Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anderson, M. (1988), Inspection time, information processing and the development of intelligence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1988.tb01079.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, M., Nettelbeck, T., & Barlow, J. (1997). Reaction time measures of speed of processing: Speed of response selection increases with age but speed of stimulus categorization does not. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 145–157.Google Scholar

Anderson, M., Reid, C., & Nelson, J. (2001). Developmental changes in inspection time: What a difference a year makes. Intelligence, 29, 475–486.Google Scholar

Baumeister, A. A., & Kellas, G. (1968). Reaction time and mental retardation. In Ellis, N. R. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (vol. 3, pp. 163–193). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Biederman, J., Monuteaux, M. C., Doyle, A. E., Seidman, L. J., Wilens, T. E., Ferrero, F., et al. (2004). Impact of executive function deficits and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on academic outcomes in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(5), 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.757Google Scholar

Birren, J. E., & Fisher, L. M. (1992). Aging and slowing of behavior: Consequences for cognition and survival. In Sonderegger, T. B. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1991 (pp. 1–37). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Bonney, K. R., Almeida, O. P., Flicker, L., Davies, S., Clarnette, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2006). Inspection time in non-demented older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1452–1456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bors, D. A., Stokes, T. L., Forrin, B., & Hodder, S. L. (1999). Inspection time and intelligence: Practice, strategies and attention. Intelligence, 27, 111–129.Google Scholar

Brand, C. R. (1996). The g factor: General intelligence and its implications. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar

Brand, C. R., & Deary, I. J. (1982). Intelligence and “inspection time.” In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model for intelligence (pp. 133–148). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, N., & Smith, G. A. (1984). How normal and retarded individuals monitor and regulate speed and accuracy of responding in serial choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 71–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buehner, M., Krumm, S., Ziegler, M., & Pluecken, T. (2006). Cognitive abilities and their interplay: Reasoning, crystallized intelligence, working memory components, and sustained attention. Journal of Individual Differences, 27, 57–72.Google Scholar

Burns, N. R., & Nettelbeck, T. (2003). Inspection time in the structure of cognitive abilities: Where does IT fit? Intelligence, 31, 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, N. R., Nettelbeck, T., & Cooper, C. J. (2000). Event-related potential correlates of some human cognitive ability constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 157–168.Google Scholar

Burns, N. R., Nettelbeck, T., McPherson, J., & Stankov, L. (2007). Perceptual learning on inspection time and motion perception. Journal of General Psychology, 134, 83–100.Google Scholar

Camfield, D. A., Nolidin, K., Savage, K., Timmer, J., Croft, K., Simpson, T., et al. ( 2019). Higher plasma levels of F2-isoprostanes are associated with slower psychomotor speed in healthy older adults. Free Radical Research, 53(4), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715762.2018.1513133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carlson, J. S., Jensen, C. M., & Widaman, K. (1983). Reaction time, intelligence and attention. Intelligence, 7, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1987). Jensen’s mental chronometry: Some comments and questions. In Modgil, S. & Modgil, C. (Eds.), Arthur Jensen: Consensus and controversy (pp. 297–301, 310–311). New York: Falmer.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cerella, J. (1985). Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chevalier, N., Kurth, S., Doucette, M. R., Wiseheart, M., Deoni, S. C. L., Dean, D. C., et al. (2015). Myelination is associated with processing speed in early childhood: Preliminary insights. PLoS One, 10, e0139897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chuderski, A. (2013). When are fluid intelligence and working memory isomorphic and when are they not? Intelligence, 41(4), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.003Google Scholar

Chuderski, A. (2015). The broad factor of working memory is virtually isomorphic to fluid intelligence tested under time pressure. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.Google Scholar

Coyle, T. R. (2003). A review of the worst performance rule: Evidence, theory, and alternative hypotheses. Intelligence, 31, 567–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, J. R., Deary, I. J., Allan, K. M., & Gustafsson, J. E. (1998). Evaluating competing models of the relationship between inspection time and psychometric intelligence. Intelligence, 26, 27–42.Google Scholar

Danthiir, V., Burns, N. R., Nettelbeck, T., Wilson, C., & Wittert, G. (2009). Relationships between age, processing speed, working memory, inhibition and fluid intelligence in older adults. Paper presented at the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences, Chicago, July18–22.Google Scholar

Danthiir, V., Wilhelm, O., & Schacht, A. (2005a). Decision speed in intelligence tasks: Correctly an ability? Psychology Science, 47, 200–229.Google Scholar

