Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T22:04:27.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Successfully Publishing Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences

from Part V - Tips for a Successful Research Career

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2023

By
Sicong Liu  and
Dolores Albarracin
Edited by
Austin Lee Nichols  and
John Edlund
Austin Lee Nichols
Affiliation:
Central European University, Vienna
John Edlund
Affiliation:
Rochester Institute of Technology, New York
Get access

Summary

To survive and prosper, researchers must demonstrate a successful record of publications in journals well-regarded by their fields. This chapter discusses how to successfully publish research in journals in the social and behavioral sciences and is organized into four sections. The first section highlights important factors that are routinely involved in the process of publishing a paper in refereed journals. The second section features some factors that are not necessarily required to publish a paper but that, if present, can positively influence scientific productivity. The third section discusses some pitfalls scholars should avoid to protect their scientific career. The last section addresses general publication issues within the science community. We also recommend further resources for those interested in learning more about successfully publishing research.

Keywords

PublicationScientistResearchWritingAuthorshipPeer ReviewPaperPublish or Perish
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences
Volume 1: Building a Program of Research
 , pp. 651 - 670
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, et al. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Available at: www.apa.org/ethics/code/.Google Scholar
Awrey, J., Inaba, K., Barmparas, G., et al. (2011). Reference accuracy in the general surgery literature. World Journal of Surgery, 35(3), 475–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechtel, W. & Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C, 36, 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bem, D. J. (1995). Writing a review article for Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 118(2), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.172Google Scholar
Bem, D. J. (1987). Writing the empirical journal article. In Zanna, M. P. & Darley, J. M. (eds.), The Compleat Academic (pp. 171–201). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Boice, R. & Jones, F. (1984). Why academicians don’t write. Journal of Higher Education, 55(5), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornmann, L. & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/asiGoogle Scholar
Bossuyt, P., Reitsma, J., & Bruns, D. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138, 40–44.Google Scholar
Cano, A. F. (2021). Letter to the Editor : publish, publish … cursed ! Scientometrics, 126(4), 3673–3682.Google Scholar
Carlson, R. V., Boyd, K. M., & Webb, D. J. (2004). The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: Past, present and future. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 57(6), 695–713.Google Scholar
Carson, S., Fama, J., Clancy, K., Ebert, J., & Tierney, A. (2012). Writing for Psychology: A Guide for Psychology Concentrators. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, T. C. (1897). Studies for students: The method of multiple working hypotheses. Journal of Geology, 5(8), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.3109/13590849208997976Google Scholar
Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the social sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2011). Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180.Google Scholar
Dwan, K., Altman, D. G., Arnaiz, J. A., et al. (2008). Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS ONE, 3(8), e3081.Google Scholar
Dworkin, J. D., Linn, K. A., Teich, E. G., et al. (2020). The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nature Neuroscience, 23(8), 918–926.Google Scholar
Etter, J. & Stapleton, J. (2009). Citations to trials of nicotine replacement therapy were biased toward positive results and high-impact-factor journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 831–837.Google Scholar
Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127556Google Scholar
Fiore, N. A. (2007). The Now Habit: A Strategic Program for Overcoming Procrastination and Enjoying Guilt-Free Play. Penguin.Google Scholar
Fisher, B. S., Cobane, C. T., Vander Ven, T. M., & Cullen, F. T. (1998). How many authors does it take to publish an article? Trends and patterns in political science. PS – Political Science and Politics, 31(4), 847–856. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500053452Google Scholar
Fiske, D. W. & Fogg, L. (1992). But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper! Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer comments. In Kazdin, A. E. (ed.), Methodological Issues & Strategies in Clinical Research (pp. 723–738). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. D. (1993). Statement of editorial policy: 1993. American Psychologist, 48, 5–7.Google Scholar
Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–150.Google Scholar
Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2011). Changing incentives to publish. Science, 333(6043), 702–703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197286Google Scholar
Gastel, B. (2016). How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. Greenwood.Google Scholar
Grant, L. & Ward, K. B. (1991). Gender and publishing in sociology. Gender & Society, 5(2), 207–223.Google Scholar
Greene, A. E. (2013). Writing Science in Plain English. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371Google Scholar
Hollenbeck, J. R. & Wright, P. M. (2017). HARKing, SHARKing, and THARKing: Making the case for post hoc analysis of scientific data. Journal of Management, 43(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679487Google Scholar
Hommel, B. (2020). Pseudo-mechanistic explanations in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(4), 1294–1305. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12448Google Scholar
Hudson, J. (1996). Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(3), 153–158.Google Scholar
Ilie, A. & Ispas, D. (2007). Excellence through diversity: Interview with a prolific researcher. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 3(3).Google Scholar
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2018). Defining the role of authors and contributors. Available at: www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.Google Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P. A. & Klavans, R. (2018). The scientists who publish a paper every five days. Nature, 561, 167–169.Google Scholar
Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, 5, 212. Available at: www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf.Google Scholar
Jung, H. & Albarracin, D. (2021). Concerns for others increases the likelihood of vaccination against influenza and COVID-19 more in sparsely rather than densely populated areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(1), e2007538118.Google Scholar
Kazak, A. E. (2018). Editorial: Journal article reporting standards. American Psychologist, 73(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000263Google Scholar
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klesky, K. (2015). The Professor Is In: The Essential Guide to Turning Your Ph.D. into a Job. Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Klingner, J. K., Scanlon, D., & Pressley, M. (2005). How to publish in scholarly journals. Educational Researcher, 34(8), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034008014Google Scholar
