Åfarli, T. 1994. A Promotion Analysis of Restrictive Relative Clauses. The Linguistic Review 11, 81–100.Google Scholar

Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., and Choueiri, L.. 2010. The Syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Albirini, A. 2014. Toward Understanding the Variability in the Language Proficiencies of Arabic Heritage Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 18(6), 730–765.Google Scholar

Albirini, A. and Benmamoun, E.. 2015. Factors Affecting the Retention of Sentential Negation in Heritage Egyptian Arabic. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8(3), 470–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albirini, A., Benmamoun, E., and Chakrani, B.. 2013. Gender and Number Agreement in the Oral Production of Arabic Heritage Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 1–18.Google Scholar

Albirini, A., Benmamoun, E., and Saadah, E.. 2011. Grammatical Features of Egyptian and Palestinian Arabic Heritage Speakers’ Oral Production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45, 273–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arad, M. 2003. Roots and Patterns. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Au, T., Knightly, L., Jun, S., and Oh, J.. 2002. Overhearing a Language during Childhood. Psychological Science 13, 238–243.Google Scholar

Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E. 2000. The Feature Structure of Functional Categories: A Comparative Study of Arabic Dialects. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E. 2017. VSO Word Order, Primarily in Arabic Languages. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Bhatia, A., and Polinsky, M.. 2009. Closest Conjunct Agreement in Head Final Languages. In van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen (ed.), Linguistic Variation Yearbook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 67–88.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers: Opportunities and Challenges for Linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39, 129–181.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Albirini, A., Montrul, S., and Saadah, E.. 2014. Arabic Plurals and Root and Pattern Morphology in Palestinian and Egyptian Heritage Speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(1), 89–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Abunasser, M., Al-Sabbagh, R., Bidaoui, A., and Shalash, D.. 2014. The Location of Sentential Negation in Arabic Varieties. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 5, 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bock, J. K., Nicol, J., and Cutting, J. C.. 1999. The Ties That Bind: Creating Number Agreement in Speech. Journal of Memory and Language 40, 330–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolonyai, A. 2007. (In)vulnerable Agreement in Incomplete Bilingual L1 Learners. The International Journal of Bilingualism 11, 3–21.Google Scholar

Borer, H. 2005a. Structuring Sense: Vol. 1. In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Borer, H. 2005b. Structuring Sense: Vol. 2. The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Borer, H. 2013. Structuring Sense: Vol. 3. Taking Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brame, M. 1968. A New Analysis of the Relative Clause: Evidence for an Interpretive Theory. Unpublished ms., MIT.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1977. ‘On wh-Movement.’ In Culicover, P. et al. (eds.), Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 71–132.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In Martin, R. et al. (eds.), Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2019. Some Puzzling Foundational Issues: The Reading Program. Catalan Journal of Linguistics Special Issue, 263–285.Google Scholar

Fassi Fehri, A. 1993. Issues in the Structure of Arabic Clauses and Words. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Godson, L. 2004. Phonetics of Language Attrition: Vowel Production and Articulatory Setting in the Speech of Western Armenian Heritage Speakers. Ph.D. dissertation, UCSD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Håkansson, G. 1995. Syntax and Morphology of Language Attrition: A Study of Five Bilingual Expatriate Swedes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 5, 153–171.Google Scholar

Halle, M. and Marantz, A.. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111–176.Google Scholar

Hornstein, N. 2018. The Minimalist Program after 25 Years. Annual Review of Linguistics 4, 49–65.Google Scholar

Jelinek, E. 1981. On Defining Categories: Aux and Predicate in EgyptianGoogle Scholar

Colloquial Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Keenan, E. and Comrie, B.. 1977. Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 63–99.Google Scholar

Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2009. Binding Interpretations of Anaphors by Korean Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 16, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopman, H. and Szabolcsi, A.. 2000. Verbal Complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Larsson, I and Johannessen, J. B.. 2015. Embedded Word Order in Heritage Scandinavian. In Hilpert, M., Östman, J.-O., Mertzlufft, C., and Riessler, M. (eds.), New Trends in Nordic and General Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 239–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, J. 1979. Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. 1981. A Prosodic Theory of Nonconcatenative Morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12(3), 373–418.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. and Prince, A.. 1990. Foot and Word in Prosodic Morphology: The Arabic Broken Plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 209–283.Google Scholar

Mohammad, M. 1988. On the Parallelism between IP and DP. In Borer, H. (ed.), Proceedings of WCCFL VII. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 241–254.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2010. How Similar are L2 Learners and Heritage Speakers? Spanish Clitics and Word Order. Applied Psycholinguistics 31, 167–207.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oh, J. S., Au, T. K.-F., and Jun, S.-A.. 2010. Early Childhood Language Memory in the Speech Perception of International Adoptees. Journal of Child Language 37, 1123–1132.Google Scholar

Oh, J., Jun, S., Knightly, L., and Au, T. K.-F.. 2003. Holding on to Childhood Language Memory. Cognition 86, B53–B64.Google Scholar

Omar, M. 1973. The Acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a Native Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. 2011. Reanalysis in Adult Heritage Language: A Case for Attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 305–328.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polinsky, M. and Scontras, G.. 2020. Understanding Heritage Languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23, 4–20.Google Scholar

Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.Google Scholar

Saadah, E. 2011. The production of Arabic Vowels by English L2 Learners and Heritage Speakers of Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Sherkina-Lieber, M. and Murasugi, K.. 2015. Noun Incorporation and Case in Heritage Inuktitut. In S. Vinerte (ed.) Proceedings of the 2015 Canadian Linguistic Association Annual Conference.Google Scholar

Shlonsky, U. 1997. Clause Structure and Word Order in Hebrew and Arabic: An Essay in Comparative Semitic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shlonsky, U. 2004. The Form of Semitic Noun Phrases. Lingua 114(12), 1465–1526.Google Scholar

Soltan, U. 2007. On Formal Feature Licensing in Minimalism: Aspects of Standard Arabic Morphosyntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.Google Scholar

Sorace, A. 2004. Native Language Attrition and Developmental Instability at the Syntax-Discourse Interface: Data, Interpretations and Methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2), 143–145.Google Scholar

Unsworth, S. 2016. Quantity and Quality of Language Input in Bilingual Language Development. In Nicoladis, E. and Montanari, S. (eds.), Lifespan Perspectives on Bilingualism. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 136–196.Google Scholar

Vergnaud, J. R. 1974. French Relative Clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Yip, V. and Mathews, S.. 2007. The Bilingual Child: Early Development and Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ambridge, B. 2010. Review of Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition: Defining the Limits of Frequency as an Explanatory Concept, ed. by I. Gülzow & N. Gagarina. Journal of Child Language 37, 453–475.Google Scholar

Ambridge, B. and Kidd, E.. 2015. The Ubiquity of Frequency Effects. Journal of Child Language 42, 239–273.Google Scholar

Baker, C. 2014. A Parents’ and Teachers’ Guide to Bilingualism. Clarendon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. and Schlesewsky, M.. 2009. The Role of Prominence Information in the Real-Time Comprehension of Transitive Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Approach. Language and Linguistics Compass 3, 19–58.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. 2002. Sequentiality as the Basis of Constituent Structure. In Givón, T. and Malle, B. (eds.), The Evolution of Language Out of Pre-Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 109–134.Google Scholar

Chien, Y.-C. and Wexler, K.. 1990. Children’s Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1, 225–295.Google Scholar

Cho, S. 1999. The Acquisition of Relative Clauses: Experimental Studies on Korean. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar

Clackson, K., Felser, C., and Clahsen, H.. 2011. Children’s Processing of Reflexives and Pronouns in English: Evidence for Eye-Movements during Listening. Journal of Memory and Language 65, 128–144.Google Scholar

Clifton, C. and Frazier, L.. 1989. Comprehending Sentences with Long-distance Dependencies. In Carlson, G. and Tanenhaus, M. (eds.), Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 273–317.Google Scholar

Conroy, A., Takahashi, E., Lidz, J., and Phillips, C.. 2009. Equal Treatment for All Antecedents: How Children Succeed with Principle B. Linguistic Inquiry 40, 446–486.Google Scholar