Danthiir, V., Wilhelm, O., Schulze, R., & Roberts, R. D. (2005b). Factor structure and validity of paper-and-pencil measures of mental speed: Evidence for a higher-order model? Intelligence, 33, 491–514.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J. (2000). Looking down on human intelligence: From psychophysics to the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J. (2003). Reaction time and psychometric intelligence: Jensen’s contributions. In Nyborg, H. (Ed.), The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen (pp. 53–75). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Allerhand, M., & Der, G. (2009). Smarter in middle age, faster in old age: A cross-lagged panel analysis of reaction time and cognitive ability over 13 years in the West of Scotland Twenty-07 study. Psychology and Aging, 24, 40–47.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Bastin, M. E., Pattie, A., Clayden, J. D., Whalley, L. J., Starr, J. M., et al. (2006). White matter integrity and cognition in childhood and old age. Neurology, 66, 505–512.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Der, G., & Ford, G. (2001a). Reaction times and intelligence differences: A population-based cohort study. Intelligence, 29, 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deary, I. J., Hunter, R., Langan, S. J., & Goodwin, G. M. (1991). Inspection time, psychometric intelligence and clinical estimates of cognitive ability in pre-senile Alzheimer’s disease and Korsakoff’s psychosis. Brain, 114, 2543–2554.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Leaper, S. A., Murray, A. D., Staff, R. T., & Whalley, L. J. (2003). Cerebral white matter abnormalities and lifetime cognitive change: A 67-year follow-up of the Scottish Mental Survey of 1932. Psychology and Aging, 18, 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deary, I. J., Simonotto, E., Marshall, A., Marshall, I., Goddard, N., & Wardlaw, J. M. (2001b). The functional anatomy of inspection time: A pilot fMRI study. Intelligence, 29, 497–510.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., & Stough, C. (1996). Intelligence and inspection time: Achievements, prospects and problems. American Psychologist, 51, 599–608.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., & Stough, C. (1997). Looking down on intelligence. American Psychologist, 52, 1148–1150.Google Scholar

Deluca, J., & Kalmar, J. H. (2007). Information processing speed in clinical populations. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., & Shayer, M. (2013a). Developmental intelligence: From empirical to hidden constructs. Intelligence, 41(5), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.014Google Scholar

Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., Shayer, M., Mouyi, A., Kazi, S., & Platsidou, M. (2013b). Cycles in speed-working memory-G relations: Towards a developmental–differential theory of the mind. Intelligence, 41(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.10.010Google Scholar

Detterman, D. K. (1982). Does g exist? Intelligence, 6, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detterman, D. K. (1987). What does reaction time tell us about intelligence? In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 177–200). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Duncan, J., Seitz, R. J., Koldny, J., Bor, D., Herzog, H., Ahmed, A., et al. (2000). A neural basis for general intelligence. Science, 289, 457–460.Google Scholar

Edmonds, C. J., Isaacs, E. B., Visscher, P. M., Rogers, M., Lanigan, J., Singhal, A., et al. (2008). Inspection time and cognitive abilities in twins aged 7 to 17 years: Age-related changes, heritability and genetic covariance. Intelligence, 36, 210–255.Google Scholar

Egan, V. (1994). Intelligence, inspection time and cognitive strategies. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 305–316.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eysenck, H. J. (1987). Speed of information processing, reaction time, and the theory of intelligence. In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 21–67). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Finkel, D., Reynolds, C. A., McArdle, J. J., & Pedersen, N. L. (2007). Age changes in processing speed as a leading indicator of cognitive aging. Psychology and Aging, 22, 558–568.Google Scholar

Fox, M. C., Roring, R. W., & Mitchum, A. L. (2009). Reversing the speed-IQ correlation: Intra-individual variability and attentional control in the inspection time paradigm. Intelligence, 37, 76–80.Google Scholar

Frearson, W., & Eysenck, H. J. (1986). Intelligence, reaction time (RT) and a new “odd-man-out” RT paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 807–817.Google Scholar

Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (2000). Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Biological Psychology, 54, 1–34.Google Scholar

Galloway-Long, H., & Huang-Pollock, C. (2018). Using inspection time and ex-Gaussian parameters of reaction time to predict executive functions in children with ADHD. Intelligence, 69, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Gregory, T., Callaghan, A., Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, C. (2009). Inspection time predicts individual differences in everyday functioning among elderly adults: Testing discriminant validity. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28, 87–92.Google Scholar

Gregory, T., Nettelbeck, T., Howard, S., & Wilson, C. (2008). Inspection time: A biomarker for cognitive decline. Intelligence, 36, 664–671.Google Scholar

Gregory, T., Nettelbeck, T., Howard, S., & Wilson, C. (2009a). A test of the cascade model in the elderly. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 71–73.Google Scholar

Gregory, T., Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, C. (2009b). Within-person changes in inspection time predict memory. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 741–743.Google Scholar

Grudnik, J. L., & Kranzler, J. H. (2001). Meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and inspection time. Intelligence, 29, 523–535.Google Scholar

Gunning-Dixon, F. M., & Raz, N. (2000). The cognitive correlates of white matter abnormalities in normal aging: A quantitative review. Neuropsychology, 14, 224–232.Google Scholar

Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008). Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 1–65.Google Scholar

Hick, W. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Noll, J. (1997). Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gc theory. In Flanagan, D. P., Genshaft, J. L., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53–91). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, E. (1980). Intelligence as an information processing concept. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 449–474.Google Scholar

