Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Background
- Part II Theoretical Foundations
- Part III Basic Principles of Multimedia Learning
- Part IV Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning
- Part V Principles for Managing Essential Processing in Multimedia Learning
- Part VI Principles Based on Social and Affective Features of Multimedia Learning
- Part VII Principles Based on Generative Activity in Multimedia Learning
- 28 The Generative Activity Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 29 The Mapping Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 30 The Drawing Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 31 The Imagination Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 32 The Self-Explanation Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 33 The Guided Inquiry Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 34 The Feedback Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 35 The Learner Control Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 36 The Cognitive Load Self-Management Principle in Multimedia Learning
- Part VIII Multimedia Learning with Media
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
32 - The Self-Explanation Principle in Multimedia Learning
from Part VII - Principles Based on Generative Activity in Multimedia Learning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 November 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Background
- Part II Theoretical Foundations
- Part III Basic Principles of Multimedia Learning
- Part IV Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning
- Part V Principles for Managing Essential Processing in Multimedia Learning
- Part VI Principles Based on Social and Affective Features of Multimedia Learning
- Part VII Principles Based on Generative Activity in Multimedia Learning
- 28 The Generative Activity Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 29 The Mapping Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 30 The Drawing Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 31 The Imagination Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 32 The Self-Explanation Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 33 The Guided Inquiry Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 34 The Feedback Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 35 The Learner Control Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 36 The Cognitive Load Self-Management Principle in Multimedia Learning
- Part VIII Multimedia Learning with Media
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
This chapter briefly describes what the self-explanation principle is, in terms of self-explaining as a generative activity to enhance learning, the utterances of self-explanations, and the cognitive processes of self-explaining. It expands on inferring, the key underlying process of self-explaining, and contrasts inferring in the context of self-explaining while learning from inferring in the context of reading comprehension. Self-explaining is shown to play a central role in multimedia learning, analogous to learning from multiple sources in a single medium, such as multiple texts. This chapter introduces the ICAP theory of active learning and uses it to provide a coherent framework to interpret the multitude of studies of self-explanation.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning , pp. 381 - 393Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P., & Wood, D. (2002). Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. The Journal of the Learning Science, 11, 25–61.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, S., & Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669–681.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 774–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthold, K., Eysink, T. H. S., & Renkl, A. (2009) Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science, 37(4), 345–363.Google Scholar
Bisra, K., Liu, Q., Nesbit, J. C., Salima, F., & Winne, P. H. (2018). Inducing self-explanation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 703–725.Google Scholar
Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., & Newton, K. J. (2013). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: Differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning and Instruction, 25, 24–34.Google Scholar
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2006). Effects of personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts. Reading Psychology, 27, 457–484.Google Scholar
Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485–522.Google Scholar
Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 182–197.Google Scholar
Calin-Jageman, R. J., & Horn Ratner, H. (2005). The role of encoding in the self-explanation effect. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 523–543.Google Scholar
Chamberland, M., & Mamede, S. (2015). Self-explanation, an instructional strategy to foster clinical reasoning in medical students. Health Professions Education, 1(1), 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberland, M., St-Onge, C., Setrakian, J., Lanthier, L., Bergeron, L., Bourget, A., Mamede, S., Schmidt, H., & Rikers, R. (2011). The influence of medical students’ self-explanations on diagnostic performances. Medical Education, 45(7), 688–695.Google Scholar
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, C. C., Malkiewich, L., & Kumar, A. S. (2019). Learning to notice science concepts in engineering activities and transfer situations. Science Education, 103(2), 440–471.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology (pp. 161–238). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105.Google Scholar
PAIR-C: A unifying framework for explaining misconceptions. Educational Psychologist.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Adams, J., Bogusch, E. B., Bruchok, C., Kang, S., Lancaster, M., Levy, R., McEldoon, K., Stump, G. S., Wylie, R., Xu, D., & Yaghmourian, D. L. (2018). Translating the ICAP theory of cognitive engagement into practice. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 1–56.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49, 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Y. H., & Lee, S. E. (2013). The role of co-explanation and self-explanation in learning from design examples of PowerPoint slides. Computers & Education, 69, 400–407.Google Scholar
Clark, D. B., Virk, S. S., Barnes, J., & Adams, D. M. (2016). Self-explanation and digital games: Adaptively increasing abstraction. Computers & Education, 103, 28–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–170.Google Scholar
Clark, R., & Mayer, R. (2011). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
Conati, C., & VanLehn, K. (2000). Toward computer-based support of meta-cognitive skills: A computational framework to coach self-explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 389–415.Google Scholar
Corbett, A., Wagner, A., Lesgold, S., Ulrich, H., & Stevens, S. (2006). The impact on learning of generating vs. selecting descriptions in analyzing algebra example solutions. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences (pp. 99–105). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
de Bruin, A. B., Rikers, R. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2007). The effect of self-explanation and prediction on the development of principled understanding of chess in novices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(2), 188–205.Google Scholar
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2011). Improved effectiveness of cueing by self‐explanations when learning from a complex animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, B., & Chi, M. T. H. (2011). Instruction based on self-explanation. In Mayer, R. E., & Alexander, P. A. (eds.), The Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (Vol. 36, pp. 296–321). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freeman, S., Eddy, S., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410–8415.Google Scholar