Lapidow, A. & Scudder, P. (2019). Shared first authorship. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(4), 618–620.Google Scholar
Lee, A. & Boud, D. (2003). Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 187–200.Google Scholar
Leimu, R. & Koricheva, J. (2005). What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(1), 28–32.Google Scholar
Li, Y. (2019). Mentoring junior scientists for research publication. In Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication (pp. 233–250). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Linton, J. D., Tierney, R., & Walsh, S. T. (2011). Publish or perish: How are research and reputation related? Serials Review, 37(4), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2011.09.001Google Scholar
Liu, S. & Tenenbaum, G. (2018). Research methods in sport and exercise psychology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.224Google Scholar
Luck, S. J. (2014). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique, 2nd ed. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4736938Google Scholar
Masic, I. (2011). How to search, write, prepare and publish the scientific papers in the biomedical journals. Acta Informatica Medica, 19(2), 68–79.Google Scholar
McDougall, W. (2015). An Introduction to Social Psychology. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
McEnernehy, L. (2013). The problem of the problem. In The University of Chicago Writing Program (pp. 1–30). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McEnernehy, L. (2021). Leadership lab: The craft of writing effectively. Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtIzMaLkCaM&t=3085s.Google Scholar
McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453053Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1997). Creative hypothesis generating in psychology: Some useful heuristics. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Milkman, K. (2021). How to Change: The Science of Getting from Where You Are to Where You Want to Be. Penguin.Google Scholar
Miller, A. N., Taylor, S. G., & Bedeian, A. G. (2011). Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16(5), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111167751Google Scholar
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of report of parallel-group randomised trials. JAMA, 285, 1987–1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Grp, P. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097Google Scholar
Mudrak, B. (2021). What is a megajournal? Available at: www.aje.com/arc/what-is-a-megajournal.Google Scholar
Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V., et al. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Murtaugh, P. A. (2002). Journal quality, effect size, and publication bias in meta‐analysis. Ecology, 83(4), 1162–1166.Google Scholar
Neill, U. S. (2008). Publish or perish, but at what cost? Journal of Clinical Investigation, 118(7), 2368.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s publish fewer papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245Google Scholar
Payne, A. A. & Siow, A. (2003). Does federal research funding increase university research output? Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Phaf, R. H. (2020). Publish less, read more. Theory and Psychology, 30(2), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319898250Google Scholar
Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference. Science, 146(3642), 347–353.Google Scholar
Polka, J. K., Kiley, R., Konforti, B., Stern, B., & Vale, R. D. (2018). Publish peer reviews. Nature, 560(7720), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06032-wGoogle Scholar
Qiu, J. (2010). Publish or perish in China. Nature, 463(7278), 142. https://doi.org/10.1038/463142aGoogle Scholar
Rawat, S. & Meena, S. (2014). Publish or perish: Where are we heading? Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 19(2), 87–89.Google Scholar
Reich, E. S. (2009). The rise and fall of a physics fraudster. Physics World, 22(5), 24.Google Scholar
Riviera, E. (2013). Scientific communities as autopoietic systems: The reproductive function of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1442–1453. https://doi.org/10.1002/asiGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P. (2009). What kind of empirical research should we publish, fund, and reward?: A different perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 435–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01151.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701.Google Scholar
Saxe, R., Carey, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 87–124.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, J. C. (1988). Research article productivity by mass communication scholars. Journalism Quarterly, 65(2), 479–484.Google Scholar
Segran, E. (2015). Why a fake article titled “Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?” was accepted by 17 medical journals. Available at: www.fastcompany.com/3041493/why-a-fake-article-cuckoo-for-cocoa-puffs-was-accepted-by-17-medical-journals.Google Scholar
Sharman, A. (2015). Where to publish. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 97(5), 329–332. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2015.0003Google Scholar
Shockley, W. (1957). On the statistics of individual variations of productivity in research laboratories. Proceedings of the IRE, 45(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1957.278364Google Scholar
Smith, H. M. & Banks, P. B. (2017). How dangerous conservation ideas can develop through citation errors. Australian Zoologist, 38(3), 408–413.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Writing for your referees. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals (pp. 161–168). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strunk, W. (2007). The Elements of Style. Penguin.Google Scholar
Tramer, M. R. (2013). The Fujii story: A chronicle of naive disbelief. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 30(5), 195–198.Google Scholar
van Dalen, H. P. & Henkens, K. (2012). Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 1282–1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/asiGoogle Scholar
VandenBos, G. R. (2017). From print to digital (1985–2015): APA’s evolving role in psychological publishing. American Psychologist, 72(8), 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000229Google Scholar
Vetter, P., Vu, D. L., L’Huillier, A. G., et al. (2020). Clinical features of COVID-19. BMJ, 369, m1470.Google Scholar
von Elm, E., Altman, D., Egger, M., et al. (2007). The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet, 370, 1453–1457.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Dworkin, J., Zhou, D., et al. (2020). Gendered citation practices in the field of communication. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ywrcqGoogle Scholar
Warren, M. G. (2000). Reading reviews, suffering rejection. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals (pp. 169–186). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (2003). Four golden lessons. Nature, 426(6965), 389. https://doi.org/10.1038/426389aGoogle Scholar
Weiner, I. B. (2003). Handbook of Psychology, History of Psychology. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Weisshaar, K. (2017). Publish and perish? An assessment of gender gaps in promotion to tenure in academia. Social Forces, 96(2), 529–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox052Google Scholar
Wicherts, J. M. & Bakker, M. (2012). Publish (your data) or (let the data) perish! Why not publish your data too? Intelligence, 40(2), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.01.004Google Scholar
World Medical Association (2008). Declaration of Helsinki. Available at: www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/doh-oct2008.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×