Hutchison, C. W., Nathan, P. J., Mrazek, L., & Stough, C. (2001). Cholinergic modulation of speed of early information processing: The effect of donepezil on inspection time. Psychopharmacology, 44, 440–442.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1982). Reaction time and psychometric g. In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model for intelligence (pp. 93–132). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1987). Individual differences in the Hick paradigm. In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 101–175). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: the science of mental ability. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Juhel, J. (1991). Relationships between psychometric intelligence and information-processing speed indexes. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 73–105.Google Scholar

Kail, R. (1991). Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490–501.Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2009). Associative learning predicts intelligence above and beyond working memory and processing speed. Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.03.004Google Scholar

Krumm, S., Schmidt-Atzert, L., Michalczyk, K., & Danthiir, V. (2008). Speeded paper-pencil sustained attention and mental speed tests. Journal of Individual Differences, 29, 205–216.Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity? Intelligence, 14, 389–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013). Sustaining attention to simple tasks: A meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 870–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030694Google Scholar

Larson, G. E., & Alderton, D. L. (1990). Reaction time variability and intelligence: A “worst performance” analysis of individual differences. Intelligence, 14, 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehrl, S., & Fischer, B. (1990). A basic information psychological parameter (BIP) for the reconstruction of concepts of intelligence. European Journal of Personality, 4, 259–286.Google Scholar

Longstreth, L. E. (1984). Jensen’s reaction time investigations of intelligence: A critique. Intelligence, 8, 139–160.Google Scholar

Luciano, M., Smith, G. A., Wright, M. J., Geffen, G. M., Geffen, L. B., & Martin, N. G. (2001). On the heritability of inspection time and its covariance with IQ: A twin study. Intelligence, 29, 443–457.Google Scholar

Luciano, M., Wright, M. J., Geffen, G. M., Geffen, L. B., Smith, G. A., & Martin, N. G. (2004). A genetic investigation of the covariation among inspection time, choice reaction time, and IQ subtest scores. Behavior Genetics, 34, 41–50.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. (1986). The biology of intelligence? British Journal of Psychology, 77, 1–18.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J., & Bennett, E. S. (2002). IT, IQ and perceptual speed. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(4), 685–693.Google Scholar

Madden, D. J. (2001). Speed and timing in behavioral processes. In Birren, J. E. & Schaie, K. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed., pp. 288–312). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Marr, D. B., & Sternberg, R. J. (1987). The role of mental speed in intelligence: A triarchic perspective. In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 271–294). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence, 17, 433–442.Google Scholar

McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present and future. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (2nd ed., pp. 156–182). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Meiran, N., & Shahar, N. (2018). Working memory involvement in reaction time and its contribution to fluid intelligence: An examination of individual differences in reaction-time distributions. Intelligence, 69, 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.004Google Scholar

Nathan, P. J., & Stough, C. (2001). Inspection time: A neuropsychophysiological test for measuring the functional integrity of the cholinergic system. Medical Hypotheses, 57, 759–760.Google Scholar

Nathan, P. J., Stough, C., & Siteram, G. (2000). Serotonin and information processing: A pharmacodynamic study on the effects of citalopram on cognitive and psychomotor function. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 15, 306–307.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (1985). What reaction times time. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 193–263.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (1987). Inspection time and intelligence. In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 295–346). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (1994). Speediness. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human intelligence. (pp. 1014–1019). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (1998). Jensen’s chronometric research: Neither simple nor sufficient but a good place to start. Intelligence, 29, 233–241.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (2001). Correlation between inspection time and psychometric abilities: A personal interpretation. Intelligence, 29, 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (2003). Inspection time and g. In Nyborg, H. (Ed.), The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen (pp. 77–91). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., Gregory, T., Wilson, C., Burns, N., Danthiir, V., & Wittert, G. (2008). Inspection time: A marker for less successful ageing. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of the International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR), Decatur, Georgia, December 11–13.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Kirby, N. H. (1983). Measures of timed performance and intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 39–52.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Lally, M. (1976). Inspection time and measured intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 17–22.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Vita, P. (1992). Inspection time in two childhood age cohorts: A constant of a developmental function? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 189–198.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, C. (1985). A cross-sequential analysis of developmental differences in speed of visual information processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 1–22.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, C. (1997). Speed of information processing and cognition. In Maclean, W. E. J. (Ed.), Ellis’ handbook of mental deficiency, psychological theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 245–274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Young, R. (1989). Inspection time and intelligence in 6 year old children. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 605–614.Google Scholar

Neubauer, A. C. (1997). The mental speed account to the assessment of intelligence In Carlson, J. S., Kingma, J., & Tomic, W. (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Reflections on the concept of intelligence (vol. 4, pp. 149–173). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Neubauer, A. C., & Bucik, V. (1996). The mental speed-IQ relationship: Unitary or modular? Intelligence, 22, 23–48.Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Süβ, H.-M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2008). Which working memory functions predict intelligence? Intelligence, 36(6), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.01.007Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Schulze, R., & Süß, H.-M. (2005). Working memory and intelligence – their correlation and their relation: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.61Google Scholar

O’Connor, T. A., & Burns, N. R. (2003). Inspection time and general speed of processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 713–724.Google Scholar

Olsson, H., Björkman, C., Haag, K., & Juslin, P. (1998). Auditory inspection time: On the importance of selecting the appropriate sensory continuum. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 627–634.Google Scholar

Parker, D. M., Crawford, J. R., & Stephen, E. (1999). Auditory inspection time and intelligence: A new spatial localization task. Intelligence, 27, 131–139.Google Scholar

Petrill, S. A., Luo, D., Thompson, L. A., & Detterman, D. K. (2001). Inspection time and the relationship among elementary cognitive tasks, general intelligence, and specific cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 29, 487–496.Google Scholar

Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Posthuma, D., de Geus, E. J. C., & Boomsma, D. I. (2001). Perceptual speed and IQ are associated through common genetic factors Behavior Genetics, 31, 593–602.Google Scholar

Rabbitt, P., Scott, M., Lunn, M., Thacker, N., Lowe, C., Pedleton, N., et al. (2007). White matter lesions account for all age-related declines in speed but not in intelligence. Neuropsychology, 21, 363–370.Google Scholar

Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333–367.Google Scholar

Reed, T. E., & Jensen, A. R. (1992). Conduction velocity in a brain nerve pathway of normal adults correlates with intelligence level. Intelligence, 16, 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, T. E., & Jensen, A. R. (1993). Choice reaction time and visual pathway nerve conduction velocity both correlate with intelligence but appear not to correlate with each other: Implications for information processing. Intelligence, 17, 191–203.Google Scholar

Reed, T. E., Vernon, P. A., & Johnson, A. M. (2004). Confirmation of correlation between brain nerve conduction velocity and intelligence level in normal adults. Intelligence, 32, 563–572.Google Scholar

Ritchie, S. J., Bates, T. C., Der, G., Starr, J. M., & Deary, I. J. (2013). Education is associated with higher later life IQ scores, but not with faster cognitive processing speed. Psychology and Aging, 28(2), 515–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030820Google Scholar

Roberts, R. D., & Stankov, L. (1999). Individual differences in speed of mental processing and human cognitive abilities: Toward a taxonomic model. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 1–120.Google Scholar

Rockstroh, S., & Schweizer, K. (2004). The effect of retest practice on the speed-ability relationship. European Psychologist, 9, 24–31.Google Scholar

Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.Google Scholar

Salthouse, T. A. (2006). Mental exercise and mental aging. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 68–87.Google Scholar

Schafer, E. P. W. (1985). Neural adaptability: A biological determinant of g factor intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 240–241.Google Scholar

Schaie, K. W. (2005). Developmental influences on adult intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H.-M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414–429.Google Scholar

Schweizer, K., Zimmermann, P., & Koch, W. (2000). Sustained attention, intelligence, and the crucial role of perceptual processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 271–287.Google Scholar

Sculthorpe, L. D., Stelmack, R. M., & Campbell, K. B. (2009). Mental ability and the effect of pattern violation discrimination on P300 and mismatch negativity. Intelligence, 37, 405–411.Google Scholar

Sheppard, L. D., & Vernon, P. A. (2008). Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 535–551.Google Scholar

Smith, G. A., & Carew, M. (1987). Decision time unmasked: Individuals adopt different strategies. Australian Journal of Psychology, 39, 339–351.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence and creativity synthesized. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, S. (1975). Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1–32.Google Scholar

Stough, C., Bates, T., Mangan, G. L., & Colrain, I. (2001a). Inspection time and intelligence: Further attempts at reducing the apparent motion strategy. Intelligence, 29, 219–230.Google Scholar

Stough, C., Nettelbeck, T., Cooper, C., & Bates, T. (1995). Strategy use in Jensen’s RT Paradigm: Relationships to intelligence? Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 61–65.Google Scholar

Stough, C., Thompson, J. C., Bates, T. C., & Nathan, P. J. (2001b). Examining neurochemical determinants of inspection time: Development of a biological model. Intelligence, 29, 511–522.Google Scholar

Strachan, M. W. J., Deary, I. J., Ewing, F. M. E., Ferguson, S. S. C., Young, M. J., & Frier, B. M. (2001). Acute hypoglycemia impairs the functioning of the central but not peripheral nervous system. Physiology and Behavior, 72, 83–92.Google Scholar

Stroud, J. M. (1956). The fine structure of psychological time. In Quastler, H. (Ed.), Information theory in psychology. Glencoe, UK: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. C., Stough, C., Nathan, P. J., Ames, D., & Ritchie, C. (2000). Effects of the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine on inspection time. Psychopharmacology, 150(1), 117–119.Google Scholar

Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review, 80, 1–52.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N. (2010). Interference control, working memory capacity, and cognitive abilities: A latent variable analysis. Intelligence, 38(2), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.12.003Google Scholar

Verhaeghen, P. (2013). The elements of cognitive aging: Meta-analyses of age-related differences in processing speed and their consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. A. (1987). New developments in reaction time research. In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 1–20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. A., & Mori, M. (1992). Intelligence, reaction times, and peripheral nerve conduction velocity. Intelligence, 16, 273–288.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. A., Wickett, J. C., Bazana, P. C., & Stelmack, R. M. (2000). The neuropsychology and psychophysiology of human intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vickers, D., Nettelbeck, T., & Willson, R. J. (1972). Perceptual indices of performance: The measurement of “inspection time” and “noise” in the visual system. Perception, 1, 263–295.Google Scholar

Welford, A. T. (1968). Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Zajac, I. T., & Burns, N. R. (2007). Measuring auditory inspection time in primary school children. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 45–52.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 567–589.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170–177.Google Scholar

Ashby, F. G., Ell, S. W., Valentin, V. V., & Casale, M. B. (2005). FROST: A distributed neurocomputational model of working memory maintenance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1728–1743.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1971). The control of short-term memory. Scientific American, 225, 82–90.Google Scholar

Awh, E., Fukuda, K., Vogel, E. K., & Mayr, U. (2009). Quantity not quality: The relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Paper presented at the fiftieth annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, November.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. A. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bartholomew, D. J., Deary, I. J., & Lawn, M. (2009). A new lease of life for Thomson’s bonds model of intelligence. Psychological Review, 116(3), 567–579. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0016262Google Scholar

Bayliss, D. M., Jarrold, C., Gunn, D. M., & Baddeley, A. D. (2003). The complexities of complex span: Explaining individual differences in working memory in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 71–92.Google Scholar

Binet, A. (1903). Etude expérimentale de l’intelligence (The experimental study of intelligence). Paris: Schlecher.Google Scholar

Botvinick, M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 356–366.Google Scholar

Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.Google Scholar

Bunge, S. A., Klingberg, T., Jacobsen, R. B., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). A resource model of the neural basis of executive working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 3573–3578.Google Scholar

Bunting, M. F. (2006). Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 183–196.Google Scholar

Burgess, G. C., Braver, T. S., Conway, A. R. A., & Gray, J. R. (2011). Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 674–692.Google Scholar

Case, R., Kurland, M. D., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404.Google Scholar

Chein, J. M., Moore, A. B., & Conway, A. R. A. (2011). Domain-general mechanisms of active maintenance and serial recall in complex working memory span. Neuroimage, 54, 550–559.Google Scholar

Chuah, Y. M. L., & Maybery, M. T. (1999). Verbal and spatial short-term memory: Common sources of developmental change? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 7–44.Google Scholar

Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Palacios, A., Juan-Espinosa, M., & Kyllonen, P. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32, 277–296.Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D., & Minkoff, S. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(5), 769–786.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–191.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Saults, J. S., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A., et al. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51(1), 42–100.Google Scholar

Cowan, N., Fristoe, N. M., Elliott, E. M., Brunner, R. P., & Saults, J. S. (2006). Scope of attention, control of attention, and intelligence in children and adults. Memory and Cognition, 34, 1754–1768.Google Scholar

Crowder, R. G. (1982). The demise of short-term memory. Acta Psychologica, 50, 291–323.Google Scholar

Dahlin, E., Bäckman, L., Neely, A. S., & Nyberg, L. (2009). Training of the executive component of working memory: Subcortical areas mediate transfer effects. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 27(5), 405–419.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Behavior and Verbal Learning, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 561–584.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422–433.Google Scholar

Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann, H. J., & Usher, M. (2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112, 3–42.Google Scholar

Dempster, F. N., & Corkill, A. J. (1999). Interference and inhibition in cognition and behavior: Unifying themes for educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 1–88.Google Scholar

Drew, T., & Vogel, E. K. (2009). Working memory capacity limitations. In Squire, L. R. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of neuroscience (vol. 10, pp. 523–531). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Dunlosky, J., & Kane, M. J. (2007). The contributions of strategy use to working memory span: A comparison of strategy-assessment methods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1227–1245.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In Ross, B. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 145–199). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245.Google Scholar

Frank, M. J., Loughry, B., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2001). Interactions between the frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: A computational model. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 137–160.Google Scholar

Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory and Cognition, 26, 263–276.Google Scholar

Gignac, G. E. (2014). Fluid intelligence shares closer to 60% of its variance with working memory capacity and is a better indicator of general intelligence. Intelligence, 47, 122–133. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.09.004Google Scholar

Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F., & Braver, T. S. (2003). Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 316–322.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z. (2003). Why are some people more knowledgeable than others? A longitudinal study of real-world knowledge acquisition. Memory & Cognition, 31, 902–917.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2002). Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity, and age on cognitive performance: An investigation of the knowledge-is-power hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 339–387.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z., & Meinz, E. J. (2011). Limits on the predictive power of domain-specific experience and knowledge in skilled performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(5), 275–279. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422061Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2005). Does domain knowledge moderate involvement of working memory capacity in higher-level cognition? A test of three models. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 377–397.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. (1949). Organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Jonides, J., Lewis, R. L., Nee, D. E., Lustig, C. A., Berman, M. G., & Moore, K. S. (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 193–224.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Miura, T. K., & Colflesh, G. J. H. (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the n-back task: A question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 615–622.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 637–671.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66–71.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.Google Scholar

