Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

Chapter 12 - Intellectual Giftedness

from Part III - Intelligence and Group Differences

References

Archambault, F. X., Jr., Westberg, K. L., Brown, S., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers (RM93102). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Baum, S. M. (1988). An enrichment program for gifted learning disabled students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 226–230.
Baum, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Hébert, T. P. (1995). Reversing underachievement: Creative productivity as a systematic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 224–235.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ceci, S. J., Barnett, S. M., & Kanaya, T. (2003). Developing childhood proclivities into adult competencies: The overlooked multiplier effect. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 70–92). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (pp. 109–117). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: A longitudinal study of their development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Dai, D. Y., & Renzulli, J. S. (2008). Snowflakes, living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 114–130.
Delcourt, M. A. B. (1993). Creative productivity among secondary school students: Combining energy, interest, and imagination. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 23–31.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
Dweck. C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285.
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
EricssonK. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.
Feldman, D. H., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1991). Nature's gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Frasier, M., & Passow, A. (1994). Toward a new paradigm for identifying talent potential. Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Gagne, F. (2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent development. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 67–79). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 200–209.
Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gavin, M. K., Casa, T. M., Adelson, J. L., Carroll, S. R., Sheffield, L. J., & Spinelli, A. M. (2007). Project M3: Mentoring mathematical minds: Challenging curriculum for talented elementary students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 566–585.
Gentry, M. L., & Owen, S. V. (1999). An investigation of the effects of total school flexible cluster grouping on identification, achievement, and classroom practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 224–243.
Gruber, H. E. (1986). The self-construction of the extraordinary. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 247–263). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gubbins, E. J., Housand, B., Oliver, M., Schader, R., & De Wet, C. (2007). Unclogging the mathematics pipeline through access to algebraic understanding: University of Connecticut site. Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Gustafsson, J., & Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 186–242). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Hébert, T. P. (1993). Reflections at graduation: The long-term impact of elementary school experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review, 16, 22–28.
Hébert, T. H., & Reis, S. M. (1999). Culturally diverse high-achieving students in an urban high school. Urban Education, 34, 428–457.
Housand, A., & Reis, S. M. (2009). Self-regulated learning in reading: Gifted pedagogy and instructional settings. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 108–136.
Kulik, J. A. (1993). An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives (RBDM 9204). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Kulik, C. L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415–428.
Lohman, D. F., Gambrell, J., & Lakin, J. (2008). The commonality of extreme discrepancies in the ability profiles of academically gifted students. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 269–282.
Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10 year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 718–729.
Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. M., & Moon, S. M. (Eds.). (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Phillipson, S. N., & McCann, M. (2007). Conceptions of giftedness: Sociocultural perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reis, S. M. (1998). Work left undone: Compromises and challenges of talented females. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Reis, S. M. (2002). Toward a theory of creativity in diverse creative women. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 305–316.
Reis, S. M. (2005). Feminist perspectives on talent development: A research based conception of giftedness in women. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 217–245). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Reis, S. M., & Diaz, E. I. (1999). Economically disadvantaged urban female students who achieve in school. Urban Review, 31, 31–54.
Reis, S. M., Gubbins, E. J., Briggs, C., Schreiber, F. R., Richards, S., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Reading instruction for talented readers: Case studies documenting few opportunities for continuous progress. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 309–338.
Reis, S. M., Hébert, T. P., Díaz, E. I., Maxfield, L. R., & Ratley, M. E. (1995). Case studies of talented students who achieve and underachieve in an urban high school (Research Monograph No. 95120). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152–170.
Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Coyne, M., Schreiber, F. J., Eckert, R. D., & Gubbins, E. J. (2007). Using planned enrichment strategies with direct instruction to improve reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude toward reading: An evidence-based study. Elementary School Journal, 108, 3–24.
Reis, S. M., Neu, T. W., & McGuire, J. M. (1997). Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Exceptional Children, 63, 463–479.
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness: Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (246–279). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 33–40, 57–58.
Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 217–245). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Renzulli, J. S., & Park, S. (2002). Giftedness and high school dropouts: Personal, family, and school related factors. Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2003). Conception of giftedness and its relation to the development of social capital. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 75–87). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Rogers, K. B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner (RBDM 9102). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Shavinia, L. V. (2001). Beyond IQ: A new perspective on the psychological assessment of intellectual abilities. New Ideas in Psychology, 19(1), 27–47.
Simonton, D. K. (1998). Creativity, genius, and talent development. Roeper Review 21(1), 86–87.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106, 435–457.
Simonton, D. K. (2005). Genetics of giftedness: The implications of an emergenic-epigenetic model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 312–326). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: how practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Sternberg, R. J (1997). Successful intelligence. New York, NY: Plume.
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Implicit theories of intelligence as exemplar stories of success: Why intelligence test validity is in the eye of the beholder. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(1), 159–167.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). WICS as a model of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 109–137.
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59, 325–338.
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The WISC model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 327–342). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., Ferrari, M., Clinkenbeard, P. R., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1996). Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children: A construct validation of a triarchic model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 129–137.
SternbergR. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Teaching for successful intelligence. To increase student learning and achievement. Arlington Heights, IL: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ferrari, M., & Clinkenbeard, P. (1999). A triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(1), 1–11.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.
Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (Eds.). (1994). Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 343–357). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1991). The social psychology of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp, 27–44). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Taylor, L. A. (1992). The effects of the Secondary Enrichment Triad Model and a career counseling component on the career development of vocational-technical school students. Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Terman, L. M. (1925–1959). Genetic studies of genius (5 vols.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Terman, L. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children (Vol. I, 2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Tieso, C. L. (2002). The effects of grouping and curricular practices on intermediate students’ math achievement (RM02154). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Jr., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms. (RM93104). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.