Gadgil, S., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Chi, M. T. (2012). Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 47–61.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 129–151.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Halpern, D. F., & Hakel, M. (2007). 25 Principles of Learning. Washington, DC: Task Force on Lifelong Learning at Work and at Home. Available from www.psyc.memphis.edu/learning/whatweknow/index.shtml (last accessed March 16, 2021).Google Scholar
Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: Current processing and cue validity as constrains on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 36, 93–103.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. A. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of 800+ Meta-Analysis on Achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hausmann, R. G. M., van de Sande, B., & VanLehn, K. (2008) Shall we explain? Augmenting learning from intelligent tutoring systems and peer collaboration. In Woolf, B. P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., & Lajoie, S. (eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5091. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hegarty, M., & Just, M. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 717–742.Google Scholar
Hoyos, C., & Gentner, D. (2017). Generating explanations via analogical comparison. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1364–1374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Investigating the impact of integrating self-explanation into an educational game: A pilot study. In Chang, M., Hwang, W. Y., Chen, M. P., & Muller, W. (eds.), Edutainment Technologies (pp. 250–254). Taipei: Springer.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1246–1252.Google Scholar
King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303–323.Google Scholar
Kramarski, B., & Dudai, V. (2009). Group-metacognitive support for online inquiry in mathematics with differential self-questioning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4), 377–404.Google Scholar
Kwon, K., Kumalasari, C. D., & Howland, J. L. (2001). Self-explanation prompts on problem-solving performance in an interactive learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(2), 96–112.Google Scholar
Legare, C. H., & Lombrozo, T. (2014). Selective effects of explanation on learning during early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 198–212.Google Scholar
Lin, L., Atkinson, R. K., Savenye, W. C., & Nelson, B. C. (2016). Effects of visual cues and self-explanation prompts: Empirical evidence in a multimedia environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 799–813.Google Scholar
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Spencer, V., & Fontana, J. (2003). Promoting success in high school world history: Peer tutoring versus guided notes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 52–65.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and Instruction (2nd ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 107–119.Google Scholar
Muldner, K., Burleson, W., & Chi, M. T. H. (2014). Learning from self-explaining emergent phenomena. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 847–854). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
Najjar, L. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(2), 129–150.Google Scholar
Nathan, M., Mertz, K., & Ryan, R. (1994). Learning through self-explanation of mathematics examples: Effects of cognitive load. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 4–8, New Orleans.Google Scholar
O’Neil, H. F., Chung, G. K., Kerr, D., Vendlinski, T. P., Buschang, R. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2014). Adding self-explanation prompts to an educational computer game. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 23–28.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T., Symons, S., & MacLatchy-Gaudet, H. (1998). Brief research report: A comparison of self-explanation and elaborative interrogation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 434–445.Google Scholar
Pashler, H., Bain, P., Bottage, B., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning (NCER 2007–2004). Washington DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Available from http://ncer.ed.gov (last accessed 16 February 2021)Google Scholar
Pine, K. J., & Messer, D. J. (2000). The effect of explaining another’s actions on children’s implicit theories of balance. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 35–52.Google Scholar
Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2009). Intelligent tutoring systems with multiple representations and self-explanation prompts support learning of fractions. In Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 441–448). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2015). Successful learning with multiple graphical representations and self-explanation prompts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 30–46.Google Scholar
Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12(5), 529–556.Google Scholar
Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Self-explanation in a multi-media context. In Mayer, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 271–286). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010). A closer look at split visual attention in system and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 100–110.Google Scholar
Stark, R. (1999). Lernen mit Lösungsbeisplielen: Einfluss unvollständiger Lösungsbeispiele auf Beispielelaboration, Motivation and Lernerfolg [Learning by Worked-Out Examples: The Impact of Completion Tasks on Example Elaboration, Motivation and Learning Outcomes]. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
Steffensen, M. S., Joag-Dev, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 10–29.Google Scholar
Sun-Lin, H. Z., & Chiou, G. F. (2017). Effects of self-explanations and game-reward on sixth graders’ algebra variable learning. Educational Technology & Society, 20, 126–137.Google Scholar
Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2003). An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183–218.Google Scholar
van Peppen, L. M., Verkoeijen, P. P., Heijltjes, A. E., Janssen, E. M., Koopmans, D., & van Gog, T. (2018). Effects of self-explaining on learning and transfer of critical thinking skills. Frontiers in Education, 3, 100.Google Scholar
VanLehn, K., Jones, R. M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1992). A model of the self-explanation effect. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 1–59.Google Scholar
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1996). The effects of “playing historian” on learning in history. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(7), 63–72.Google Scholar
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 30.Google Scholar
Williams, J. J., & Lombrozo, T. (2013). Explanation and prior knowledge interact to guide learning. Cognitive Psychology, 66(1), 55–84.Google Scholar
Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2008). Why instructional explanations often do not work: A framework for understanding the effectiveness of instructional explanations. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 49–64.Google Scholar
Wylie, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (2014). The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. E. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed., pp. 413–432). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wylie, R., Koedinger, K. R., & Mitamura, T. (2009). Is self-explanation always better? The effects of adding self-explanation prompts to an English grammar tutor. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1300–1305). Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Wylie, R., Sheng, M., Mitamura, T., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Effects of adaptive prompted self-explanation on robust learning of second language grammar. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 588–590). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Yeh, Y. F., Chen, M. C., Hung, P. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). Optimal self-explanation prompt design in dynamic multi-representational learning environments. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1089–1100.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by