Karbach, J., & Kray, J. (2009). How useful is executive control training? Age differences in near and far transfer of task-switching training. Developmental Science, 12(6), 976–990.Google Scholar

Kondo, H., Morishita, M., Osaka, N., Osaka, M., Fukuyama, H., & Shibasaki, H. (2004). Functional roles of the cingulo-frontal network in performance on working memory. Neuroimage, 21, 2–14.Google Scholar

Kovacs, K., & Conway, A. R. A. (2016). Process overlap theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence. Psychological Inquiry, 27(3). http://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1153946Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389–433.Google Scholar

Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J., & Bennett, E. S. (2003). The fractionation of working memory maps onto different components of intelligence. Intelligence, 31, 519–531.Google Scholar

McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004Google Scholar

McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 817–835.Google Scholar

McNamara, D. S., & Scott, J. L. (2001). Working memory capacity and strategy use. Memory and Cognition, 29, 10–17.Google Scholar

Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 621–640.Google Scholar

Mukunda, K. V., & Hall, V. C. (1992). Does performance on memory for order correlate with performance on standardized measures of ability? A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 16, 81–97.Google Scholar

Nee, D. E., & Jonides, J. (2008). Neural correlates of access to short-term memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 14228–14233.Google Scholar

Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28, 411–421.Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Farrell, S., Jarrold, C., & Greaves, M. (2012). Modeling working memory: An interference model of complex span. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(5), 779–819. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0272-4Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Süß, H. M. (2005). Working memory and intelligence – their correlation and their relation: A comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 61–65.Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Süß, H. M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittman, W. W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167–193.Google Scholar

O’Reilly, R. C., & Frank, M. J. (2006). Making working memory work: A computational model of learning in the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Neural Computation, 18, 283–328.Google Scholar

O’Reilly, R. C., & Norman, K. A. (2002). Hippocampal and neocortical contributions to memory: Advances in the complementary learning systems framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 505–510.Google Scholar

Osaka, M., Osaka, N., Kondo, H., Morishita, M., Fukuyama, H., Aso, T., et al. (2003). The neural basis of individual differences in working memory capacity: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 18, 789–797.Google Scholar

Osaka, N., Osaka, M., Kondo, H., Morishita, M., Fukuyama, H., & Shibasaki, H. (2004). The neural basis of executive function in working memory: An fMRI study based on individual differences. Neuroimage, 21, 623–631.Google Scholar

Pollack, I., Johnson, I. B., & Knaff, P. R. (1959). Running memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 137–146.Google Scholar

Postle, B. R. (2006). Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience, 139, 23–38.Google Scholar

Ranganath, C. (2006). Working memory for visual objects: Complementary roles of inferior temporal, medial temporal, and prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience, 139(1), 277–289.Google Scholar

Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychological Review, 115, 893–912.Google Scholar

Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4–27.Google Scholar

Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1970). Independent functioning of verbal memory stores: A neuropsychological study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 261–273.Google Scholar

Smith, E. E., Geva, A., Jonides, J., Miller, A., Reuter-Lorenz, P., & Koeppe, R. A. (2001). The neural basis of task-switching in working memory: Effects of performance and aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 2095–2100.Google Scholar

Süß, H. M., Oberauer, K., Wittman, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working memory capacity explains reasoning ability – and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288.Google Scholar

Thompson, G. (1916). A hierarchy without a general factor. British Journal of Psychology, 8, 271–281.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The measurement of intelligence. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Todd, J. J., & Marois, R. (2004). Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 428, 751–754.Google Scholar

Turley-Ames, K. J., & Whitfield, M. M. (2003). Strategy training and working memory task performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 446–468.Google Scholar

Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2006a). Simple and complex memory spans and their relation to fluid abilities: Evidence from list-length effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 68–80.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2006b). A temporal-contextual retrieval account of complex span: An analysis of errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 346–362.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, A. (2010). The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: An individual differences analysis of immediate free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 240–247.Google Scholar

Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 784–775.Google Scholar

Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1969). The selective impairment of auditory verbal short-term memory. Brain, 92, 885–896.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (2005). Ability determinants of individual differences in skilled performance. In Sternberg, R. J. & Pretz, J. E. (Eds.), Cognition and intelligence: Identifying the mechanisms of the mind (pp. 142–159). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 567–589.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.Google Scholar

Arteche, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2008). The relationship of trait EI with personality, IQ and sex in a UK sample of employees. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 421–426.Google Scholar

Bara, B. G., Bucciarelli, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1995). Development of syllogistic reasoning. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 157–193.Google Scholar

Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., & Liepmann, D. (2001). Perspectives on fluid and crystallized intelligence: Facets for verbal, numerical, and figural intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(6), 977–994.Google Scholar

Beauducel, A., & Kersting, M. (2002). Fluid and crystallized intelligence and the Berlin Model of Intelligence Structure (BIS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 97–112.Google Scholar

