Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:13:03.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Instructional Feedback in Medical Education

from Part II - Domain-Specific Feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2018

By
Joan Sargeant  and
Christopher Watling
Edited by
Anastasiya A. Lipnevich  and
Jeffrey K. Smith
Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
Affiliation:
Queens College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York
Jeffrey K. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback , pp. 289 - 312
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. (2016). Common Program Requirements. Retrieved from www.acgme.org.Google Scholar
Archer, J. C. (2010). State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Medical Education, 44, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. (2015). Graduation Questionnaire National Report. Retrieved from www.afmc.ca/sites/default/files/documents/en/Publications/AFMC%20Graduation%20Questionnaire%20National%20Report%202015.pdf.Google Scholar
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238.Google Scholar
Barclay, L. J., Skarlicki, D. P., & Pugh, S. D. (2005). Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 629–643.Google Scholar
Bates, J., Konkin, J., Suddards, C., Dobson, S., & Pratt, D. (2013). Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Medical Education, 47, 362–374.Google Scholar
Bing-You, R. G., & Paterson, J. (1997). Feedback falling on deaf ears: Residents’ receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Medical Teacher, 19, 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boud, D., Keough, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brett, J. F., & Atwater, L. E. (2001). 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930–942.Google Scholar
Cantillon, P., & Sargeant, J. (2008). Giving feedback in clinical settings. British Medical Journal, 337, a1961.Google Scholar
Carraccio, C., Englander, R., Gilhooly, J., Mink, R., Hofkosh, D., Barone, M. A., & Holmboe, E. S. (2016). Building a framework of entrustable professional activities, supported by competencies and milestones, to bridge the educational continuum. Academic Medicine, 92. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, R. B., & Detsky, A. S. (2011). The education and training of future physicians: Why coaches can’t be judges. Journal of the American Medical Association, 306, 993–994.Google Scholar
Davis, D. A., Mazmanian, P. E., Fordis, M., Van Harrison, R., Thorpe, K. E., & Perrier, L. (2006). Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 1094–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeNisi, A., & Kluger, A. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management, 14, 129–139.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, S. E. (2004). The five-stage model of adult skills acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 24, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudek, N., Marks, M., & Regher, G. (2005). Failure to fail: The perspectives of clinical supervisors. Academic Medicine, 80(Suppl. 10), S84–S87.Google Scholar
Duffield, K. E., & Spencer, J. A. (2002). A survey of medical students’ views about the purposes and fairness of assessment. Medical Education, 36, 879–886.Google Scholar
Ende, J. (1983). Feedback in clinical medical education. Journal of the American Medical Association, 250, 777–781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 79(Suppl. 10), S70–S81.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15, 988–999.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2015). Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise: A perspective from the expert-performance approach with deliberate practice. Academic Medicine, 90, 1471–1486.Google Scholar
Eva, K. W., Armson, H., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Loney, E., Mann, K., & Sargeant, J. (2012). Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: On the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17, 15–26.Google Scholar
Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2005). Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine, 80(Suppl. 10), S46–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2008). “I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self assessment. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, J. R., Snell, L. S., Cate, O. T., Holmboe, E. S., Carraccio, C., Swing, S. R., … & Harris, K. A. (2010). Competency-based medical education: Theory to practice. Medical Teacher, 32, 638–645.Google Scholar
Gabbard, G. O., & Westen, D. (2003). Rethinking therapeutic action. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84(Part 4), 823–841.Google Scholar
Gawande, A. (2011, October 3). Personal best: Top athletes and singers have coaches. Should you? The New Yorker.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. (2009). The Educational Kanban: Promoting effective self-directed adult learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 84, 927–934.Google Scholar
Goodstone, M., & Diamante, T. (1998). Organizational use of therapeutic change: Strengthening multisource feedback systems through interdisciplinary coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 50, 152–163.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Heen, S., & Stone, D. (2014). Managing yourself – finding the coaching in criticism: The right way to receive feedback. Harvard Business Review, 92(1–2), 108–111.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 269–274.Google Scholar
Hirsh, D., Walters, L., & Poncelet, A. N. (2012). Better learning, better doctors, better delivery system: Possibilities from a case study of longitudinal integrated clerkships. Medical Teacher, 34, 548–554.Google Scholar
Hodges, B. D. (2010). A tea-steeping or i-Doc model of medical education? Academic Medicine, 85(Suppl. 9), S34–S44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmboe, E. S. (2004). Faculty and the observation of trainees’ clinical skills: Problems and opportunities. Academic Medicine, 79, 16–22.Google Scholar
Holmboe, E. S. (2015). Realizing the promise of competency-based medical education. Academic Medicine, 90, 411–413.Google Scholar
Iobst, W. F., Sherbino, J., Cate, O. T., Richardson, D. L., Dath, D., Swing, S. R., … & Frank, J. R. (2010). Competency-based medical education in postgraduate medical education. Medical Teacher, 32, 651–656.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1998). Feedback interventions towards an understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 7(3), 67–72.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & Van Dijk, D. (2010). Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Medical Education, 44, 1166–1174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kogan, J. R., Holmboe, E. S., & Hauer, K. E. (2009). Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302, 1316–1326.Google Scholar
LaDonna, K., Hatala, R., Lingard, L., Voyer, S., & Watling, C. (2017). Staging a performance: Learners’ perceptions about direct observation during residency. Medical Education (in press).Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefroy, J., Watling, C., Teunissen, P. W., & Brand, P. (2015). Guidelines on feedback for clinical education: The dos, don’ts, and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspectives in Medical Education, 4, 284–299.Google Scholar
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. (2016). Functions and structure of a medical school: Standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. Retrieved from www.lcme.org.Google Scholar
Lockyer, J., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Holmboe, E., Loney, E., … & Sargeant, J. (2011). Feedback data sources that inform physician self assessment. Medical Teacher, 33(2), e113–e120.Google Scholar
Lye, P. S., Biernat, K. A., Bragg, D. S., & Simpson, D. (2001). A pleasure to work with: An analysis of written comments on student evaluations. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 1, 128–131.Google Scholar
Madan, R., Conn, D., Dubo, E., Voore, P., & Wiesenfeld, L. (2012). The enablers and barriers to the use of direct observation of trainee clinical skills by supervising faculty in a psychiatry residency program. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 57, 269–272.Google Scholar
Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Science Education, 14, 595–621.Google Scholar
Mann, K., van der Vleuten, C., Eva, K., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., … & Sargeant, J. (2011). Tensions in informed self-assessment: How the desire for feedback and reticence to collect/use it create conflict. Academic Medicine, 86, 1120–1127.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mattar, S. G., Alseidi, A. A., Jones, D. B., Jeyarajah, D. R., Swanstrom, L. L., Aye, R. W., … & Minter, R. M. (2013). General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: Results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Annals of Surgery, 258, 440–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2013). Changing conceptions of feedback. In Boud, D. & Molloy, E. (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 11–33). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn (studies of the person). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
Ross, V., Mauksch, L., Huntington, J., & Beard, J. M. (2012). Interdisciplinary direct observation: Impact on precepting, residents, and faculty. Family Medicine, 44, 318–324.Google ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. (2011). General standards of accreditation applicable to all residency programs. Retrieved from www.royalcollege.ca.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Holmboe, E., Eva, K., … & Loney, E. (2010). Processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: A conceptual model. Academic Medicine, 85, 1212–1220.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Armson, H., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Mann, K., Silver, I., … & Boudreau, M. (2016). Evidence-informed facilitated feedback: The R2C2 feedback model. MedEdPORTAL Publications, 12, 10387. Retrieved from www.mededportal.org/publication/10387/.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Eva, K. W., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Holmboe, E., … & van der Vleuten, C. (2011). Features of assessment learners use for informed self-assessments of clinical performance. Medical Education, 45, 636–647.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Lockyer, J., Mann, K., Holmboe, E., Silver, I., Armson, H., … & Power, M. (2015). Facilitated reflective performance feedback: Developing an evidence- and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Academic Medicine, 90, 1698–1706.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., & Ferrier, S. (2005). Exploring family physicians’ reactions to multisource feedback: Perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Medical Education, 39, 497–504.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Science Education, 13, 275–288.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2009). Reflection: A link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Advances in Health Science Education Theory Practice, 3, 399–410.Google Scholar
Telio, S., Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2015). The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Academic Medicine, 90(5), 609–614.Google Scholar
Telio, S., Regehr, G., & Ajjawi, R. (2016). Feedback and the educational alliance: Examining credibility judgments and their consequences. Medical Education, 509, 933–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Cate, O., & Scheele, F. (2007). Competency-based postgraduate training: Can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Academic Medicine, 82, 542–547.Google Scholar
Teunissen, P., Stapel, D., van der Vleuten, C., Scherpbier, A., Boor, K., & Scheele, F. (2009). Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents’ feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Academic Medicine, 84, 910–917.Google Scholar
Van Niewerburgh, C. (2012). Coaching in education: Getting better results for students, educators and parents. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
Voyer, S., Cuncic, C., Butler, D. L., MacNeil, K., Watling, C., & Hatala, R. (2016). Investigating conditions for meaningful feedback in the context of an evidence-based feedback program. Medical Education, 50, 943–954.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Watling, C. (2016). The uneasy alliance of assessment and feedback. Perspectives in Medical Education, 5, 262–264.Google Scholar
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C., & Lingard, L. (2014). Learning culture and feedback: An international study of medical athletes and musicians. Medical Education, 48, 713–723.Google Scholar
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C., Vanstone, M., & Lingard, L. (2012a). Understanding feedback responses: The potential and limitations of regulatory focus theory. Medical Education, 46, 593–602.Google Scholar
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C., Vanstone, M., & Lingard, L. (2013). Music lessons: Revealing medicine’s learning culture through comparison with that of music. Medical Education, 47, 842–850.Google Scholar
Watling, C., LaDonna, K., Lingard, L., Voyer, S., & Hatala, R. (2016b). “Sometimes the work just needs to be done”: Sociocultural influences on direct observation in medical training. Medical Education, 50, 1054–1064.Google Scholar
Watling, C. J., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C., & Lingard, L. (2012b). Learning from clinical work: The roles of learning cues and credibility judgments. Medical Education, 46, 192–200.Google Scholar
Watling, C. J., Kenyon, C. F., Schulz, V., Goldszmidt, M. A., Zibrowski, E., & Lingard, L. (2010). An exploration of faculty perspectives on the in-training evaluation of residents. Academic Medicine, 85, 1157–1162.Google Scholar
Watling, C. J., Kenyon, C., Zibrowski, E., Schulz, V., Singh, I, Goldszmidt, M., … & Lingard, L. (2008). Rules of engagement: Residents’ perceptions of the in-training evaluation process. Academic Medicine, 83(Suppl. 10), S97–S100.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×