ACT, Inc. (2017). ACT Tessera social and emotional learning assessment: Comprehensive theory of action. Retrieved from: https://pages2.act.org/rs/035-EZR-959/images/Tessera_Theory_of_Action.pdf?aliId=62500134.Google Scholar

Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar

Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.Google Scholar

Belfield, C., Bowden, A. B., Klapp, A., Levin, H., Shand, R., & Zander, S. (2015). The economic value of social and emotional learning. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 6, 508–544.Google Scholar

Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health behaviors: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 887–919.Google Scholar

Brackett, M. A., & Rivers, S. E. (2014). Transforming students’ lives with social and emotional learning. In Pekrun, R. & Linnebrink-Gracia, L. (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

CASEL. (2015). Effective social and emotional learning programs: Middle and high school edition. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. Retrieved from: https://casel.org/middle-and-high-school-edition-casel-guide/.Google Scholar

CASEL. (2017). What is SEL? Retrieved from: https://casel.org/what-is-sel/.Google Scholar

Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. New York: Conference Board. Retrieved from www.conference-board.org/pdf_free/BED-06-Workforce.pdf.Google Scholar

Character Lab. (2017). Character Growth Card. Retrieved from https://cdn.characterlab.org/assets/Character-Growth-Card-cad815b0b3ba79c794bcfd3a89e2a8d5ac3057963fff02cee539d8d9af1b9777.pdf.Google Scholar

Conley, D. T., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Creating systems of assessment for deeper learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.Google Scholar

Corcoran, R. P., Cheung, A., Kim, E., & Chen, X. (2017). Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Educational Research Review. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.12.001.Google Scholar

Damian, R. I., Su, R., Shanahan, M., Trautwein, U., & Roberts, B. W. (2014). Can personality traits and intelligence compensate for background disadvantage? Predicting status attainment in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 473–489.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Whalley, L. J., & Starr, J. M. (2003). IQ at age 11 and longevity: Results from a follow-up of the Scottish Mental Survey 1932. In Finch, C. E., Robine, J.-M., & Christen, Y. (Eds.), Brain and longevity: Perspectives in longevity (pp. 153–164). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H.-P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programs. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129.Google Scholar

Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44, 237–251.Google Scholar

Dunesbury, L., Weissberg, R. P., Goren, P., & Domitrovich, C. (2014). State standards to advance social and emotional learning: Findings from CASEL’s state scan of social and emotional learning standards, preschool through high school, 2014. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. Retrieved from www.casel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/casel-brief-on-state-standards-january-2014.pdf.Google Scholar

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal intervention. Child Development, 82, 405–432.Google Scholar

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 294–309.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Retrieved from www.nap.edu/download/10022.Google Scholar

Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2009). Changing the subject: The educational implications of developing emotional wellbeing. Oxford Review of Education, 35, 371–389.Google Scholar

Elias, M. J., Ferrito, J. J., & Moceri, D. C. (2016 ). The other side of the report card: Assessing students’ social, emotional, and character development. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ge, X., & Conger, R. D. (1999). Adjustment problems and emerging personality characteristics from early to late adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 429–459.Google Scholar

Haller, E. P., Child, D. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1988). Can comprehension be taught? A quantitative synthesis of “metacognitive” studies. Educational Researcher, 17, 5–8.Google Scholar

Hart Research Associates. (2010). Raising the bar: Employers’ views on college learning in the wake of the economic downturn. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2009_EmployerSurvey.pdf.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 7–77.Google Scholar

Hezlett, S., Kuncel, N., Vey, M., Ahart, A., Ones, D., Campbell, J., & Camara, W. (2001). The effectiveness of the SAT in predicting success early and late in college: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar

Hooper, A. C., Cullen, M. J., & Sackett, P. R. (2006). Operational threats to the use of situational judgment tests: Faking, coaching, and retesting issues. In Weekley, J. and Ployhart, R. (Eds.), Situational judgment tests (pp. 205–323). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

James, W. (1981). The principles of psychology. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1890.)Google Scholar

Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Adams, R., Perry, D. G., Workman, K. A., Furdella, J. Q., & Egan, S. K. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relationships in early adolescents: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 224–251.Google Scholar

John, O. P., & De Fruyt, F. D. (2015). Framework for the Longitudinal Study of Social and Emotional Skills in Cities. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/CERI/CD(2015)13&docLanguage=En.Google Scholar

Johnston, P. H. (2012). Opening minds. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.Google Scholar

Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Hoglund, W. L. G., & Aber, J. L. (2010). A school-randomized clinical trial of an integrated social-emotional learning and literacy intervention: Impacts after 1 school year. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 829–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541.Google Scholar

Kautz, T., Heckman, J. J., Diris, R., ter Weel, B. T., & Borghans, L. (2014). Fostering and measuring skills: Improving noncognitive skills to promote lifetime success. OECD, Educational and Social Progress. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/Fostering-and-Measuring-Skills-Improving-Cognitive-and-Non-Cognitive-Skills-to-Promote-Lifetime-Success.pdf.Google Scholar

Kelley, T. L. (1927). The interpretation of educational measurements. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book.Google Scholar

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar

Kobrin, J. L., Patterson, B. F., Shaw, E. J., Mattern, K. D., & Barbuti, S. M. (2008). Validity of the SAT® for predicting first-year college grade point average. College Board Research Rep. No. 2008-5. New York: College Board.Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., Lipnevich, A. A., Burrus, J., & Roberts, R. D. (2014). Personality, motivation, and college readiness: A prospectus for assessment and development. ETS Research Report Series, 2014, 1–48.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., McCallen, L. N., Miles, K. P., & Smith, J. K. (2014). Mind the gap! Students’ use of exemplars and detailed rubrics as formative assessment in writing. Instructional Science, 42, 539–559.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., Preckel, F., & Roberts, R. D. (2016). Psychosocial constructs: Knowns, unknowns, and future directions. In Lipnevich, A. A., Preckel, F., and Roberts, R. D. (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice. Springer.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 319–333.Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J. (2010). Final topic assessment rubric. Social and emotional learning standards rubric assessment system and the scales, the handbook, and implementation. Unpublished documents prepared for the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL).Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J. (2015). Using formative assessment with SEL skills. In Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Gullotta, T. P. (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 336–347). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Mattern, K. D., & Patterson, B. F. (2011).The validity of the SAT for predicting fourth-year grades: 2006 SAT validity sample. College Board Statistical Report 2011-7. New York: College Board.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.Google Scholar

National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Report by the Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Payton, J., Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., Schellinger, K. B., & Pachan, M. (2008). The positive impact of social and emotional learning for kindergarten to eighth-grade students: Findings from three scientific reviews. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. Retrieved from www.casel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/PDF-4-the-positive-impact-of-social-and-emotional-learning-for-kindergarten-to-eighth-grade-students-executive-summary.pdf.Google Scholar

Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.Google Scholar

Primi, R., Santos, D., John, O. P., & De Fruyt, F. (2016). Development of an inventory assessing social and emotional skills in Brazilian youth. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 5–16.Google Scholar

Robbins, S. B., Allen, J., Casillas, A., Peterson, C. H., & Le, H. (2006). Unraveling the differential effects of motivational and skills, social, and self-management measures from traditional predictors of college outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 598–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288.Google Scholar

Robbins, S. B., Oh, I., Lee, H., & Buton, C. (2009). Intervention effects on college performance and retention as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors: Integrated meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1163–1184.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R, Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Walton, K., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.Google Scholar

Roberts, R. D., Martin, J. E., & Olaru, G. (2015). A Rosetta stone for noncognitive skills: Understanding, assessing, and enhancing noncognitive skills in primary and secondary education. Asia Society and Professional Examination Service. Retrieved from: https://pages2.act.org/rosetta-stone-for-noncognitive-skills.html.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.Google Scholar

Schonfeld, D. J., Adams, R. E., Fredstrom, B. K., Weissberg, R. P., Gilman, R., Voyce, C., Tomlin, R., & Speese-Linehan, D. (2015). Cluster-randomized trial demonstrating impact on academic achievement of elementary social emotional learning. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 406–420.Google Scholar

Schunk, D. H. (2008). Cognition and instruction. In Learning theories: An educational perspective (pp. 278–323). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th edn.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2005). An IRT approach to constructing and scoring pairwise preference items involving stimuli on different dimensions: An application to the problem of faking in personality assessment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 184–201.Google Scholar

Stemler, S. E. (2012). What should university admissions tests predict? Educational Psychologist, 47, 5–17.Google Scholar

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, R. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88, 1156–1171.Google Scholar

Walton, K. E., & Billera, K. A. (2016). Personality development during the school-aged years: Implications for theory, research, and practice. In Lipnevich, A. A., Preckel, F., & Roberts, R. D. (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don’t students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Ziegler, M., MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. D. (Eds.) (2011). New perspectives on faking in personality assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zins, J., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does research say? New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar