Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Community Engagement and Outreach
- The Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Community Engagement and Outreach
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction: Organizational Community Engagement over Time
- Part II University–Community Partnerships
- Part III Disciplinary Outreach
- Part IV Interdisciplinary Outreach
- Part V Leading Community Engagement Efforts
- Part VI Putting It All Together
- Appendix A: Contributor Biographies
- Index
- References
Part I - Introduction: Organizational Community Engagement over Time
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 December 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Community Engagement and Outreach
- The Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Community Engagement and Outreach
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction: Organizational Community Engagement over Time
- Part II University–Community Partnerships
- Part III Disciplinary Outreach
- Part IV Interdisciplinary Outreach
- Part V Leading Community Engagement Efforts
- Part VI Putting It All Together
- Appendix A: Contributor Biographies
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Holland, B. A. (2016). Factors influencing faculty engagement – Then, now and future. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20, 73.Google Scholar
McCormick, A. C. & Zhao, C. M. (2005). Rethinking and reframing the Carnegie classification. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(5), 51–57.Google Scholar
Sandy, M. & Holland, B. A. (2006). Different worlds and common ground: Community partner perspectives on campus–community partnerships. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 13(1), 30–43.Google Scholar
References
American Association of State Colleges and Universities (2002). Stepping forward as stewards of place: A guide for leading public engagement at state colleges and universities. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Barge, J. K., Lee, M., Maddux, K., Nabring, R., & Townsend, B. (2008). Managing dualities in planned change initiatives. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(4), 364–390.Google Scholar
Barnett, K. (2011). System members at odds: Managing divergent perspectives in the higher education change process. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(2), 131–140.Google Scholar
Basinger, J. (2001). When a president quits early, the damage can linger on. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49, A22–A23.Google Scholar
Bauman, D., Davis, T., Myers, B., & O’Leary, B. (2017). Executive compensation at private and public colleges, Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from www.chronicle.com/interactives/executive-compensation?cid=FEATUREDNAV#id=table_public_2016.Google Scholar
Beere, C., Votruba, J., & Wells, G. (2011). Becoming an engaged campus. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Billig, S. (2002). Adoption, implementation, and sustainability of K-12 service learning. In Furco, A. & Billig, S. (Eds.), Service-learning: The essence of the pedagogy (pp. 245–267). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, V. (2005). Public scholarship: An administrator’s view. In Peters, S., Jordan, N., Adamek, M., & Alter, T. (Eds.), Engaging campus and community: The practice of public scholarship in the state and land-grant university system (pp. 363–392). Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.Google Scholar
Bok, D. (2013). Higher education in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, E. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1, 11–20.Google Scholar
Bringle, R. & Hatcher, J. (2000). Institutionalization of service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 273–290.Google Scholar
Brown University Swearer Center (2017). Retrieved from www.brown.edu/academics/college/swearer.Google Scholar
Butin, D. (2006). Disciplining service learning: Institutionalization and the case for community studies. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 57–64.Google Scholar
Checkoway, B. (2013). Strengthening the scholarship of engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17, 69–84.Google Scholar
Cuban, S. & Anderson, J. (2007). Where’s the justice in service-learning? Institutionalizing service-learning from a social justice perspective at a Jesuit university. Equity and Excellence in Education, 40, 144–155.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, G. (2010). Issues and challenges in higher education leadership: Engaging for change. Australian Educational Researcher, 37(3), 57–76.Google Scholar
Driscoll, A. (2009). Carnegie’s new Community Engagement classification: Affirming higher education’s role in community. New Directions in Higher Education, 147, 5–12.Google Scholar
Duderstadt, J. (2000). A university for the 21st century. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, P., & Kezar, A. (2011). Presidents leading: The dynamics and complexities of campus leadership. In Altbach, P., Gumport, P., & Berdahl, R. (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (pp. 279–311). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Furco, A. (2002a). Institutionalizing service-learning in higher education. Journal of Public Affairs, 6, 39–67.Google Scholar
Furco, A. (2002b). Self-assessment rubric for the institutionalization of service-learning in higher education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Furco, A., & Holland, B. (2013). Improving research on service learning institutionalization through attention to theories of organizational change. In Clayton, P., Bringle, R., & Hatcher, J. (Eds.), Research on service learning (pp. 505–535). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
Gelmon, S., Seifer, S., Kauper-Brown, J., & Mikkelsen, M. (2005). Building capacity for community engagement: Institutional self-assessment. Seattle, WA: Community- Campus Partnerships for Health. Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/pdf_files/self-assessment-copyright.pdf.Google Scholar
Goleman, D. (2006). What makes a good leader? In Rosenbach, W. & Taylor, R. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in leadership (pp. 159–173). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423–451.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A. & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal of Change Management, 9, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, B. (1997). Analyzing institutional commitment to service: A model of key organizational factors. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 30–41.Google Scholar
Holland, B. (2006). Levels of commitment to community engagement. Adapted from Holland, B. A. (1998). Michigan Journal Community Service Learning, 4, 30–41. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56942366cbced6cface3bc8b/t/56cc97800442621c56f07df3/1456248704964/HollandMatrix.pdf.Google Scholar
Holland, B. (2009). Will it last? Evidence of institutionalization at Carnegie classified community engagement institutions. New Direction for Higher Education, 147, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K. T. (2011). Leadership in context: Lessons from new leadership theory and current leadership development practice. London, UK: The King’s Fund.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (2016). Community engagement: Exploring its effects during a university presidential transition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
Kezar, A. (2009). Change in higher education: Not enough or too much? Change, 41(6), 18–23.Google Scholar
Kezar, A., Gallant, T., & Lester, J. (2012). Everyday people making a difference on college campuses: The tempered grassroots leadership tactics of faculty and staff. Studies in Higher Education, 36(2), 129–151.Google Scholar
Klein, M. F. & Salk, R. J. (2013). Presidential succession planning: A qualitative study in private higher education. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20, 335–345.Google Scholar
Kouzes, J. & Posner, B. (2007). The leadership challenge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kurre, F., Ladd, L., Foster, M., Monahan, M., & Romano, D. (2012). The state of higher education in 2012. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 5, 233–256.Google Scholar
Liang, J. & Sandmann, L. (2015). Leadership for community engagement – A distributed leadership perspective. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19(1), 35–63.Google Scholar
Lohse, M. (2008). The organizational entry of a new college president: Twenty-four months of sensemaking and socialization (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences (2008-99190-394).Google Scholar
Martin, J., Samels, J., & Associates (2004). Presidential transition in higher education: Managing leadership change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Meyerson, J. & Johnson, S. (1993). Planning for strategic decision making. In Ingram, R. & Associates (Eds.), Governing public colleges and universities: A handbook for trustees, chief executives, and other campus leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Monks, J. (2007). Public versus private university presidents pay levels and structure. Economics of Education Review, 26, 338–348.Google Scholar
Monks, J. (2012). Job turnover among university presidents in the United States of America. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34, 139–152.Google Scholar
Padilla, A. (2004). Passing the baton: Leadership transitions and the tenure of presidents. In Martin, J., Samels, J., & Associates (Eds.), Presidential transition in higher education: Managing leadership change (pp. 37–58). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Plater, W. M. (2011). Collective leadership for engagement: Reclaiming the public purpose of higher education. In Saltmarsh, J. & Hartley, M. (Eds.), “To serve a larger purpose”: Engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education (pp. 102–129). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Purcell, J. W. (2013). The engaged community college: Supporting the institutionalization of engagement through collaborative action inquiry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
Robken, H. (2007). Leadership turnover among university presidents. Management Revue, 18, 138–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, E. (1971). Communication of diffusion: A cross-cultural approach. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, W. & Taylor, R. (Eds.) (2006). Contemporary issues in leadership. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sanaghan, P., Goldstein, L., & Gaval, K. (2008). Presidential transitions: It’s not just the position, it’s the transition. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Sandmann, L. & Plater, W. (2009). Research on institutional leadership for service learning. In Clayton, P., Bringle, R., & Hatcher, J. (Eds.), Research on service learning (pp. 505–535). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
Sandmann, L. & Weerts, D. (2008). Reshaping institutional boundaries to accommodate an engagement agenda. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 181–196.Google Scholar
Saul, S. (2015). Salaries of private college presidents continue to rise, Chronicle survey finds. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2015/12/07/us/salaries-of-private-college-presidents-continue-to-rise-survey-finds.html.Google Scholar
Schlossberg, N. (1981). A model for analyzing human adaptation to transition. Counseling Psychologist, 9, 2–18.Google Scholar
Schlossberg, N. (2003). The transition guide: A new way to think about change. Potomac, MD: Transition Works.Google Scholar
Schlossberg, N. (2004). Transitions: Theory and application. Paper presented at the IAEVG-NCDA Symposium, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Selingo, J. (Ed.) (2014). The innovative university: What college presidents think about change in American higher education. Washington, DC: The Chronicle of Higher Education.Google Scholar
Smerek, R. (2011). Sensemaking and sensegiving: An exploratory study of the simultaneous “being and learning” of new college and university presidents. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18, 80–94.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. (2008). New times demand new scholarship: Opportunities and challenges for civic engagement at research universities. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3, 19–42.Google Scholar
Tarde, G. (1903). The laws of imitation (trans. by E. Parson). New York, NY: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Walshok, M. (1999). Strategies for building the infrastructure that supports profession-related public service. Educational Record, 65, 18–21.Google Scholar
Weerts, D. & Sandmann, L. (2010). Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 81, 632–657.Google Scholar
Zaccaro, S. (2001). The nature of executive leadership: A conceptual and empirical analysis of success. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar