Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning
- The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction Motivation and Its Relation to Learning
- Part I The Self and Its Impact
- Part II Rewards, Incentives, and Choice
- Part III Interest and Internal Motivation
- Part IV Curiosity and Boredom
- 16 Curiosity and Learning
- 17 Curiosity
- 18 The Role of Curiosity and Interest in Learning and Motivation
- 19 Boredom
- 20 The Costs and Benefits of Boredom in the Classroom
- Part V Goals and Values
- Part VI Methods, Measures, and Perspective
- Index
- References
20 - The Costs and Benefits of Boredom in the Classroom
from Part IV - Curiosity and Boredom
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 February 2019
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning
- The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction Motivation and Its Relation to Learning
- Part I The Self and Its Impact
- Part II Rewards, Incentives, and Choice
- Part III Interest and Internal Motivation
- Part IV Curiosity and Boredom
- 16 Curiosity and Learning
- 17 Curiosity
- 18 The Role of Curiosity and Interest in Learning and Motivation
- 19 Boredom
- 20 The Costs and Benefits of Boredom in the Classroom
- Part V Goals and Values
- Part VI Methods, Measures, and Perspective
- Index
- References
Summary
Boredom has traditionally been viewed as detrimental to learning. We present an alternative perspective. The vast majority of past research on academic boredom has examined judgments about the boringness of a situation and the propensity to feel bored, rather than actual state boredom. While retrospective judgments about the boringness of a task may be a cause of later disengagement, we argue that in-the-moment state boredom is a consequence of disengagement. This claim flows from our definition of boredom as the uncomfortable feeling associated with the unfulfilled desire to be mentally engaged.We propose that in-the-moment feelings of boredom can be an aid to learning. First, boredom is an immediate process indicator of a failure in learning, which can signal the need to correct disengaged, ineffectual learning. Second, boredom is an uncomfortable feeling, so it motivates an engagement of mental resources as a means of eliminating boredom. We believe our theoretical analysis points towards fruitful future empirical inquiry, clarifies the interpretation of existing findings, and highlights areas where theory development and conceptual precision are needed.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning , pp. 490 - 514Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Ahmed, W., van der Werf, G., Kuyper, H., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Emotions, self-regulated learning, and achievement in mathematics: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcaro, A. & Panksepp, J. (2011). The SEEKING mind: Primal neuro-affective substrates for appetitive incentive states and their pathological dynamics in addictions and depression. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(9), 1805–20.Google Scholar
Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2012) The brain's default network and its adaptive role in internal mentation. Neuroscientist, 18, 251–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aupperle, R. L., Melrose, A. J., Francisco, A., Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2015). Neural substrates of approach-avoidance conflict decision-making. Human Brain Mapping, 36(2), 449–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbalet, J. M. (1999). Boredom and social meaning. The British Journal of Sociology, 50(4), 631–46.Google Scholar
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company. doi: 10.1037/11164-000.Google Scholar
Berlyne, D. E. (Ed.). (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Oxford: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Bernstein, H. E. (1975). Boredom and the ready-made life. Social Research, 42, 512–37.Google Scholar
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265–89.Google Scholar
Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) The brain's default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (1124), 1–38.Google Scholar
Carriere, J. S., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2008). Everyday attention lapses and memory failures: The affective consequences of mindlessness. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 835–47.Google Scholar
Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind-wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(21), 8719–24.Google Scholar
Collette, F. & Van der Linden, M. (2002). Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(2), 105–25.Google Scholar
Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel – now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70.Google Scholar
Dal Mas, D. E. & Wittmann, B. C. (2017). Avoiding boredom: Caudate and insula activity reflects boredom-elicited purchase bias. Cortex, 92, 57–69.Google Scholar
Damrad-Frye, R. & Laird, J. D. (1989). The experience of boredom: The role of the self-perception of attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 315.Google Scholar
Danckert, J. & Merrifield, C. (2016). Boredom, sustained attention and the default mode network. Experimental Brain Research, 236(9), 1–12.Google Scholar
Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., & Newall, N. E. (2009). A longitudinal analysis of achievement goals: From affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 948.Google Scholar
Daniels, L. M., Tze, V. M., & Goetz, T. (2015). Examining boredom: Different causes for different coping profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 255–61.Google Scholar
Dashmann, E. C., Goetz, T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2011). Testing the predictors of boredom at school: Development and validation of the precursors to boredom scales. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 421–40.Google Scholar
Eastwood, J. D., Cavaliere, C., Fahlman, S. A., & Eastwood, A. E. (2007). A desire for desires: Boredom and its relation to alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(6), 1035–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 482–95.Google Scholar
Ellis, H. C. & Ashbrook, P. W. (1988). Resource allocation model of the effect of depressed mood states on memory. In Fiedler, K. & Forgas, J. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 25–43). Toronto: Hogrefe International.Google Scholar
Fahlman, S. A., Mercer-Lynn, K. B., Flora, D. B., & Eastwood, J. D. (2013). Development and validation of the multidimensional state boredom scale. Assessment, 20(1), 68–85.Google Scholar
Fenichel, O. (1953). On the psychology of boredom. In Fenichel, O. (Ed.), The collected papers of Otto Fenichel (Vol. 1, pp. 292–302). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Fenske, M. J. & Raymond, J. E. (2006). Affective influences of selective attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 312–16.Google Scholar
Fox, E. (1995). Pre-cuing target location reduces interference but not negative priming from visual distractors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(1), 26–40.Google Scholar
Fox, K. C., Spreng, R. N., Ellamil, M., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Christoff, K. (2015). The wandering brain: Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of mind-wandering and related spontaneous thought processes. Neuroimage, 111, 611–21.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Y. K., Eastwood, J. D., LaGuardia, J., & Danckert, J. (2011). Boredom: An emotional experience distinct from apathy, anhedonia, or depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(6), 647–666.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M., Martiny-Huenger, T., & Oettingen, G. (2014). Affective consequences of intentional action control. Advances in Motivation Science, 1, 49–83.Google Scholar
Greenson, R. R. (1951). Apathetic and agitated boredom. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 20, 346–7.Google Scholar
Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2003). Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(1), 253–8.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. A. (1981). Attention, personality, and the self-regulation of mood: Absorbing interest and boredom. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 10, 281–315.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. A., Haier, R. J., & Buchsbaum, M. S. (1984). Intrinsic enjoyment and boredom coping scales: Validation with personality, evoked potential, and attention measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(2), 183–93.Google Scholar
Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–71.Google Scholar
Hunter, A. & Eastwood, J. D. (2016). Does state boredom cause failures of attention? Examining the relations between trait boredom, state boredom, and sustained attention. Experimental Brain Research, 236(9), 1–10.Google Scholar
Klapp, O. E. (1986). Overload and boredom: Essays on the quality of life in the information society. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Knutson, B., Adams, C. M., Fong, G. W., & Hommer, D. (2001). Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(16), RC159–RC159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, 315(5810), 393–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menon, V. & Uddin, L. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention, and control: A network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5–6), 655–67.Google Scholar
Merrifield, C. & Danckert, J. (2014). Characterizing the psychophysiological signature of boredom. Experimental Brain Research, 232(2), 481–91.Google Scholar
Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Daniels, L. M. (2010). What to do when feeling bored? Students' strategies for coping with boredom. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 626–38.Google Scholar
Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2011). Coping with boredom in school: An experience sampling perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 49–59.Google Scholar
Nunoi, M. & Yoshikawa, S. (2016). Deep processing makes stimuli more preferable over long durations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28:6, 756–63.Google Scholar
O'Hanlon, J. F. (1981). Boredom: Practical consequences and a theory. Acta Psychologica, 49, 53–82.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–41.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Boredom and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 696.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. E., Fenske, M. J., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2003). Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 14(6), 537–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russel, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–78.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A. & Hidi, E. S. (2016). The Power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C. (2003). Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience, 6(12), 1317–22.Google Scholar
Sidlauskaite, J., Wiersema, J. R., Roeyers, H., Krebs, R. M., Vassena, E., Fias, W., ... Sonuga-Barke, E. (2014). Anticipatory processes in brain state switching: Evidence from a novel cued-switching task implicating default mode and salience networks. NeuroImage, 98, 359–65.Google Scholar
Smith, R. P. (1981). Boredom: A review. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 23, 329–40.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Thackray, R. I. (1981). The stress of boredom and monotony: A consideration of the evidence. Psychosomatic Medicine, 43(2), 165–76.Google Scholar
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(4), 571–90.Google Scholar
Tze, V. M., Daniels, L. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). Evaluating the relationship between boredom and academic outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 119–44.Google Scholar
Tze, V. M., Daniels, L. M., Klassen, R. M., & Li, J. C. H. (2013). Canadian and Chinese university students’ approaches to coping with academic boredom. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 32–43.Google Scholar
Tze, V. M., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2014). Patterns of boredom and its relationship with perceived autonomy support and engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 175–87.Google Scholar
Uddin, L. Q. (2015). Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 55–61.Google Scholar
Ulrich, M., Keller, J., & Grön, G. (2015). Neural signatures of experimentally induced flow experiences identified in a typical fMRI block design with BOLD imaging. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(3), 496–507. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv133.Google Scholar
Ulrich, M., Keller, J., Hoenig, K., Waller, C., & Grön, G. (2014) Neural correlates of experimentally induced flow experiences. NeuroImage, 86, 194–202.Google Scholar
Vodanovich, S. J. & Watt, J. D. (2016). Self-report measures of boredom: An updated review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 150(2), 196–228.Google Scholar
Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., Fiorella, L., Carper, T., & Schatz, S. (2012). The definition, assessment, and mitigation of state boredom within educational settings: A comprehensive review. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 89–111.Google Scholar
Weissman, D. H., Roberts, K. C., Visscher, K. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006). The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nature Neuroscience, 9(7), 971–8.Google Scholar
Yagi, Y., Ikoma, S., & Kikuchi, T. (2009). Attentional modulation of the mere exposure effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1403.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, pt. 2), 1.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by