Crain, S., Goro, T., and Thornton, R.. 2006. Language Acquisition Is Language Change. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35, 31–49.Google Scholar

Deen, K. 2011. The Acquisition of the Passive. In de Villiers, J. and Roeper, T. (eds.), Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition. New York: Springer, 155–187.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. 2002. Reflections on Frequency Effects in Language Processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 297–339.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. 2016. Frequency in Language Learning and Language Change. In Behrens, H. and Pfänder, S. (eds.), Experience Counts: Frequency Effects in Language. Berlin: de Gruyter, 239–256.Google Scholar

Genesee, F. 2007. A Short Guide to Raising Children Bilingually. Multilingual Living Magazine 2, 18–21.Google Scholar

Goodluck, H. and Stojanovic, D.. 1996.The Structure and Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Serbo-Croatian. Language Acquisition 5, 285–315.Google Scholar

Grodzinsky, Y. 2000. The Neurology of Syntax: Language Use without Broca’s Area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23, 1–71.Google Scholar

Gülzow, I. and Gagarina, N.. 2007. Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition: Defining the Limits of Frequency as an Explanatory Concept. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hart, B. and Risley, T.. 1995. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. 2014. Cross-linguistic Variation and Efficiency. Oxford: OxfordGoogle Scholar

Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., Rumiche, R., Señor, M., and Parra, M., 2012. Dual Language Exposure and Early Bilingual Development. Journal of Child Language 39, 1–27.Google Scholar

Hsu, C.-C., Hermon, G., and Zukowski, A.. 2009. Young Children’s Production of Head-Final Relative Clauses: Elicited Production Data from Chinese Children. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18, 323–360.Google Scholar

Huh, Sorin. 2015. A Corpus Study of L2 Korean Relative Clause Development. Language Research 51, 845–868.Google Scholar

Jaeggli, O. 1980. Remarks on to-contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 239–245.Google Scholar

Jeon, K. S. and Kim, H.-Y.. 2007. Development of Relativization in Korean as a Foreign Language: The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy in Head-internal and Head-external Relative Clause. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, S. 2014. The Role of Syntactic and Semantic Information in the Frequency Distribution of Relative Clauses in Korean: A Corpus-based Analysis. Language Information 19, 5–32.Google Scholar

Keenan, E. and Comrie, B.. 1977. Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 63–100.Google Scholar

Kim, C.-E. and O’Grady, W.. 2016. Asymmetries in Children’s Production of Relative Clauses: Data from English and Korean. Journal of Child Language 42, 1038–1071.Google Scholar

Kim, H.-S. 2005. Processing Strategies and Transfer of Heritage and Non-heritage Learners of Korean. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of East Asian Languages and Literatures, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar

Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2009. Binding Interpretations of Anaphors by Korean Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 16, 3–35.Google Scholar

Kwon, N., Polinsky, M., and Kluender, R.. 2006. Subject Preference in Korean. In Baumer, D., Montero, D., and Scanlon, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 1–14.Google Scholar

Kwon, N., Lee, Y., Gordon, P., and Kluender, R.. 2010. Cognitive and Linguistic Factors Affecting Subject/Object Asymmetry: An Eye-tracking Study of Prenominal Relative Clauses in Korean. Language 86, 546–582.Google Scholar

Lee-Ellis, S. 2009. The Development and Validation of a Korean C-Test Using Rasch Analysis. Language Testing 26, 245–274.Google Scholar

Lee-Ellis, S. 2011. The Elicited Production of Korean Relative Clauses by Heritage Speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 57–89.Google Scholar

Lohndal, T., Rothman, J., Kupisch, T., and Westergaard, M.. 2019. Heritage Language Acquisition: What It Reveals and Why It Is Important for Formal Linguistic Theories. Language and Linguistics Compass 13, https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12357Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1843. A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: Longmans, Green and Co..Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nevins, A., Pesetsky, D., and Rodrigues, C.. 2009. Pirahã Exceptionality: A Reassessment. Language 85, 355–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicol, J. and Swinney, D.. 1989. The Role of Structure in Coreference Assignment during Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18, 5–19.Google Scholar

O’Grady, W. 2008. Does Emergentism Have a Chance? In Chan, H., Jacob, H., and Kapia, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 16–35.Google Scholar

O’Grady, W. 2013. The Illusion of Language Acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3, 253–285.Google Scholar

O’Grady, W. 2015a. Anaphora and the Case for Emergentism. In MacWhinney, B. and O’Grady, W. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell, 100–122,Google Scholar

O’Grady, W. 2015b. Processing Determinism. Language Learning 65, 6–32.Google Scholar

O’Grady, W., Lee, M., and Choo, M.. 2001. The Acquisition of Relative Clauses by Heritage and Non-heritage Learners of Korean as a Second Language: A Comparative Study. Journal of Korean Language Education 12, 283–294.Google Scholar

O’Grady, W., Lee, M., and Choo, M.. 2003. A Subject-Object Asymmetry in the Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Korean as a Second Language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, 433–448.Google Scholar

O’Grady, W., Lee, M., and Kwak, H.. 2009. Emergentism and Second Language Acquisition. In Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T. (eds.), The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Bingley: Emerald Press, 69–88.Google Scholar

Pearson, B., Fernández, S., Lewedeg, V., and Oller, D.. 1997. The Relation of Input Factors to Lexical Learning by Bilingual Infants. Applied Psycholinguistics 18, 41–58.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. 2011. Reanalysis in Adult Heritage Language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 305–332.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. and Scontras, G.. 2019. Understanding Heritage Languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22, in press.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. and Chomsky, N.. 2018. Towards Eliminating Arbitrary Stipulations Related to Parameters: Linguistic Innateness and the Variation Model. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8, 764–769.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. and Slabakova, R.. 2018. The Generative Approach to SLA and Its Place in Modern Second Language Studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40, 417–442.Google Scholar

Roy, D. 2009. New Horizons in the Study of Child Language Acquisition. Proceedings of Interspeech 2009. Brighton. Retrieved from http://dkroy.media.mit.edu/publications/Google Scholar

Scontras, G., Fuchs, Z., and Polinsky, M.. 2015. Heritage Language and Linguistic Theory. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences 6, 1–20.Google Scholar

Song, M., O’Grady, W., Cho, S., and Lee, M.. 1997. The Learning and Teaching of Korean in Community Schools. In Kim, Y.-H. (ed.), Korean language in America 2. American Association of Teachers of Korean, 111–127.Google Scholar

Townsend, D. and Bever, T.. 2001. Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Traxler, M., Morris, R., and Seely, R.. 2002. Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47, 69–90.Google Scholar

Van de Weijer, J. 2002. How Much Does an Infant Hear in a Day? Proceedings of the GALA2001 Conference on Language Acquisition, 2002. Retrieved from http://person2.sol.lu.se/JoostVanDeWeijer/Texts/gala01.pdfGoogle Scholar

van Rij, J., van Rijn, J., and Hendriks, P.. 2010. Language Acquisition: A Case Study in Pronoun Comprehension. Journal of Child Language 37, 731–766.Google Scholar

Warren, P., Speer, S., and Schafer, A.. 2003. Wanna-contraction and Prosodic Disambiguation in US and NZ English. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 15, 31–49.Google Scholar

Wells, C. 1985. Language Development in the Pre-school Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Yun, J., Chen, Z., Hunter, T., Whitman, J., and Hale, J.. 2015. Uncertainty in Processing Relative Clauses across East Asian Languages. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 24, 113–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zukowski, A. 2009. Elicited Production of Relative Clauses in Children with Williams Syndrome. Language and Cognition Processes 24, 1–42.Google Scholar

Alim, H. S., Rickford, J., and Ball, A. (eds.) 2016. Raciolinguistics. How Language Shapes Our Ideas about Race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alvord, S. and Rogers, B.. 2014. Miami Cuban Spanish Vowels in Contact. Sociolinguistic Studies 8(1), 139–170.Google Scholar

Anderson, B. R. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. 1999. Loss of Gender Agreement in L1 Attrition: Preliminary Results. Bilingual Research Journal 23(4), 389–408.Google Scholar

Anya, U. 2016. Realized Identities in Second Language Learning: Speaking Blackness in Brazil. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Avineri, N. 2012. Heritage Language Socialization Practices in Secular Yiddish Educational Contexts: The Creation of a Metalinguistic Community. Doctoral Dissertation, UCLA. Retrieved from www.bjpa.org/content/upload/bjpa/c__c/Avineri-%20Heritage%20Language%20Socialization.pdf.Google Scholar

Avineri, N. 2017. Contested Stance Practices in Secular Yiddish Metalinguistic Communities: Negotiating Closeness and Distance. Journal of Jewish Languages 5(2), 174–199.Google Scholar

Avineri, N. 2019. The ‘Heritage Narratives’ of Yiddish Metalinguistic Community Members. In Falconi, E. and Garber, K. (eds.), The Tales We Tell: Storytelling and Narrative Practice. Leiden: Brill Publishers.Google Scholar

Avineri, N. and Kroskrity, P. V.. 2014. On the (Re-)Production and Representation of Endangered Language Communities: Social Boundaries and Temporal Borders. In Avineri, N. and Kroskrity, P. V. (eds.), Reconceptualizing Endangered Language Communities: Crossing Borders and Constructing Boundaries. [Special Issue]. Language & Communication 38(1), 1–7.Google Scholar

Avni, S. 2012. Hebrew as Heritage: The Work of Language in Religious and Communal Continuity. Linguistics and Education 23(3), 323–333.Google Scholar

Back, M. and Zavala, V. (eds.) 2019. Racialization and Language: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from Peru. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bale, J. 2010. Arabic As a Heritage Language in the United States. International Multilingual Research Journal 4(2), 125–151.Google Scholar

Barkhuizen, G. 2015. Narrative Inquiry. In Paltridge, B. and Phakiti, A. (eds.), Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury, 169–185.Google Scholar

Beaudrie, S., Ducar, C., and Relaño-Pastor, A. M.. 2009. Curricular Perspectives in the Heritage Language Context: Assessing Culture and Identity. Language, Culture and Curriculum 22(2), 157–174.Google Scholar

Bernstein, B. 1971. Class, Codes and Control. Vol. I. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bleaman, I. L. 2018. Outcomes of Minority Language Maintenance: Variation and Change in New York Yiddish (Publication No. 10824723). Doctoral dissertation, New York University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar

Bloch, A. and Hirsch, S.. 2017. “Second Generation” Refugees and Multilingualism: Identity, Race and Language Transmission. Ethnic and Racial Studies 40(14), 2444–2462.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1979. La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris,FR: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brice Heath, S. 1983. Ways with Words. Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, M. 1999. ‘Why Be Normal?’: Language and Identity Practices in a Community of Nerd Girls. Language in Society 28(2), 203–223.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K.. 2005. Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5), 585–614.Google Scholar

Burns, K. E. and Waugh, L. R.. 2018. Mixed Messages in the Spanish Heritage Language Classroom: Insights from CDA of Textbooks and Instructor Focus Group Discussions. Heritage Language Journal 15(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. and Kulick, D.. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carreira, M. and Beeman, T.. 2014. Voces: Latino Students on Life in the United States. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar

Carreira, M. and Kagan, O.. 2011. The Results of the National Heritage Language Survey: Implications for Teaching, Curriculum Design, and Professional Development. Retrieved from the National Heritage Language Resource Center website: www.nhlrc.ucla.edu/surveyreport/paper.pdfGoogle Scholar

Cashman, H. 2018. Queer, Latinx, & Bilingual: Narrative Resources in the Negotiation of Identities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chang, C. and Yao, Y.. 2016. Toward an Understanding of Heritage Prosody: Acoustic and Perceptual Properties of Tone Produced by Heritage, Native, and Second Language Speakers of Mandarin. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 134–160.Google Scholar

Chaparro, S. 2019. But Mom! I’m Not a Spanish Boy: Raciolinguistic Socialization in a Two-way Immersion Bilingual Program. Linguistics and Education 50, 1–12.Google Scholar

Chappell, W. 2019. The Sociophonetic Perception of Heritage Spanish Speakers in the United States: Reactions to Labiodentalized <v> in the Speech of Late Immigrant and U.S.-born Voices. In Chappell, W. (ed.), Recent Advances in the Study of Spanish Sociophonetic Perception. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 240–264.Google Scholar

Chen, S., Zhou, Q., and Uchikoshi, Y.,. 2018. Heritage Language Socialization in Chinese American Immigrant Families: Prospective Links to Children’s Heritage Language Proficiency. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Coates, J. 1996. Women Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Creese, A. 2009. Building on Young People’s Linguistic and Cultural Continuity: Complementary Schools in the United Kingdom. Theory Into Practice 48(4), 267–273.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Forum 89(1), 139–167.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. and Danesi, M.. 1990. Heritage Languages: The Development and Denial of Canada’s Linguistic Resources. Toronto: Our Schools/Our Selves and Garamond Press.Google Scholar

Curdt-Christiansen, X. 2008. Reading the World through Words: Cultural Themes in Heritage Chinese Language Textbooks. Language and Education 22(2), 95–113.Google Scholar

Dao, M. D. and Nguyen, A. T.. 2017. Vietnamese Tones Produced by Australian Vietnamese Speakers. Heritage Language Journal 14(3), 224–247.Google Scholar

Dean-Olmsted, E. M. 2012. Speaking Shami: Syrian Jewish Mexican Language Practices as Strategies of Integration and Legitimation (Publication No. 3509907). Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar

Del Valle, J. (ed.) 2007. La lengua, ¿patria común? Ideas e ideologías del español. Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana.Google Scholar

Demuro, E. and Gurney, L.. 2018. Mapping Language, Culture, Ideology: Rethinking Language in Foreign Language Instruction. Language and Intercultural Communication 18(3), 287–299.Google Scholar

DuBord, E. and Kimball, E.. 2016. Cross-language Community Engagement: Assessing the Strengths of Heritage Learners. Heritage Language Journal 13(3), 298–330.Google Scholar

Duff, P. A. 2018. Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics. In Litosseliti, L. (ed.), Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury, 305–330.Google Scholar

Duranti, A. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. 2000. Linguistic Variation As Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fishman, J. A. 1966. Language Loyalty in the United States: The Maintenance and Perpetuation of Non-English Mother Tongues by American Ethnic and Religious Groups. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Fishman, J. A. 2001. 300-Plus Years of Heritage Language Education in the United States. In Peyton, J. K., Ranard, D. A., and McGinnis, S. (eds.), Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource. McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics, 81–97.Google Scholar

Flores, C. 2010. The Effect of Age on Language Attrition: Evidence from Bilingual Returnees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(4), 533–546.Google Scholar

García-Sánchez, I. M. 2010. The Politics of Arabic Language Education: Moroccan Immigrant Children’s Language Socialization into Ethnic and Religious Identities. Linguistics and Education 21(3), 171–196.Google Scholar

Goble, R. A. 2016. Linguistic Insecurity and Lack of Entitlement to Spanish among Third-generation Mexican Americans in Narrative Accounts. Heritage Language Journal 13(1), 29–54.Google Scholar

Guardado, M. 2014. The Discourses of Heritage Language Development: Engaging Ideologies in Canadian Hispanic Communities. Heritage Language Journal 11(1), 1–28.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. J. 1968. The Speech Community. In Sills, D. L. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan, 381–386.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Rivas, C. 2011a. Variación y cambio pragmático en el español de los cubanos en Miami: el efecto de la generación en el discurso bilingüe. In García, C. and Placencia, M. E. (eds.), Estudios de variación pragmática en español. Buenos Aires: Dunken, 167–183.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Rivas, C. 2011b. El efecto del género en el discurso bilingüe. Un estudio sobre peticiones. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada 54, 37–59.Google Scholar

Guy, G. 2011. Language, Social Class, and Status. In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–185.Google Scholar

Harasta, J. 2017. ‘Because They Are Cornish’: Four Uses of a Useless Language. Heritage Language Journal 14, 248–263.Google Scholar

He, A. W. 2010. The Heart of Heritage: Sociocultural Dimensions of Heritage Language Learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30, 66–82.Google Scholar

Hidalgo, M. 1993. The Dialectics of Language Maintenance and Language Loyalty in Chula Vista, CA: A Two-Generation Study. In Roca, A. and Lipski, J. M. (eds.), Spanish in the U.S.: Language Contact and Diversity. Berlin: Mouton, 47–71.Google Scholar

Hill, J. 2008. The Everyday Language of White Racism. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Jaffe, A. 2007. Discourses of Endangerment: Contexts and Consequences of Essentializing Discourses. In Duchene, A. and Heller, M. (eds.), Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the Defence of Languages. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 57–75.Google Scholar

Johnson, E. J., Avineri, N., and Johnson, D. C.. 2017. Exposing Gaps in/between Discourses of Linguistic Deficits. International Multilingual Research Journal 11(1), 5–22.Google Scholar

Kagan, O. 2012. Intercultural Competence of Heritage Language Learners: Motivation, Identity, Language Attitudes, and the Curriculum. Proceedings of Second Intercultural Competence Conference 2, 72–84.Google Scholar

Kang, Y. and Nagy, N.. 2016. VOT Merger in Heritage Korean in Toronto. Language Variation and Change 28(2), 249–272.Google Scholar

King, K. A. 2000. Language Ideologies and Heritage Language Education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 3(3), 167–184.Google Scholar

Kirschen, B. 2020. Intergenerational Transmission of Ladino: Three Generations of Speakers in the Twenty-First Century. Heritage Language Journal 17(1), 70–91.Google Scholar

Kirschen, B. 2015. Judeo-Spanish Encounters Modern Spanish: Language Contact and Diglossia among the Sephardim of Los Angeles and New York City. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar

Kirschen, B. 2016. Diglossic Distribution among Judeo-Spanish-Speaking Sephardim in the United States. In Ross, S., Soomekh, S., and Ansell, L. (eds.), Sephardi and Mizrahi Jews in America: The Jewish Role in American Life. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 25–52.Google Scholar

Kirschen, B. 2019. Lexical Variation among South Florida’s Judeo-Spanish-speaking Sephardim. Journal of Jewish Languages 7(1), 53–84.Google Scholar

Klee, C. and Caravedo, R.. 2019. Migration and Orders of Indexicality in Lima. In Lynch, A. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Spanish in the Global City. London: Routledge, 176–203.Google Scholar

Klein, W. 2013. Speaking Punjabi: Heritage Language Socialization and Language Ideologies in a Sikh Education Program. Heritage Language Journal 10(1), 36–50.Google Scholar

Kroskrity, P. V. 2004. Language Ideologies. In Duranti, A. (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 496–517.Google Scholar

Kupisch, T., Barton, D., Hailer, K., Klaschik, E., Stangen, I., Lein, T., and van de Weijer, J.. 2014. Foreign Accent in Adult Simultaneous Bilinguals. Heritage Language Journal 11(2), 123–150.Google Scholar

Kurata, N. 2015. Motivational Selves of Japanese Heritage Speakers in Australia. Heritage Language Journal 12(2), 110–131.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, R. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Lambert, W. and Taylor, D.. 1996. Language in the Lives of Ethnic Minorities: Cuban American Families in Miami. Applied Linguistics 17(4), 477–500.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. 2000. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lave, J. and Wenger, E.. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leap, W. 1996. Word’s Out: Gay Men’s English. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Lee, J. S. 2002. The Korean Language in America: The Role of Cultural Identity in Heritage Language Learning. Language, Culture, and Curriculum 15(2), 117–133.Google Scholar

Leeman, J. 2015. Heritage Language Education and Identity in the United States. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35, 100–119.Google Scholar

Leeman, J. and Martínez, G.. 2007. From Identity to Commodity: Discourses of Spanish in Heritage Language Textbooks. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 4(1), 35–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leeman, J., Rabin, L., and Román-Mendoza, E.. 2011. Critical Pedagogy beyond the Classroom Walls: Community Service-learning and Spanish Heritage Language Education. Heritage Language Journal 8(3), 481–495.Google Scholar

Leonard, W. Y. 2017. Producing Language Reclamation by Decolonising ‘Language’. In Leonard, W. Y. and De Korne, H. (eds.), Language Documentation and Description. London: EL Publishing, 15–36.Google Scholar

Li, Q., Zhang, H., and Taguchi, N.. 2017). The Use of Mitigation Devices in Heritage Learners of Chinese. Heritage Language Journal 14(2), 150–170.Google Scholar

Livia, A. and Hall, K. (eds.) 1997. Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender and Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lo, A. 2009. Lessons about Respect and Affect in a Korean Heritage Language School. Linguistics and Education 20(3), 217–234.Google Scholar

Lynch, A. 2009. A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Final /s/ in Miami Cuban Spanish. Language Sciences 31(6), 767–790.Google Scholar

Lynch, A. 2017. The Social Diffusion of English-based Lexical Innovations in Miami Cuban Spanish. In Cuza, A. (ed.), Cuban Spanish Dialectology: Variation, Contact and Change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 165–187.Google Scholar

Lynch, A. 2018a. A Historical View of US Latinidad and Spanish as Heritage Language. In Potowski, K. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Spanish as a Heritage Language. London: Routledge, 17–35.Google Scholar

Lynch, A. 2018b. Spatial Reconfigurations of Spanish in Postmodernity: The Relationship to English and Minoritized Languages. In King, J. and Sessarego, S. (eds.), The Dynamics of Language Variation and Change: Varieties of Spanish across Space and Time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–34.Google Scholar

Lynch, A. (ed.) 2019. The Routledge Handbook of Spanish in the Global City. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Łyskawa, P., Maddeaux, R., Melara, E., and Nagy, N.. 2016. Heritage Speakers Follow All the Rules: Language Contact and Convergence in Polish Devoicing. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 219–244.Google Scholar

Maloof, V. M., Rubin, D. L., and Miller, A. N.. 2006. Cultural Competence and Identity in Cross-Cultural Adaptation: The Role of a Vietnamese Heritage Language School. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9(2), 255–273.Google Scholar

Mar-Molinero, C. 2018. Language Issues for US-raised ‘Returnees’ in Mexico. In Potowski, K. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Spanish as a Heritage Language. London: Routledge, 555–567.Google Scholar

Melo-Pfeifer, S. 2015. The Role of the Family in Heritage Language Use and Learning: Impact on Heritage Language Policies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18(1), 26–44.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2011. Spanish Heritage Speakers: Bridging Formal Linguistics, Psycholinguistics and Pedagogy. Heritage Language Journal 8(1), 1–6.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2015. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moore, E. 2014. “You Are Children But You Can Always Say …”: Hypothetical Direct Reported Speech and Child–Parent Relationships in a Heritage Language Classroom. Text & Talk 34(5), 591–621.Google Scholar

Moore, S. C., Fee, M., Ee, J., Wiley, T., Arias, M. B.. 2014. Exploring Bilingualism, Literacy, Employability and Income Levels among Latinos in the United States. In Callahan, R. and Gándara, P. (eds.), The Bilingual Advantage: Language, Literacy and the US Labor Market. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 45–76.Google Scholar

Morgan, M. 2006. Speech Community. In Duranti, A. (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 3–22.Google Scholar

Nagy, N. 2015. A Sociolinguistic View of Null Subjects and VOT in Toronto Heritage Languages. Lingua 164, 309–327.Google Scholar

Nagy, N. 2016. Heritage Languages as New Dialects. In Côté, M.-H., Knooihuizen, R., and Nerbonne, J. (eds.), The Future of Dialects: Selected Papers from Methods in Dialectology XV. Berlin: Language Science, 15–34.Google Scholar

Nagy, N. 2018. Linguistic Attitudes and Contact Effects in Toronto’s Heritage Languages: A Variationist Sociolinguistic Investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(4), 429–446.Google Scholar

Norton Peirce, B. 1995. Social Identity, Investment, and Language Learning. TESOL Quarterly 29(1), 9–31.Google Scholar

Nove, C. R. 2018. Social Predictors of Case Syncretism in New York Hasidic Yiddish. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 24(2), 87–95.Google Scholar

O’Grady, W., Lee, O. S., and Lee, J. H.. 2011. Practical and Theoretical Issues in the Study of Heritage Language Acquisition. Heritage Language Journal 8(3), 315–332.Google Scholar

Oh, J. S. and Au, T. K.. 2005. Learning Spanish As a Heritage Language: The Role of Sociocultural Background Variables. Language, Culture and Curriculum 18(3), 229–241.Google Scholar

Oh, J. S. and Nash, B. A.. 2014. Attitudes and Motivations of Adult Spanish Language Learners: A Comparison of Heritage Language Learners and Second Language Learners. Heritage Language Journal 11(1), 29–44.Google Scholar

Okubo, Y. 2010. Heritage: Owned or Assigned? The Cultural Politics of Teaching Heritage Language in Osaka, Japan. Critical Asian Studies 42(1), 111–138.Google Scholar

Ortega, L. 2020. The Study of Heritage Language Development from a Bilingualism and Social Justice Perspective. Language Learning 70(S1), 15–53.Google Scholar

Otheguy, R. 2016. The Linguistic Competence of Second-Generation Bilinguals: A Critique of ‘Incomplete Acquisition’. In Tortora, C., den Dikken, M., Montoya, I., and O’Neill, T. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2013. Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 301–319.Google Scholar

Pascual y Cabo, D. (ed.) 2016. Advances in Spanish as a Heritage Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Pégram, S. 2005. Being Ourselves: Immigrant Culture and Self-identification among Young Haitians in Montreal. Ethnic Studies Review 28(1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Peña, S. 2013. ¡Oye loca! From the Mariel Boatlift to Gay Cuban Miami. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. and Kagan, O.. 2007. Heritage Languages: In the ‘Wild’ and in the Classroom. Languages and Linguistics Compass 1(5), 368–395.Google Scholar

Potowski, K. 2016. Inter-Latino Language and Identity: MexiRicans. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Preece, S. 2008. Multilingual Gendered Identities: Female Undergraduate Students in London Talk about Heritage Languages. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 7(1), 41–60.Google Scholar

Pu, C. 2012. Community-based Heritage Language Schools: A Chinese Example. Kappa Delta Pi Record 48(1), 29–34.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. and Sánchez, L.. 2013. What’s So Incomplete about Incomplete Acquisition? A Prolegomenon to Modeling Heritage Language Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(4), 478–508.Google Scholar

Rao, R. 2015. Manifestations of /bdg/ in Heritage Speakers of Spanish. Heritage Language Journal 12(1), 48–74.Google Scholar

Roman, D., Pastor, A., and Basaraba, D.. 2019. Internal Linguistic Discrimination: A Survey of Bilingual Teachers’ Language Attitudes toward Their Heritage Students’ Spanish. Bilingual Research Journal 42(1), 6–30.Google Scholar

Ronquest, R. 2016. Stylistic Variation in Heritage Spanish Vowel Production. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 275–297.Google Scholar

Rosa, J. 2018. Looking Like a Language, Sounding Like a Race. Raciolinguistic Ideologies and the Learning of Latinidad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sánchez, R. 1983. Chicano Discourse. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Schilling, N. 2011. Language, Gender, and Sexuality. In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 218–237.Google Scholar

Schwartz, M., Nir, B., Leiken, M., Levie, R., and Ravid, D.. 2014. The Acquisition of Noun Plurals among Early Sequential Russian-Hebrew Speaking Bilinguals. Heritage Language Journal 11(2), 151–185.Google Scholar

Seal, C. A. 2017. Positive and Negative Identity Practices in Heritage Language Education. International Journal of Multilingualism 15(4), 329–348.Google Scholar

Shin, S. J. 2010. “What about Me? I’m Not Like Chinese but I’m Not Like American”: Heritage-Language Learning and Identity of Mixed-Heritage Adults. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 9(3), 203–219.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, C. 1994. Language Contact and Change. Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, C. 2014. Bilingual Language Acquisition: Spanish and English in the First Six Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, M. 1998. Contemporary Transformations of Local Linguistic Communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 27, 401–426.Google Scholar

Skura, S. and Dean-Olmsted, E. M.. 2018. Jewish Spanish in Mexico City and Buenos Aires. In Hary, B. and Benor, S. (eds.), Languages in Jewish Communities, Past and Present. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 383–413.Google Scholar

Smith, L. 2008. Heritage, Gender and Identity. In Graham, B. and Howard, P. (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity. Farnham: Ashgate, 159–179.Google Scholar

Stanford, J. N. and Preston, D. (eds.) 2009. Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Stroud, C. and Heugh, K.. 2011. Language in Education. In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 413–429.Google Scholar

Swain, M. 1985. Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in Its Development. In Gass, S. and Madden, C. (eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 235–253.Google Scholar

Szecsi, T. and Szilagyi, J.. 2012. Immigrant Hungarian Families’ Perceptions of New Media Technologies in the Transmission of Heritage Language and Culture. Language, Culture and Curriculum 25(3), 265–281.Google Scholar

Tamošiūnaitė, A. 2013. Lithuanian Saturday Schools in Chicago: Student Proficiency, Generational Shift, and Community Involvement. Heritage Language Journal 10(1), 108–133.Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, M. and Abugov, N.. 2010. The Legacy of the Linguistic Fence: Linguistic Patterns among Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Girls. Heritage Language Journal 7(1), 74–90.Google Scholar

Tomiyama, M. 2008. Age and Proficiency in L2 Attrition: Data from Two Siblings. Applied Linguistics 30(2), 253–275.Google Scholar

Torres, L. 2016. Building a Translengua in Latina Lesbian Organizing. The Journal of Lesbian Studies 21(3), 272–288.Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Urciuoli, B. 1996. Exposing Prejudice: Puerto Rican Experiences of Language, Race, and Class. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Urciuoli, B. 2008. Whose Spanish? The Tension between Linguistic Correctness and Cultural Identity. In Niño-Murcia, M. and Rothman, J. (eds.), Bilingualism and Identity: Spanish at the Crossroads with other Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 257–277.Google Scholar

Valdés, G. 1978. A Comprehensive Approach to the Teaching of Spanish to Bilingual Spanish-Speaking Students. Modern Language Journal 62(3), 102–110.Google Scholar

Valdés, G. and Geoffrion-Vinci, M.. 1998. Chicano Spanish: The Problem of the ‘Underdeveloped’ Code in Bilingual Repertoires. Modern Language Journal 82(4), 473–501.Google Scholar

Vilar Sánchez, K. 2003. La remigración en la adolescencia. Aspectos sociolingüísticos, psicológicos y sociolaborales. Granada: Editorial Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar

Villa, D. and Rivera-Mills, S.. 2009. An Integrated Multi-generational Model for Language Maintenance and Shift: The Case of Spanish in the Southwest. Spanish in Context 6(1), 26–42.Google Scholar

Weekly, R. 2018. Attitudes, beliefs and responsibility for heritage language maintenance in the UK. Current Issues in Language Planning. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1554324Google Scholar

Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar

Willoughby, L. 2014. Meeting the Challenges of Heritage Language Education: Lessons from One School Community. Current Issue in Language Planning 15(3), 265–281.Google Scholar

Woolard, K. A. and Schieffelin, B. B.. 1994. Language Ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology 23(1), 55–82.Google Scholar

Yazan, B. and Ali, I.. 2018. Family Language Policies in a Libyan Immigrant Family in the U.S.: Language and Religious Identity. Heritage Language Journal 15(3), 369–388.Google Scholar

Yeh, Y. C., Ho, H. J., and Chen, M. C.. 2015. Learning Vietnamese as a Heritage Language in Taiwan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 36(3), 255–265.Google Scholar

Zentella, A. C. 1995. The “Chiquita-fication” of U.S. Latinos and Their Languages, or Why We Need an Anthro-political Linguistics. SALSA III: The Proceedings of the Symposium about Language and Society at Austin (1–18). Austin, TX: Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Zentella, A. C. 1997. Growing Up Bilingual. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Zentella, A. C. 2014. TWB (Talking While Bilingual): Linguistic Profiling of Latin@s, and other Linguistic Torquemadas. Latino Studies 12(4), 620–635.Google Scholar

Zéphir, F. 1997. The Social Value of French for Bilingual Haitian Immigrants. The French Review 70(3), 395–406.Google Scholar

