Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T04:31:18.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

87 - Genetic Testing

from Section 1 - Prevention and Screening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2019

Carrie D. Llewellyn
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
City, University of London
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
University College London
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
City, University of London
Keith J. Petrie
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Tracey A. Revenson
Affiliation:
City University of New York
John Weinman
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P. D., Narod, S., et al. (2003). Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 72(5), 11171130.Google Scholar
Bleiker, E. M., Esplen, M. J., Meiser, B., et al. (2013). 100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues? Familial Cancer 2, 325339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, W., Daly, M. & Garber, J. (1997). Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer: II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Study Consortium. Journal of the American Medical Association 277, 9971003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S. & Parmigiani, G.(2007). Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(11), 13291333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chompret, A. (2002). The Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Biochemie, 84, 7582.Google Scholar
Chompret, A., Brugieres, L., Ronsin, M., et al. (2000). P53 germline mutations in childhood cancers and cancer risk for carrier individuals. British Journal of Cancer, 82, 19321937.Google Scholar
Cousens, N., Kaur, R., Meiser, B., et al. (2016). Community attitudes towards a Jewish community BRCA1/2 testing program. Familial Cancer, epublication ahead of print.Google Scholar
Daly, M. B., Pilarski, R., Axilbund, J. E., et al. (2015). Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian, version 2.2015. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 14, 153162.Google Scholar
Douma, K. F., Bleiker, E. M., Aaronson, N. K., et al. (2010). Long-term compliance with endoscopic surveillance for familial adenomatous polyposis. Colorectal Disease, 12, 11981207.Google Scholar
Elrick, A., Ashida, S., Ivanovich, J., et al. (2017). Psychosocial and clinical factors associated with family communication of cancer genetic test results among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26(1), 173181.Google Scholar
Forman, A. D. & Hall, M. J. (2009). Influence of race/ethnicity on genetic counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Breast Journal, 15 (Suppl. 1), S56S62.Google Scholar
Glassey, R., Ives, A., Saunders, C., et al. (2016). Decision making, psychological wellbeing and psychosocial outcomes for high risk women who choose to undergo bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a review of the literature. Breast, 28, 130135.Google Scholar
Graves, K. D., Vegella, P., Poggi, E. A., et al. (2012). Long-term psychosocial outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: differences across affected status and risk-reducing surgery choice. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 21(3): 445455.Google Scholar
Hirschberg, A. M., Chan-Smutko, G. & Pirl, W. F. (2015). Psychiatric implications of cancer genetic testing. Cancer, 121, 341360.Google Scholar
Howard, A. F., Balneaves, L. G. & Bottorff, J. L. (2009). Women’s decision making about risk-reducing strategies in the context of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18, 578597Google Scholar
Jasperson, K. W., Tuohy, T. M., Neklason, D. W., et al. (2010). Hereditary and familial colon cancer. Gastroenterology, 138, 20442058.Google Scholar
Kinney, A. Y., Butler, K. M., Schwartz, M. D., et al. (2014). Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 106, dju328.Google Scholar
Lesko, L. J. & Schmidt, S. (2013). Clinical implementation of genetic testing in medicine: a US regulatory science perspective. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 77, 606611.Google Scholar
Lynch, H. T., Lynch, P. M., Lanspa, S. J., et al. (2009). Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications. Clinical Genetics , 76, 118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malkin, D., Li, F. P., Strong, L. C., et al. (1990). Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas and other neoplasms. Science, 250, 12331238.Google Scholar
Malkin, D., Garber, J. E., Strong, L., et al. (2016). The cancer predisposition revolution: how was the inherited basis of cancer foreshadowed? Science, 352, 10521053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiser, B., Quinn, V. F., Gleeson, M., et al. (2016). When knowledge of a heritable gene mutation comes out of the blue: treatment-focused genetic testing in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. European Journal of Human Genetics, epublication in advance of print.Google Scholar
Monahan, K. J. & Hopkins, L. ( 2016). Diagnosis and management of hereditary gastric cancer. Recent Results in Cancer Research, 205, 4560.Google Scholar
Nichols, K. E., Malkin, D., Garber, J. E., et al. (2001). Germ-line p53 mutations predispose to a wide spectrum of early-onset cancers. Cancer, Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 10, 8387.Google Scholar
Noar, S. M., Althouse, B. M., Ayers, J. W., Francis, D. B. & Ribisl, K. M. (2015). Cancer information seeking in the digital age: effects of Angelina Jolie’s prophylactic mastectomy announcement. Medical Decision Making, 35(1), 1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patenaude, A. F. (2012), Prophylactic Mastectomy: Insights from Women who Chose to Reduce Their Risk. Santa Barbara, CA; Praeger.Google Scholar
Patenaude, A. F. & Schneider, K. A. (2016). Issues arising in psychological consultations to help parents talk to minor and young adult children about their cancer genetic test result: a guide to providers. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26, 251260.Google Scholar
Ringwald, J., Wochnowski, C., Bosse, K., et al. (2016). Psychological distress, anxiety and depression of cancer-affected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: a systematic review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, epublished ahead of print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, L. S., Hendrix, A., Xie, X. J. et al., (2015). Prediction of cancer prevention: from mammogram screening to identification of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in underserved populations. EBioMedicine, 21, 18271833.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, V. M., Corona, R., Bodurtha, J. N., et al. (2016). Family ties: the role of family context in family health history communication about cancer. Journal of Health Communication, 21, 346355.Google Scholar
Roussi, P. & Miller, S. M. (2014). Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37(5), 931954.Google Scholar
Stan, D. L., Schuster, L. T. & Wick, M. J. (2013). Challenging and complex decisions in the management of the BRCA mutation carrier. Journal of Women’s Health, 22, 825834.Google Scholar
Syngal, S., Brand, R. E., Church, J. M., et al. (2015). ACG clinical guideline: genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 110, 223262.Google Scholar
Tercyak, K. P., Mays, D., DeMarco, T. A., et al. (2013). Decisional outcomes of maternal disclosure of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 22(7), 12601266.Google Scholar
van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H. J., et al. (2006). Experience of parental cancer in childhood is a risk factor for psychological distress during genetic cancer susceptibility testing. Annals of Oncology, 17(7), 10901095.Google Scholar
Villani, A., Tabori, U., Schiffman, J., et al. (2011). Biochemical and imaging surveillance in germline TP53 mutation carriers with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: a prospective observational study. Lancet Oncology, 12, 559567.Google Scholar
Wakefield, C. E., Hanlon, L. V., Tucker, K. M., et al. (2016). The psychological impact of genetic information on children: a systematic review. Genetics in Medicine, 18(8): 755762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×