Bilalic, M., & Campitelli, G. (2018). Studies of the activation and structural changes of the brain associated with expertise. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 233–256). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1957). Going beyond the information given. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1909). Experimental tests of higher mental processes and their relation to general intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 94–177.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13, 40–52.Google Scholar

Carlstedt, B., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Ullstadius, E. (2000). Item sequencing effects on the measurement of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 28, 145–160.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40(3), 153–193.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.Google Scholar

Chastain, R. L. (1992). Adaptive processing in complex learning and cognitive performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar

Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F. (2011). Individual differences: Their measurement and validity. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 2, pp. 117–151). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. (1988). Intelligence, task complexity and tests of sustained attention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., & Stough, C. (1996). Intelligence and inspection time: Achievements, prospects, and problems. American Psychologist, 51, 599–608.Google Scholar

Detterman, D. K. (1986). Human intelligence is a complex system of separate processes. In Sternberg, R. J. & Detterman, D. K. (Eds.), What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition (pp. 57–61). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Douven, I. (2017). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, s.v. Abduction. https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2017/entries/abductionGoogle Scholar

Elson, S. B., Hartman, R., Beatty, A., Trippe, M., Buckley, K., Bornmann, J., et al. (2018). Critical analytic thinking skills: Do they predict job-related task performance above and beyond general intelligence? Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 4(1), 9–29.Google Scholar

Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179–197.Google Scholar

Embretson, S. E. (2016). Understanding examinees’ responses to items: Implications for measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 35, 6–22.Google Scholar

Evans, J. S. B. T., & Feeney, A. (2004). The role of prior belief in reasoning. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 78–102). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, J. S. B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. N., & McDaniel, M. A. (2001). The stability of validity coefficients over time: Ackerman’s (1988) model and the General Aptitude Test Battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 60–79.Google Scholar

Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41–68). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a developmental cascade. Psychological Science, 7, 237–241.Google Scholar

Furnham, A., Crump, J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Managerial level, personality and intelligence. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 805–818.Google Scholar

Galotti, K. M., Baron, J., & Sabini, J. P. (1986). Individual differences in syllogistic reasoning: Deduction rules or mental models? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 16–25.Google Scholar

Gambrell, J. L. (2013). Effects of age and schooling on 22 ability and achievement tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45–56.Google Scholar

Gilhooly, K. J. (2004). Working memory and reasoning. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 49–77). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gobet, F., & Waters, A. J. (2003). The role of constraints in expert memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 1082–1094.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, J.-E. (1988). Hierarchical models of individual differences in cognitive abilities. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 4, pp. 35–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10, 371–388.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., & Alkire, M. T. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. NeuroImage, 25(1), 320–327.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F., & Butler, H. A. (2018). Is critical thinking a better model of intelligence? In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of human intelligence (pp. 183–196). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L. (1998). A basis for research on age differences in cognitive capabilities. In McArdle, J. J. & Woodcock, R. W. (Eds.), Human cognitive abilities in theory and practice (pp. 57–91). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Blankson, N. (2005). Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, test, and issues (vol. 2, pp. 41–68). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Masunaga, H. (2006). A merging theory of expertise and intelligence. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 587–612). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huber, C. R., & Kuncel, N. R. (2016). Does college teach critical thinking? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86, 431–468.Google Scholar

Hunt, E. B. (2010). Human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, E. B., Frost, N., & Lunneborg, C. (1973). Individual differences in cognition: A new approach to intelligence. In Bower, G. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 7, pp. 87–122). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1982). The chronometry of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 1, pp. 255–310). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (2005a). Constructive replication of the visual-perceptual-image rotation model in Thurstone’s (1941) battery of 60 tests of mental ability. Intelligence, 33, 417–430.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (2005b). The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2011). Placing inspection time, reaction time, and perceptual speed in the broader context of cognitive ability: The VPR model in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Intelligence, 39, 405–417.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Gottesman, I. I. (2006). Clarifying process versus structure in human intelligence: Stop talking about fluid and crystallized. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 136–137.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., te Nijenhuis, J., & Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (2007). Replication of the hierarchical visual-perceptual-image rotation model in de Wolff and Buiten’s (1963) battery of 46 tests of mental ability. Intelligence, 35, 69–81.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004). Mental models and reasoning. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 169–204). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Khemlani, S. S. (2013). Toward a unified theory of reasoning. Psychology of learning and motivation, 59, 1–42.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow, vol. 1. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 440–458.Google Scholar

Kuncel, N. R. (2011). Measurement and meaning of critical thinking (Research report for the NRC 21st Century Skills Workshop). Washington: National Research Council.Google Scholar

Kvist, A. V., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2008). The relation between fluid intelligence and the general factor as a function of cultural background: A test of Cattell’s investment theory. Intelligence, 36, 422–436.Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389–433.Google Scholar

Larson, G. E., Merritt, C. R., & Williams, S. E. (1988). Information processing and intelligence: Some implications of task complexity. Intelligence, 12(2), 131–147.Google Scholar

Leighton, J. P. (2004). The assessment of logical reasoning. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 291–312). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., & Roohr, K. C. (2014). Assessing critical thinking in higher education: Current state and directions for next-generation assessment. Research Report ETS RR-14-10. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 4, pp. 181–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F., & Hagen, E. (2001). Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 6). Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F., Korb, K., & Lakin, J. M. (2008). Identifying academically gifted English language learners using nonverbal tests: A comparison of the Raven, NNAT, and CogAT. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 275–296.Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F., & Lakin, J. M. (2017). Cognitive Abilities Test (Forms 7 & 8): Research handbook. Itasca, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Major, J. T., Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2012). Comparing models of intelligence in Project TALENT: The VPR model fits better than the CHC and extended Gf–Gc models. Intelligence, 40, 543–559.Google Scholar

Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (2001). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 223–247.Google Scholar

Marshalek, B. (1981). Trait and process aspects of vocabulary knowledge and verbal ability. Technical Report No. 15. Aptitude Research Project, School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar

Marshalek, B., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1983). The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence, 7(2), 107–127.Google Scholar

Martinez, M. E. (2000). Education as the cultivation of intelligence. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Naglieri, J. A. (1996). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement.Google Scholar

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408.Google Scholar

Nickerson, R. S. (2004). Teaching reasoning. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 410–442). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2012). Cognitive abilities. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology (pp. 179–224). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Salgado, J. F. (2010). Cognitive abilities. In Farr, J. & Tippins, N. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 235–275). Clifton, NJ: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2015). Education for life and work: Developing transferrable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Postlethwaite, B. E. (2011). Fluid ability, crystallized ability, and performance across multiple domains: A meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar

Primi, R. (2001). Complexity of geometric inductive reasoning tasks contribution to the understanding of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 41–70.Google Scholar

Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. L. (2006). Laboratory studies of training, skill acquisition, and retention of performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 265–286). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Raaheim, K. (1988). Intelligence and task novelty. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 4, pp. 73–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1977). Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, M. J. (1993). Human reasoning: Deductive rules or mental models, or both? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 569–589.Google Scholar

Roberts, R. D., & Stankov, L. (1999). Individual differences in speed of mental processing and human cognitive abilities: Toward a taxonomic model. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 1–120.Google Scholar

Robinson, C. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1978). Making inferences about relevance in understanding problems. In Revlin, R. & Mayer, R. E. (Eds.), Human reasoning (pp. 195–206). Washington: Halsted Press.Google Scholar

Rozeboom, W. W. (1997). Good science is abductive, not hypothetico-deductive. In Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., & Steiger, J. H. (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 335–391). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ryans, D. G. (1938). A study of the observed relationship between persistence test results, intelligence indices, and academic success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 29, 573–580.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F. (2017). Using ability tests in selection. In The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of recruitment, selection and employee retention (pp. 113–150). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar

Salthouse, T. A., Babcock, R. L., Mitchell, D. R. D., Palmon, R., & Skovronek, E. (1990). Sources of individual differences in spatial visualization ability. Intelligence, 14, 187–230.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.Google Scholar

Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 99–144). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Sechrest, L. (1963). Incremental validity: A recommendation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23, 153–158.Google Scholar

Snow, R. E., Kyllonen, P. C., & Marshalek, B. (1984). The topography of learning and ability correlations. Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, 2, 47–103.Google Scholar

Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In Linn, R. (Ed.), Educational measurement (vol. 3, pp. 263–331). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of “intelligence” and the principles of cognition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Spilsbury, G. (1992). Complexity as a reflection of the dimensionality of a task. Intelligence, 16, 31–45.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., Sá, W. C., & West, R. F. (2004). Individual differences in thinking, reasoning, and decision making. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 375–409). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2010). A framework for critical thinking, rational thinking and intelligence. In Preiss, D. D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development (pp. 195–237). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672–695.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 259–264.Google Scholar

Stenning, K., & Monaghan, P. (2004). Strategies and knowledge representation. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 129–168). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Toward a unified theory of human reasoning. Intelligence, 10, 281–314.Google Scholar

Strenze, T. (2015). Intelligence and success. In Goldstein, S., Princiotta, D., & Naglieri, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of intelligence: Evolutionary theory, historical perspective, and current concepts (pp. 405–413). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (2005). Faceted models of intelligence. In Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of measuring and understanding intelligence (pp. 313–332). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Süß, H.-M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working memory capacity explains reasoning ability – and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288.Google Scholar

Swiney, J. F. (1985). A study of executive processes in intelligence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

US Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (2018). Standard occupational classification manual. www.bls.gov/soc/2018/soc_2018_manual.pdfGoogle Scholar

Vernon, P. E. (1950). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. E. (1965). Ability factors and environmental influences. American Psychologist, 20, 723–733.Google Scholar

West, R. F., Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2008). Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 930–941.Google Scholar

Wilhelm, O. (2005). Measuring reasoning ability. In Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of measuring and understanding intelligence (pp. 373–392). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 60–82.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 567–589.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar

Arthur, W., Barret, G. V., & Alexander, R. A. (1991). Prediction of vehicular accident involvement: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 4, 89–105.Google Scholar