Zhang, D. 2012. Co-ethnic Network, Social Class, and Heritage Language Maintenance among Chinese Immigrant Families. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 11(3), 200–223.Google Scholar

Albirini, A. and Benmamoun, E.. 2015. Factors Affecting the Retention of Sentential Negation in Heritage Egyptian Arabic. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(3), 470–489.Google Scholar

Arslan, S., Bastiaanse, R., and Felser, C.. 2015. Looking at Evidence in Visual World: Eye-movements Reveal How Bilingual and Monolingual Turkish Speakers Process Grammatical Evidentiality. Frontiers in Psychology 6, Art. 1387. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01387Google Scholar

Basnight-Brown, D. M. and Altarriba, J.. 2007. Differences in Semantic and Translation Priming across Languages: The Role of Language Direction and Language Dominance. Memory and Cognition 35(5), 953–965.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers: Opportunities and Challenges for Linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 46, 129–181.Google Scholar

Bianchi, J. 2013. Gender in Italian-German Bilinguals: A comparison with German L2 Learners of Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(3), 538–557.Google Scholar

Canseco-González, E., Brehm, L., Brick, C. A., Brown-Schmidt, S., Fischer, K., Wagner, K.. 2010. Carpet or Cárcel: The Effect of Age of Acquisition and Language Mode on Bilingual Lexical Access. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(5), 669–705.Google Scholar

Chang, C. B. 2016. Bilingual Perceptual Benefits of Experience with a Heritage Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(4), 791–809.Google Scholar

Chang, C. B., Haynes, E. F., Yao, Y., and Rhodes, R.. 2009. A Tale of Five Fricatives: Consonantal Contrast in Heritage Speakers of Mandarin. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15, 37–43.Google Scholar

Chang, C. B., Haynes, E. F., Yao, Y., and Rhodes, R.. 2010. The Phonetic Space of Phonological Categories in Heritage Speakers of Mandarin. In Bane, M., Bueno, J., Grano, T., Grotberg, A., and McNabb, Y. (eds.), Proceedings from the 44th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: The Main Session. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 31–45.Google Scholar

Chang, C. B., Haynes, E. F., Yao, Y., and Rhodes, R.. 2011. Production of Phonetic and Phonological Contrast by Heritage Speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129(6), 3964–3980.Google Scholar

Chung, E. S. 2018. Second and Heritage Language Acquisition of Korean Case Drop. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21(1), 63–79.Google Scholar

Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., and Silva, R.. 2010. Morphological Structure in Native and Nonnative Language Processing. Language Learning 60, 21–43.Google Scholar

Cunnings, I. 2017. Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(4), 659–678.Google Scholar

Cuza, A. 2012. Cross-Linguistic Influence at the Syntax Proper: Interrogative Subject-Verb Inversion in Heritage Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism 17(1), 71–96.Google Scholar

Davis, C., Sánchez-Casas, R., Garcia-Albea, J. E., Guasch, M., Molero, M., and Ferré, P.. 2010. Masked Translation Priming: Varying Language Experience and Word Type with Spanish–English Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(2), 137–155.Google Scholar

Dragoy, O., Virfel, E., Yurchenko, A., and Bastiaanse, R.. 2019. Aspect and Tense Attrition in Russian-German Bilingual Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 23(1), 275–295.Google Scholar

Dussias, P. E. 2003. Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Second Language Learners: Some Effects of Bilinguality on L1 and L2 Processing Strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, 529–557.Google Scholar

Dussias, P. E. and Sagarra, N.. 2007. The Effect of Exposure on Parsing in Spanish-English Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10, 101–116.Google Scholar

Frazier, L. and Fodor, J. D.. 1978. The Sausage Machine: A New Two-Stage Parsing Model. Cognition 6(4), 291–325.Google Scholar

Fukuda, S. 2017. Floating Numeral Quantifiers as an Unaccusative Diagnostic in Native, Heritage, and L2 Japanese Speakers. Language Acquisition 24(3), 169–208.Google Scholar

Godson, L. 2004. Vowel Production in the Speech of Western Armenian Heritage Speakers. Heritage Language Journal 2, 44–69.Google Scholar

Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., and Sandoval, T. C.. 2008. More Use Almost Always Means a Smaller Frequency Effect: Aging, Bilingualism, and the Weaker Links Hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 58, 787–814.Google Scholar

Gollan, T. H., Schotter, E. R., Gomez, J., Murillo, M., and Rayner, K.. 2014. Multiple Levels of Bilingual Language Control: Evidence from Language Intrusions in Reading Aloud. Psychological Science 25, 585–595.Google Scholar

Gor, K. 2014. Raspberry, Not a Car: Context Predictability and a Phonological Advantage in Early and Late Learners’ Processing of Speech in Noise. Frontiers in Psychology 5, Art. 1449.Google Scholar

Gor, K. 2018. Yes to the King, and No To the ship: Heritage Speakers Differ from Late Second Language Learners in Word Recognition. In Kresin, S. and Baukus, S. (eds.), Connecting across Languages and Cultures: A Heritage Language Festschrift in Honor of Olga Kagan. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers, 163–172.Google Scholar

Gor, K. and Cook, S.. 2010. Nonnative Processing of Verbal Morphology: In Search of Regularity. Language Learning 60(1), 88–126.Google Scholar

Gor, K., Chrabaszcz, A., and Cook, S.. 2018. Early and Late Learners Decompose Inflected Nouns, but Can They Tell Which Ones Are Inflected Correctly? Journal of Second Language Studies 1, 113–147.Google Scholar

Gor, K., Chrabaszcz, A., and Cook, S.. 2019. A Case for Agreement: Processing of Case Inflection by Early and Late Learners. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9(1), 6–41.Google Scholar

Grinstead, J. 2010. Linguistic Interfaces and Child Spanish. In Domínguez, L. and Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Romance Turn 3. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 189–218.Google Scholar

Hoot, B. 2017. Narrow Presentational Focus in Heritage Spanish and the Syntax–Discourse Interface. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7, 63–95.Google Scholar

Hoot, B. 2019. Focus in Heritage Hungarian. Language Acquisition 26(1), 46–72.Google Scholar

Hopp, H. 2017. Individual Differences in L2 Parsing and Lexical Representations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(4), 689–690.Google Scholar

Hrycyna, M., Lapinskaya, N., Kochetoz, A., and Nagy, N.. 2011. VOT Drift in 3 Generations of Heritage Language Speakers in Toronto. Canadian Acoustics 39, 166–167.Google Scholar

Hulsen, M. 2000. Language Loss and Language Processing: Three Generations of Dutch Migrants in New Zealand. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Jacob, G. and Kirkici, B.. 2016. The Processing of Morphologically Complex Words in a Specific Speaker Group: A Masked-priming Study with Turkish Heritage Speakers. The Mental Lexicon 11(2), 308.Google Scholar

Jacob, G., Safak, D. F., Demir, O., and Kikici, B.. 2019. Preserved Morphological Processing in Heritage Speakers: A Masked Priming Study on Turkish. Second Language Research 35(2), 173–194.Google Scholar

Jegerski, J. 2018a. Psycholinguistic Perspectives on Spanish as a Heritage Language. In Potowski, K. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Spanish as a Heritage/Minority Language. New York: Routledge, 221–234.Google Scholar

Jegerski, J. 2018b. The Processing of the Object Marker a by Heritage Spanish Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(6), 585–602.Google Scholar

Jegerski, J. 2018c. Sentence Processing in Spanish as a Heritage Language: Relative Clause Attachment in Early Bilinguals. Language Learning 68(3), 598–634.Google Scholar

Jegerski, J. and Keating, G. D.. 2018, October. Processing Difficulty in Heritage Bilingual Sentence Comprehension: A Comparison of Self-Paced Reading and Eyetracking. Paper presented at the Bilingualism Forum, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar

Jegerski, J. and VanPatten, B. (eds.) 2014. Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jegerski, J. and Sekerina, I. A.. 2020. The Processing of Input with Differential Object Marking by Heritage Spanish Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23(2), 274–282.Google Scholar

Jegerski, J., Keating, G. D., and VanPatten, B.. 2016. On-line Relative Clause Attachment Strategy in Heritage Speakers of Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism 20(3), 254–268.Google Scholar

Kaan, E. 2014. Predictive Sentence Processing in L2 and L2. What Is Different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4, 257–282.Google Scholar

Keating, G. D. and Jegerski, J.. 2015. Experimental Designs in Sentence Processing Research: A Methodological Review and User’s Guide. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37(1), 1–32.Google Scholar

Keating, G. D., Jegerski, J., and VanPatten, B.. 2016. Online Processing of Subject Pronouns in Monolingual and Heritage Bilingual Speakers of Mexican Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(1), 36–49.Google Scholar

Kim, B. and Goodall, G.. 2016. Islands and Non-islands in Native and Heritage Korean. Frontiers in Psychology 7, Art. 134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00134Google Scholar

Kim, J.-Y. 2015. Perception and Production of Spanish Lexical Stress by Spanish Heritage Speakers and English L2 Learners of Spanish, In Willis, E., Martín Butragueño, P., and Herrera Zendejas, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 106–128.Google Scholar

Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2009. Binding Interpretation of Anaphors by Korean Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 16, 3–35.Google Scholar

Kuperberg, G. R. and Jaeger, T. F.. 2016. What Do We Mean by Prediction in Language Comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31(1), 32–59.Google Scholar

Kupisch, T., Belikova, A., Özçelik, Ö., Stangen, I., and White, L.. 2017. Restrictions on Definiteness in the Grammars of German-Turkish Heritage Speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7, 1–32.Google Scholar

Laleko, O. 2011. Restructuring of Verbal Aspect in Heritage Russian: Beyond Lexicalization. International Journal of Language Studies 5(3), 13–26.Google Scholar

Laleko, O. 2018. What Is Difficult about Grammatical Gender? Evidence from Heritage Russian. Journal of Language Contact 11, 233–267.Google Scholar

Lee, T. 2011. Grammatical Knowledge of Korean Heritage Speakers. Early vs. Late Bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1, 149–174.Google Scholar

Lukyanchenko, A. and Gor, K.. 2011. Perceptual Correlates of Phonological Representations in Heritage Speakers and L2 Learners. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 414–426.Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, W. 2007. Morphological Processes in Language Comprehension. In Gaskell, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–193.Google Scholar

Mikhaylova, A. 2018. Morphological Bottleneck: The Case of Russian Heritage Speakers. Journal of Language Contact 11, 268–303.Google Scholar

Momma, S. and Phillips, C.. 2018. The Relationship between Parsing and Generation. Annual Review of Linguistics 4, 233–254.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2011. Morphological Errors in Spanish Second Language Learners and Heritage Speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2), 155–161.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Montrul, S, and Bowles, M.. 2009. Back to Basics: Differential Object Marking under Incomplete Acquisition in Spanish Heritage Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(4), 363–383.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. and Foote, R.. 2014. Age of Acquisition Interactions in Bilingual Lexical Access: A Study of the Weaker Language of L2 Learners and Heritage Speakers. The International Journal of Bilingualism 18(3), 274–303.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. and Ionin, T.. 2012. Dominant Language Transfer in Spanish Heritage Speakers and L2 Learners in the Interpretation of Definite Articles. The Modern Language Journal 96(1), 70–94.Google Scholar

Montrul, S., Bhatia, A., Bhatt, R., and Puri, V.. 2019. Case Marking in Hindi as a Weaker Language. Frontiers in Psychology 10, Art. 461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00461.Google Scholar

Montrul, S., Davidson, J., de la Fuente, I., and Foote, R.. 2014. Early Language Experience Facilitates Gender Agreement Processing in Spanish Heritage Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(1), 118–138.Google Scholar

O’Grady, W., Schafer, A., Perla, J., Lee, O.-S., and Wieting, J.. 2009. A Psycholinguistic Tool for the Assessment of Language Loss: The HALA Project. Language Documentation and Conservation 3, 100–112.Google Scholar

O'Grady, W., Kwak, H.-Y., Lee, O.-S., and Lee, M.. 2011. An Emergentist Perspective on Heritage Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 223–245.Google Scholar

Orfitelly, R. and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Is It All Processing All the Way Down? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(3), 335–340.Google Scholar

Pereltsvaig, A. 2005. Aspect Lost, Aspect Regained. Restructuring of Aspectual Marking in American Russian. In Kempchinsky, P. and Slabakova, R. (eds.), Aspectual Inquiries. Berlin: Springer, 369–395.Google Scholar

Pickering, M. J. and Gambi, C.. 2018. Predicting While Comprehending Language: A Theory and Review. Psychological Bulletin 144(10), 1002–1044.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. 2008. Russian Gender under Incomplete Acquisition. Heritage Language Journal 6(1), 40–71.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. 2011. Reanalysis in Adult Heritage Language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 305–328.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. and Kagan, O.. 2007. Heritage Languages: In the ‘Wild’ and in the Classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5), 368–395.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. and Scontras, G.. 2020. Understanding Heritage Languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23, 4–20.Google Scholar

Ronai, E. 2018. Quantifier Scope in Heritage Bilinguals: A Comparative Experimental Study. In Hucklebidge, S. and Nelson, M. (eds.), NELS 48: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Vol. 2. 29–38. GLSA, 29–38.Google Scholar

Scontras, G., Polinsky, M., Tsai, C.-Y. E., and Mai, K.. 2017. Cross-Linguistic Scope Ambiguity: When Two Systems Meet. Glossa 2(1), 36, 1–28.Google Scholar

Sekerina, I. A. and Sauermann, A.. 2015. Visual Attention and Quantifier-Spreading in Heritage Russian Bilinguals. Second Language Research 31(1), 75–104.Google Scholar

Sekerina, I. A. and Trueswell, J. C.. 2011. Processing of Contrastiveness by Heritage Russian Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(3), 280–300.Google Scholar

Sekerina, I. A., Fernández, E. M., and Clahsen, H. (eds.) 2008. Developmental Psycholinguistics: Online Methods in Children’s Language Processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sherkina-Lieber, M. 2015. Tense, Aspect, and Agreement in Heritage Labrador Inuttitut. Do Receptive Bilinguals Understand Functional Morphology? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5(1), 30–61.Google Scholar

Silverberg, S. and Samuel, A. G.. 2004. The Effect of Age of Second Language Acquisition on the Representation and Processing of Second Language Words. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 381–398.Google Scholar

White, L. 2011. Second Language Acquisition at the Interfaces. Lingua 121, 577–590.Google Scholar

Aalberse, S. and Moro, F. R.. 2014. Stability in Chinese and Malay Heritage Languages as a Source of Divergence. In Braunmüller, Kurt, Höder, Steffen, and Kühl, Karoline (eds.), Stability and Divergence in Language Contact. Factors and Mechanisms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 141–161.Google Scholar

Aalberse, S., Backus, A., and Myusken, P.. 2019. Heritage Languages: A Language Contact Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Abel, J. and Babel, M.. 2017. Cognitive Load Reduces Perceived Linguistic Convergence between Dyads. Language and Speech 60(3), 479–502.Google Scholar

Adamou, E. 2013. Replicating Spanish estar in Mexican Romani. Linguistics 51(6), 1075–1105.Google Scholar

Avineri, N. 2017. Contested Stance Practices in Secular Yiddish Metalinguistic Communities: Negotiating Closeness and Distance. Journal of Jewish Languages 5(2), 174–199.Google Scholar

Babel, A. (ed.) 2016. Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Babel, A. 2018. Between the Andes and the Amazon: Language and Social Meaning in Bolivia. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Backus, A. 2014. Towards a Usage-Based Account of Language Change: Implications of Contact Linguistics for Linguistic Theory. In Nicolaï, Robert (ed.), Questioning Language Contact. Leiden: Brill, 91–118.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers: Opportunities and Challenges for Linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39(3–4), 129–181.Google Scholar

Bruyn, A. 2009. Grammaticalization in Creoles: Ordinary and Not-so-ordinary Cases. Studies in Language 33(2), 312–337.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, J., Perkins, R., and Pagliuca, W.. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Croft, W. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

D’Alessandro, R. 2015. Null Subjects. In Fábregas, Antonio, Mateu, Jaume, and Putnam, Michael (eds.), Contemporary Linguistic Parameters. London: Bloomsbury Press, 201–226.Google Scholar

Dahl, O. 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Doğruöz, A. S. and Backus, A.. 2009. Innovative Constructions in Dutch Turkish: An Assessment of Ongoing Contact-induced Change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(1), 41–63.Google Scholar

Erker, D. 2017. The Limits of Named Language Varieties and the Role of Social Salience in Dialectal Contact: The Case of Spanish in the United States. Language and Linguistics Compass 11(1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. A. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, B. and Kuteva, T.. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, B. and Kuteva, T.. 2010. Contact and Grammaticalization in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 86–105.Google Scholar

Hoffman, M. F., and Walker, J. 2010. Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language variation and change 22 (1), 37–67.Google Scholar

Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C.. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Irizarri von Schulten, P. 2016. Spanish as a Heritage Language in the Netherlands: A Cognitive Linguistic Exploration. PhD dissertation, Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Irvine, J. and Gal, S.. 2000. Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation. In Kroskrity, P. V. (ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 35–83.Google Scholar

Jacob, G., Safak, D. F., Demir, O., and Kirkici, B.. 2019. Preserved Morphological Processing in Heritage Speakers: A Masked Priming Study on Turkish. Second Language Research 35(2), 173–194.Google Scholar

Johannessen, J. B. and Larsson, I.. 2015. Complexity Matters: On Gender Agreement in Heritage Scandinavian. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1842.Google Scholar

Johannessen, J. B. and Larsson, I.. 2018. Stability and Change in Grammatical Gender: Pronouns in Heritage Scandinavian. Journal of Language Contact 11(3), 441–480.Google Scholar

Kerswill, P. and Williams, A.. 2002. “Salience” as an Explanatory Factor in Language Change: Evidence from Dialect Levelling in Urban England. In Jones, M. and Esch, E. (eds.), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-linguistic Factors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 81–110.Google Scholar

Kim, J. Y. 2019. Discrepancy between Heritage Speakers’ Use of Suprasegmental Cues in the Perception and Production of Spanish Lexical Stress. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1–18.Google Scholar

Kootstra, G. J. and Doedens, W. J.. 2016. How Multiple Sources of Experience Influence Bilingual Syntactic Choice: Immediate and Cumulative Cross-language Effects of Structural Priming, Verb Bias, and Language Dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(4), 710–732.Google Scholar

Kootstra, G. J. and Muysken, P.. 2017. Cross-Linguistic Priming in Bilinguals: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Language Processing, Acquisition, and Change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(2), 215–218.Google Scholar

Kroskrity, P. V. 2004. Language Ideologies. In Duranti, A. (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 496–517.Google Scholar

Kupisch, T. and Rothman, J.. 2018. Terminology Matters! Why Difference Is Not Incompleteness and How Early Child Bilinguals Are Heritage Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(5): 564–582.Google Scholar

Kupisch, T., Akpinar, D., and Stöhr, A.. 2013. Gender Assignment and Gender Agreement in Adult Bilinguals and Second Language Learners of French. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(2), 150–179.Google Scholar

Kusters, W. 2003. Linguistic Complexity, the Influence of Social Change on Verbal Inflection. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar

Laleko, O. 2018. What Is Difficult about Grammatical Gender? Evidence from Heritage Russian. Journal of Language Contact 11(2), 233–267.Google Scholar

Levon, E. and Buchstaller, I.. 2015. Perception, Cognition, and Linguistic Structure: The Effect of Linguistic Modularity and Cognitive Style on Sociolinguistic Processing. Language Variation and Change 27(3), 319–348.Google Scholar

Lively, S., Pisoni, D., Summers, V., and Bernacki, R.. 1993. Effects of Cognitive Workload on Speech Production: Acoustic Analyses and Perceptual Consequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93(5), 2962–2973.Google Scholar

Loebell, H. and Bock, K.. 2003. Structural Priming across Languages. Linguistics 41(5), 791–824.Google Scholar

Lohndal, T. and Westergaard, M.. 2016. Grammatical Gender in American Norwegian Heritage Language: Stability or Attrition? Frontiers in Psychology 7, 344.Google Scholar

Matthews, S. and Yip, V.. 2009. Contact-induced Grammaticalization: Evidence from Bilingual Acquisition. Studies in Language 33(2), 366–395.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 2009. Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. and Sakel, J.. 2007. Investigating the Mechanisms of Pattern Replication in Language Convergence. Studies in Language 31(4), 829–865.Google Scholar

Mayr, R., Morris, J., Mennen, I., and Williams, R.. 2017. Disentangling the Effects of Long-term Language Contact and Individual Bilingualism: The Case of Monophthongs in Welsh and English. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(3), 245–267.Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. 2001. The World’s Simplest Grammars Are Creole Grammars. Linguistic Typology 5(2–3), 125–166.Google Scholar

Miestamo, M. 2008. Grammatical Complexity in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. In Miestamo, M., Sinnemäki, K., and Karlsson, F. (eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 23–41.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2004. Subject and Object Expression in Spanish Heritage Speakers: A Case of Morphosyntactic Convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2), 125–142.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2009. Knowledge of Tense-Aspect and Mood in Spanish Heritage Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2), 239–269.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2018. Heritage Language Development: Connecting the Dots. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(5), 530–546.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. and Perpiñán, S.. 2011. Assessing Differences and Similarities between Instructed Heritage Language Learners and L2 Learners in Their Knowledge of Spanish Tense-Aspect and Mood (TAM) Morphology. Heritage Language Journal 8(1), 90–133.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. and Sánchez-Walker, N.. 2013. Differential Object Marking in Child and Adult Spanish Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 20(2), 109–132.Google Scholar

Montrul, S., Foote, R., and Perpiñán, S.. 2008. Gender Agreement in Adult Second Language Learners and Spanish Heritage Speakers: The Effects of Age and Context of Acquisition. Language Learning 58(3), 503–553.Google Scholar

Montrul, S., de la Fuenta, I., Davidson, J., and Foote, R.. 2013. The Role of Experience in the Acquisition and Production of Diminutives and Gender in Spanish: Evidence from L2 Learners and Heritage Speakers. Second Language Research 29(1), 87–118.Google Scholar

Moro, F. R. 2017. Aspectual Distinctions in Dutch-Ambon Malay Bilingual Heritage Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(2), 178–193.Google Scholar

Moro, F. R. 2018. Divergence in Heritage Ambon Malay in the Netherlands: The Role of Social-Psychological Factors. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(4), 395–411.Google Scholar

Nagy, N. 2018. Linguistic Attitudes and Contact Effects in Toronto’s Heritage Languages: A Variationist Sociolinguistic Investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(4), 429–446.Google Scholar

Nance, C. 2020. Bilingual Language Exposure and the Peer Group: Acquiring Phonetics and Phonology in Gaelic Medium Education. International Journal of Bilingualism 24(2), 360–375.Google Scholar

O’Grady, W., Kwak, H-Y., Lee, O.-S., and Lee, M.. 2011. An Emergentist Perspective on Heritage Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2), 223–245.Google Scholar

Otheguy, R. 2016. The Linguistic Competence of Second-Generation Bilinguals: A Critique of “Incomplete Acquisition.” In Tortora, C., den Dikken, M., Montoya, I., and O'Neill, T. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected Papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 301–329.Google Scholar

Otheguy, R. and Zentella, A. C.. 2012. Spanish in New York: Language Contact, Dialectal Leveling, and Structural Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. 2008. Russian Gender under Incomplete Acquisition. The Heritage Language Journal 6(1), 40–71.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Poplack, S. and Levey, S.. 2010. Contact-Induced Grammatical Change: A Cautionary Tale. In Auer, Peter and Enrich Schmidt, Jürgen (eds.), Language and Space – An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation: Volume 1 – Theories and Methods. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 391–419.Google Scholar

Preston, D. 2004. Three Kinds of Sociolinguistics: A Psycholinguistic Perspective. In Fought, C. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections. New York: Oxford University Press, 140–158.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. T. and Sánchez, L.. 2013. What’s So Incomplete about Incomplete Acquisition?: A Prolegomenon to Modeling Heritage Language Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(4), 478–508.Google Scholar