 2nd edn. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Grzanka, Patrick R. 2014. Introduction: Intersectional Objectivity. In Intersectionality: A Foundations and Frontiers Reader. Edited by Grzanka, Patrick R.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra G. 1987. Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2006. Science and Social Inequality: Feminist and Postcolonial Issues. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1998. The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Heng, Geraldine. 1997. “A Great Way to Fly”: Nationalism, the State, and the Varieties of Third-World Feminism. In Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures. Edited by Alexander, M. Jacqui and Talpade Mohanty, Chandra. New York, NY and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy, and Leavy, Patricia. eds. 2007. Feminist Research Practice: A Primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 2008. Just Methods: An Interdisciplinary Feminist Reader. Boulder, CO, and London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
King, Deborah K. 1988. Multiple Jeopardy, Multiple Consciousness: The Context of a Black Feminist Ideology. Signs 14(1): 42–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopman, Louise. El Salvador NOT For Sale! Post-war Struggles for Dignity, Human Rights, and Social Justice (forthcoming).Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine A. 2013. Intersectionality as Method: A Note. Signs 38(4): 1019–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2013. Transnational Feminist Crossings: On Neoliberalism and Radical Critique. Signs 38(4): 967–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naples, Nancy A. 2003. Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis, and Activist Research. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1997. Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third-World Feminism. New York, NY, and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nash, Jennifer C. 2011. “Home Truths” on Intersectionality. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 23(2): 445–470.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan. 1999. Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramazanoglu, Caroline and Holland, Janet. 2002. Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinharz, Shulamit. 1989. Teaching the History of Women's Contributions to Sociology: Or, D. S. Thomas, Wasn't She the One Who Was Married to W.I? The American Sociologist 20(1): 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinharz, Shulamit. 1994. Toward an Ethnography of “Voice” and “Silence.” In Human Diversity: Perspectives on People in Context. Edited by Trickett, Edison, Watts, Roderick and Birman, Dina. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 178–200.Google Scholar
Reinharz, Shulamit. 2011. Observing the Observer: Understanding Our Selves in Field Research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reinharz, Shulamit, with Davidman, Lynn. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reinharz, Shulamit with Bombyk, Marti and Wright, Jan. 1983. Methodological Issues in Feminist Research: A Bibliography of Literature in Women's Studies, Sociology and Psychology. Women's Studies International Forum 6(4): 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1980. Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. Signs 5(4): 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Niall, Smith, Clarissa, and Werndly, Angela. eds. 2013. Studying Sexualities: Theories, Representations, Cultures. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salper, Roberta. 2014. Domestic Subversive: A Feminist's Take on the Left 1960–1976. Tucson, AZ: Anaphora Literary Press.Google Scholar
Schall, Lindsay B. 2004. The Irony of Pro-Anorexia Websites: The Two Faces of Support. Honors Thesis, Sociology, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology (Northeastern Series on Feminist Theory). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Edited by Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 271–313.Google Scholar
Sprague, Joey. 2005. Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging Differences. New York, NY: AltaMira/Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Turkle, Sheryl. 1984. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Wilson, Shamillah, Sengupta, Anasuya, and Evans, Kristy. eds. 2005. Defending Our Dreams: Global Feminist Voices for a New Generation. London and New York, NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar