Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:54:16.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Prodigies and Savants

from Part III - Intelligence and Group Differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2019

By
David Henry Feldman  and
Martha J. Morelock
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

For about a century there has been a modest research effort to explain the nature of prodigies and savants. Savant research emerged out of the medical field and centered on deficit/remediation. Research with prodigies generally consists of case studies by psychologists with an interest in the manifestation and development of extreme talent, sometimes as part of the “gifted child” movement in the United States, more recently as anomalies in developmental psychology.

Research into both phenomena evolved to incorporate new questions, including debates over the role of general versus specific intellectual abilities in talent development. This chapter summarizes and reviews research on prodigies and savants. It also reviews what, to date, has been found about the nature and interplay of general and specific intellectual strengths and weaknesses more generally, offering a possible role for both specific talent and general ability.

Keywords

prodigiessavantsgeneral intelligencespecific intelligencedomain-specific abilities
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence , pp. 258 - 290
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baeck, E. (2002). The neural networks of music. European Journal of Neurology, 9(5), 449–460.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1997). On language savants and the structure of the mind. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1(2), 163–186.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, F. (1930). Wunderkinder psychologische untersuchungen. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosious Barth. (Untranslated)Google Scholar
Bidder, G. P. (1856). On mental calculation. Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 15, session 1855–56, February 19 and 26.Google Scholar
Bokkon, I., Salari, V., Scholkmann, F., Dai, J., & Grass, F. (2013). Interdisciplinary implications on autism, savantism, Asperger syndrome and the biophysical picture representation: Thinking in pictures. Cognitive Systems Research, 22–23, 67–77.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., & Krasnegor, N. A. (Eds.) (1989). Stability and continuity in mental development: Behavioral and biological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brody, L. E., & Stanley, J. C. (2005). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically and/or verbally: Using the MVCT: 4 Model to develop their talents. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 20–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1971). The nature and uses of immaturity. American Psychologist, 27, 1–22.Google Scholar
Butterworth, B. (2001). What makes a prodigy? Nature Neuroscience, 4(1), 11–12.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. I. D. (2005). Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. F., & Linfoot, J. J. (1983). George Parker Bidder: The calculating prodigy. Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications, 23, 68–71.Google Scholar
Clynes, T. (2015). The boy who played with fusion. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Comeau, G., Lu, Y., Swirp, M., & Mielke, S. (2017a). Measuring the musical skills of a prodgy: A case study. Intelligence, 66, 84–97.Google Scholar
Comeau, G., Vuvan, D. T., Picard-Deland, C., & Peretz, I. (2017b). Can you tell a prodigy from a professional musician? Music Perception, 35, 199–209.Google Scholar
Conway, F., & Siegelman, J. (2005). Dark hero of the information age: In search of Norbert Wiener, the father of cybernetics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cowan, R., Stainthorp, R., Kapnogianni, S., & Anastasiou, M. (2004). The development of calendrical skills. Cognitive Development, 19(2), 169–178.Google Scholar
Edmunds, A. L., & Noel, K. A. (2003). Literary precocity: An exceptional case among exceptional cases. Roeper Review, 25(4), 185–194.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.) (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D. H. (1995). Intelligence in prodigies. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of intelligence (pp. 845–850). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. H. (1999). A developmental, evolutionary perspective on gifts and talents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22(2), 159–167.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. H. (2000). Figurative and operative processes in the development of artistic talent. Human Development, 43, 60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D. H. (2003). A developmental, evolutionary perspective on gifts and talents. In Borland, J. (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 9–33). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. H. (2008). Prodigies. In Plucker, J. & Callahan, C. (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 501–512). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. H. (2016). Two roads diverged in the musical wood: A coincidence approach to the lives and careers of Nyiregyhazi and Menuhin. In McPherson, G. (Ed.), Musical prodigies: Interpretations from psychology, education, musicology, and ethnomusicology (pp. 115–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. H., with Goldsmith, L. T. (1986). Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., Kornhaber, M., & Wake, W. (1996). Intelligence: Multiple perspectives. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, L. T. (1987). Girl prodigies: Some evidence and some speculations. Roeper Review, 10(2), 74–82.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, L. T. (2000). Tracking trajectories of talent: Child prodigies growing up. In Friedman, R. C. & Shore, B. M. (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 89–118). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hermelin, B., & O’Connor, N. (1986). Idiot savant calendrical calculators: Rules and regularities. Psychological Medicine, 16, 1–9.Google Scholar
Hildesheimer, W. (1982/1977). Mozart. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Hill, A. L. (1977). Idiots-savants: Rate of incidence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 161–162.Google Scholar
Ho, W. (Ed.) (1989). Yani: The brush of innocence. New York: Hudson Hills Press.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, L. (1942). Children above 180 IQ. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book. (Reprinted by Arno Press, 1975.)Google Scholar
Hou, C., Miller, B., Cummings, J., Goldberg, M., Mychack, P., Bottino, B., & Benson, F. (2000). Artistic savants. Neuropsychiatry, 13, 29–38.Google Scholar
Howard, R. W. (2008). Linking extreme precocity and adult eminence: A study of eight prodigies at international chess. High Ability Studies, 19(2), 117–130.Google Scholar
Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 399–406.Google Scholar
Hulbert, A. (2005). The prodigy puzzle. New York Times Magazine, November 30, 64–71.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. (2005). A genius explains. The Guardian, February 12. www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2005/feb/12/weekend7.weekend2Google Scholar
Kanigel, R. (1991). The man who knew infinity: A life of the genius Ramanujan. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kearney, K., & Kearney, C. (1998). Accidental genius. Juneau, AK: Woodshed Press.Google Scholar
Kenneson, C. (1998). Musical prodigies: Perilous journeys, remarkable lives. Portland, OR: Amadeus Press.Google Scholar
Kunda, M., & Goel, A. (2011). Thinking in pictures as a cognitive account of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1157–1177.Google Scholar
Leites, N. S. (1960). Intellectual giftedness. Moscow: APN Press.Google Scholar
Leites, N. S. (Ed.) (1996). Psychology of giftedness of children and adolescents. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Morelock, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in engineering and physical sciences among the gifted: An inorganic-organic distinction. In Heller, K., Mönks, F., Sternberg, R., & Subotnik, R. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 633–648). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). 1 in 10,000: A longitudinal study of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718–729.Google Scholar
McPherson, G. E. (Ed.) (2006). The child as musician: A handbook of musical development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, G. E. (2007). Diary of a child prodigy musician. In Williamson, A. & Coimbra, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Performance Science 2007 (pp. 213–218). Porto, Portugal: Association of European Conservatories.Google Scholar
Milbrath, C. (1998). Patterns of artistic development in children: Comparative studies of talent. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, B. L., Boone, K., Cummings, L. R., & Mishkin, F. (2000). Functional correlates of musical and visual ability in frontotemporal dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 458–463.Google Scholar
Miller, B. L., Cummings, J., Mishkin, F., Boone, K., Prince, F., Ponton, M., et al. (1998). Emergence of artistic talent in fronto-temporal dementia. Neurology, 51, 978–982.Google Scholar
Miller, L. K. (1989). Musical savants: Exceptional skill in the mentally retarded. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Miller, L. K. (1999). The savant syndrome: Intellectual impairment and exceptional skill. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 31–46.Google Scholar
Miller, L. K. (2005). What the savant syndrome can tell us about the nature and nurture of talent. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(3–4), 361–374.Google Scholar
Morelock, M. J. (1995). The profoundly gifted child in family context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tufts University, Medford, MA.Google Scholar
Morelock, M. J. (2013). Prodigies, passion, persistence, and pretunement: Musings on the biological bases of talent. In Kaufman, S. B. (Ed.), The complexity of greatness: Beyond talent or practice (pp. 83–101). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morelock, M. J., & Feldman, D. H. (1993). Prodigies and savants: What they have to tell us about giftedness and human cognition. In Heller, K. A., Monks, F. J., & Passow, A. H. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 161–181). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Morelock, M. J., & Feldman, D. H. (1999). Prodigies. In Runco, M. & Pritzker, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 1303–1320). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morelock, M. J., & Feldman, D. H. (2003). Prodigies, savants and Williams syndrome: Windows into talent and cognition. In Monks, F. J., Heller, K. A., Sternberg, R. J., & Subotnik, R. (Eds.), International handbook for research on giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 455–469). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Mursell, J. (1937). The psychology of music. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
O’Boyle, M. (2008a). Adolescent psychopathology and the developing brain. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 481–483.Google Scholar
O’Boyle, M. (2008b). Mathematically gifted children: Developmental brain characteristics and their prognosis for well-being. Roeper Review, 30, 181–186.Google Scholar
O’Connor, N. (1989). The performance of the “idiot savant”: Implicit and explicit. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 24, 1–20.Google Scholar
O’Connor, N., & Hermelin, B. (1984). Idiot savant calendrical calculators: Math or memory? Psychological Medicine, 14, 801–806.Google Scholar
O’Connor, N., & Hermelin, B. (1987). Visual and graphic abilities of the idiot savant artist. Psychological Medicine, 17, 79–80.Google Scholar
Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peek, F. (1997). The real Rain Man. Salt Lake City, UT: Harkness.Google Scholar
Peek, F., with Hanson, L. L. (2007). The life and message of the real Rain Main: The journey of a mega-savant. Port Chester, NY: Dude Publishing/National Professional Resources.Google Scholar
Pring, L., Ryder, N., Crane, L., & Hermelin, B. (2012). Creativity in savant artists with autism. Autism, 16, 45–57.Google Scholar
Radford, J. (1990). Child prodigies and exceptional early achievers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Revesz, G. (1916/1970). The psychology of a musical prodigy. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
Rolfe, L. (1978). The Menuhins: A family odyssey. San Francisco: Panjandrum Books.Google Scholar
Ruthsatz, J., & Detterman, D. K. (2003). An extraordinary memory: The case study of a musical prodigy. Intelligence, 31, 509–518.Google Scholar
Ruthsatz, J., & Stephens, K. (2016). The prodigy’s cousin. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Ruthsatz, J., & Urbach, J. B. (2012). Child prodigy: A novel cognitive profile places elevated general intelligence, exceptional working memory and attention to detail at the root of prodigiousness. Intelligence, 40, 419–426.Google Scholar
Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on Mars. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Scheerer, M., Rothmann, E., & Goldstein, K. (1945). A case of “idiot savant”: An experimental study of personality organization. Psychology Monograph, 58, 1–63.Google Scholar
Schlaug, G., Jancke, L., Huang, Y., & Steinmetz, H. (1995a). In vivo evidence of structural brain asymmetry in musicians. Science, 267, 699–701.Google Scholar
Schlaug, G., Jancke, L., Huang, Y., & Steinmetz, H. (1995b). Increased corpus callosum size in musicians. Neuropsychologica, 33, 1047–1055.Google Scholar
Selfe, L. (1977). Nadia: A case of extraordinary drawing ability in an autistic child. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shavinina, L. (1999). The psychological essence of the child prodigy phenomenon: Sensitive periods and cognitive experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(1), 25–38.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106(3), 435–457.Google Scholar
Singh, H., & O’Boyle, M. W. (2004). Inter-hemispheric interaction during global-local processing in mathematically gifted adolescents, average-ability youth, and college students. Neuropsychology, 18(2), 371–377.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V., & Tsimpli, I. (1995). The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, S. B. (1983). The great mental calculators: The psychology, methods, and lives of calculating prodigies past and present. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, A. (2009). Explaining and inducing savant skills: Privileged access to lower level, less processed information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 364, 1399–1405.Google Scholar
Snyder, A., Mulcahy, E., Taylor, J., Mitchell, D., Sachdev, P., & Gandevia, S. (2003). Savant-like skills exposed in normal people by suppressing the left fronto-temporal lobe. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 2, 149–158.Google Scholar
Solomon, A. (2012). Far from the tree: Parents, children, and the search for identity. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. C. (1996). SMPY in the beginning. In Benbow, C. P. & Lubinski, D. (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 225–235). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. C. (2000). Helping students learn only what they don’t already know. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 216–222.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tammet, D. (2006). Born on a blue day: Inside the extraordinary mind of an autistic savant. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Tammet, D. (2009). Embracing the wide sky: A tour across the horizons of the mind. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, A. (1993). History of giftedness and “gifted education” in world perspective. In Heller, K. A., Monks, F. J., & Passow, A. H. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 3–27). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Thioux, M., Stark, D. E., Klaiman, C., & Schultz, R. T. (2006). The day of the week when you were born in 700 ms: Calendar computation in an autistic savant. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1155–1168.Google Scholar
Thompson, R., & Nelson, C. (2001). Developmental science and the media. American Psychologist, 56(1), 5–15.Google Scholar
Treffert, D. (1989). Extraordinary people: Understanding “idiot savants.” New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Treffert, D. (2006). Extraordinary people: Understanding savant syndrome. Omaha, NE: iUniverse.Google Scholar
Treffert, D. (2008). Myths that persist: Savant syndrome 2008. www.wisconsinmedicalsociety.org/professional/savant-syndrome/resources/articles/myths-that-persist-savant-syndrome-2008Google Scholar
Treffert, D. (2009). The savant syndrome: An extraordinary condition. A synopsis: Past, present, future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 364, 1351–1357.Google Scholar
Treffert, D. (2013). Savant syndrome: A compelling case for innate talent. In Kaufman, S. B. (Ed.), The complexity of greatness: Beyond talent or practice (pp. 103–118). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Treffert, D. (2014). Savant syndrome: Realities, myths and misconceptions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 564–571.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I., & Smith, N. (1999). Modules and quasi-modules: Language and theory of mind in a polyglot savant. Learning and Individual Differences, 10(3), 193–215.Google Scholar
Viscott, D. S. (1970). A musical idiot savant. Psychiatry, 33, 494–515.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. (1986). The prodigy: A biography of William James Sidis, America’s greatest child prodigy. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. (1953). Ex-prodigy: My childhood and youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Winner, E. (1982). Invented worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winner, E. (1996). The rage to master: The decisive role of talent in the visual arts. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games (pp. 271–301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Young, R. (1995). Savant syndrome: Processes underlying extraordinary abilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, R. (Writer) (1989). A Real Rainman [VHS Film]. Maple Plain, MI: Simitar Entertainment.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×